Republicans Dodge Even Basic Questions On Medicaid Cut Plans: ‘Decisions Haven't Been Made'

House Republicans' work of making sweeping cuts to Medicaid — the social safety net program that provides health care coverage for 72 million low-income and disabled Americans — while publicly pretending they are not doing so continues this week.
House Energy and Commerce Committee Republicans met on Tuesday morning to try and work through their internal fight over how exactly they want to enact cuts to Medicaid. They also held firm in their commitment to publicly obscure how bad slashing the program will be for those who rely on it for health insurance. As we've reported, the committee is tasked with finding $880 billion in cuts to programs in their jurisdiction — a huge chunk of which is not just expected but almost certainly will have to come from Medicaid.
Several options on how to get to Republicans' self-imposed targeted reductions in federal spending are being discussed during these meetings, but the GOP conference is seemingly at an impasse as many vulnerable Republicans oppose deep cuts to Medicaid.
Most of the committee members walked out of Tuesday's closed-door meeting without saying a word. The Energy and Commerce Committee's chair, Rep. Brett Guthrie (R-KY), was never even seen exiting the meeting, at least not through the main door, where reporters were waiting.
Rep. Gus Bilirakis (R-FL), a member of the committee, described the nearly two-hours long meeting as 'productive.' 'No sticking point,' he told the reporters staked out outside the room. 'Decisions haven't been made.'
Energy & Commerce Republicans are expected to meet again tomorrow morning to continue discussions.
Meanwhile, Democrats on the committee and staffers say they're skeptical Republicans will be able to meet their self-imposed deadline as they internally battle over the cuts to the popular program.
'I have not seen a single word of legislation,' Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) told TPM as she walked out of a floor vote on Tuesday.
'From the beginning, Republicans have tried to have their cake and eat it too, which is: pass a reconciliation bill that gives massive tax breaks to the richest people in this country, not blow up the deficit, and a segment of them not wanting to cut Medicaid. And that's just math. You cannot accomplish all three of those things in one bill,' Ocasio-Cortez told TPM.
'There's no way they're going to be able to do the things they want to do without cutting Medicaid. Just point, blank, period,' she added. 'And so it does put them in a bind. I think that's why we've seen the markups on Medicaid … get bumped this week because I think they're realizing that all these promises that they've made to different parts of their caucus are not reconcilable. They're just not and they're going to have to make some hard decisions that they've been avoiding this entire time.'
When asked about the timeline, the New York Democrat said that even if the Republicans were able to provide the text of the legislation on time, 'I don't know how they're going to scrape together the votes, to be honest.'
Thune Acknowledges Ed Martin May Be Toast
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) acknowledged what journalists have been speculating for a few weeks: that Ed Martin, Trump's nominee to serve as the head of the D.C. U.S. Attorney's office, 'probably' doesn't have the votes to get his nomination moved out of the Senate Judiciary Committee. That comes after Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) told reporters this week that he had communicated to the White House that he was a 'no' on Martin. Tillis has been saying as much for months, primarily due to Martin's beliefs about the Jan. 6 insurrection at the Capitol.
'I think that would suggest that he's probably not going to get out of committee,' Thune said today, referencing Tillis' 'no.' Senate Republicans hold a 12-10 majority on the panel, so Tillis voting against the nominee would leave it deadlocked 11-11 in the committee.
Tillis met with Martin earlier this week to try to work out their differences — as the clock on Martin's ability to serve in an interim capacity runs out and as Democrats on the panel indicate their interest in attempting to push for a public confirmation hearing for Martin. Since taking office in an acting capacity, Martin has used his post to threaten investigations into Trump's perceived political enemies, including Democratic members of Congress.
Tillis' remarks to CNN after his meeting with Martin on Monday night:
Who Among Us
Today on the Trump Administration Officials Are Bad At Technology beat, from Wired:
Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, used the same easily cracked password for different online accounts over a period of years, according to leaked records reviewed by WIRED.
LMAO
Politico: Trump picks Rudy Giuliani's son for key World Cup post
Andrew Giuliani, who used to assist Trump with golf, had served as a special assistant to the President and associate director of the Office of Public Liaison during Trump's first term. Perhaps this seeming demotion had something to do with his laughably unsuccessful bid for New York governor in 2021 — during which he campaigned as an outsider, citing his father's law license suspension in the state. The suspension, of course, was due to his role in trying to steal the 2020 election for Trump.
Or maybe the demotion was due to how dumb this campaign video looked. He seemingly recorded in a parking lot, with the camera propped up on the back of a car.
In Case You Missed It
Another Judge Finds Trump Did Not Validly Invoke Alien Enemies Act Against Alleged Gang
While His Admin Delights In The Culture Wars, Trump Tiptoes Around Abortion. At Least For Now.
NEW this morning, from Hunter Walker: President Trump's Media Company Is Offering Movies About 'Lizard People' And Other Wild Conspiracy Theories
No One Is On The Same Page On Medicaid Cuts—Including Guy Running Medicaid Agency
Yesterday's Most Read Story
Trump Allies Sue John Roberts To Give White House Control Of Court System
What We Are Reading
ICE Agents Are Targeting DC Restaurants
The Company Behind the Signal Clone Mike Waltz Used Has Direct Access to User Chats

