GNU's ‘clearing house' called into question

DA Federal Council chairperson Helen Zille said the party will challenge the Expropriation Act.
Image: Itumeleng English/ Independent Newspapers
The Government of National Unity's (GNU) Clearing House Mechanism, established to resolve policy disagreements within the 10-member coalition, has been questioned over its effectiveness by the DA and Rise Mzantsi.
Despite the mechanism's efforts to address disputes, the DA has continued to raise issues separately, including its latest challenge to the Expropriation Act, specifically the issue of nil compensation.
Recently, DA federal council chairperson Helen Zille described the GNU clearing house mechanism as a "waste of time," stating that it does not work and "everyone acknowledges its ineffectiveness".
"What we need is a mechanism in the GNU to implement clauses 19 and 18 (in the terms of reference). We do not need to renegotiate the laws of the game or anything; what we need is mechanisms that implement the statement of intent," Zille said.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad Loading
The DA has launched several court challenges since its inclusion in the GNU, including a challenge to the Employment Equity Amendment Act (EEAA) and the Expropriation Act.
The party argues that these laws are unconstitutional and will negatively impact the economy.
The DA's lawyers will appear in the North Gauteng High Court to challenge the EEAA, which the party believes will repel investors and discriminate against certain races.
The party's Federal Council has also passed a motion supporting Section 25 of the Constitution, which states that compensation for expropriated property must be "just and equitable" as determined by a court of law.
The DA will pursue a constitutional challenge to the Expropriation Act in the High Court, arguing that it poses a direct threat to the rights enshrined in the Constitution and undermines the country's investment climate.
Rise Mzansi spokesperson Mabine Seabe said his party would like to see the Clearing House Mechanism terms of reference finalised, so that the body has full effect.
'The body is only as good as the terms of reference and the goodwill of the signatories to the Statement of Intent. We will continue working through all fora to ensure that South Africa is a better place in 2029 than it is today,' Seabe said.
The Good Party's Brett Herron said the Clearing House had only dealt with one substantive dispute - on the implementation of the BELA Act - which was raised by the DA in the first Clearing House meeting.
'Although we dealt with the BELA Act it was not, in our view, a matter that was appropriately brought to the Clearing House. The dispute should've arisen in the GNU cabinet or between the Party Leaders and then be referred to the Clearing House as a dispute resolution mechanism,' Herron said.
'The Expropriation Act has already been passed by the last parliament and signed into law by the President. It's a product of another election mandate.
'If the DA wants to persuade the GNU parties to amend policy on expropriation it should raise the issue in the cabinet or the GNU party leaders forum and if their proposal leads to a dispute or cannot be resolved there, then it could be referred to the Clearing House,' he said.
Herron further said the Clearing House was not the place for the DA to reopen debate on policies and laws that it had already lost.
Despite the parties' skepticism, the GNU Clearing House Mechanism, led by deputy president Paul Mashatile, has made efforts to address disputes within the GNU.
The mechanism held its inaugural meeting on October 16, 2024, where it welcomed the draft Terms of Reference and agreed to finalise them in the next meeting.
The meeting was convened by Mashatile, who emphasised the importance of resolving policy disagreements within the GNU.
Political analyst Dr John Molepo said the effectiveness of the GNU Clearing House Mechanism remains to be seen.
'While this mechanism has provided a platform for discussion and resolution of disputes, the DA's continued court challenges raise questions about its ability to address the complex issues at hand,' he said.
Mashatile's acting spokesperson was unavailable for comment on Tuesday.
Cape Times

