Will Gov Lamont run again? Here's what he said

Gov. Ned Lamont declined to give an answer Thursday on the question of whether he will run for a third term as governor — a difficult feat that has only been accomplished by one other politician in the past 200 years.
He discussed the question Thursday in his office, just 12 hours after the legislative session concluded.
'I'm thinking about it seriously. I love the job. I think Susan and I are a pretty good team,' Lamont said.
'That's not a yes or a no though,' he said. 'That's a I'm thinking about it seriously. I'm thinking about it with Susan. I'm thinking about it with Annie Lamont.'
There's no timeframe for making or announcing a decision, the governor said.
'I'm a lot more inclined and interested in keeping going, keep this positive momentum going than I was six months ago,' he said, noting that he'd put the issue on hold during the 'tricky' budget season.
Alluding to a potential recession caused by President Donald Trump's economic policies, Lamont said now may be the time for an experienced leader who had navigated the COVID pandemic, knows how to handle the unconventional and unpredictable president.
'I worked with him for the first two years. I know some of the players down there. That makes a big difference …. You've got to navigate through incredible uncertainties since every week there's another change incoming. … It just makes me think this may be a good place for me to be,' he said.
'I'm working with the White House on things like energy… but if you want to come to one of my schools and try to take a Dreamer out of that classroom, I'll be standing there at the door. I don't need to go out and pick a fight but I think people know where I stand.'
Even giants of Connecticut politics including Abe Ribicoff, Ella Grasso and Lowell P. Weicker, did not serve for a third term.
The only person to win three four-year terms was Republican John G. Rowland, who resigned during his third term amid a corruption scandal.
Some insiders had predicted that Lamont would run again, while others said they simply did not know.
For Lamont, it was a highly personal decision. Many politicians make the decision simply based on whether they believe they can win or not.
In Lamont's case, he is currently 71 years old and would be 73 at the start of his third term in January 2027. He would then be 77 years old at the end of the four-year term. Another factor is whether his wife, Annie, would retire. She has declined to retire and is still working at 68 as a highly successful venture capitalist who specializes in the health care industry.
Lamont planned a press conference for Thursday morning in his Capitol office, but he declined to say Wednesday night whether he would answer the biggest question in Connecticut politics by announcing whether he will run.
When asked by The Courant if he would be talking Thursday about his future plans, Lamont said, 'I think I am, yeah.'
Asked if he would reveal his decision Wednesday night, he responded, 'No. Then you won't show up tomorrow. I'm just going to go over the budget, what it means, and where it takes us. … Hey, thanks, guys.'
The question of whether Lamont would run again in November 2026 has been hanging over the Connecticut political world for at least a year.
If Lamont were not on the ballot, a crowded field of possible candidates could jump into the race, including Lt. Gov. Susan Bysiewicz of Middletown, state Attorney General William Tong of Stamford, Comptroller Sean Scanlon of Guilford, and former Hartford mayor Luke Bronin, among others.
Depending on who decides to run, their positions would immediately open up, meaning there could be primaries for sought-after positions like attorney general and comptroller.
On the Republican side, longtime candidate Matthew Corey has already announced he is running for lieutenant governor. Corey has run unsuccessfully two times against U.S. Sen. Chris Murphy of Hartford in 2018 and 2024, and he lost three times against U.S. Rep. John B. Larson of East Hartford in 2012, 2014, and 2016.
Lamont said he believes that the 2025 session was successful, with a two-year budget that he said will promote opportunity and affordability.
'Look what we did on child care. Look what we did on special ed,' Lamont told Capitol reporters. He touted the passage of his plan to fund universal pre-kindergarten for families making up to $100,000 a year and his plan to constrain special education costs that have stressed municipal budgets for years.
He also applauded the passage of a housing policy bill that encourages towns to create affordable housing to address the state's housing crisis. Target numbers of units each town should have, such as a fair share percentage, were unhelpful, he said.
'You gotta lighten up on the regulations.'
Concerning the session, Lamont said, 'I think it was pretty good. We're on time. We've got a balanced budget. … We're making some strategic investments. We're not raising taxes – at least on individuals. I don't think we broke the spending cap. We'll be paying down over a billion dollars in pension debt yet again. That didn't happen before I got here.'
Christopher Keating can be reached at ckeating@courant.com

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

American Press

3 hours ago

• American Press

Iranian ambassador says US ‘decided to destroy diplomacy' with strikes on nuclear sites

Republican presidential nominee former President Donald Trump arrives at an election night watch party at the Palm Beach Convention Center, on Wednesday in West Palm Beach, Fla. (Associated Press) Iran said that the U.S. 'decided to destroy diplomacy' with its strikes on the country's nuclear program and that the Iranian military will decide the 'timing, nature and scale of Iran's proportionate response.' Iran's U.N. ambassador, Amir Saeid Iravani, spoke to an emergency meeting of the United Nations Security Council hours after the U.S. attack. 'We will take all measures necessary,' he told the meeting.

