Post Reports: He's dying of cancer. They chose to start their family.

The 7 is off today but we're sharing a moving recent episode of "Post Reports." Since 2000, the rate of new cancer diagnoses for people ages 15 to 49 has climbed by 10 percent. This year, more than 200,000 people in that age group will be newly diagnosed with cancer. They will join more than 2.1 million Americans who were also diagnosed as young adults and are living with the disease. In today's episode, Post video journalist Drea Cornejo sits down with host Elahe Izadi to talk about how Drea's own cancer diagnosis three years ago, when she was 26, motivated her to report on the realities facing more younger adults. Drea documented the lives of Tanner and Shay Martin over the past six months as they navigated Tanner's terminal colon cancer diagnosis with big life decisions including starting a family. While most young adults survive their cancer diagnosis, they still face the potential of a greatly altered future with implications for relationships, careers, finances and family planning.
You can watch The Post's short documentary about Tanner and Shay here. Be sure to also check out the comic about Drea's diagnosis here.
Today's show was produced by Elana Gordon. It was mixed by Ted Muldoon and edited by Renita Jablonski with additional editing by Lynh Bui, Mary-Ellen Deily and Dan Keating.
Additional reporting for this story came from Dan Keating, Ariana Cha and Julia Wall. Special thanks to Wendy Galietta, Whitney Leaming, Jessica Koscielniak and Stephen Smith.
Subscribe to The Washington Post here

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Forbes

9 minutes ago

• Forbes

Examining The Economic Case For College Mental Health

U.S. Dollar Signs In 2021, the American Council on Education conducted a survey of college and university presidents, which indicated that student mental health was the top-rated pressing issue. Many presidents are currently tasked with balancing the need to support student mental health with demands from other campus departments, financial constraints, as well as federal and state policies. Furthermore, the rise of preventive and online services from third-party vendors might make it difficult for some administers to know what financial investments could have the greatest returns. Daniel Eisenberg is a professor of health policy and management at UCLA and obtained a doctoral degree in economics from Stanford University. He's a principal investigator of the Healthy Minds Network (HMN) for Research on Adolescent and Young Adult Mental Health, which administers national survey studies on college student mental health. Eisenberg argued that economic evaluations of mental health services could help administrators balance their priorities, as well as highlight the financial benefits that many campus counseling centers provide. He stated, '…our research indicates that there is a fairly strong economic case for investing in student mental health.' The Economic Benefits Of Improved Student Mental Health A 2024 report by the Center of Collegiate Mental Health indicated that counseling centers are remarkably effective in reducing distress and suicide ideation among students with elevated risk. While protecting against suicide, and providing crisis response services on campus, avoids emotional/financial costs to families and schools, the financial impact extends to local communities. According to a 2020 report by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Service Administration, the average cost per case for a community mobile crisis program is $1,520, including $455 related to the mobile crisis unit being on site. Many counseling centers don't rely on mobile crisis programs, meaning that these savings to their communities are significant. Counseling services are also effective in treating non-crisis concerns and are associated with improved academic outcomes. For example, a 2005 study in the Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics found that untreated diagnosed depression was associated with 0.49 decrease in GPA, while receiving treatment was associated with a .044 increase in GPA. Academic performance is often a high priority for administrators, but Eisenberg argued that the financial implications of this also benefits society. He said, '…the students will end up with higher levels of education and greater lifetime earnings, which are important economic benefits for them and their communities… These economic benefits are relevant for communities on local and national scales, because we are talking about a more skilled and productive workforce emerging from higher education.' Eisenberg's argument is supported by a 2019 report by the United States Federal Reserve System, which described college education as a path to higher incomes and greater economic well-being. Another improved academic outcome associated with student mental health is university retention. According to Eisenberg, "Reducing depressive symptoms, for example, is likely to lower the likelihood that students leave college before graduating. This means that student mental health interventions can help institutions retain tuition and other enrollment-driven revenue…' Eisenberg's argument is supported be a 2024 study in the Journal of College Student Mental Health, which found that about two-thirds of counseling center clients stated that services helped them stay in school. These savings on tuition revenue extend multiple years until graduation. Furthermore, as the 2024 study indicated, the retention rate among counseling center clients was higher than the overall campus population. Thus, campus counseling centers can have a significant financial impact on the revenue of institutions. Return On Investment Related To Student Mental Health In 2019, Eisenberg helped create a report with the American Council on Education about investing in student mental health. This report provided a link to an online return on investment (ROI) tool that can be customized to understand the economic returns from specific mental health investments. Eisenberg stated, 'Schools can use this online calculator to generate estimates for the economic case of investing in student mental health programs at their institution." The professor further argued that schools should invest in services with established effectiveness. A possible example is a 2025 report by Inside Higher Ed, which discussed a statewide agreement with a telehealth provider. This report argued that more information is needed to determine if this service increased the capacity of counseling centers and if the mental health of students improved over time. According to Eisenberg, knowing the effectiveness of a service is vital. He commented, 'That said, if institutions can identify mental health programs without solid evidence of effectiveness, and replace those with programs that have stronger evidence, that is likely to yield improvements in terms of student wellbeing and economic consequences.' Campus counseling centers are uniquely effective due to their general location, established facilities, easy access to licensed mental health providers, and real-time connections with campus stakeholders. When financial concerns affect a school, administrators often consider constraining their investments. However, Eisenberg warned about negative economic consequences for reducing mental health services on campuses. He argued, 'The negative economic consequences of decreasing investments would be the exact flip side of the positive consequences.'