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

IOL News

an hour ago

• IOL News

Political leaders demand stricter laws for whistle-blower safety

There is a need for laws that protect whistle-blowers. Image: Meta AI World Whistle-blowers Day on June 23 is dedicated to raising awareness about the crucial role that whistleblowers play in exposing wrongdoing and promoting transparency. THERE have been heightened calls for the Government of National Unity (GNU) to provide better protection to whistle-blowers. During a recent mini-plenary session, members of parliament (MP) from various political parties debated the need for strengthening whistle-blower protection by enacting robust laws that guarantee anonymity, job security, and legal support for individuals who reported corruption. Visvin Reddy, an uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) Party member of parliament, said they tackled corruption head on. 'We don't silence whistle-blowers. We protect them because in a country drowning in lies, the person who tells the truth is the bravest one of all. I will say this loud and clear, if Babita Deokaran had spoken out under an MK government, she would still be alive today. She would be protected, not hunted; celebrated not assassinated; and the people stealing from our people, they would be behind bars, and not behind desks.' Reddy said those who spoke the truth, faced losing their jobs or lives. 'Take Babita for example, she worked in the Gauteng health department. She saw money meant for hospitals and nurses being looted through dodgy PPE tenders. She did the right thing and what did she get? She was killed in front of her home. The big fish behind it, where are they? They are still free. 'There are officials in licensing departments who are watching bribes being taken daily. There are municipal officials who see tenders given to cronies while people go without water. They stay silent because they know the risk. Over 10 years, the AG (Auditor General) has flagged billions in corruption. That's why the MK Party says enough is enough. We are not here to protect the corrupt. We are here to protect the brave souls who speak up,' he said. Reddy said there was a need for laws that protected whistle-blowers, guarantee anonymity and job safety, provide legal support and emergency relocation if needed. 'We propose a whistle-blower protection act, an independent whistleblower agency, a national whistle-blower heroes fund and jail time for leaking a whistle-blower's identity. All whistle-blower reports need to be automatically investigated by a corruption unit free from political interference. Let us honour Babita and let us protect the next brave voice. This is not about politics; this is about the soul of our nation,' he said. Dereleen James, an ActionSA MP said: 'If the GNU even cared one iota about protecting whistle-blowers they would have done it by now. If they were remotely serious about strengthening protections for the brave South Africans who risk everything to expose corruption then the Zondo Commission's recommendations would not be gathering dust three years later. Untouched, unimplemented and just forgotten.' She said the GNU was not a unity of purpose. 'It's a coalition of coverups and the so-called progressive. The GNU does not want to protect whistle-blowers because they are protecting themselves. They drag their feet on funding the NPA because they are terrified of being prosecuted. They do not want to fight corruption because they are corrupt. The GNU does not want justice, they want silence. Silence from Babita Deokaran, silence from every South African who dares speak the truth. 'Well not on our watch. This is why ActionSA will be introducing a Zero Tolerance Corruption Bill to take on public enemy number one which is corruption. The bill is a warning shot to every crooked politician who thinks they will be shuffled from one coy cozy position to the next. We are coming for you. To every official who thinks that looting the State can be followed by a quiet retirement or diplomatic posting, your time is up. The bill will ensure that anyone convicted of corruption will never hold public office again. Once you break the bond of public trust, you are out forever. 