11 Sunscreens Sold In New Zealand Didn't Meet SPF Claims, As Revealed By An Australian Test
Press Release – Consumer NZ
Consumer NZ research and test writer Belinda Castles says consumers expect sunscreens to protect them. But Castles isnt surprised the protection falls short of whats claimed on the bottle.
Australian consumer group Choice's test of household sunscreens has shown 16 out of 20 tested sunscreens didn't meet their SPF claims.
These include products sold in New Zealand, including Banana Boat, Nivea and Neutrogena sunscreens.
Consumer NZ research and test writer Belinda Castles says consumers expect sunscreens to protect them. But Castles isn't surprised the protection falls short of what's claimed on the bottle.
'Consumer NZ ran a sunscreen testing programme until 2022, and the results found by Choice are consistent with what we've found previously,' she says.
The Choice test found:
Nivea Sun Protect & Moisture Lock SPF50+ tested at SPF40
Sun Bum Premium Moisturising Sunscreen Lotion SPF50+ tested at SPF40.
Consumer's 2021 tests of both these sunscreens also got SPF results in the 40s.
Banana Boat, Bondi Sands and Neutrogena sunscreens also failed to meet their SPF label claims in both Choice and earlier Consumer testing.
While most of the products in the Australian tests still provide moderate or high SPF protection, one product – Ultra Violette Lean Screen SPF50+ Mattifying Zinc Sunscreen – only returned an SPF of 4. Choice tested the sunscreen again at a second lab to confirm this result and got a similar low SPF of5. This sunscreen is also sold in New Zealand.
Castles says the test results for the big sunscreen brands is particularly concerning, given these companies' lack of transparency about when and where their products are tested.
'Sunscreens sold in New Zealand are now regulated under the Sunscreen (Product Safety Standard) Act 2022 and must meet the Australian and New Zealand sunscreen standard, which has requirements for independent testing. However, when we updated our sunscreens database last year, the companies that market Banana Boat, Bondi Sands, Neutrogena, Nivea and Sun Bum refused to provide this information.'
Consumer has also been campaigning for companies to be required to test their sunscreens regularly to ensure the products continue to meet their label claims.
'Our sunscreen research found some companies were relying on test results that are several years old. The latest Choice tests back our call.'
Invisible Zinc Face + Body Mineral Sunscreen SPF50+ tested at 38 in the Australian test. The company told Consumer this product was last tested in 2017.
Woolworths Sunscreen SPF50+ Everyday Lotion tested at 27 in the Australian test. The company told Consumer this product was last tested in 2018.
Choice is calling on Australia's Therapeutic Goods Administration to urgently carry out its own sunscreen compliance testing. Choice has also asked the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) to investigate if any SPF claims are misleading.
Consumer will be raising the same issues with New Zealand regulators and the Commerce Commission.
Products tested available in New Zealand
SPF results in 50+
La Roche-Posay Anthelios Wet Skin Sunscreen SPF 50+ – tested at 72
Neutrogena Ultra Sheer Body Lotion SPF 50 – tested at 56
Mecca Cosmetica To Save Body SPF 50+ Hydrating Sunscreen – tested at 51
SPF results in the 40s
Nivea Sun Kids Ultra Protect and Play Sunscreen Lotion SPF 50+ – tested at 41
Nivea Sun Protect and Moisture Lock SPF 50+ Sunscreen – tested at 40
Sun Bum Premium Moisturising Sunscreen Lotion 50+ – tested at 40
SPF results in the 30s
Banana Boat Sport Sunscreen Lotion SPF 50+ – tested at 35
Bondi Sands SPF 50+ Fragrance Free Sunscreen – tested at 32
Invisible Zinc Face + Body Mineral Sunscreen SPF 50 – tested at 38
SPF results in the 20s
Banana Boat Baby Zinc Sunscreen Lotion SPF 50+ – tested at 28
Bondi Sands SPF 50+ Zinc Mineral Body Lotion – tested at 26
Neutrogena Sheer Zinc Dry-Touch Lotion SPF 50 – tested at 24
Woolworths Sunscreen Everyday Tube SPF 50+ – tested at 27
SPF results <10 <>10 <>
Ultra Violette's Lean Screen SPF 50+ Mattifying Zinc Skinscreen – tested at 4
For the full test results, visit CHOICE sunscreen results: https://www.choice.com.au/health-and-body/beauty-and-personal-care/skin-care-and-cosmetics/articles/sunscreen-test
In partnership with Health New Zealand Te Whatu Ora, Consumer NZ's sunscreen database allows users to filter sunscreens by factors such as price, water resistance, SPF protection and the last time a sunscreen was tested.
