Reach Ten declares maiden dividend of 1c per share
Reach Ten managing director Leo Chin
KUALA LUMPUR: Reach Ten Holdings Bhd - which was listed on the Main Market of Bursa Malaysia on May 2, 2025 - has announced its first interim dividend of one sen per share, along with its financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2025.
According to to statement by the group, the post-listing dividend is in line with its dividend policy to distribute up to 30% of its net profit.
During the first quarter, the Sarawak-based telecommunications service provider said it recorded a net profit of RM7.12mil on the back of revenue of RM23.05mil, which translates to an earnings per share of 0.89 sen.
The reported results cover only two months - February and March 2025 - following the completion of the merger of its subsidiaries on Feb 5, 2025, which is in accordance with Malaysian Financial Reporting Standards.
"As such, the revenue and profit solely represent the post-acquisition performance of the consolidated entities," it said in a statement.
On a full-quarter basis, revenue and net profit would have been RM28.4mil and RM8.2 mil, respectively, said the group.
There are no comparative figures for the corresponding preceding quarter's results as this is only the second interim financial report being announced by the company in compliance with the listing requirements.
According to the group, revenue for the quarter was mainly driven by its satellite-based communication networks and services segment, which contributed 63.2% of total revenue.
Fibre optic communication networks and services accounted for 21.4%, while telecommunications infrastructure and managed services contributed 15.4%.
"We remain confident in the group's growth trajectory, driven by rising demand for digital connectivity, supportive government policies, and ongoing infrastructure expansion.
Managing director Leo Chin said the group remains optimistic about its business outlook, supported by positive structural trends in Malaysia's telecommunications sector.
"Our strategic focus on underserved markets, particularly in Sarawak, positions us well to capture emerging opportunities and deliver long-term value to our shareholders," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Tankers U-turn, zig-zag, pause around Strait of Hormuz
SINGAPORE: At least two supertankers made U-turns at the Strait of Hormuz following US military strikes on Iran, shiptracking data shows, as more than a week of violence in the region prompts vessels to speed, pause, or alter their journeys. Washington's decision to join Israel's attacks on Iran has stoked fears that Iran could retaliate by closing the strait between Iran and Oman through which around 20 per cent of global oil and gas demand flows. That has spurred forecasts of oil surging to US$100 a barrel. Disruption is already evident, with tankers avoiding spending more time than needed in the strait, industry sources said. Singapore-based Sentosa Shipbrokers said that over the past week, empty tankers entering the Gulf are down 32 per cent while loaded tanker departures are down 27 per cent from early May levels. The Coswisdom Lake, a very large crude carrier (VLCC), reached the strait on Sunday before making a U-turn and heading south, Kpler and LSEG data showed. On Monday it turned back again, resuming its journey towards the port of Zirku in the United Arab Emirates. The South Loyalty, also a VLCC, made a similar U-turn and remained outside the strait on Monday, LSEG data showed. It was scheduled to load crude from Iraq's Basra terminal, according to Kpler data and two shipping sources. The Coswisdom Lake was scheduled to load crude at Zirku for delivery to China. It was chartered by Unipec, a trading arm of China's state-run Sinopec, LSEG and Kpler data showed. Sinopec did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Shipowners will try to minimise time that vessels spend inside the Strait of Hormuz due to the conflict, KY Lin, spokesperson at Taiwan's Formosa Petrochemical Corp. "Vessels will only enter the region when it is nearer to their loading time," he said on Monday. Japanese shipping firms Nippon Yusen and Mitsui O.S.K. Lines said on Monday they continue to transit the strait but have instructed their vessels to minimise time spent in the Gulf. Several oil traders and analysts told Reuters that they had been warned to expect possible shipping delays as vessels wait for their turn outside the area. Iran's parliament on Sunday approved a measure to close the strait, Iran's Press TV reported, but any such move would require approval from the Supreme National Security Council. Iran has threatened to close the strait in the past but has never done so.
Barnama
9 hours ago
- Barnama
PGB Eyes Strong Growth from Industrial and Residential Developments After Record Profit Year
KUALA LUMPUR, June 23 (Bernama) -- Johor-based property developer Paragon Globe Berhad (PGB) is positioning itself for sustained growth in the industrial and residential sectors, supported by strategic projects and Johor's buoyant economic prospects, following a record-breaking financial performance in its recently concluded financial year. For the financial year ended March 31, 2025, PGB achieved a remarkable net profit of RM105.6 million, reversing a previous year's net loss of RM1.2 million. Revenue surged to RM306.3 million from RM51 million the year before, primarily driven by strategic land disposals and robust industrial property sales.
The Star
11 hours ago
- The Star
Ratings, reviews and riddles: What's the deal with online reviews?
