Who died in the OceanGate Titan submersible disaster? A look at the victims

Who died in the OceanGate Titan submersible disaster? A look at the victims OceanGate, in a statement at the time, had described the victims as "true explorers who shared a distinct spirit of adventure, and a deep passion for exploring and protecting the world's oceans."
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Newly released footage captures sound of Titan submersible imploding
Newly released video appeared to capture the sound of the Titan submersible imploding on its way to visit the Titanic wreck in June 2023.
On the second anniversary of the ill-fated Titan submersible, the tragic incident is back in the spotlight, courtesy of a Netflix documentary that takes an in-depth look at the implosion that left five men dead.
"Titan: The OceanGate Disaster" dropped on Netflix on June 11, just seven days before the two-year marker, and it "examines OceanGate CEO Stockton Rush, his quest to become the next billionaire innovator and the doomed underwater endeavor that forced the world to reconsider the price of ambition in the depths of the ocean," according to the new feature-length documentary's synopsis.
The Titanic-visiting vehicle imploded two miles below sea level on June 18, 2023, about one hour and 45 minutes into the voyage. Its wreckage was found on the ocean floor about 330 yards off the bow of the Titanic. All five people aboard were killed.
The Coast Guard is still investigating the cause of the implosion and is expected to release a final report. A series of hearings were held in 2024 as part of the investigation, and a lawsuit has been filed by the family of French maritime and Titanic expert, Paul-Henri Nargeolet, claiming all five passengers probably experienced "terror and anguish" in their final moments.
OceanGate, in a statement at the time, had described the victims as "true explorers who shared a distinct spirit of adventure, and a deep passion for exploring and protecting the world's oceans."
As the Netflix documentary premieres, here's what to know about the victims of the submersible.
Stockton Rush
Stockton Rush, 61, was the CEO of OceanGate, which he founded in 2009 and oversaw financial and engineering strategies, according to the company's website, which was taken down in the wake of the fatal implosion, USA TODAY previously reported. Rush was the pilot of the Titan submersible at the time of the disaster.
He was also the co-founder of OceanGate Foundation, a non-profit organization, "which aims to catalyze emerging marine technology to further discoveries in marine science, history, and archaeology," according to the company's website.
Rush, who held degrees from Princeton University and the University of California, Berkeley, had an adventurous spirit, per his obituary in the New York Times. He also told Fast Company in 2017 that he "wanted to be the first person on Mars.'
Rush was a member of a prominent family in San Francisco and a descendant of two signers of the Declaration of Independence, according to SFGate.
The outlet reported that he was working as an aerospace engineer for McDonnell Douglas when he married his wife, Wendy, in 1986. His wife is the descendant of retailing magnate Isidor Straus and his wife, Ida, two of the wealthiest people to die aboard the Titanic, according to the New York Times.
Who was Stockton Rush? OceanGate CEO focus of Titan implosion documentary
Hamish Harding
Hamish Harding, a British billionaire explorer who was chairman of Action Aviation, a global sales company in business aviation.
Harding, 58, was a flying enthusiast who had been to space and held three Guinness World Records related to his explorations by plane and into the deep ocean.
Harding's family, in a statement, described him as a dedicated father of two and a 'living legend' who loved to explore and push the boundaries of what was possible. The businessman also went on many adventures with his son, Giles, who at 12 became the youngest person to make a trip to the South Pole.
Harding is survived by his wife, Linda Harding, with whom he had four children, according to The Independent.
Paul-Henry Nargeolet
Paul-Henry Nargeolet, 77, a French maritime and Titanic expert, was director of Underwater Research for E/M Group and RMS Titanic, Inc. He successfully dived in a submersible to the site of the Titanic wreckage 37 times and "supervised the recovery of 5,000 artifacts," according to EMGroup's website, which also says he's "widely considered the leading authority on the wreck site."
A French Navy veteran who served as a submarine pilot, mine-clearing diver and deep-sea diver, Nargeolet is survived by his wife, Anne Sarraz-Bournet; two daughters, a son, a stepson and four grandsons, according to his New York Times obituary. His wife, Michele Marsh, an Emmy Award-winning newscaster in New York, died in 2017 of complications from breast cancer, per the outlet.
Shahzada Dawood
Shahzada Dawood, 48, hailed from one of Pakistan's wealthiest families and served on the board of trustees for the Dawood Foundation, an education nonprofit based in Pakistan, according to the World Economic Forum. He was also on the board of the SETI Institute, a non-profit research organization, as well as serving as vice chairman on the board of Pakistani Engro Corporation.
Dawood is survived by a daughter, Alina, and his wife, Christine.
Suleman Dawood
Shahzada Dawood's son, Suleman Dawood, 19, loved science fiction, solving Rubik's Cubes and playing volleyball, the New York Times reported.
He was a business student at the University of Strathclyde in Glasgow and had planned to join his father in working for Engro after graduating from college, his obituary read, per TODAY.com.
'The relationship between Shahzada and Suleman was a joy to behold; they were each other's greatest supporters and cherished a shared passion for adventure and exploration of all the world had to offer them,' the Dawood family said in a statement, per the New York Times.
Contributing: Jeanine Santucci, Isabelle Butera, Javier Zarracina, Janet Loehrke, Grace Hauck, Kayla Jimenez / USA TODAY
Saman Shafiq is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Reach her at sshafiq@gannett.com and follow her on X and Instagram @saman_shafiq7.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Los Angeles Times