Medscape

10 minutes ago

• Medscape

ASCO 2025: Impact of Therapeutic Advances in Prostate Cancer

Petros Grivas, MD, shares key updates from ASCO 2025, focusing on advances in prostate cancer across disease stages. He highlights promising results from the AMPLITUDE trial showing a radiographic progression-free survival benefit with niraparib plus abiraterone in patients with BRCA-mutated tumors and anticipated further data from the PSMAddition trial involving lutetium-PSMA. Additional discussions included prostate-specific antigen nadir as a prognostic marker, quality-of-life outcomes from the ARANOTE trial, and emerging therapies like BiTEs and theranostics for castration-resistant disease. He emphasizes the importance of somatic and germline testing in personalizing treatment and improving outcomes for both patients and their families.

WebMD

27 minutes ago

• WebMD

How to Finally Treat Acne Scars (Without Wasting Time or Money)

Acne may fade, but the scars it leaves behind can linger for years – both on the skin and emotionally. For many, acne scars affect self-esteem and confidence, long after the last breakout has healed. The good news: Today's acne scar treatments are more effective, personalized, and safer than ever. The key is knowing what type of scars you have and how to match them with the most appropriate therapy. Understanding Your Acne Scars Not all acne scars are the same. Each type responds differently to treatment, so accurate identification is an important first step. Ice pick scars: Deep, narrow scars that resemble small puncture marks. Often considered one of the most challenging types to treat. Think V-shaped. Boxcar scars: Broad, well-defined depressions with sharp edges, commonly seen on the cheeks and temples. Think U-shaped. Rolling scars: Shallow, wave-like indentations caused by bands of scar tissue pulling down the skin. Hypertrophic or keloid scars: Raised, thickened scars often found on the chest, shoulders, or jawline. Post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) or erythema (PIE): Red or dark discoloration that remains after acne resolves, especially common in skin of color. While technically not a true scar, they can feel like it! Accurate diagnosis leads to more successful outcomes and avoids the trial and error that can waste both time and money. There Is No Universal 'Fix' Despite online claims, no single product or procedure treats every type of acne scar. Treatment needs to be customized based on scar type, skin tone, and individual goals. Be cautious of 'miracle' solutions or overly aggressive procedures that promise dramatic results overnight. Evidence-Based Treatments That Work Here are some of the most effective, dermatologist-approved methods: Subcision and Laser-Assisted Subcision Ideal for rolling scars, subcision involves releasing the fibrous bands beneath the skin that cause depressions. When combined with laser therapy, it also stimulates collagen for smoother skin. Microneedling With Radiofrequency This combines fine needles with thermal energy to remodel skin and improve texture. It is a preferred option for moderate scarring and has minimal downtime. TCA CROSS (Chemical Reconstruction of Skin Scars) This technique uses a high-strength acid like TCA or phenol, applied directly into ice pick scars to stimulate collagen production. It's highly targeted and effective for deep, narrow scars. Laser Resurfacing Ablative lasers like CO2 or erbium can improve skin texture and depth of scarring. Caution is advised for people with darker skin tones to reduce the risk of pigmentation issues. Topical Treatments for Pigmentation When scars leave behind discoloration, the following options can be effective: Broad-spectrum sunscreen used daily Tretinoin to increase skin turnover and collagen boosting Brightening agents such as vitamin C, niacinamide, azelaic acid, and tranexamic acid Lasers and chemical peels may also be used as a second step, once inflammation has resolved. Don't Overlook Fillers and Biostimulatory Treatments For certain types of depressed acne scars – like rolling or boxcar scars – injectables can offer fast and visible improvement. These are especially helpful when used alongside other treatments like subcision or microneedling. Here's how they work: Hyaluronic acid fillers: Add immediate volume to lift indented scars and smooth the skin's surface. Results are visible right away and can last six to 12 months. Biostimulatory injectables (like Sculptra or Radiesse): They do more than just fill. These stimulate your skin's natural collagen production for gradual, longer-lasting improvement, and they're especially useful in combination treatments. Combination therapy: This is often used after subcision to hold the skin up and prevent the scar from tethering down again. While not a permanent fix, fillers can be a powerful tool in your acne scar treatment plan, especially if you're looking for quicker wins while working on long-term skin texture. Address Active Acne First Scar treatments are only effective when active acne is controlled. Initiating scar therapy while breakouts continue can undermine results and increase the risk of complications. Begin by managing active acne to set the foundation for long-term skin health. Set Realistic Expectations While complete scar removal is unlikely, significant improvement – often 30% to 50% – is achievable. These changes can make a major difference in how the skin looks and feels, contributing to greater self-confidence and comfort. Navigating the world of acne scar treatments can be overwhelming. With an accurate diagnosis, evidence-based therapies, and a personalized approach, real and lasting improvement is possible. Rather than chasing quick fixes, focus on progress. The skin has an impressive ability to heal with the right support – and your path to smoother, more confident skin may be closer than you think.