For more information about sunscreens, including information about the 150+ sunscreens in our database, visit: Sunscreens | Overview – Consumer NZ: https://www.consumer.org.nz/products/sunscreens
Content Sourced from scoop.co.nz
Original url
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Tonga's Health System Hit By Cyberattack
A team of Australian cyber experts flew to Tonga this week after the country's National Health Information System was breached, leading to a demand for payment from the hackers. Talanoa O Tonga reports the Health Minister Dr Ana Akauola saying the system has been shut down, and staff are handling data manually. Dr Akauola said that hackers encrypted the system and demanded payment, but she has assured MPs "the hackers won't damage the information" on the system. This system was introduced in 2019 with Asian Development Bank (ADB) support to digitise Tonga's health records before going "live" in 2021. Police Minister Paula Piukala was critical of past governments for ignoring warnings that Tonga's digital infrastructure is not fully prepared for these threats. Journalist Sifa Pomana said the hackers are demanding millions of dollars, according to Tonga Police. Residents are being urged to bring essential records to the hospital to help with manual record-keeping.
Scoop
5 days ago
- Scoop
Australasian-led Clinical Trial In Stem Cell Transplant For Blood Cancers Set To Change 40 Years Of Standard Practice
Leading Australian and New Zealand researchers have demonstrated that the use of a new, less toxic drug combination after stem cell transplants for leukaemia significantly improves patient outcomes post-transplant, reducing the risk of the life-threatening complication of Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD). The BM12 CAST trial, a major clinical trial led by the Australasian Leukaemia & Lymphoma Group (ALLG) across New Zealand and Australian hospitals, will transform global blood stem cell transplant outcomes for people with high-risk blood cancers like leukaemia. 'This new treatment triples the chances of a patient being alive, healthy and free of GVHD three years after stem cell transplant,' said lead ALLG BM12 researcher, Professor David Curtis, Clinical Haematologist and senior bone marrow transplant physician at The Alfred and Director of Malignant Haematology Research at the Australian Centre for Blood Diseases, Monash University. Blood stem cell transplants are often lifesaving for leukaemia patients, but they come with a high risk of life-threatening complications, especially in the first 100 days after transplant. Common side effects include infections, organ damage, and the often-debilitating Graft versus Host Disease (GVHD), an irreversible lifelong complication. 'The BM12 trial showed the new treatment combination is simple, safe and more effective than current methods in preventing GVHD, which contributes to death or life-long illness in 20% of patients undergoing a blood stem cell transplant,' said Prof Curtis. Results of BM12 trial were published in the New England Journal of Medicine and presented at the European Hematology Association 2025 Meeting in Milan, Italy. These results are game-changing for stem cell transplant patients, with cyclosporin and cyclophosphamide offering a new standard of care for prevention of GVHD for patients with aggressive blood cancers undergoing transplant from a matched related blood stem cell donor. Researchers compared the standard drug combination used for the last 40 years with a new combination of cyclophosphamide and cyclosporin, for leukaemia patients. The new drug combination tripled the number of patients that were alive, cured of the blood cancer and not suffering from GVHD three years after transplant (49.1% vs 14.2% for the standard drug combination). The risk of serious side effects also dropped from 32.4% to 19.7%. The trial's success has immediate implications for clinical practice in the management of blood stem cell transplants. The simplicity and effectiveness of the new treatment, along with reduced toxicity and improved patient outcomes, will become the new standard of care in GVHD prevention for matched sibling transplants. The ALLG BM12 CAST trial's success is particularly important for patients such as Gladys Borgueta, who was diagnosed with Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML) and admitted to Auckland Hospital's Motutapu Ward in May 2021. 'Nothing prepares you for an unexpected diagnosis like acute myeloid leukaemia, everything else becomes a blur and your world is turned upside down. Nothing prepares you for the months, weeks in hospital and sometimes in isolation,' said Gladys. ALLG researcher, haematologist Dr Clinton Lewis and colleagues from Auckland Hospital, met with Gladys and suggested the ALLG BM12 trial. 