a day ago

• Los Angeles Times

After my marriage fell apart, darkness got to me. Then I was catfished

'You don't revere me anymore.' The words rolled off my tongue at my husband, who had been acting strangely for a few days. 'Revere?' he said with such distaste that it stunned me. Then I did what any wife married for 23 years might do: I read his emails. I wanted the truth. 'All she does is spend money!' screamed up at me from the computer screen. I wasn't in love with my husband anymore. I did still love him and had planned to sacrifice my happiness to make sure he was taken care of until the end. Then he betrayed me and let me off the hook. He didn't cheat. He talked behind my back in ways that I felt dishonored me. Imagine reading your husband's emails (I'm not perfect) and finding long conversations between him and his daughter about you. This from the man you've been with for 25 years! I suppose I knew this day would come. Money was always the bane of our relationship. My husband would not have initiated divorce because it would have cost him too much. Did I spend? Yes, I suppose, but only to improve our home in Culver City, give us a luscious yard and a new paved driveway. And that's not to mention all the trips we took to fascinating places. I had done a lot for him. Surprised him with a bar mitzvah in Jerusalem, brought his 'mathematical art' to life through art shows and social media and planned our busy social schedule. I moved to the Pico-Robertson area to be close to my niece and her three kids. Darkness consumed me, but my face was masked with perpetual smiles. How do you begin again at 71? Friends tried to guide me to dating sites, but I wasn't ready. I took refuge in my apartment with my dog, Murray, who kept me alive through the COVID-19 pandemic, depression and divorce. My life consisted of walking the dog, writing children's books and binge-watching Netflix nightly. Once the divorce was over, loneliness won out. I moved to a new city an hour outside of L.A. Male attention came from a 31-year-old gardener who brought me flowers every Tuesday. 'I'm old enough to be your grandmother,' I said. I was feeling the need for male energy, but not with this young man. So I turned to online dating. I scrolled down the list of all my likes on a dating site. One man caught my eye. He was Jewish, intelligent and had a dog named Erik. I sent him a like back. 'Can you give me your number so we can text?' he asked. What could it hurt? The next two weeks were a whirlwind. We were in a textationship. I felt so high I stopped eating. I lost six pounds in three days. Jay enchanted me with all the romantic things that he was going to do for me. He sent me love songs. I wasn't just beautiful; I was extremely beautiful and I shouldn't worry about being overweight, he told me. He wanted a soulmate and convinced me that we were meant to be. Blown away by our connection, we both realized bashert (or fate) had won out. I was the happiest I had been in many years. Finally something was going to come easy for me. But I wasn't naive. Red flags started to pop up. Jay and I had barely spoken on the phone when he told me that he had to be in Washington, D.C. for three weeks to work on a military base. He wouldn't be able to video chat, and if he did, he could get fired. On a Friday morning, two weeks into our relationship, I texted, 'I'm sorry, but I can't invest anymore into this relationship until I see you.' He asked if I could Skype. (Oh, remember Skype?) Red flag. Why not FaceTime? I waited all day Saturday for him to call. Nothing. On Sunday morning, I blocked him on my phone. Murray and I headed to the ocean. On Monday, unable to text me, he emailed. Hope reared its head again. 'How can you give up all we shared together?' he asked. 'I so want you to be true, Jay, but I still need to see your face,' I replied. At 7 a.m. Monday, he called. In bed with no makeup on, we met on Google Meet. I loved the face on his profile, but I didn't think this face was the same one I saw on-screen. I asked him why he said he was a New York native on his profile when I knew he grew up in Sweden. He shrugged it off as a small embellishment. I fake smiled and asked him to say something to me in Swedish. He mumbled something that meant 'bright day.' My intuition was on fire. The guy had to be a liar. Was he grooming me to ask for money? Was he trying to feel important? Did he want to inflict harm? Later that day, he sent me an email. 'I told you I couldn't talk on video and that I'd be home soon enough, and we could be together. Now, they've found out that I made a video call and I could get fired. I'm not sure this was worth it. I'm angry you didn't believe me.' (He allegedly did secret work as an engineer for the Department of Defense.) I texted back: 'Goodbye, Jay.' 'Wow, goodbye,' he answered. I could've gone back into depression, but I was already out. I felt empowered. Catfished or not, I have to thank Jay — or whatever his name really is. He put the pep back in my step even if he didn't mean a word of it. Through the ping-pong of our conversations, my darkness ceased to be. I realized that I was capable of feeling again. Whatever it was that we meant to each other, Mr. Catfish managed to give me the very thing I was missing: Hope. The author is an actor, writer and producer living in Southern California with her dog Murray. L.A. Affairs chronicles the search for romantic love in all its glorious expressions in the L.A. area, and we want to hear your true story. We pay $400 for a published essay. Email LAAffairs@ You can find submission guidelines here. You can find past columns here.

