Norway House chief says First Nations can help Manitoba's potential to be global 'Costco of critical minerals'

The chief of the only First Nation to fully own a mining company in Manitoba says he wants the provincial and federal governments to recognize his community's role in boosting critical mineral exploration as a global race to secure those materials heats up.
Norway House Cree Nation Chief Larson Anderson says his community took full ownership of the Minago nickel project on the Thompson nickel belt in November. The mine could enter production within the next five years, he said.
Nickel — which is used to make things like stainless steel, solar panels and batteries — is not the only critical mineral at the site. Magnesium deposits were recently discovered and they're believed to be more abundant and valuable than nickel, Anderson said.
While Anderson has noticed the federal and provincial governments jointly announcing support for mining organizations and new mining companies across the country, he says that hasn't been the case for Norway House.
"This is the first-ever First Nation-owned mine [in Manitoba], and we think the province and the federal government would want to jump on that opportunity and help First Nations get out of being a burden to the taxpayer," he said.
"First Nations can help this province become a have province, as opposed to continuing to be a have-not."
Norway House had one of 15 mining projects that received just over $3 million from the province about a year ago.
A spokesperson for Natural Resources Minister Jamie Moses declined to comment on this story due to Election Financing Act rules about government communications during byelections. (The Transcona constituency has a byelection March 18.)
Premier Wab Kinew recently touted Manitoba as the "Costco of critical minerals" — a line previously used by former premier Heather Stefanson — when he and other Canadian leaders visited the U.S. capital earlier this month to try to dissuade American lawmakers from going ahead with proposed tariffs on Canadian goods.
"In order to keep the American economy moving forward, you need access to those raw materials," he told reporters in Washington on Feb. 12.
Kinew also said clean energy provided by Manitoba Hydro makes the province a desirable destination for future mining development.
"We have what America needs."
Digging into the details
motivated by a desire to access critical minerals.
But if Manitoba truly is the Costco of critical minerals, then some of the shelves appear to be empty.
Manitoba is home to 30 of the 34 minerals on Canada's critical minerals list in 2024, which includes six that have been prioritized for their ability to drive economic growth and strengthen supply chains, the NDP provincial government's critical mineral strategy says.
However, there were just four mines digging up critical minerals in Manitoba last year, the province says: the Sinomine Resources Group's Tanco mine in Lac du Bonnet, Vale Base Metals' Thompson mine in Thompson, Hudbay Minerals' Lalor mine in Snow Lake and the Potash Agri Development Corporation of Manitoba's mine near the Saskatchewan border at Harrowby, Man., west of Russell.
Together, those mines produce seven critical minerals: copper, zinc, cobalt, nickel, potash, lithium and cesium.
There are 45 companies actively exploring for 19 critical minerals in Manitoba, including the six minerals prioritized as economic boosters: cobalt, copper, graphite, lithium, nickel and rare earth elements, the critical mineral strategy says.
Manitoba produced about 31 per cent of Canada's zinc in 2022, as well as eight per cent of its nickel and all of its cesium and lithium, the province's strategy says. Manitoba also has one of two lithium mines in North America.
'Critical to the future'
Lac du Bonnet Mayor Ken Lodge says he believes Manitoba has the potential to live up to its billing as the Costco of critical minerals.
"A lot of them are already identified in their ore bodies, and it's just a matter of having a company come in and actually start doing the work," he said.
"Nothing happens overnight … but you have to start somewhere."
However, the province has to be cautious and minimize the environmental footprint attached to increased mining activity, Lodge said.
He wants to see Manitoba leave a positive mining legacy to use the minerals "that we've been blessed with, without damaging our environment."
Those environmental risks can be managed but not completely eliminated, as critical minerals are typically found in low concentrations, requiring more ore to be dug from the ground, said Warren Mabee, director of Queen's University's Institute for Energy and Environmental Policy.
"It does raise concerns, because there's so much material [to go through] in order to get the products," he said.
The global race to dig up critical minerals is largely motivated by a need to support a green economy in the future, he said.
"We need those products in order to make the motors, the batteries, the systems that will allow us to decarbonize and move toward a cleaner energy future," Mabee said.
"It's critical to the future to be able to get as much as we can."
China produces about 75 per cent of the global market's rare earth elements — a group of 17 heavy metals found in the earth that are crucial to manufacturing electronics, magnets, lasers and glass — and the country therefore has a lot of control over the supply chain, Mabee said.
The critical mineral strategy released by the Manitoba NDP government in November says industry must be "more strategic about investment" amid heightened geopolitical uncertainty.
It emphasizes Indigenous engagement, including notifying Indigenous groups of proposed mining activity early, and environmentally responsible mining development, requiring environmental licences from prospective mining projects.
The strategy also proposes the development of a revenue sharing model for mining with Indigenous communities, and promises to work with the federal government to support Indigenous mining in Manitoba, as well as an Indigenous procurement policy.
The strategy concludes by saying that Manitoba "hasn't been ready to take advantage" of its wealth of critical minerals in the past.
'Ready to do what it takes'
Chief Anderson said Manitoba and Canada haven't been ready to make the most of First Nations' involvement in mining development.
He wants more than just a partnership from the two levels of government.
"This has to go far deeper than that, and we need to start talking about being on the same level as the government," he said.
He suggested that First Nations are an untapped resource in the fight against Trump's mockery of Canada's sovereignty — if broken treaty promises and outstanding settlement claims are addressed.
"If they use the power of the First Nations' land ownership that was never relinquished, that could be a bigger argument to be able to stand firm on their beliefs that Canada is sovereign," he said.
"But they need to address the First Nation sovereignty issue first."

