Majority of Albertans rejected provincial pension in 2023 survey
Nearly two-thirds of respondents to the Alberta government's pension engagement survey did not want to dump the Canada Pension Plan and switch to a plan run by the province.
Numbers provided by the government showed 63 per cent of people who responded to the 2023 were opposed to an Alberta pension, 10 per cent were in favour and 12 per cent were undecided or unsure.
The remaining 15 per cent was made up of people whose responses were incomplete, or contained questions or suggestions for "other alternatives."
The survey results were released to the Edmonton Journal this week after a 21-month battle. The newspaper reported that it asked the province for the responses on multiple occasions only to be met with refusal or documents full of redactions.
The data was finally posted to the government's open data site this week after the privacy and information commissioner became involved.
In its response, the government cited two 2025 polls which suggested public opinion was shifting in favour of a provincial pension plan.
"While recent surveys on an APP show public opinion may be shifting, we will continue to engage with Albertans on this topic through the Alberta Next panel," Marisa Breeze, press secretary to finance minister Nate Horner, wrote.
"The Alberta Pension Protection Act guarantees we won't replace the CPP with an Alberta Pension Plan unless Albertans approve it in a referendum."
Responses in the document called the idea "reckless" and the survey "a farce."
"I do not support this idea. I will move out of Alberta if this happens," one respondent said. "I am Canadian first and fully support the Canada Pension Plan.
"Withdrawal from the CPP would be a horrendous miscalculation that will impact our province for generations to come," said another.
WATCH | Why Alberta says it's entitled to half of the Canada Pension Plan:
Why Alberta says it's entitled to half of Canada's Pension Plan | About That
2 years ago
Duration 12:14
The Alberta government wants out of the Canada Pension Plan — and the province wants to take more than half of the pot with it. Andrew Chang breaks down how Alberta arrived at its $334 billion take-home figure — and why some experts say the province needs to double check its math.
One respondent characterized the government's pension ambitions as "political posturing."
"Stop playing games with my retirement to spite the rest of the country.
Supporters of a provincial pension said they wanted Alberta to be independent from Ottawa.
"Alberta has paid dearly since Confederation," one respondent wrote. "We deserve independence financially."
Edmonton-Decore MLA Sharif Haji, the NDP opposition critic for affordability and utilities, said the results prove that Albertans do not want a provincial pension. He criticized the government for trying to hide the survey answers.
"It took close to two years," Haji said. "What it tells me is that they never wanted to share because the result was not the one that they wanted."
Haji said an Alberta pension plan is part of Premier Danielle Smith's separation agenda, which includes the push for an Alberta provincial police service.
In 2023, the province released a report from an independent third party called Lifeworks, that claimed Alberta would be entitled to 53 per cent or $344 billion of the CPP if it withdrew from the national plan in 2027.
But Canada's chief actuary determined late last year that the amount was between 20 and 25 per cent of the $575 billion plan.
Smith has said Albertans would have to approve an exit from the CPP via an referendum before her government made any move.
An engagement panel led by former provincial treasurer Jim Dinning held town halls on the pension issue in the fall of 2023.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
14 minutes ago
- CTV News
Brampton Mayor calls for terror designation of India-based Bishnoi gang
Brampton Mayor Patrick Brown is calling on Ottawa to label the Lawrence Bishnoi gang a terrorist organization, warning the India-based group has entrenched itself in Peel Region and is linked to a number of criminal activities. Brown made the comment during an interview with calling the Bishnoi gang a 'horrible criminal organization.' His comments come just days after British Columbia Premier David Eby made a similar request of Ottawa and promised to formally write Prime Minister Mark Carney about the matter. 'We've had a number of Bishnoi-related criminal activities in Peel Region,' Brown told CTV News Toronto. 'We know they're happening across the country because we actually are in close contact with other law enforcement, particularly in B.C., where there's activity with the same criminal network.' Bishnoi himself has been imprisoned in India since 2014 but the country's counterterrorism law enforcement agency, the National Investigation Agency, has previously said that he continued to operate his 'terror-syndicate' from behind bars and through an associate in Canada. Brown said that the gang Bishnoi leads employs a global network of '700 shooters' and is actively recruiting vulnerable residents in Peel and beyond — a level of criminality he suggests is 'akin to a terrorist organization.' Brown further alleges that he is directing criminal activity throughout Canada. 'This is not a Brampton issue, Mississauga issue, a Toronto issue… This is transnational crime,' he told 'Whether it is crime syndicates from Mexico or crime syndicates from India, we are dealing with transnational crime increases in recent years that is a new challenge to our ability to push out criminality.' An opportunity for 'greater investigative tools' Just this week, a new report from Canada's spy agency labelled India as one of the 'main perpetrators' of foreign interference and espionage. The report also pointed to a link between government agents and 'criminal networks to sow violent activity in South Asian communities in Canada.' It's reality that Brown says the Ottawa should not turn a blind eye to. 'I think diplomacy is important, trade is important but if another country wanted us to turn a blind eye to transnational crime in order to achieve that, I think that would be something that's beyond what we should be comfortable with,' he said, Brown says classifying the Bishnoi network as a terrorist entity under Canada's Criminal Code would empower police to act more decisively. 'The listing would mean greater investigative tools, resources, collaboration with multiple agencies, intelligence sharing,' he said. 'There's just a number of things that are triggered by that designation.' He also says the threat has gripped his local community, particularly residents of South Asian descent who recognize the Bishnoi name from headlines in India. 'We have a lot of residents of South Asian background who are terrified by it,' Brown said. 'It's at the behest of PRP, who I've got great confidence in, but it's also at the behest of residents of mine that I know feel terrified by the brazen nature of their activity in Canada.' Already, Brown's office has submitted several recommendations to Ottawa to bolster public safety, including Criminal Code amendments, bail reform, and stronger intelligence sharing between agencies. He says increased federal involvement is essential. 'You can't fix public safety unless you get all levels of government owning their part and doing their part,' he said. 'The Government of Canada, since they're in charge of Public Safety Canada, CBSA and RCMP, there's certainly a lot they can do to be part of the solution.' With files from The Canadian Press.