'We will be introducing whistle-blowers rewards based on international best practice. If the State won't protect whistle-blowers, then let us do so. We will give whistle-blowers the means, the safety and the legal support they need to come forward and take down the syndicates that have embedded themselves at the heart of government. The truth is, the GNU is not a solution to our crisis, it is the crisis. The so-called progressive caucus is not a solution. They are the wolves eyeing the sheep and ActionSA will not sit quietly while South Africans are expected to accept corruption that goes unpunished,' she said. Glynnis Breytenbach, a Democratic Alliance MP said: 'In this country are at a crossroads in democracy. One where the integrity of our institutions, the trust of our citizens and the sanctity of our constitutional values are under immense strain.' She said the matter of whistle-blower protection in South Africa was an issue not only of legal and administrative reform, but of moral imperative. 'Whistle-blowers play an important role in our society. They are not saboteurs, they are not enemies of the state, they are brave men and women who often at great personal cost shine a light on corruption, maladministration, abuse of power and gross human rights violations. They are guardians of public interest, uncompensated sentinels of our democracy. 'Whistle-blowers act in the spirit of Section 195 of our Constitution which enshrines principles of transparency, accountability and good governance. They ensure that State power is exercised lawfully, ethically and in the service of the people. When they step forward to expose wrongdoing they are often met not with gratitude or protection but with intimidation, harassment, unemployment isolation and in far too many cases, death,' she said. Breytenbach said that the current state of whistle-blower protection in South Africa was inadequate and incoherent. 'The main legislative instrument, the Protected Disclosures Act (PDA) was a progressive step forward at the time of its enactment. But over two decades later it has not evolved sufficiently to address the sophisticated threats whistle-blowers face today. The act applies primarily to employees in the workplace context. It does not extend adequately to contractors, consultants, volunteers or community members who may witness corruption or wrongdoing. 'The PDA offers no proactive physical protection or financial support. It only provides post-op remedies which are often difficult, expensive and time consuming to pursue. No independent whistle-blower protection authority exists. Oversight is fragmented across the public protector the SAPS, the Hawks and other bodies, none of which are solely or effectively tasked with whistle-blower protection. As a result many whistleblowers have had their identities leaked often by those entrusted with their safety. 'One of the proposals is a private bill which is being prepared by the DA to be introduced in the near future. We must always remember the words of Archbishop Desmond Tutu, who said, 'If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor'. I urge this parliament to act boldly, decisively and immediately. Let us institutionalise the values of our constitution. We should not wait for another name to be added to the tragic lists of those betrayed by the very system they try to save,' she said. Marlon Daniels, a Patriotic Alliance MP, said whistle-blowers, who had the courage to expose corruption often at great personal risk are not just informants. 'They are patriots. They are defenders of justice and deserve our full protection. If the information they provide us is factual, if it exposes the fraud or abuse of power then we must stand with them without any hesitation.' Daniels said whistle-blowers also played a critical role in holding the powerful accountable. 'Without whistle-blowers, State capture would have remained hidden. Billions of taxpayers money would still be looted with impunity and public trust in government would be completely eroded. Yet, what happens to those who speak out? They face intimidation, job losses and even threats to their lives. This is unacceptable. If we are serious about fighting corruption we must ensure that those who expose it are protected and not persecuted. 'We demand robust whistle-blower protection laws that guarantee anonymity. Whistle-blowers must be able to report corruption without fear of exposure. No individual should also lose their livelihood for doing the right thing and as far as legal support goes, the State must provide legal defense to whistle-blowers against frivolous lawsuits or retaliation. 'South Africa is at a crossroads. We can either side with those who steal from the poor or we can stand with the brave men and women who risk everything to expose the truth. The Patriotic Alliance chooses the side of justice. If South Africa is to be saved from corruption we must empower the whistle-blower. Let us pass these laws and defend the brave. Let us rebuild this nation,' he said. THE POST

