Support group helps Bristol woman with endometriosis
A 21-year-old living with stage three endometriosis said a support group has helped her to feel less lonely.Mia Harrison, who lives in Bristol, has suffered with the condition since she was 12-years-old. Every month, she is left with "all encompassing" pain affecting her legs, stomach, back and head.Over the years, Ms Harrison has undergone two surgeries and trialled different contraception methods, diets and exercise plans, but has found nothing to drastically ease her pain."It's not just painful periods, it's so much more than that. It controls every single aspect of my life, from my work, university, my friendships, relationships, my mental health," she said.
Ms Harrison spent seven years trying to understand why she experienced more pain during her periods compared to any of her friends or family members.She was dismissed by many doctors who told her that painful periods are normal, that she has a low pain tolerance and she was "too young" to have a condition like endometriosis."I started to feel like I was going crazy and I was making it up in my head," she said.
Endometriosis causes cells similar to those in the lining of the womb to grow in other parts of the body, leading to severe pain.There is no cure for it.
Ms Harrison said the condition is "really difficult" to live with and leaves her feeling anxious about making plans in case she has to cancel them at the last minute."It's really difficult to explain to people who have never gone through it."She hopes that talking about the condition and raising awareness of it will help others dealing with it and help to validate those who have not yet figured out the cause of their pain."I empathise with people that really struggle with the pain but don't know why."It's such a lonely place to be," she added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
I've been ordered by my doctor to stop doomscrolling for medical reasons
At a particularly dark time for world affairs, I often find myself compulsively doomscrolling at on my phone, sometimes disappearing into the bathroom to do it. It often feels like a brief escape from the kids. But I had no idea that it can cause serious health problems. Earlier this week, Dr Pumam Krisham, the resident doctor on BBC Morning Live, claimed that sitting on the loo and scrolling on your phone has been known to cause haemorrhoids – or worse. It can also give you a weakened pelvic floor, which can trigger bladder issues such as incontinence, or even result in prolapse. If the perils of being exposed to too much bluescreen weren't giving you sleepless nights, that surely will. But doomscrolling on the loo is a habit that 57 per cent of Britons admit to doing, according to a YouGov poll – myself included. It's so easy for a three-minute trip to the loo to turn into 15 to 20 minutes of scrolling, posting and texting. And it's the reason I ended up in hospital last week. I've had insomnia, which has weakened my immune system. It turns out that waking at 3am and checking your phone, thinking 'Has the US bombed Iran yet…?', interferes with your sleep patterns, suppressing melatonin production and making it harder to drift off and stay asleep. A recent study showed how an extra hour of screen time each day was linked to a 33 per cent increase in insomnia risk. And, earlier this month, another study – of teenagers' habits – revealed that spending more than two hours a day scrolling on phones or tablets doubles their risk of anxiety disorders and increases their chances of depression fourfold. I hit rock bottom in my bathroom last week. Having lost all sense of time, I eventually realised I'd been scrolling through stories about the Air India crash for 45 minutes, which itself is pretty unhealthy. But 'toilet-scrolling', as it's known, is a double-whammy health hazard. The combination of the pressure on your lower quarters from prolonged sitting and the negative impact on mental health of doomscrolling finally took its toll on me: I had to go to hospital. In hindsight, I had been needing to use the bathroom more frequently, which had meant scrolling even more than usual while locked in there… and eventually I started to feel quite unwell. But I had no idea that, on a Sunday at an urgent walk-in centre, I would be diagnosed with a urinary tract infection. I was given emergency antibiotics – but it didn't get any better. When I developed a mild fever and a rash on my leg, I was directed to A&E as there was a chance the infection could be sepsis. When I did the 'blanching test', the rash didn't fade when pressed with a clear glass. Typically, before I was called to give a urine sample, do blood tests and have an ultrasound to check my kidneys, I spent my time in the hospital waiting room doomscrolling. I was put on new, mega-strong antibiotics and ordered to rest in bed, which I'm not good at. I was also told that I needed to look at the stress levels in my life and make changes. Doomscrolling on the loo has got to go. To avoid further bladder issues, I have now weaned myself off toilet-scrolling – a filthy habit that triggers a dopamine release but is just not worth it. So, goodbye, doomscrolling. Catching up on all the bad news from around the world on your phone is one thing – but doing it on the loo is a recipe for disaster.
Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
Every baby in the UK to receive DNA testing
Every baby in the UK will have their DNA tested under a new 10-year plan for the NHS. The whole-genome sequencing will screen for hundreds of diseases and allow people to "leapfrog" killer illnesses, according to the Health Secretary, Wes Streeting. Speaking to the Telegraph, he revealed plans to move the NHS towards a model of sickness prevention rather than treatment. Personalised medicine, made possible through things like DNA testing, will form a big part of that plan, with £650m pledged to genomics research by the government. "The revolution in medical science means that we can transform the NHS over the coming decade, from a service which diagnoses and treats ill health to one that predicts and prevents it," said Mr Streeting in a statement. "Genomics presents us with the opportunity to leapfrog disease, so we're in front of it rather than reacting to it." Newborns are currently offered a blood test when they are around five days old to check for nine rare but serious conditions. In those blood spot tests, the baby's heel is pricked to collect a few drops of blood on a card, but with whole genome sequencing, blood samples are typically taken from the umbilical cord shortly after birth. In the past, Mr Streeting has spoken about his desire to make the NHS more preventative, in order to reduce rates of serious illness and save money. Technologies like artificial intelligence will be used by the health service to predict illness and allow treatment or medication to be offered much earlier. "With the power of this new technology, patients will be able to receive personalised healthcare to prevent ill health before symptoms begin, reducing the pressure on NHS services and helping people live longer, healthier lives," said Mr Streeting. Along with a greater focus on prevention, the Government's 10-year plan is expected to include Mr Streeting's two other "shifts" in the NHS: moving care away from hospitals to communities, and from analogue to digital services. It follows Chancellor Rachel Reeves' announcement that the Government would increase NHS funding by £29 billion per year in real terms over the next three years as it tries to cut waiting lists in line with its election promises.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Esther Rantzen hails Commons passage of ‘rigorous and safe' assisted dying bill
The assisted dying bill, if it becomes law, would remove the burden of seeing a loved one die in pain, the campaigner Esther Rantzen has said, insisting its backers have got right the balance between giving help to those who ask for it and protecting vulnerable people. The terminally ill adults (end of life) bill cleared the Commons with a majority of 23 votes on Friday, but must yet be debated by the Lords before returning to the Commons for consideration of any amendments they may make. 'I think people misunderstand when somebody says 'one of the reasons I wanted assisted dying was I didn't want to be a burden'. Well, that's how I feel in the sense that, if I die in agony, that memory will be a burden for my family. Not because I'm awkward or inconvenient, I may be both those things, but because nobody wants to see a loved one die in pain. Nobody wants that,' Rantzen told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Saturday. Asked if she had any doubts about the detail of the bill, she added: 'I think we have got this right. Having the committee stage [in parliament], with that committee rigorously looking at every clause and deciding to set up a multidisciplinary panel of social workers, someone versed in psychology, someone legal, so that they could examine it in each case.' She added this 'makes it so rigorous and so safe. And, in other countries around the world which we've looked at because they've had assisted dying legalised for some time, it has not produced coercion.' The legislation could face a difficult passage through the Lords, with critics poised to table amendments to add further restrictions and safeguards to the bill. And it was suggested to Rantzen that peers could also choose to debate it for so long that it simply runs out of parliamentary time. 'I don't need to teach the House of Lords how to do their job. They know it very well, and they know that laws are produced by the elected chamber. Their job is to scrutinise, to ask questions, but not to oppose.' Rantzen, who turns 85 on Sunday and has terminal cancer, acknowledged the legislation would probably not become law in time for her to use it and she would have to 'buzz off to Zurich' to use the Dignitas clinic. The Paralympian and crossbench peer Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson told BBC Breakfast: 'We're getting ready for it to come to the Lords and, from my personal point of view, about amending it to make it stronger … I do think there are a lot more safeguards that could be put in.' And the Conservative peer and disability rights campaigner Lord Shinkwin said the narrow Commons majority underlined the need for peers to take a close look at the legislation. Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, who steered the bill through the Commons, said she hoped peers would not seek to derail the legislation, which could run out of parliamentary time if it is held up in the Lords. 'I would be upset to think that anybody was playing games with such an important and such an emotional issue.'