Hamilton Spectator

3 hours ago

• Hamilton Spectator

Trump's go-it-alone strategy on Iran risks dividing an already split Congress

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump's decision to launch a military strike on Iran's nuclear sites without fully consulting the U.S. Congress layered a partisan approach onto a risky action, particularly because the White House briefed top Republican leaders beforehand without doing the same for Democrats. While House Speaker Mike Johnson , Senate Republican leader John Thune and the GOP chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee were all briefed before the action, their counterparts were not. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer was given a perfunctory heads-up by the White House shortly before the strikes were made public. And House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries' office received a 'courtesy call' before Trump announced it. The so-called Gang of Eight congressional and intelligence leaders were not notified before the mission , according to two people familiar with the situation and granted anonymity to discuss it. One, Rep. Jim Himes, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said he learned of the strikes on social media, which he said 'is an uncomfortable thing for the ranking member of the Intelligence Committee.' 'Bad enough that we weren't informed,' Himes, of Connecticut, said Sunday on CNN, 'but unconstitutional that we didn't have the opportunity to debate and speak, as the representatives of the people, on what is one of the more consequential foreign policy things that this country has done in a long time.' It's a highly unusual situation that is complicating the difficult politics ahead for the president and his party as the U.S. enters an uncertain national security era with the surprise military attack on the nuclear facilities, an unprecedented incursion in Iran. Trump faces a vote in Congress as soon as this week on a war powers resolution from Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., that would 'direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.' Another resolution has been introduced by lawmakers from both parties in the U.S. House. And at least one Democrat, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, said Trump's actions are 'clearly grounds for impeachment.' At the same time, the Trump administration is expecting Congress to send an additional $350 billion in national security funds as part of the president's big tax breaks bill also heading soon for a vote. Senators are set to be briefed Tuesday behind closed doors on the situation in Iran. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Sunday that the White House made 'bipartisan courtesy calls' to congressional leadership. She said in a social media post that the White House spoke to Schumer 'before the strike' but that House leader Jeffries 'could not be reached until after, but he was briefed.' While the president has authority as the commander in chief of the U.S. armed forces to order specific military actions, any prolonged war-time footing would traditionally need authorization from Congress. The House and Senate authorized actions in Iraq, Afghanistan and beyond after the Sept. 11, 2001, attack. 'Congress should be consulted,' Kaine said on CBS' 'Face the Nation.' 'We were not.' As soon as Trump announced the actions late Saturday, he won swift support from the GOP leadership in Congress. Johnson, Thune and the Senate Intelligence Committee chairman, Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas, were all briefed ahead of time and sent almost simultaneous statements backing the military campaign, as did the House Intelligence Committee chairman, Rep. Rick Crawford, also of Arkansas. But by apparently engaging with only one side of the political aisle, Trump risks saddling his Republican Party with political ownership of the military action against Iran, which may or may not prove popular with Americans. Rather than rally the country to his side, Trump risks cleaving its already deep divisions over his second term agenda. Johnson, who praised Trump's action against Iran as 'the right call,' said the president's targeted strike was within his authority and in line with past presidential actions. 'Leaders in Congress were aware of the urgency of this situation and the Commander-in-Chief evaluated that the imminent danger outweighed the time it would take for Congress to act,' Johnson, R-La., said on social media. Trump himself has shown little patience for political dissent from within his party, even as criticism rolls in from among his most trusted backers. The Iran military campaign threatens to splinter Trump's Make America Great Again movement, which powered his return to the White House. Many Trump supporters aligned with his campaign promises not to involve the United States in overseas actions and instead to be a peace-making president. 'I think I represent part of the coalition that elected Trump,' said Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., on CBS. 'We were tired of endless wars in the Middle East.' Massie and Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California have introduced their own war powers resolution in the House, a sign of how close the far left and far right have bonded over their opposition to U.S. campaigns abroad, particularly in the Middle East. The Trump administration insisted Sunday the U.S. is not seeking a war with Iran. 'We're not at war with Iran. We're at war with Iran's nuclear program,' said Vice President JD Vance on NBC's 'Meet the Press.' And Trump swiftly attacked Massie, who is one of the most steadfast non-interventionist GOP lawmakers in Congress — along with Sen. Rand Paul, also of Kentucky — and the president suggested he would turn his Republican Party against the congressman. 'MAGA should drop this pathetic LOSER, Tom Massie, like the plague!' the president said on social media. 'The good news is that we will have a wonderful American Patriot running against him in the Republican Primary, and I'll be out in Kentucky campaigning really hard.' __ Associated Press writer Mary Clare Jalonick contributed to this report. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Chicago Tribune