Mail & Guardian

2 hours ago

• Mail & Guardian

Environment minister reflects on his – and the GNU's – first year in office

Minister Dion George. (Photo: Environmentza/X) When George, who was sworn into office on 3 July under the coalition President Cyril Ramaphosa put together after his ANC lost its outright parliament majority — said serving in this government 'has required all of us to work collaboratively – sometimes across vastly different perspectives — toward a common goal: delivering real outcomes for the people of South Africa'. In a media briefing to assess how his department has fared over the past year, George said the GNU has created a situation where departments are increasingly working across silos, 'where ideas are strengthened through debate and collective intelligence', and where the urgency of service delivery is matched by a 'shared will to get things done'. This week analysts George said his department had approached its work 'with a recognition that our environmental mandate is not separate from the economic one, or the social one. They are deeply interconnected.' Protecting natural resources, wildlife Among George's 'big six' priority areas is protecting natural resources and wildlife. Here, he cited his department's significant achievement regarding the protection of the critically endangered 'After learning about the sharp population declines and the human impacts causing them, I called for open, lawyer-free discussions that brought together conservation organisations like BirdLife South Africa and Sanccob [Southern African Foundation for the Conservation of Coastal Birds, industry leaders in the fishing sector and our departmental experts,' he said. This collaborative approach led to a court-ordered agreement to implement island closures around key breeding colonies. 'We amended the small pelagic fishery permit conditions to enforce these closures, ensuring sustainable fishing near vital penguin habitats,' he said. These changes were implemented almost immediately. His department is also tackling the harm caused by bunkering in Algoa Bay, near St Croix Island, once home to the largest African penguin colony in the world. Ship-to-ship refuelling has caused oil spills and underwater noise pollution. After a A coordinated approach has led to prosecutions and a continued decline in rhino poaching incidents, with George noting his department's attention is also turning to species such as 'The lives of these animals are not commodities. They are a vital part of our ecological and cultural identity,' he said. George said his department's efforts were showing that jobs can be created, new industries stimulated and growth unlocked, 'while caring for the planet'. He noted that in the fourth quarter of last year, the agriculture, forestry and fishing sectors recorded a 'remarkable' 17.2% growth, contributing two-thirds of the total GDP growth for that quarter. In the first quarter of this year, these sectors grew by 15.8%. 'These are not just numbers,' he said. 'They reflect thousands of jobs and livelihoods sustained. We increased the number of fish species available to The department's harbour revitalisation programme has created more than 2 300 work opportunities while through expanded support for sustainable aquaculture, 'we're seeing green technology spark new enterprises along our coasts'. George said the recent floods in KwaZulu-Natal and Mthatha in the Eastern Cape are only the latest signs that the time for talk regarding climate change is over. This is why the department finalised the The department secured George said these were not blanket waivers. 'Each exemption comes with firm conditions, including health interventions for affected communities, real-time emissions monitoring, and a firm commitment to transition to cleaner energy sources. We are holding polluters accountable.' The department is working with the presidency and the department of mineral resources and energy to develop a competitive power market, 'bringing independent power producers into the fold. The goal is clear: to deliver both energy security and environmental sustainability.' South Africa has contributed to international environmental governance, and continues to lead. George said it played a major role in negotiating the At the last climate summit in Baku, South Africa 'brokered a deal that balanced the need for ambitious climate action with the reality of our economic conditions', he said, adding that this agreement unlocked green investment for local projects that will support South Africa's just energy transition. 'And in our G20 Presidency year, we are hosting major environment and climate sustainability meetings, positioning South Africa as a leader on the African continent and beyond. These engagements not only strengthen our global voice but also attract investment and expertise.' George said another of his key focus areas has been making his department's systems more efficient, transparent and responsive. It had launched the regulatory efficiency strategy for environmental turbocharge, a set of reforms to speed up approvals for energy and infrastructure projects, 'while still protecting the environment'. His department had identified 11 renewable energy development zones where significantly simplified environmental impact assessments had reduced approval times from 300 days to 147. 'For lower sensitivity areas, we've introduced fast-tracked authorisations that can be processed in around 70 days,' the minister said. The new national web-based environmental screening tool is 'already helping developers identify low-impact sites for projects, streamlining planning and protecting biodiversity'. Since his appointment, George has finalised 162 environmental appeals, '106 of them since our 100-day feedback session', which is a 'testament to our commitment to fairness, transparency and turnaround times'. Although the department is operating in a constrained fiscal environment, it has launched a departmental spending review and implemented firm cost-containment measures. 'But, more importantly, we have begun thinking creatively about revenue generation,' he said. 'Each branch of our department is tasked with identifying savings and new funding streams.' This includes sourcing international donor support for enforcement and anti-poaching, innovative financing mechanisms for green projects and working with the treasury on sustainable budget models. The minister said the South African Forestry Company or Safcol, SANParks and the South African Weather Service are receiving strategic attention to address governance weaknesses and boost their effectiveness. 'We also celebrated the achievement of a clean audit at iSimangaliso Wetland Park — a symbol of what good governance can look like across our sector,' while flagship projects to elevate the country's environmental brand, improve delivery and stimulate economic opportunity have been initiated. George said the department is finalising the national carbon credits and biodiversity offsets framework, which will allow companies to 'offset emissions responsibly', while directing funds into conservation and community development.