One of the first things that online shoppers usually search for when looking to buy something is user reviews. Rows upon rows of stars, scores, and ratings that are meant to guide and inform each and every purchase can in reality turn out to be far less useful than hoped for these days. From Malaysia Cyber Consumer Association (MCCA) deputy president Azrul Zafri Azmi's perspective, reviews remain very relevant to Malaysian consumers, especially when it comes to things like ordering from e-commerce platforms or deciding on where to eat. According to him, studies have shown that 71% of Malaysians take reviews into account before making an online purchase. However, he says that there are still some clear underlying issues when it comes to online reviews in Malaysia. 'The challenge now is not access to reviews, but how authentic and reliable they are. 'Honestly, trust has dropped a bit in recent years. Some consumers have started to question reviews that sound too generic or too perfect. 'We're seeing more fake reviews, incentivised ones, and even copy-pasted feedback across listings. These trends make it harder for genuine reviews to stand out,' Azrul Zafri says. Tainted trust This rings true for KL-based auditor Lee Xien Wen, an avid online shopper who says he has encountered everything from irrelevant and unhelpful reviews to ones he suspects are outright fake. 'Some of the reviews would say things like, 'Looks pretty, haven't tried it yet', often repeated in different languages. 'It makes me think they're just trying to earn points or rewards, or could even be fake reviews generated by bots. 'If I see too many like that, I usually avoid the seller or brand altogether and look for a different option,' he says, adding that this has led him to prefer official seller pages for products rather than third parties' pages, and to look for user-posted product review videos that appear to be more genuine. From Azrul Zafri's point of view, reviews being left on e-commerce platforms solely to obtain rewards, without any helpful information for other potential buyers, undermine the purpose of reviews entirely. From Azrul Zafri's point of view, reviews being left on e-commerce platforms solely to obtain rewards, without any helpful information for other potential buyers, undermine the purpose of reviews entirely. — AZRUL ZAFRI AZMI 'This is a big issue. It's unethical, and more importantly, it misleads others. Some platforms give coins or points for every review, which unintentionally encourages this behaviour. 'When users rate a product they haven't even tried, it defeats the whole purpose of helping other consumers make better choices,' he says. According to Azrul Zafri, those leaving such reviews may not fully understand the impact of what they are doing, which in the long run 'damages the system that all of us rely on – and genuine buyers end up getting misled', he adds. An April 2025 statement from the Mufti of Federal Territory's Office (FT Mufti) similarly states that leaving false reviews or ratings for products purchased on e-commerce platforms without using them or examining their quality is an act of deception, which is prohibited or 'haram'. The FT Mufti further states that any rewards obtained through disingenuous reviews are also considered 'haram' and should be left unused until their expiry. Azrul Zafri further notes that there are also restaurants that offer discounts or free items in exchange for five-star ratings on platforms like Google, which he believes is problematic. 'I think encouraging reviews is fine – but when businesses tie rewards specifically to five-star ratings, it becomes manipulative. 'It's no longer about feedback; it's about boosting ratings unfairly. It also puts pressure on customers to give high scores, whether they mean it or not,' he says. Confusing mix Concerns have also been raised about e-commerce platform features that aggregate reviews on similar items within the same product category from other listings across the site. Azrul Zafri says that the aggregated reviews might not even refer to the exact same product, potentially misleading buyers. 'When reviews from different sellers or product variants are lumped together, consumers may think they're looking at feedback for the exact item they're buying – when they're not. 'That creates confusion, especially if one seller has poor service or quality,' he says. Shoppers like Lee point out that reviews from other sellers are not indicative of how responsive or reliable a specific seller may be, while sellers like Fithry Akbar Ali feel that the feature is unfair, as it took them years to build a strong reputation, with newer sellers benefiting from the pool of existing reviews that they did not earn. Fithry Akbar operates an online shop primarily centred around video games. 'I've encountered new competitors who just started selling similar products as myself and others, but noticed their product has over 500 reviews, despite it being a new listing. 'It completely kills off years and years of reviews built by original sellers. Buyers would then simply buy from these new sellers, thinking their product is trustworthy and reliable due to the high ratings,' he says. He also highlights the possibility of counterfeit product listings being associated with real ones due to being furnished with aggregated reviews, which could further mislead consumers into buying fake products. Fake reviews have become a significant concern across e-commerce platforms, especially overseas, according to various reports. — Image by freepik In a statement to LifestyleTech, a Shopee spokesperson addressed these concerns, stating that the intended purpose of such aggregated reviews is to provide assistance to new sellers and product listings. 'This feature only lasts for seven calendar days from the time of a new listing creation, after which sellers will have to rely on themselves to get good reviews. 