UK's longest serving female minister leaves Senedd

The UK's longest serving female minister is leaving the Welsh Parliament next year.
Social Justice Secretary Jane Hutt, 75, has enjoyed an almost unbroken cabinet run in various roles, since powers were devolved from Westminster to Wales in 1999.
The Labour Vale of Glamorgan Senedd member has announced she will stand down from Cardiff Bay at the May 2026 election. She previously led the health and education ministries and served under six first ministers.
In a statement, Hutt said it was a difficult decision to make but she would be working as hard as ever over the next 16 months, "standing up for the Vale, for Wales and for the social justice principles and values that brought me into politics".
Labour Welsh minister's fuel payment cut warning
Ex-minister quits ahead of Wales' 2026 election
Quarter of Labour Senedd members stepping down
Hutt thanked the people of the Vale of Glamorgan for their "wonderful support, friendship and opportunities" over the last 25 years as their elected Welsh Parliament member.
She said it had been an honour and privilege to represent and serve her constituents in every part of the Vale of Glamorgan.
"I have also been very fortunate to be given the opportunity to serve in the Welsh Government over this period helping to shape and support policies and laws to meet the needs of Wales," she added.
Hutt's departure means that more than a third of the Labour Senedd group, 11 out of the 30 members, are quitting the parliament next year.
She became Welsh health minister in 1999, when Alun Michael led the first devolved government in Cardiff.
Tony Blair was two years into his spell as UK prime minister, Bill Clinton was US President and Boris Yeltsin was leading Russia.
What was then called the Millennium Stadium was about to open in the Welsh capital.
Hutt's current full title is Cabinet Secretary for Social Justice, Trefnydd [government business manager] and Chief Whip.
Her responsibilities include co-ordinating measures to increase prosperity and tackle poverty, managing Welsh government business in the Senedd and maintaining Labour members discipline in the chamber so that business gets through.
The next Senedd poll is predicted to be potentially tough for Labour, under a new voting system that will reflect more how people vote.
The Welsh Parliament will also expand from 60 to 96 members in May 2026.
The other Labour members leaving the Senedd include former first ministers Mark Drakeford and Vaughan Gething.
Ex-minister Antoniw to leave Senedd next year
Minister to quit ahead of Wales' 2026 election
Vaughan Gething says he will leave Welsh Parliament