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Ottawa Citizen

an hour ago

• Ottawa Citizen

The complicated, high-risk task ahead for Alberta's new man in D.C.

Alberta's new man in Washington, D.C., is Nathan Cooper, the 44-year-old former MLA from the rural heartland of the province. Nathan just wrapped up six years as Speaker of the Alberta legislature, an all-around nice fellow credited with keeping partisan shenanigans in the legislature to a minimum. Article content Ontario, Quebec and Alberta are the only provinces with full-time boots on the ground in D.C.; Alberta has a total of 11 staff in four offices across America, Nathan reports. 'To put that in perspective,' he adds, 'Quebec has close to 100 full-time people trying to defend the interests of Quebec in the U.S.' Article content Article content Article content I'm curious: What would entice Nathan to quit a plum job — refereeing partisan debates under the dome in Edmonton — and move to D.C. as a diplomat, a place where it's a struggle for anyone to be heard above the cacophony of lobbyists and legislators? Article content Article content Alberta needs someone in D.C. 'who can tell our story,' Nathan pitches. It's a glib answer to my question, but he qualifies his response; he knows he needs to convince not just the pro-energy crowd in the U.S. of the merits of Alberta as a trading partner, but the skeptics too. 'It's very possible,' he observes, 'the House and the Senate will be different after the (American) midterms.' Article content 'And, I think the Speaker's role, in many respects, prepared me for that,' he explains, 'because at the end of the day, you need to be able to garner the trust and respect of both sides of the House, or you end up in a very unruly place.' Article content Article content Nathan replaces former MP James Rajotte as Alberta's representative in Washington, and when we chat, he's been in the new job for less than two weeks. Cellphone in hand and safely parked on the side of the road, he's enroute to G7 briefing meetings in Calgary. A full 20 minutes into our conversation, he relaxes a little, unbuckles his seatbelt and takes a few sips of his Tim Horton's coffee. Article content Article content 'What a rocket ride,' he says with a nervous laugh, and describes his first week in D.C., alongside Premier Danielle Smith: meeting U.S. senators and congresspeople, as well as Canadian and American energy producers. After the G7, where the hosting province enjoys certain privileges including 'grip and grins' with world leaders, there's the Calgary Stampede in early July, a shindig that attracts politicos from across the world. Article content By August, Nathan plans to have his family settled in D.C. and he'll be working from an office lodged within the Canadian Embassy. 'Alberta and Ontario are still inside the embassy,' he explains, 'while the province of Quebec has their own office space and functions independent of the embassy.'