Daily Maverick

3 hours ago

• Daily Maverick

US joining war on Iran creates major political headache for SA

With the world on tenterhooks following the US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites, South African politicians have been notably cautious in articulating their initial positions. By sunset on Sunday, 22 June, as news of the extraordinary US bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities at Israel's behest continued to ricochet globally, barely a single South African politician seemed willing to come out publicly with a position on the matter. Fikile Mbalula. Gayton McKenzie. Herman Mashaba. These are hardly shrinking violets when it comes to making their views known on forums like X — yet on the matter of the Iranian bombing, at the time of writing, there was a deafening silence from them. Neither was there yet an official statement available from either the DA or the ANC, suggesting that SA's two biggest political parties were to some degree agonising over what, exactly, to say. From Parliament's committee on international relations: niks. The Department of International Relations and Cooperation (Dirco) was mute on Sunday too, and a Daily Maverick query to its spokesperson, Clayson Monyela, went unanswered. Ramaphosa issues mild reprimand of US By mid-afternoon, President Cyril Ramaphosa had grasped the nettle — kind of — and released a statement that said relatively little. 'President Cyril Ramaphosa and the South African government have noted with a great deal of anxiety the entry by the United States of America into the Israel-Iran war,' it read, followed by a weak rebuke of the Trump administration. 'It was South Africa's sincerest hope that President Donald Trump would use his influence and that of the US government to prevail on the parties to pursue a dialogue path in resolving their issues of dispute.' The statement concluded, as is on brand for Ramaphosa, with a call for 'peaceful resolution'. Despite the fact that Tehran and Pretoria enjoy warm diplomatic relations, Ramaphosa's statement revealed the diplomatic egg dance that the situation presents to the South African government. South Africa cannot risk alienating the Trump administration further, with the relationship still on life support from the buildup to the Trump-Ramaphosa Oval Office showdown in late May. The Israel factor is a significant complication The difficulty for Pretoria is that the Iranian strike was overtly carried out at the behest of Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu. Trump's brief televised announcement, confirming that US fighter jets had targeted multiple nuclear research sites in Iran, ended not only with 'God bless the Middle East' and 'God bless America' but also, specifically, 'God bless Israel' — a closing flourish that left little doubt about whose interests were being prioritised. South Africa has positioned itself internationally as one of the staunchest critics of Israel's conduct, culminating in its landmark International Court of Justice case accusing Israel of genocide in Gaza. Pretoria has also publicly cut diplomatic ties with Israel, formally downgrading the embassy. In the face of this new regional escalation, it must now consider how to balance that principled commitment with its allegiance to Iran, a fellow BRICS member — while simultaneously avoiding direct confrontation with a still-dominant United States. With that in mind, the silence of the political class on Sunday was, frankly, understandable. BRICS buddies band together? South Africa and Iran have shared membership of BRICS since an invitation was issued to the latter at the 2023 Johannesburg summit. Other BRICS states were less hesitant in responding to the bombing. The Chinese foreign ministry issued an unambiguous condemnation: 'China strongly condemns the U.S. attacks on Iran and bombing of nuclear facilities under the safeguards of the IAEA [International Atomic Energy Agency]. The actions of the U.S. seriously violate the purposes and principles of the UN Charter and international law, and have exacerbated tensions in the Middle East. China calls on the parties to the conflict, Israel in particular, to reach a ceasefire as soon as possible, ensure the safety of civilians, and start dialogue and negotiation.' Saudi Arabia, whose new BRICS membership sits awkwardly with its often-fraught relationship with Iran, struck a more guarded tone. Its official English-language X account posted: 'The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is following with great concern the developments in the sisterly Islamic Republic of Iran, represented by the targeting of Iranian nuclear facilities by the United States of America.' The United States, meanwhile, was vocally backed by a handful of close allies. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer offered a firm endorsement of the bombing, posting on X: 'Iran's nuclear programme is a grave threat to international security. Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat.' But from other corners of the West, the reaction was unease rather than celebration. Carl Bildt, co-chair of the European Council on Foreign Relations, called the bombing a 'clear-cut violation of international law'. UN Secretary-General António Guterres said he was 'gravely alarmed' by the use of force by the US. A massively unpopular war Complicating the picture for South Africa is the fact that this conflict is likely to be widely unpopular across the globe — including among Western populations. Comparisons are already being drawn with the disastrous US invasion of Iraq in 2003, and social media suggests a growing generational divide in how such conflicts are understood as the post-World War 2 political consensus crumbles. Young people in particular are questioning why Israel, which has not signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and possesses undeclared nuclear weapons, is held to a radically different standard than Iran, which remains under international inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency. This is also a moment when support for Israel is at an all-time low. Tens of thousands of protesters flooded European capitals over the weekend, voicing opposition to the ongoing bombardment of Gaza. In June, a YouGov poll showed support for Israel in Western Europe had sunk to its lowest levels ever recorded. In Germany, France and the UK, only between 13% and 21% of respondents now hold favourable views of Israel, compared to 63% to 70% expressing negative sentiments. As South Africa mulls its response, the stakes are particularly high. The government has sought to portray itself as a champion of the Global South, a defender of international law, and a broker of multipolar diplomacy. The entrance of the United States into open hostilities against Iran, with Israel applauding from the wings, tests every aspect of that narrative. DM