Iran's brutal regime is facing a reckoning. Consequences of US attack will go beyond Tehran
This attack comes on top of the defanging of Iran's other strategic instrument, its regional terrorist proxies such as Hezbollah and Hamas. The Houthis are still standing, even if much weakened. Its other supporters in Lebanon have been weakened; Bashar al-Assad, its Syrian dictator ally, is now sitting in Moscow, having managed to flee the country with barely the clothes on his back a few months ago.
The US reportedly dropped six GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) bunker-busting bombs on the Fordow nuclear facility, which is buried beneath a mountain. These attacks have, at the very least, set back the Iranian nuclear weapons programme considerably. The fear of opponents of such military action against the programme – that this would simply hasten an Iranian nuclear bomb – does not seem to understand that the programme is now severely degraded and incapable of delivering a weapon at this point.
Iran's Islamic regime, which has terrorised the region and its own population for decades, is finally facing a reckoning. Its nuclear programme, one of the two tools it has used in its terrorist strategy, may well have been destroyed now. Parts of it were already bombed by Israel. But its most secure sites – Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan – have now been hit by the United States.
Iran risked a fight
Iran has been making threats, seeking to deter others simply through its capacity for reckless behaviour, despite its weakness in other ways. Its economy is not in good shape despite its oil wealth, and its military is not particularly effective because the regime focuses more on covert forces.
But terrorist strategies can only get you so far. Over time, others can figure out ways to work around your threats or prepare themselves so that they can escalate to deter. That is what Israel, in particular, has done. It has effectively neutered both Hezbollah and Hamas, picking off its leaders and cadre in highly effective direct and indirect operations that were breathtaking in their audacity and meticulous in their execution.
Iran has been risking this fight for a long time, repeatedly attacking the US and Israel and their partners. Iran has been an expansionist power in the region, creating instability by building up covert forces from Lebanon in the Mediterranean to Yemen in the Arabian Sea. None of this was necessary.
It was not necessary for Iranian security, except in the broadest definition of national security—which equates it with control over the entire region. The country had little reason to fight with either Israel or the US, neither of which was a threat to Iran or even the regime. Nevertheless, Iran picked this fight, and it is now paying the price.
Also read: To be or not to be? Trump's next call on Iran-Israel conflict will reshape West Asia
On the losing end
There is no way that Iran can win this fight. Prudence would dictate that Tehran take a deep breath and reassess its choices. It did this to some extent after the US killed the commander of the Quds force, Qasem Soleimani, in 2020. Whether the country will act prudently now that its bluff has been called remains to be seen.
If Iran doesn't take a step back to reevaluate, there will be further US action, which could lead to a regime change in Tehran. There was already an argument for this—that as long as the current Islamist regime continues in power, it could attempt to reconstitute the nuclear weapons programme. The only way to ensure the programme ends is by changing the rulers who want the weapons. But the US, and Trump in particular, do not appear keen on this as they know the risks associated with such goals. America seems intent on halting military operations, now that it has achieved its ends in large measure.
Tehran's response is critical because further imprudence will lead to its end. While the demise of this brutal regime is an outcome that is much to be desired, it will also likely come at great cost to innocent Iranians who have already been suffering under its yoke. And of course, others in the region will also bear the repercussions.
Also read: No country can stop Israel-Iran war now. For Netanyahu & Khamenei, it's a zero-sum game
Consequences beyond Tehran
The US attack on Iran will have consequences beyond Iran and the West Asian region—such as on domestic politics in the US. It could splinter Trump's MAGA (Make America Great Again) coalition. Even before this attack, there were some clear breaks with anti-Israel and anti-Semitic sections of MAGA criticising various supporters of Israel, or arguments favouring US attacks on Iran. That argument had never directly targeted Trump. The question is whether that will change or whether MAGA will be whatever Trump says it is.
Internationally, this will be at least partially good news for Ukraine. Iran has been supporting Russia by supplying it with drones that kill Ukrainian civilians. While this attack might not directly affect the supply of drones to Russia—because Russia has also built drone factories within its territory now—it will still be satisfying for Kyiv to see Moscow's allies get their comeuppance.
Trump's action could also send a message to China. The US president recently said that nobody can predict his behaviour as he doesn't decide what to do until the last minute. He is correct, since he often doesn't know what he wants to do, and has no philosophical perspective beyond childish grievances and venality to guide him. But this means that if China was hoping that Trump would stand aside if it invades Taiwan, it will now be much more uncertain.