Global News

an hour ago

• Global News

Carney travels to Europe for security, defence talks with EU, NATO

Prime Minister Mark Carney will depart for Europe on Sunday for back-to-back summits where he is expected to make major commitments for Canada on security and defence. Carney will be joined by Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand, Defence Minister David McGuinty and secretary of state for defence procurement Stephen Fuhr at the EU and NATO summits, where military procurement and diversifying supply chains will top the agendas. The international meetings come as Canada looks to reduce its defence procurement reliance on the United States due to strained relations over tariffs and President Donald Trump's repeated talk about Canada becoming a U.S. state. Carney will fly first to Brussels, Belgium, starting the trip with a visit to the Antwerp Schoonselhof Military Cemetery where 348 Canadian soldiers are buried. He will also meet with Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever, European Council President António Costa and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. Story continues below advertisement At the EU-Canada summit, Anand and McGuinty are expected to sign a security and defence agreement with the EU in what one European official described Friday as one of the most ambitious deals Europe has ever signed with a third country. The agreement will open the door to Canada's participation in the ReArm Europe initiative, allowing Canada to access a 150-billion-euro loan program for defence procurement, called Security Action for Europe. An EU official briefing reporters on Friday said once the procurement deal is in place, Canada will have to negotiate a bilateral agreement with the European Commission to begin discussions with member states about procurement opportunities. A Canadian official briefing reporters on the summit Saturday said the initial agreement will allow for Canada's participation in some joint procurement projects. However, a second agreement will be needed to allow Canadian companies to bid. 1:48 Carney to increase U.S. steel, aluminum tariffs if trade talks with Trump stall At the EU-Canada summit, leaders are also expected to issue a joint statement to underscore a willingness for continued pressure on Russia, including through further sanctions, and call for an immediate and permanent ceasefire in Gaza. Story continues below advertisement After Brussels, Carney heads to The Hague in the Netherlands for the NATO leaders' summit on Tuesday and Wednesday. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy There, Carney will meet with the King of the Netherlands and later with leaders of Nordic nations to discuss Arctic and transatlantic security. At the NATO summit, Carney will take part in bilateral meetings with other leaders. The summit agenda includes a social dinner hosted by the king and queen of the Netherlands and a two-and-a-half hour meeting of the North Atlantic Council. NATO allies are expected to debate a plan to hike alliance members' defence spending target to five per cent of national GDP. NATO data shows that in 2024, none of its 32 members spent that much. The Canadian government official who briefed reporters on background says the spending target and its timeline are still up for discussion, though some allies have indicated they would prefer a seven-year timeline while others favour a decade. Canada hasn't hit a five- per- cent defence spending threshhold since the 1950s and hasn't reached the two per cent mark since the late 1980s. NATO says that, based on its estimate of which expenditures count toward the target, Canada spent $41 billion in 2024 on defence, or 1.37 per cent of GDP. That's more than twice what it spent in 2014, when the two per cent target was first set; that year, Canada spent $20.1 billion, or 1.01 per cent of GDP, on defence. Story continues below advertisement In 2014, only three NATO members achieved the two per cent target — the U.S., the U.K., and Greece. In 2025, all members are expected to hit it. Any agreement to adopt a new spending benchmark must be ratified by all 32 NATO member states. Former Canadian ambassador to NATO Kerry Buck told The Canadian Press the condensed agenda is likely meant to 'avoid public rifts among allies,' describing Trump as an 'uncertainty engine.' 'The national security environment has really, really shifted,' Buck said, adding allies next door to Russia face the greatest threats. 'There is a high risk that the U.S. would undercut NATO at a time where all allies are increasingly vulnerable.' Trump has suggested the U.S. might abandon its mutual defence commitment to the alliance if member countries don't ramp up defence spending. Story continues below advertisement 'Whatever we can do to get through this NATO summit with few public rifts between the U.S. and other allies on anything, and satisfy a very long-standing U.S. demand to rebalance defence spending, that will be good for Canada because NATO's good for Canada,' Buck said. Carney has already made two trips to Europe this year — the first to London and Paris to meet with European allies and the second to Rome to attend the inaugural mass of Pope Leo XIV.

Calgary Herald

an hour ago

• Calgary Herald

The complicated, high-risk task ahead for Alberta's new man in D.C.

Article content I can't help but wonder: Isn't it confusing, operating under one embassy roof, with the Albertans cozying up to Americans (for example, allowing U.S. liquor back on shelves) while other provinces threaten retaliation against Trump's latest tariff hikes for steel and aluminum? Article content And worse, isn't there a risk that provincial representation in D.C. is proof — to those who care about these things — there is no unified Team Canada position that even the prime minister can wrangle? Article content 'The (Canadian) embassy is pretty good to us,' Nathan answers, thoughtfully, 'and I think we're pretty fair with the embassy. On most things we're 'Team Canada.'' But, he acknowledges, 'there are some issues, around energy and resource development, where we have a different view of the world. Article content 'The good news,' he adds, 'is most people don't know — even (American) legislators — what we're doing on a province-to-province basis, whether or not we're retaliating, whether we are in lockstep with the federal government. Article content Article content 'Things are so chaotic there,' Nathan reflects, that even the Americans 'don't pretend to know what the Trump administration is going to do.' Everyone, he says, accepts that every situation is fluid and dynamic: 'That's the default position of everyone right now in D.C.' Article content Nathan represented the rural constituency of Olds-Didsbury-Three Hills for a decade; his exit from partisan politics triggered a byelection to be held later this month. One of the candidates in the race is Cameron Davies, leader of the Alberta Republican Party; it openly advocates for Alberta's secession from Canada. Article content Many of his former constituents are frustrated, Nathan admits, 'they want to consider separation, but at the end of the day, the overwhelming majority of those people just want Canada to work and Alberta to have a strong role similar to the role that Quebec plays in Confederation.' That's a part of the Alberta story he may need to explain more fully to people in D.C. Article content Article content Nathan's certainly not agitating for Alberta to become America's 51st state, but he is paying close attention to Carney's nation-building efforts. 'If there's no pipeline with hydrocarbons in it, be it gas or oil, in the approved list of (nation-building) projects,' he cautions, 'that will have significant impact on how Albertans feel about national unity.' Article content Americans, too, are watching Canada's new prime minister, and see him clearly as the guy in charge of negotiating a new bilateral economic and security pact with Trump, Nathan says. But some are asking: 'Which Carney is going to govern: the climate change advocate or the world banker?'