'I knew that the team around me would give me the best care possible. I had however no high expectations just because this was a trial, it could go either way,' Gladys said. Gladys was allocated to the new treatment arm of the BM12 clinical trial and received a stem cell transplant in January 2022. The new drug combination meant that her transplant was successful and she avoided serious side effects such as GVHD. Three years on, Gladys continues to do well after her transplant and is in remission from her leukaemia. 'Without research, I would not have, or for that matter any other patient, benefited from the treatment I got. I feel grateful and blessed to be given a second chance at life.' Auckland Hospital lead investigator, Dr Clinton Lewis, said, 'The results of this exciting study are already changing practice in New Zealand and will continue to improve the lives of cancer patients receiving allogeneic stem cell transplants.' 'Our options for treating Graft versus Host Disease in New Zealand remain very limited compared to other countries, so preventing this complication is incredibly important for our patients.' 'This study shows that we can help our patients live better lives, free of their cancer and GVHD, when we utilise this treatment approach. This sets an improved standard of care in New Zealand', said Dr Lewis. The BM12 CAST trial was funded by the Australian Government's Medical Research Future Fund, the Auckland Medical Research Fund and the Cancer Society of New Zealand.
Scoop
14-06-2025
- Scoop
Do I Have To Pay For My Partner's Care?
RNZ's money correspondent answers your questions. Send your questions to If one person in a de facto relationship needs permanent medical care, does the Government require the other partner to pay for the care once the unwell patient's funds run out? The basic answer to your question is that when your partner is being assessed for their ability to pay for their care, your income and assets will usually be taken into account. If you're referring to medical care in a rest home setting, your assets and personal income affect whether your partner will qualify for a residential care subsidy. 'People who need residential care are required to pay for it themselves, if they can afford to do so. If they cannot afford it, they may be eligible for a residential care subsidy, which Health New Zealand pays directly to the care provider,' said Ministry of Social Development group general manager for client service delivery Graham Allpress. 'MSD's role is to check whether people qualify for this subsidy by performing a 'financial means assessment'. 'To get the subsidy, a person's income and assets must be under a certain amount. If they are in a relationship, the combined income and assets of both parties must be under a certain amount.' People can qualify for the subsidy if they are 50 to 64, single and without dependent children, or over 65 and meet the income and means test. That means, even if your partner's funds have run out, your assets could still be taken into account. If only one partner needs care, the couple combined need to have assets of no more than $155,873 not including the family home and car, or $284,636 if you do want the home and car in the assessment. If it's other types of care that you're thinking of, it could be a good idea to contact Health NZ for a needs assessment. There are options such as the supported living payment but eligibility for this is assessed on a household income basis, too. I'm currently a NZ tax resident living in NZ, but previously lived in Australia (over a decade ago) and purchased shares on the ASX that I continue to own and receive dividends for (which I declare as part of my income). If I sold these shares now, worth about $150,000, what taxes would they be subject to? Specifically, would I have to pay a capital gains tax on the increased share value (as I would if I were an Australian tax resident). This is probably a question for an accountant with expertise in Australian tax. Based on information available online, it seems that you potentially should have paid tax on the shares in Australia when you stopped being an Australian resident. Assuming that didn't happen, the Australian Tax Office is likely to be expecting capital gains tax to be paid on them when they are sold. You aren't likely to have any New Zealand tax obligations. Tax experts tell me that the authorities have access to a lot of data these days so it's possible that the Australian Tax Office will find out about any share sale and might get in touch with you. I am 78 years of age and still work part time and also still contribute to my KiwiSaver. Am I eligible for the government contribution? Sorry, no. While the government said it was going to start making contributions to 16 and 17-year-olds' accounts, it hasn't budged on the upper limit of 65.