Cosmopolitan

2 days ago

• Cosmopolitan

Grenfell Tower now: finally, after eight years the government has announced new plans for the site

Eight years after a tragic fire broke out claiming the lives of 72 people, Grenfell Tower still stands in North Kensington, the fire-damaged building is as a stark reminder of the 72 people who were killed in the blaze eight years ago. Now, a new Netflix documentary has gone into granular detail about the fire, with Grenfell: Uncovered looking into the factors that led to the fateful event on 14 June. It took 60 hours for the fire to be fully extinguished. While the main building itself is made of concrete, the building's exterior was clad in aluminium composite material (ACM) with polyethylene (PE) at its core. PE is highly flammable, which led to the quick spread of the fire. The building is now badly damaged, with a 2020 report saying some of the disrepair to the upper levels of the tower had been exacerbated by the weather conditions. In 2018, in the run-up to the first anniversary, the top few floors of the tower had a sign added; a large green heart, which has come to be representative of Grenfell, as well as the statement: Grenfell: Forever in Our Hearts However, the government has since announced new plans for the tower block – which have not necessarily been warmly received by survivors or by those who lost loved ones in the fire. Cosmopolitan UK speaks to Jackie and Bernie Bernard, who lost their brother Ray to the Grenfell fire, as well as Grenfell: Uncovered documentary maker Olaide Sadiq, about future plans for Grenfell. In February this year, Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner confirmed plans to demolish Grenfell Tower. In a statement, the government said they had consulted independent expert advice, with engineers advising 'it is not practicable to retain many of the floors of the building in place as part of a memorial that must last in perpetuity'. Because of this, the Deputy Prime Minister has concluded ' that it would not be fair to keep some floors of the building that are significant to some families, whilst not being able to do so for others'. It will now take two years for the tower to be deconstructed, with the government saying this will be done in a 'careful and sensitive way'. However, this has not been welcomed by everyone in the community. Speaking to Cosmopolitan UK, Bernie explained: 'Personally, I think it's an insult. 'I think everybody understands the tower has to come down, but it doesn't have to come down to ground level. 'I'm saying is at least keep the main reception intact so that we have a place where we can go to grieve the people that were cremated in that building. The plans aren't something the bereaved have welcomed.' Olaide Sadiq, who attended the most recent Grenfell memorial earlier this month, agreed the mood was sombre amongst those who are part of the community. 'I think there was a there was a large shock within the community when they decided that's what they were doing with the tower,' she tells Cosmopolitan UK. 'While making the documentary, a lot of our contributors told us they go to the tower regularly. It's a second grave site for them for when they want to pay their respects to people they've lost. 'There's an understanding that perhaps the building can't remain 24 storeys high, but when the tower is brought down to ground level, it's gone – and if it's out of sight, it's out of mind.' A report by the Grenfell Tower Memorial Commission said construction of a permanent memorial to those affected by the Grenfell fire could begin as early as 2026. The commission, which is comprised of of representatives of the bereaved, survivors, local residents as well as two independent co-chairs, was created in order to ensure the community was at the heart of decisions on the long-term future of the site. Plans are thought to include a garden, monument and space for grieving. The commission said: "Everyone agrees that if Grenfell Tower comes down, it should be dismantled with care and respect, and in a way that honours our loved ones who were taken from us." Kimberley Bond is a Multiplatform Writer for Harper's Bazaar, focusing on the arts, culture, careers and lifestyle. She previously worked as a Features Writer for Cosmopolitan UK, and has bylines at The Telegraph, The Independent and British Vogue among countless others.

USA Today

3 days ago

• USA Today

What details have been released in the Titan submersible implosion?