A key distinction, of course, is that China has real material capability. In other words, it doesn't depend on threats alone, though threats are part of the strategic equation. If threats don't work, Beijing can actually undertake military action. Of course, a high-intensity war, with the world's most powerful military, is a task fraught with uncertainty.
Will Xi Jinping be willing to undertake such a risky strategy? It's difficult to predict the Chinese president's actions, especially because he is not very strategic or prudent in his behaviour. But it is fair to say that Trump's action will give him a pause.
Some American scholars are always eager to condemn the US military's over-extension and lack of prudence. They are sometimes even right. But such criticisms are rarely raised about other powers, including regional ones. They need to recognise this is a problem that afflicts many types of states and regimes. Iran is a good example. If China invades Taiwan, that would be another example of imprudence and over-expansion being a wider phenomenon.
Rajesh Rajagopalan is a professor of International Politics at Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), New Delhi. He tweets @RRajagopalanJNU. Views are personal.
(Edited by Zoya Bhatti)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
16 minutes ago
- Mint
Iran-Israel War: US strikes against Iran not aimed at regime change: Pentagon chief
Iran-Israel War: US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said on Sunday that the country's military strikes on Iran's nuclear sites were not meant for regime change plans. The US has sent private messages to Tehran before the strikes, encouraging them to negotiate, Hegseth said. Hegseth also warned Iran against retaliation against the United States, and said US forces were postured to defend themselves, and take action if needed. "This mission was not and has not been about regime change," Hegseth told reporters at the Pentagon. The president authorised a precision operation to neutralise the threats to our national interests posed by the Iranian nuclear program, he said. The United States military struck three sites in Iran on Sunday, marking its official entry into the Israel-Iran war that started about a week ago. President Donald Trump was the first to disclose the strikes. Speaking from the White House after the strikes, President Trump dubbed Iran "the bully of the Middle East" and warned that the Islamic Republic 'must now make peace.' In what has now been called Operation 'Midnight Hammer', the US strikes included 14 bunker-buster bombs, more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles and over 125 military aircraft. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff US General Dan Cane said at the briefing that initial battle damage assessments indicated that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction, but he declined to speculate whether any Iranian nuclear capabilities might still be intact. The operation pushes the Middle East to the brink of a major new conflagration in a region already aflame for more than 20 months with wars in Gaza and Lebanon and a toppled regime under President Bashar al-Asad in Syria. Soon after the US strikes, Tehran responded with a volley of missiles at Israel that wounded scores of people and destroyed buildings in its commercial hub Tel Aviv. Iran's Supreme National Security Council is weighing a decision to close the Strait of Hormuz, a vital global energy chokepoint, in response to US military strikes. The move, if approved, would escalate tensions in the region and risk disrupting nearly 20 per cent of the world's oil and gas shipments. The Strait of Hormuz is a strait between the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman. It provides the only sea passage from the Persian Gulf to the open ocean and is one of the world's most strategically important choke points. The Strait serves as the primary export route for Gulf producers such as Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Iraq, and Kuwait. Caine said at the Pentagon briefing that the US military had increased protection of troops in the region, including in Iraq and Syria. This mission was not and has not been about regime change.
News18
16 minutes ago
- News18
Iranians Must Reverse Their History For Redemption
Iranians have never been themselves since they ceased to be Persians, but it's never too late to reverse history. Now is the time On June 18, Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, issued a stark warning to the United States, declaring, 'Iran will never surrender". He said any American intervention in the ongoing Israel-Iran conflict would result in 'irreparable damage". He further vowed that Israel would face punishment, marking the sixth day of an unprecedented aerial war that has claimed hundreds of lives and targeted critical infrastructure across Iran. Indeed, Iran is proving no mean force in the conflict, as Tel Aviv, ravaged by Iranian missiles, bears witness to. Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), forged in the Iran-Iraq War (1980–1988), may be weakened but not eradicated. The defiant Iranian stance comes amid escalating tensions in West Asia, fuelled by inflammatory remarks from US President Donald Trump and Israel's initiation of a relentless bombing campaign, including strikes on Tehran's nuclear and military facilities. As Israel targets a generation tied to the 1979 revolution, it needs to be seen whether resident Iranians would turn pro-US, as the Iranian diaspora has. Does Khamenei's tough talk echo a broader narrative about the resilience of his nation and its people? Nations are fundamentally defined by their natives, some of whom possess an indomitable spirit that defies defeat, even if they cannot always be ruled. Do Iranians have it in them? Certain peoples of certain lands cannot be defeated, only ruled with difficulty, as evident in Iran's current defiance amid extreme adversity. Russians, for example, fight like they play football — no great technique but brute force and sheer tenacity. The more they get killed, the more soldiers they send to the battlefield, as Stalingrad witnessed towards the end of WWII! Afghans and some Africans can be defeated but not ruled over. They will stay as anarchic as they have always been, whether under democracy, communism, monarchy or dictatorship. It's the essential culture that cannot be defeated in India. Even under some foreign influence, its basic Hindu nature cannot be obliterated. Is the Iranian mind similarly shaped? One is not sure. On the one hand, the Iranian diaspora is longing for assimilation with American society, their four-decade-old home. On the other, the world hardly gets to hear voices from resident Iranians, but have they been any better? IRANIANS HAVE HISTORICALLY BEEN GULLIBLE Iran's history offers a complex backdrop to the question. Once the heart of the Persian Empire and a bastion of Zoroastrianism under the Sasanian Empire (224–651 CE), Iran underwent a profound transformation following the Arab Muslim invasion in 651 CE. The rise of Islam led to a steep decline in Zoroastrian followers, with their numbers dwindling to between 15,000 and 25,000 by 2012 in a population exceeding 82 million. The imposition of the jizyah tax and restrictive dhimmī laws under the Abbasids forced many Zoroastrians to convert or flee and seek refuge in India. This historical shift marked the beginning of Iran's transition from Persia to an Islamic identity, a change that was accelerated by foreign influences rather than an organic evolution. The 20th century brought further upheaval. The Pahlavi dynasty, particularly under Mohammad Reza Shah, sought to revive Iran's pre-Islamic heritage, valuing Zoroastrian contributions and enacting reforms to elevate minority status. However, the 1979 Islamic Revolution, led by Khomeini — backed by the CIA that went to the extent of hiring Saddam Hussein to assassinate the Shah, an attempt that failed — reversed these efforts, establishing a theocratic regime that suppressed secular and pre-Islamic traditions. This 'revolution' saw many Iranians — much like Kashmiri Pandits from the Kashmir valley since the reign of Sikandar Shah Miri (alias Butshikan) — flee abroad, diluting their cultural practices in diaspora. A contemporary dimension of this identity struggle must be highlighted: The role of US intervention. Recent protests, such as those sparked by Mahsa Amini's death in 2022 over the mandatory hijab law, were amplified by Western media and the Pentagon's propaganda machine as a ploy to undermine Iran's theocracy. While these protests symbolised resistance — women burning hijabs and cutting their hair in public — they subsided perhaps when the US deemed the ploy insufficient to topple the regime. Washington must be asked why it stopped echoing the voices of 'suppressed' Iranian women? Has the mission to free them been accomplished? Contrary to the media narrative, Iranian women are among the 'free-est" in the Islamic world, with minimal police action against hijab violations in rural areas, challenging the narrative pushed by some US-based Iranians who celebrate Israeli attacks. IRAN MUST TURN AROUND Drawing parallels with the tenacity of Russians, the anarchic resilience of Afghans and the enduring Hindu essence of Indian culture, a critical question must be raised about Iranians: Are they as resolute? Why did the people of Iran lose their pre-Islamic Persian identity, for example, not resisting the Abbasid invaders? If, today, some Iranian-Americans are praying for an end to the Islamic regime, have they forgotten that the country they are domiciled in now is the country that had orchestrated the fall of the Shah and replaced the secular leader with Ayatollah Khomeini in 1977-79? Are the Iranians destined to remain pawns in a geopolitical chess game forever? Will this pattern of foreign exploitation, where Iran's internal dissent is co-opted for geopolitical gain, reverse now, even after the dismantling of Iran's proxies, such as Hezbollah and the Assad regime in Syria, which has left Tehran vulnerable? Will the historically non-existent resilience of Iranians prove a wildcard? Iran's future hinges on its people's ability to reconcile their Persian and Islamic identities. To whatever extent the Mahsa Amini protests were true, external manipulation notwithstanding, it reflected a genuine yearning for freedom, aligning with a broader rejection of theocratic rule. The caveat that must be issued here is that US-backed regime changes warn against external solutions. Look at the pattern of American interventions wherever they succeeded: The US 'lost' Vietnam which was, thus, spared the horror. One of the worst students of the respective sociologies of other nations, the Americans have always left a nation-state they interfered in worse off when they left. Iran's liberation, if it comes, must depend on an internal awakening, drawing on its Zoroastrian and Persian roots, much like India's enduring Hindu culture. Speaking from an Indian perspective, neither the continuation of the pro-Pakistan, Islamist Iran