National Post
17 minutes ago
- National Post
Randall Denley: Ontario's 'historic' spending under Ford sure isn't producing results
Article content The Ontario government's finances are a paradox. The PC government regularly boasts about 'historic' levels of spending, but faces constant complaints about underfunding, especially from the health-care, education and post-secondary sectors. Article content What's the real picture? Article content Article content In fact, budget figures show that revenue and spending have increased dramatically since Premier Doug Ford was first elected. In 2019–20, his first full-year budget, total government revenue was $156.1 billion. This year, it's projected to be $219.9 billion, a 41 per cent increase. Spending has gone up by about the same percentage, from $164.8 billion in 2019–20 to a projected $232.5 billion this year. Article content With such a large spending increase, it's hard to believe that anything could be underfunded, but discouragingly, that is the case. Article content Article content Ontario's per capita spending on health care is second lowest in the country. Per-student funding for Ontario universities is the lowest in Canada. The province does a bit better on public education, with the sixth highest per-student funding nationally. Article content Those are disappointing numbers. One would expect more from the country's biggest province. Article content It's not like the Ford government is restraining spending to balance the books. Far from it. That first Ford budget had a $9-billion deficit and the current one projects a deficit of $14.6 billion. Article content A new report card on this year's budget gives Finance Minister Peter Bethlenfalvy a grade of D- for his performance on the critical issues of debt, debt interest payments, spending increases and tax relief. Article content The Canadian Taxpayers Federation report notes that Bethlenfalvy's latest budget increases debt by $22 billion, and says that by the end of the budget year, debt will have reached $461 billion. That's about $28,472 per person, the second highest in the country. Net interest payments will cost Ontarians just over $1,000 per person this year, the fourth highest in the country. Spending is up 7.9 per cent, third highest among provinces. Article content Article content The only moderately bright note in the taxpayers' report card was tax relief, where the Ford government finally made permanent a longstanding 5.7 cent per litre gas tax cut. Article content Article content Unfortunately, that cut is not typical of the Ford government's performance on taxes. Promises made in 2018 to cut corporate taxes and personal income taxes remain unfulfilled. Ontario's combined federal/provincial top marginal tax rate of 53.53 per cent is the third highest of any jurisdiction in Canada or the U.S. Article content Here, at least, there is some reassuring news. The health, education and post-secondary sectors have all benefited substantially from the increased tax take. In 2019–20, health spending was $63.7 billion. In 2025–26, it is projected to be $91.1 billion. Comparing the same two time periods, education has gone from $30.2 billion to $41 billion and post-secondary spending will rise from $10.5 billion to $13 billion.
National Post
17 minutes ago
- National Post
Colby Cosh: Taxing away the Stanley Cup
The other day a U.S. news network emailed me to see if I wanted to do a radio interview about Canada's Stanley Cup drought, which, as you all know, has just had its 32nd birthday; I presume somebody has done the decent thing and gone out and bought it a nice terry-cloth bathrobe or perhaps a stylish quarter-zip. I begged off from the request, citing pathological gloom, and resumed staring at the ceiling, an activity I intend to resume after I've written a few hundred words here. Nice to be back, by the way: please don't ask how my little Oiler-fan break went. Article content Article content The email brought a thought I've often had back to the surface of my mind, like a hunk of strawberry in a smoothie. People often blame high Canadian taxation for our Stanley Cup crisis; in a league bound by a collectively bargained salary cap, U.S. states with low income taxes have an obvious advantage in attracting free-agent players, an advantage generally accompanied by nicer weather, prettier golf courses and other features of American economics and culture. Article content Article content Article content There can't be any doubt that this is a real contributing factor to the ongoing drought, although when I look at the roster of the victorious Florida Panthers I don't see the cruel talon of the taxman. Honesty requires me to report that Florida's just effing full of tough, capable players that other teams, mostly Canadian ones, flat-out gave up on and dealt away. Article content But this reminds you that the tax burden influences every level of a competitive business that is even a little bit complicated. When it comes to the effects of onerous Canadian taxes, it's relatively easy to see that a free-agent player facing near-equal contract offers is likely to be tempted by the lower-tax jurisdiction. And the thought that keeps recurring to me is: 'We could fix that part. We could fix it easily. We could fix it overnight.' Article content I'm frankly amazed that some banzai backbencher with ambitions hasn't picked up this flag — advocating a large, explicit tax cut for NHL players in Canada, with the stated goal of giving Canadian teams a positive advantage in contesting the Cup (which, you will surely recall, is morally and lawfully the property of the Canadian people and not the National Hockey League). Article content Oh, sure, our governments would be forgoing some tax revenue from a particular category of rich people that we have decided we want to encourage, reward and retain; I suppose we can't countenance that sort of thing, except when it comes to, say, the inclusion rate on capital-gains taxes paid by corporations and trusts. If a government wanted to give more favourable tax treatment to professional hockey players, it could probably do so in a shrewdly disguised way. But it might be smarter to do it openly: declare that we're not going to fight for the Cup with one hand tied behind our backs.