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Washington Post

2 hours ago

• Washington Post

Unaware of the Battle of Bunker Hill, the British elite partied on

In mid-June 1775, as the combatants far away at Bunker Hill in Massachusetts counted their dead, the English elite — as yet unaware of the battle — were welcoming the summer with horse racing, cricket and perhaps some flirtation in the pleasure gardens by the Thames. With Parliament adjourned until October, the landowning classes would soon leave London for their estates. After weeks of torrid weather, the social season would end on June 23 with one last extravaganza, a regatta with half a million spectators crowding the river banks to watch the racing boats and a parade of barges. King George III would not attend because he was mourning the death of his sister, the scandalous queen of Denmark, and so the greatest eminence on show would be Frederick, Lord North, the prime minister. North would try to project cheerful serenity at a moment when in politics the mood was bleak. About the series In the lead-up to the 250th anniversary of America's independence, Post Opinions will be publishing a series of essays and letters about the nation's founding — and how the events of that era remain relevant today. Previous Next At age 43, North had been premier for five years. A master of Greek, Latin and parliamentary debate, but notoriously odd in his appearance — plump, with thick lips and bulging eyes, North described himself and his wife as 'the ugliest couple in London' — the prime minister suffered from private agonies of self-doubt. And on regatta day, the news that recently arrived from the colonies gave him every reason to worry. Story continues below advertisement Advertisement It had taken 40 days, until May 29, for the first, unofficial account of the British army's fighting rebel colonials at Lexington and Concord on April 19 to reach London. Reluctant to accept it, North waited for confirmation from Gen. Thomas Gage, the British commander in Boston. This came in 12 days later — and then more ships from America brought a tangle of truth and fiction. In Philadelphia, the Continental Congress had voted to create a rebel army — that was correct — but the London newspapers also carried a fake report that Boston had fallen to the insurgents. It was said that John Hancock, one of the rebel leaders, was marching on New York with 10,000 Native Americans hurrying to join him. Meanwhile, the newspaper opinion columns vilified North for being too harsh with the colonists or too mild or merely muddleheaded. North's principal opponents in Parliament were the Whigs, led by the marquess of Rockingham. Wilting in the heat at Wimbledon on Regatta Day, the marquess penned an anxious letter to his friend and ally, the Irish orator Edmund Burke. 'All things seem in suspense,' he wrote. In March, Burke had mustered almost 80 members of the House of Commons to vote for peace with the colonies, only to be overwhelmed by North's majority. Now, Rockingham could see what was unfolding in America. 'The whole of the continent is enraged,' he told Burke, 'and united in the determination of resistance.' North was being driven to the same conclusion: The insurrection he hoped to confine to New England had spread far beyond it, as from New York to Savannah royal governors and their deputies were forced to abandon their posts. In 1774, he had passed laws to close the port of Boston, end democracy in Massachusetts and intimidate the other colonies into obedience. More treason followed. Then, Parliament declared that Massachusetts was in rebellion and Gage ordered his troops to Concord, with disastrous results. Story continues below advertisement Advertisement North had also pinned his hopes on a scheme he called his 'Conciliatory Proposition.' Each colony would have to pay for its share of imperial defense and administration and, in return, Parliament would refrain from directly taxing them. Now this policy failed, too, as one by one the colonies rejected North's new deal. Their refusal to accept North's offer became known in London in the weeks before the regatta, and this — coupled with reports of the fighting near Boston — led to four meetings of North's cabinet to concoct a new strategy. They saw no reason yet to panic. The British economy was strong and the public finances robust, after many years of budget surpluses. The old enemy, the French, were beset by famine that brought rioters to Versailles. Elsewhere, Russia had defeated Turkey, seizing Crimea, and with Austria and Prussia it had carved Poland into slices. With Europe at peace, the British could take their time to subdue the colonies. The key to America lay, the cabinet believed, in the Hudson Valley. So long as the British still controlled their chain of forts along the Hudson, they could split the colonies in two and keep the rebels at bay. North climbed aboard his barge on Regatta Day believing the Hudson was securely held. Story continues below advertisement Advertisement As if conspiring with the Americans, the London weather soured. Wind and rain wrecked the parade of barges and at the regatta ball in Chelsea afterward, the wine ran out and the food was cold. The prime minister was glimpsed looking drenched and disheveled, and Lady North's silks were ruined, details mocked in the press. Worse was to come. The following morning, June 24, the newspapers revealed that Britain's Hudson Valley strategy had collapsed. The previous month, they said, the rebels had taken the river bastions Forts Ticonderoga and Crown Point. News of Bunker Hill — a British victory, but a costly one — would not arrive for four more weeks, and when it did, the British would realize that now they faced a foreign war for which they were unprepared. Hesitantly, they began to gather their forces for what might be a decisive struggle in 1776.