What details have been released in the Titan submersible implosion? Show Caption Hide Caption What is a catastrophic implosion? What we know about Titan submersible Officials believe a "catastrophic implosion" killed the five people in a missing Titanic submersible. Here's what that means. Just the FAQs, USA TODAY Two years after its tragic end that captured the attention of the nation and the world, details continue to emerge about the OceanGate Titan submersible and its final mission. In June 2023, five people hoping to catch an up-close and personal glimpse of the Titanic shipwreck descended in a 22-foot-long, 25,000-pound submersible made of titanium and carbon fiber. The craft was designed to dive up to 13,123 feet, according to OceanGate, meaning it should have been capable of safely reaching the wreckage site 12,500 feet below the surface. About 1 hour and 45 minutes into the dive, however, contact with Titan was lost, sparking a multi-day search and rescue mission that culminated in the discovery of debris scattered about 1,600 feet from the bow of the Titanic. In the years since, ongoing investigations have unveiled new pieces of evidence, including audio and video of Titan's fateful final moments. What happened to the OceanGate Titan submersible? On June 18, 2023, OceanGate submerged its tourist submersible, Titan, in the North Atlantic Ocean on a voyage to explore the Titanic wreckage. The submersible is believed to have imploded about 1 hour and 45 minutes after its trip began, resulting in the deaths of its five passengers. Wreckage of the vessel was later found scattered across the ocean floor, 330 yards away from the bow of the Titanic, the infamous liner that sank in 1912. The U.S. Coast Guard is continuing to investigate what caused the implosion. What caused the implosion? The U.S. Coast Guard is still investigating the accident to formally determine the cause of the Titan's implosion. In the years following the disaster, however, details about the submersible's handling have captured national attention. A series of hearings held by the Coast Guard last year brought many pieces of evidence and testimony to light, from claims that Titan was being navigated using an altered gaming controller to testimony about warnings OceanGate was reportedly given about the quality and safety of the submersible before its final descent. Public consensus thus far has primarily placed blame on the experimental design of the craft, which was ultimately unable to withstand the extreme pressures of its deep-sea dive. The state of the discovered debris was "consistent with catastrophic loss of the pressure chamber," Rear Admiral John Mauger of the U.S. Coast Guard said in the days after the accident. Who died in the OceanGate Titan submersible disaster? OceanGate founder and CEO Stockton Rush, 61, was piloting the Titan submersible at the time of the disaster. He oversaw financial and engineering strategies at the company and left behind a wife and two adult children. Hamish Harding, 58, was a British billionaire explorer who was chairman of Action Aviation, a global sales company in business aviation. He is survived by his wife and four children. A look at the victims: Who died in the OceanGate Titan submersible disaster? Paul-Henry Nargeolet, 77, was a French Navy veteran, maritime and Titanic expert and director of Underwater Research for E/M Group and RMS Titanic, Inc. He is survived by his wife, three children, stepson and grandchildren. Shahzada Dawood, 48, hailed from one of Pakistan's wealthiest families and served on the board of trustees for the Dawood Foundation, an education nonprofit based in Pakistan. Dawood is survived by a wife and daughter. Shahzada Dawood's son, Suleman Dawood, 19, was a business student at the University of Strathclyde in Glasgow and had planned to join his father in working for Engro after graduating from college. Newly released footage captured moment of implosion In the wake of the Coast Gaurd hearings, a lawsuit filed by the family of one of the victims and the release of two documentaries, the BBC's "Implosion: The Titanic Sub Disaster" and Netflix's "Titan: The OceanGate Disaster," additional, sometimes sordid details, have emerged in the two years since the accident. Recently, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and U.S. Coast Guard released a 23-second-long clip in February that reportedly captured the moment of implosion. Officials called the static, followed by a boom and then silence, the "suspected acoustic signature" of the implosion. Listen: New audio of Titan submersible moments before implosion The Coast Guard has released new audio of Titan submersible's final moments before implosion. The sounds were recorded by a monitor moored approximately 900 miles from the Titan's implosion site, according to the U.S. Coast Guard. Additional footage provided to the Coast Guard by OceanGate showed the moment from the perspective of the submersible's tracking and communications team, which included Wendy Rush, CEO Stockton Rush's wife. In the clip, the team is seen monitoring data and text communications. With about 400 meters to go, a muffled thump can be heard from the Titan, prompting Rush to ask, "What was that bang?" Newly released footage captures sound of Titan submersible imploding Newly released video appeared to capture the sound of the Titan submersible imploding on its way to visit the Titanic wreck in June 2023. That sound, the Coast Guard said, "later correlated with the loss of communication and tracking," and "is believed to be the sound of the Titan's implosion reaching the surface of the ocean." The Coast Guard has yet to release the findings of its investigation. However, the hearings revealed the eerie final messages sent from the crew before it was crushed by the pressure of the ocean: "All good here." Contributing: Saman Shafiq, Elizabeth Weise, USA TODAY