4 hours ago

• Chicago Tribune

President Donald Trump's go-it-alone strategy on Iran risks dividing an already split Congress

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump's decision to launch a military strike on Iran's nuclear sites without fully consulting the U.S. Congress layered a partisan approach onto a risky action, particularly because the White House briefed top Republican leaders beforehand without doing the same for Democrats. While House Speaker Mike Johnson, Senate Republican leader John Thune and the GOP chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee were all briefed before the action, their counterparts were not. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer was given a perfunctory heads-up by the White House shortly before the strikes were made public. And House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries' office received a 'courtesy call' before Trump announced it. The so-called Gang of Eight congressional and intelligence leaders were not notified before the mission, according to two people familiar with the situation and granted anonymity to discuss it. One, Rep. Jim Himes, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said he learned of the strikes on social media, which he said 'is an uncomfortable thing for the ranking member of the Intelligence Committee.' 'Bad enough that we weren't informed,' Himes, of Connecticut, said Sunday on CNN, 'but unconstitutional that we didn't have the opportunity to debate and speak, as the representatives of the people, on what is one of the more consequential foreign policy things that this country has done in a long time.' It's a highly unusual situation that is complicating the difficult politics ahead for the president and his party as the U.S. enters an uncertain national security era with the surprise military attack on the nuclear facilities, an unprecedented incursion in Iran. Trump faces a vote in Congress as soon as this week on a war powers resolution from Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., that would 'direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.' Another resolution has been introduced by lawmakers from both parties in the U.S. House. And at least one Democrat, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, said Trump's actions are 'clearly grounds for impeachment.' At the same time, the Trump administration is expecting Congress to send an additional $350 billion in national security funds as part of the president's big tax breaks bill also heading soon for a vote. Senators are set to be briefed Tuesday behind closed doors on the situation in Iran. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Sunday that the White House made 'bipartisan courtesy calls' to congressional leadership. She said in a social media post that the White House spoke to Schumer 'before the strike' but that House leader Jeffries 'could not be reached until after, but he was briefed.' While the president has authority as the commander in chief of the U.S. armed forces to order specific military actions, any prolonged war-time footing would traditionally need authorization from Congress. The House and Senate authorized actions in Iraq, Afghanistan and beyond after the Sept. 11, 2001, attack. 'Congress should be consulted,' Kaine said on CBS' 'Face the Nation.' 'We were not.' As soon as Trump announced the actions late Saturday, he won swift support from the GOP leadership in Congress. Johnson, Thune and the Senate Intelligence Committee chairman, Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas, were all briefed ahead of time and sent almost simultaneous statements backing the military campaign, as did the House Intelligence Committee chairman, Rep. Rick Crawford, also of Arkansas. But by apparently engaging with only one side of the political aisle, Trump risks saddling his Republican Party with political ownership of the military action against Iran, which may or may not prove popular with Americans. Rather than rally the country to his side, Trump risks cleaving its already deep divisions over his second term agenda. Johnson, who praised Trump's action against Iran as 'the right call,' said the president's targeted strike was within his authority and in line with past presidential actions. 'Leaders in Congress were aware of the urgency of this situation and the Commander-in-Chief evaluated that the imminent danger outweighed the time it would take for Congress to act,' Johnson, R-La., said on social media. Trump himself has shown little patience for political dissent from within his party, even as criticism rolls in from among his most trusted backers. The Iran military campaign threatens to splinter Trump's Make America Great Again movement, which powered his return to the White House. Many Trump supporters aligned with his campaign promises not to involve the United States in overseas actions and instead to be a peace-making president. 'I think I represent part of the coalition that elected Trump,' said Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., on CBS. 'We were tired of endless wars in the Middle East.' Massie and Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California have introduced their own war powers resolution in the House, a sign of how close the far left and far right have bonded over their opposition to U.S. campaigns abroad, particularly in the Middle East. The Trump administration insisted Sunday the U.S. is not seeking a war with Iran. 'We're not at war with Iran. We're at war with Iran's nuclear program,' said Vice President JD Vance on NBC's 'Meet the Press.' And Trump swiftly attacked Massie, who is one of the most steadfast non-interventionist GOP lawmakers in Congress — along with Sen. Rand Paul, also of Kentucky — and the president suggested he would turn his Republican Party against the congressman. 'MAGA should drop this pathetic LOSER, Tom Massie, like the plague!' the president said on social media. 'The good news is that we will have a wonderful American Patriot running against him in the Republican Primary, and I'll be out in Kentucky campaigning really hard.'