Miami Herald

7 hours ago

• Miami Herald

Oil prices climb moderately after US bombs Iran

Oil prices rose moderately as the market opened Sunday evening, a sign that traders are concerned, though not panicked, about how Iran may respond to the U.S. bombing of its nuclear facilities over the weekend. The increase of around 3% left U.S. oil prices hovering around $76 a barrel. That is notably higher than prices were two weeks ago, before Israel struck Iran, but still tame by recent standards. So far, the conflict between Israel and Iran has damaged oil and gas facilities in both countries, but it has not meaningfully affected the flow of energy. The big question is whether Iran will seek to change that. If it were to disrupt the flow of oil and natural gas in the Persian Gulf region, the economic toll would be steep, including for Iran. That is because a large portion of the world's oil and liquefied natural gas, or LNG, passes through the Strait of Hormuz, a waterway that hugs a portion of Iran's southern border. Newsweek reported that the Iranian Parliament on Sunday voted in support of closing the strait, according to media reports. Any final decision on retaliation, however, will rest with the country's Supreme National Security Council and leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The parliament vote merely advises him of the option to pursue. Another risk is if Iran were to attack U.S. military bases in the Middle East. 'If Iran follows through on threats to retaliate against U.S. forces in the region, traders might finally -- after more than three years of geopolitical 'wolf' cries -- price in escalatory pathways that previously seemed far-fetched,' ClearView Energy Partners, a Washington research firm, wrote after the United States bombed Iran. The war is already increasing energy costs for consumers in the United States. The price of a gallon of regular gasoline climbed nearly 3% last week, to $3.22, according to the AAA motor club. This time last year, the price was $3.45 a gallon. Prices at the pump generally lag oil prices. Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, said Sunday that Iran would respond in 'self-defense' but declined to explain what that might entail. Iran would have a hard time closing the Strait of Hormuz for a long time, but the country could make passing through it more treacherous, analysts have said. 'Multiple security experts contend that Iran has the ability to strike individual tankers and key ports with missiles and mines,' RBC Capital Markets analysts wrote Sunday. Last week, two oil tankers collided near the strait as many vessels reported experiencing interference with their GPS systems. The United Arab Emirates attributed the crash to navigational errors. Around a fifth of the world's oil and related products flows through the Strait of Hormuz each day, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. A similar share of LNG, or natural gas that has been cooled for shipment, also makes the journey. More than 80% of those fuels go to Asia, meaning those countries would be severely affected by any closing, the energy administration said. The United States and other countries would feel the effects in the form of higher energy costs. Vice President JD Vance said Sunday morning that disrupting shipping in the Strait of Hormuz would be 'suicidal' for Iran. 'What would make sense is for them to come to the negotiating table to actually give up their nuclear weapons program over the long term,' he said on the NBC program 'Meet the Press.' Secretary of State Marco Rubio also warned Iran against closing the strait. 'If they do that, it will be another terrible mistake,' Rubio told Fox News on Sunday. 'It would hurt other countries' economies a lot worse than ours. It would be, I think, a massive escalation that would have merit a response, not just by us, but from others.' Shipping on high alert in Middle East The shipping industry was placed on high alert on Sunday with warnings that Tehran could retaliate against commercial vessels following after U.S. airstrikes against Iran's nuclear facilities. Greece cautioned its ship owners to think again if considering entering the Persian Gulf in the wake of U.S. airstrikes. Vessels planning to sail through the Strait of Hormuz, the waterway that sits at the mouth of the region, should 'reassess passage' until the situation normalizes, according to a circular, seen by Bloomberg that its shipping ministry sent to vessel owners. It advised waiting in nearby safe ports. Naval forces in the area warned that ships, especially U.S.-linked ones, could be at heightened risk. The actions of the maritime industry — and its risk tolerance — will be a critical detail in the wake of the strikes because of Iran's proximity to the Strait of Hormuz. Athens' warning is the latest sign of pressure on shipping markets as attacks on Iran escalate. Tanker earnings already soared by almost 90% since Israel first started conducting airstrikes on June 13. As one of the world's largest ship-owning nations, Greece and its advice to vessel owners would have a major impact on commodity transportation markets, especially oil. There's every chance the advice will be ignored because the Persian Gulf is too important a region for shipowners to avoid and rates can always rise to compensate for the risk of sailing in the region. Shipowners that do decide to transit Hormuz should adopt the highest security level available and maintain the maximum possible distance from Iranian waters, Greece's ministry added. In Sunday's notice, the Greek ministry cited concern around a possible closure of Hormuz as a reason behind its message. Officials at three Greek tanker companies said they were still assessing the situation. One did indicate he might still allow his tankers to enter the region, while another said their ships would likely stay away. Calls and emails to the ministry weren't immediately responded to outside usual working hours. Naval groups are also warning of greater risk. On Sunday, the Joint Maritime Information Center, a liaison between navies and merchant shipping in the region, said that the U.S. airstrikes mean U.S.-linked ships sailing through the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden face a high risk of attack. Yemen's Houthi rebel group issued fresh threats against U.S. commercial and naval ships earlier in the day. There had been a ceasefire between the U.S. and the Houthis in early May, geared toward limiting the group's attacks on the U.S. navy. U.S.-linked ships should consider rerouting, the JMIC said in its update. Separately, the European Union's naval force in the region raised its threat assessment for U.S.-linked vessels as a result of the strikes. It now sees a severe threat to ships linked to the U.S. and Israel and a low risk for all other ships. 'This does not exclude the possibility of all merchant vessels being targeted in the future,' it said in an update published by France's MICA Center, which helps coordinate global maritime security. Bloomberg News and dpa contributed to this report. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Copyright 2025