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Black America Web

44 minutes ago

• Black America Web

Social Security Projected To 'Go-Broke' Earlier Than Expected

Source: filo / Getty I'm 32, and for as long as I can remember, I've heard about how Social Security was on its way to being depleted. It's been a known issue, yet there's been no meaningful legislation to address it. As a result, rising health costs and recent legislation have led to the projected 'go-broke' date moving up for both Social Security and Medicare. According to AP, an annual report released on Wednesday projects the go-broke date for the Social Security trust will occur in 2034, a year up from last year's projection of 2035. For Medicare, the new date was a bit more drastic, going up from 2036 to 2033. Now, to be clear, the go-broke date doesn't mean benefits will be stopped outright. It simply means payouts will be given at a reduced rate. For Social Security, it's estimated that benefit payouts would be capped at 81 percent, and for Medicare, the government provided health insurance that covers people age 65 and older, it's estimated that payments would only cover 89 percent of costs for patients' hospital visits, hospice care, and nursing home stays. This reduction would significantly affect the 68 million Americans currently enrolled in Medicare, The Social Security and Medicare trust funds are overseen by four trustees. The Treasury Secretary serves as managing trustee, with the Secretaries of Labor, Health and Human Services, and the Commissioner of Social Security being the other three. The trustee board technically has two other presidentially-appointed and Senate-confirmed trustees who serve as public representatives, but those roles have been empty for over a decade. 'Current-law projections indicate that Medicare still faces a substantial financial shortfall that needs to be addressed with further legislation. Such legislation should be enacted sooner rather than later to minimize the impact on beneficiaries, providers, and taxpayers,' the trustees state in the report. The go-broke date for Social Security has fluctuated quite a bit in recent years, with annual reports from recent years projecting 'go-broke' dates in 2026, 2028, and 2031, respectively. A poll conducted by AP last month revealed that 3 in 10 Americans over 60 are not confident that Social Security benefits would be there for them if they needed them. Clearly, this news won't do much to increase their confidence. Social Security Administration Commissioner Frank Bisignano, who was only sworn into his role last month, released a statement saying that 'the financial status of the trust funds remains a top priority for the Trump Administration.' This seems like another instance of the Trump administration being all talk, little action, as there seems to be very little meaningful legislation to address the issue. In fact, Trump's 'Big, Beautiful' budget bill has very little in the way of relief for Social Security and Medicare. As a millennial with very little faith in America's ability to improve upon itself, I would very much like it if I could opt out of paying Social Security because while I'm not over 60, I have very little faith that the benefits are going to be there for me by the time I can use them. Heck, at the rate we're going, I'd honestly just be happy if we even have a functional democracy at that point. SEE ALSO: Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Will Destroy Medicare, Food Stamps Student Loan Collections Make American Credit Scores Plummet SEE ALSO Social Security Projected To 'Go-Broke' Earlier Than Expected was originally published on Black America Web Featured Video CLOSE