'All such reviews are clearly marked within the app as 'Similar Product'. These Similar Product Reviews provide helpful product context for newer listings, but they do not replace the seller's effort in earning buyer trust,' it says. The e-commerce platform adds that it is not a replacement for other metrics such as store ratings, fulfilment speed, and chat responsiveness, which individual shops must still earn independently. 'Through this feature, we aim to promote fairer competition on the platform, prioritising quality, value, and service instead of legacy seller reputation alone. 'New or smaller sellers with strong offerings benefit from a level playing field, while buyers enjoy a broader range of trusted options. 'Building consumer trust and providing fair opportunities for sellers remain top priorities for Shopee,' it says. Filtering fakes The platforms themselves say that they have mechanisms in place to ensure that reviews left by customers are authentic. For instance, Lazada says in a statement to LifestyleTech that it uses 'AI (artificial intelligence) to guide users in writing more informative reviews, prompting them to comment on key aspects such as durability, design, and functionality. 'To encourage authentic user-generated content, Lazada offers LazCoins as incentives – with the highest coin rewards granted only to reviews that meet minimum word counts and include supporting visuals like photos or videos. 'We continuously moderate our review platform and take proactive steps to reduce unhelpful or suspicious reviews,' it says. The e-commerce platform adds that it also uses AI and performs manual checks of reviews to detect 'inauthentic patterns' and flags certain high-quality ones as 'Quality Reviews'. Meanwhile, the Shopee spokesperson says only customers who have actually purchased a product are able to leave reviews. 'Shopee takes a serious view of fake ratings or reviews. Under Shopee's Terms of Service, sellers must not take any action that undermines Shopee's feedback or rating system. 'Users found to be engaging in manipulative activities will face a range of penalties, including having their accounts frozen or being permanently banned on our platform. 'Consumers who are concerned they may have bought products based on fake ratings and reviews can report such products to Shopee for our investigations. They may also raise a Return/Refund request to get a refund for their purchase,' the spokesperson says. Both platforms allow users to further indicate if specific reviews are 'helpful' to boost their visibility to others as well. While Azrul Zafri acknowledges the efforts being made by the platforms, he says that more can still be done. 'Platforms need better filters for fake or copy-paste reviews, and they should educate users more clearly on review ethics,' he adds. Fake reviews have become a significant concern across e-commerce platforms, especially overseas, according to various reports. Most recently, the United Kingdom's Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) obtained a formal commitment from Amazon earlier this month to address fake reviews and 'catalogue abuse', which is a practice where sellers repurpose existing product listings to sell unrelated or lower-quality items by misleading consumers, following a four-year probe. This commitment comes in the form of faster detection systems, prompt removal of fraudulent reviews, and imposing bans on offending sellers and reviewers. Travel planning and booking platform, TripAdvisor, similarly reported a slew of fake reviews on its website in 2024. Based on figures from the website's 'Transparency Report 2025', 8% of the 31.1 million reviews it received that year were fake. This includes manipulative reviews meant to 'boost' a location or business's reputation, vandalism from a competitor, promotions of unrelated services or agendas, and paid reviews. Quest for quality Azrul Zafri advises that Malaysians treat reviews as a starting point and to be savvier consumers by looking beyond surface-level star ratings. He also recommends that shoppers be wary of overly generic comments and to try to find more detailed feedback instead. 'Reviews help, but they're not the full story. These days, I always tell people: don't just stop at star ratings. Take a bit of time to really get to know what you're buying. 'First, it's good to check the same product across different platforms – Shopee, Lazada, TikTok Shop – because sometimes the listings look the same but the sellers or the prices are very different. If it looks too cheap to be true, chances are... it probably is. 'Also, I personally like to watch quick (video) reviews. Even a short video can show how the item looks, how it's used, or what people honestly think about it – that's often more helpful than a wall of copy-paste reviews. 'Another good tip is to read comments in Facebook groups or forums. Malaysians are quite active online, and you'll often find people sharing real experiences – both good and bad – especially when a product disappoints or doesn't match expectations. 'Spend a few extra minutes doing a quick check, and it can save you from a lot of regret later,' he says. Azrul Zafri also believes that some form of light regulation by the Malaysian government would be helpful in facilitating a better e-commerce environment for local consumers. This would serve not to police opinions, but instead to ensure transparency. He suggests introducing a code of conduct for platforms to clearly define what is permitted, what isn't, and how to handle cases of abuse. He adds that ideally, this should be developed with input from the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission, relevant ministries, and civil society. 'Just like we've done with cybersecurity and online scams, we need to promote digital literacy and ethics – especially among students and young adults. 'I think it should be a joint effort between government, NGOs like MCCA, schools, and even the platforms themselves,' he says.