Yahoo

8 hours ago

• Yahoo

Strait of Hormuz becomes flash point in US-Iran conflict

The Iranian Parliament on Sunday approved a measure to close the Strait of Hormuz after the United States bombed three nuclear sites in Iran. The strait, located between Iran and Oman, remains a critical oil choke point, and closing it could have serious implications for both the global and U.S. economy. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, in several Sunday interviews, warned against shutting down the strait, calling the move 'suicidal' for the regime. Rubio also called on China — Iran's most crucial oil customer — to encourage the country against shutting it down. 'I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them about that, because they heavily depend on the Straits of Hormuz for their oil,' Rubio said on Fox News's 'Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo.' Live updates: US bombs cause 'severe damage' in Iran; UN chief calls action 'perilous' Iran's Supreme National Security Council will ultimately decide on the move. The threat to block the narrow waterway comes in response to U.S. strikes on three nuclear sites in Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow, the last of which is located inside a mountain. The Trump administration has argued the strikes, dubbed Operation Midnight Hammer, were a monumental success. But it is unclear how much the sites were damaged or how much the attack set back Iran's nuclear program. The Strait of Hormuz's width and depth allow it to handle the world's largest crude oil tankers, and very few alternatives exist if it is closed, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Approximately 20 million barrels, or 20 percent of global consumption, flowed through the strait in 2024. More than 80 percent of the crude oil and natural gas that passed through the Strait of Hormuz in 2024 was destined for Asian markets, with China, India, Japan and South Korea being the top recipients. These countries would likely be the most affected by any closure. But the U.S. market would also feel some impact if the strait were disrupted. The U.S. has been buying less oil from the Persian Gulf — importing about 532,000 barrels per day in 2024, according to the EIA. Still, consumers are businesses are still likely to see increased prices, given that oil is traded globally. And it could take months for U.S. oil companies to drill more to compensate for those increased prices, The New York Times reports. Oil prices in the past month increased due to the escalating Israel-Iran conflict, and these are estimated to climb further if Iran blocks the strait. Experts have said they estimate oil prices could increase from $73 per barrel up to $120 per barrel if tankers are blocked. 'If we see any throttling back of the Strait of Hormuz, we'll see a massive increase in the price of oil, and that will impact everything in the U.S.,' Ramanan Krishnamoorti, a professor of petroleum engineering at the University of Houston, told ABC News this month. Iran has previously seized or interfered with tankers during heightened political tensions, according to the Times. While Iran's Supreme National Security Council has yet to make a decision, some experts are skeptical that the country will actually close down the Strait of Hormuz. Experts say the move would likely lead to a near-immediate response from the U.S., and it would be self-defeating to Iran's own market. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.