UPI

an hour ago

• UPI

U.S. issues world travel warning after Iran attack

People check flight schedules in a nearly empty departure hall at Ben Gurion International Airport in Lod, near Tel Aviv, on Sunday, August 4, 2024. On Sunday night, the State Department issued a worldwide caution security alert warning Americans overseas to exercise increased caution. Photo by Debbie Hill/ UPI | License Photo June 22 (UPI) -- The State Department on Sunday night issued a global travel advisory warning Americans abroad to exercise increased caution after the United States attacked Iran's nuclear facilities the night prior. The statement from the State Department does not mention the Saturday night attack but acknowledged that "there is the potential for demonstrations against U.S. citizens and interests abroad. "The conflict between Israel and Iran has resulted in disruptions to travel and periodic closure of airspace across the Middle East," the statement said. "The Department of State advises U.S. citizens worldwide to exercise increased caution." The United States entered the Israel-Iran war on Saturday when President Donald Trump ordered U.S. warplanes to attack three of Iran's nuclear facilities. Iran has vowed revenge while deciding how, when and where it will retaliate. Israel and Iran have been in a proxy war for years, but it exploded to the forefront following the Tehran-backed militia Hamas' bloody Oct. 7, 2023, surprise attack on Israel. Earlier this month, the war between the two countries intensified when Israel attacked some of Iran's nuclear facilities and killed some of its top military officers. Iran has responded by targeting Tel Aviv and other regions of Israel. The announcement from the State Department comes after it warned Americans last week against traveling to Israel, the West Bank and Gaza. On June 14, it authorized the voluntary departure from Israel of family members and non-emergency U.S. government employees "due to volatile and unpredictable security situation in the region." Iran does not have a nuclear weapon, but fears that it might be working to achieve one has been at the forefront of both U.S. and Israeli foreign policy concerning Tehran.

Yahoo

4 hours ago

• Yahoo

Senate parliamentarian rejects GOP's attempt to limit courts' contempt powers

The Senate parliamentarian has ruled against a controversial provision in the Senate Republicans' megabill that would have made it significantly more difficult for courts to enforce contempt findings against the Trump administration. The parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, ruled that limiting courts' ability to hold Trump officials in contempt violated the Senate's rules governing what can be passed with a simple-majority vote on the budget reconciliation fast track. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) hailed the parliamentarian's decision as a major victory. 'Senate Republicans tried to write Donald Trump's contempt for the courts into law — gutting judicial enforcement, defying the Constitution and bulldozing the very rule of law that forms our democracy,' Schumer said in a statement responding to the development. 'But Senate Democrats stopped them cold. We successfully fought for rule of law and struck out this reckless and downright un-American provision,' he said. The provision, tucked into the thousand-page bill House Republicans passed in May, would have required anyone suing the federal government to pay a bond before a court would be allowed to use its contempt power to enforce injunctions and other rulings. Courts have already ruled more than 190 times against the Trump administration since January. The controversial language received little notice when it came to the floor, and Rep. Mike Flood (R-Neb.) later caused an uproar at a town hall meeting when he admitted he didn't know the provision was in the legislation when he voted for it. 'If enacted, this would have been one of the most brazen power grabs we've seen in American history — an attempt to let a future President Trump ignore court orders with impunity, putting him above the law,' Schumer said Sunday afternoon. 'Donald Trump is not above the law. And thanks to Senate Democrats — including the tireless work of Senator Durbin and the Judiciary Democrats — the courts can still hold him and any president accountable,' Schumer said, referring to Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.). Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.