that conventionally voted against New Delhi in UN forums on the question of Kashmir, nor a US-backed government that would never let India into the Chabahar port to counterbalance the Sino-Pakistani Gwadar port, is good. A CALL FOR SELF-DETERMINATION top videos View all As the aerial war rages and Khamenei's words resonate, Iran stands at a crossroads. If its people find resilience that they never did in the past, the world may get back glorious Persia, the people of which were essentially farmers but whose king build roads and ports, the language of which was influenced by fellow Indo-European Sanskrit, the science of which made one wonder how it could turn into an Islamic fundamentalist regime, and the economy of which, supported by King Darius' standardised currency, traded goods with India, China and the Roman Empire. (The author is a senior journalist and writer. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely that of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views) tags : Israel Iran tension Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: June 22, 2025, 20:39 IST News opinion Opinion | Iranians Must Reverse Their History For Redemption
NDTV
16 minutes ago
- NDTV
United Behind Iran War Effort, Israelis Express Relief At US Bombing
Israelis expressed relief and optimism Sunday after US President Donald Trump ordered air strikes on Iran, 10 days into a war that has widespread public support. Despite daily nerve-shredding trips to bomb shelters and growing damage around the country, Israelis appeared united behind Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's move to attack Iran on June 13. Trump's decision to authorise overnight bombing raids on Iran's nuclear facilities has provided further reassurance after more than a week of sorties by the Israeli air force. "The war with Iran was inevitable. You knew it would happen sooner or later," Claudio Hazan, a 62-year-old software engineer, told AFP in central Jerusalem on Sunday. "I hope that it will shorten the war, because otherwise Israel by itself would not stop until they get that Fordo place bombed," he explained, referring to the deeply buried Iranian nuclear site targeted by heavy US bombers overnight. Israelis have hunkered down for the last 10 days, with businesses closed, schools shuttered and people urged to stay home. Few have slept a full uninterrupted night since the conflict erupted due to the screeching missile warnings that flash up on mobile phones at all times of day. "We woke up to a Sunday morning of alarms and then we saw that the US attacked," David, a 43-year-old Jerusalem resident, told AFP. "We're all happy that the US is lending a hand, it has always been lending a hand." Israeli President Isaac Herzog told the BBC on Sunday that "now is an opportunity to come to a dialogue of peace, also a dialogue of peace between all nations in the region, including Israelis and Palestinians". ' God Is With Us' Israel's sophisticated air defences have kept Israeli towns and cities relatively safe, shooting down hundreds of Iranian missiles and drones that would otherwise have caused widespread devastation. Dozens have slipped through, however, with three more impacts reported on Sunday morning in the northern port of Haifa and around the coastal hub of Tel Aviv. At least 50 strikes have been acknowledged nationwide and 25 people have died, according to official figures. When a missile blasted her modern apartment block on Thursday in Ramat Gan, near Tel Aviv, resident Renana lamented to AFP that "it will take a long time until this building recovers." But she showed no rancour towards Netanyahu who has deployed Israeli forces in Gaza, Lebanon, Syria and now Iran since the attack on Israel by Palestinian group Hamas in October 2023. "The truth is that God is with us and the government should go on with whatever they're doing, which is exactly what should have been done a long time ago," Renana, who did not give her surname, told AFP. 'Sharp Contrast' Israel's usually divided political scene has also lined up behind the attack on Iran, a country generations of Israelis have grown up fearing as a threat to their existence. "Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is my political rival, but his decision to strike Iran at this moment in time is the right one," opposition leader Yair Lapid wrote in a Jerusalem Post op-ed last week. A survey carried out by the Israel Democracy Institute in the days immediately after Israel's first strikes on June 13 found that 70 percent of Israelis supported the war, although the results revealed a major divide. Among Jewish Israelis, there was 82 percent support, while only 35 percent of respondents from Israel's Arab minority, who mostly identify as Palestinian, were in favour. Dahlia Scheindlin, an Israeli pollster and political analyst, told AFP that Israelis were much more united behind the Iran campaign than the grinding conflict in Gaza which many saw as a "dirty war". Netanyahu has been criticised for failing to secure the return of Israeli hostages being held by Hamas and accused of prolonging the war for domestic political purposes. He is also subject to an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court for alleged war crimes in Gaza where nearly 56,000 people have been killed, according to the health ministry in the Hamas-run territory. "There's a very sharp contrast between how Israelis view the war in Gaza and how they view this war with Iran," Scheindlin said. She cautioned, however, that sentiment could change if it turns into a long conflict.
