Europeans seek 'digital sovereignty' as US tech firms embrace Trump

At a market stall in Berlin run by charity Topio, volunteers help people who want to purge their phones of the influence of US tech firms. Since Donald
Trump
's inauguration, the queue for their services has grown.
Interest in European-based
digital
services has jumped in recent months, data from digital market intelligence company
Similarweb
shows. More people are looking for e-mail, messaging and even search providers outside the United States.
The first months of Trump's second presidency have shaken some Europeans' confidence in their long-time ally, after he signalled his country would step back from its role in
Europe
's
security
and then launched a trade war.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Costco Shoppers Say This Wrinkle Cream Is "Actually Worth It"
The Skincare Magazine
Undo
"It's about the concentration of power in US firms," said Topio's founder Michael Wirths, as his colleague installed on a customer's phone a version of the Android operating system without hooks into the
Google
ecosystem.
Wirths said the type of people coming to the stall had changed: "Before, it was people who knew a lot about data privacy. Now it's people who are politically aware and feel exposed."
Live Events
Tesla chief Elon Musk, who also owns social media company X, was a leading adviser to the US president before the two fell out, while the bosses of Amazon,
Meta
and Google-owner Alphabet took prominent spots at Trump's inauguration in January.
Discover the stories of your interest
Blockchain
5 Stories
Cyber-safety
7 Stories
Fintech
9 Stories
E-comm
9 Stories
ML
8 Stories
Edtech
6 Stories
Days before Trump took office, outgoing president Joe Biden had warned of an oligarchic "tech industrial complex" threatening democracy.
Berlin-based search engine Ecosia says it has benefited from some customers' desire to avoid US counterparts like Microsoft's Bing or Google, which dominates web searches and is also the world's biggest email provider.
"The worse it gets, the better it is for us," founder Christian Kroll said of Ecosia, whose sales pitch is that it spends its profits on environmental projects.
Similarweb data shows the number of queries directed to Ecosia from the European Union has risen 27% year-on-year and the company says it has 1% of the German search engine market.
But its 122 million visits from the 27 EU countries in February were dwarfed by 10.3 billion visits to Google, whose parent Alphabet made revenues of about $100 billion from Europe, the Middle East and Africa in 2024 - nearly a third of its $350 billion global turnover.
Non-profit Ecosia earned 3.2 million euros ($3.65 million) in April, of which 770,000 euros was spent on planting 1.1 million trees.
Google declined to comment for this story.
Reuters could not determine whether major US tech companies have lost any market share to local rivals in Europe.
Digital sovereignty
The search for alternative providers accompanies a debate in Europe about "digital sovereignty" - the idea that reliance on companies from an increasingly isolationist United States is a threat to Europe's economy and security.
"Ordinary people, the kind of people who would never have thought it was important they were using an American service are saying, 'hang on!'," said UK-based internet regulation expert Maria Farrell. "My hairdresser was asking me what she should switch to."
Use in Europe of Swiss-based ProtonMail rose 11.7% year-on-year to March compared to a year ago, according to Similarweb, while use of Alphabet's Gmail, which has some 70% of the global email market, slipped 1.9%.
ProtonMail, which offers both free and paid-for services, said it had seen an increase in users from Europe since Trump's re-election, though it declined to give a number.
"My household is definitely disengaging," said British software engineer Ken Tindell, citing weak US data privacy protections as one factor.
Trump's vice president JD Vance shocked European leaders in February by accusing them - at a conference usually known for displays of transatlantic unity - of censoring free speech and failing to control immigration.
In May, Secretary of State Marco Rubio threatened visa bans for people who "censor" speech by Americans, including on social media, and suggested the policy could target foreign officials regulating US tech companies.
US social media companies like Facebook and Instagram parent Meta have said the European Union's Digital Services Act amounts to censorship of their platforms.
EU officials say the Act will make the online environment safer by compelling tech giants to tackle illegal content, including hate speech and child sexual abuse material.
Greg Nojeim, director of the Security and Surveillance Project at the Center for Democracy & Technology, said Europeans' concerns about the US government accessing their data, whether stored on devices or in the cloud, were justified.
Not only does US law permit the government to search devices of anyone entering the country, it can compel disclosure of data that Europeans outside the US store or transmit through US communications service providers, Nojeim said.
Mission impossible?
Germany's new government is itself making efforts to reduce exposure to US tech, committing in its coalition agreement to make more use of open-source data formats and locally-based cloud infrastructure.
Regional governments have gone further - in conservative-run Schleswig-Holstein, on the Danish border, all IT used by the public administration must run on open-source software.
Berlin has also paid for Ukraine to access a satellite-internet network operated by France's Eutelsat instead of Musk's Starlink.
But with modern life driven by technology, "completely divorcing US tech in a very fundamental way is, I would say, possibly not possible," said Bill Budington of US digital rights nonprofit the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
Everything from push notifications to the content delivery networks powering many websites and how internet traffic is routed relies largely on US companies and infrastructure, Budington noted.
Both Ecosia and French-based search engine Qwant depend in part on search results provided by Google and Microsoft's Bing, while Ecosia runs on cloud platforms, some hosted by the very same tech giants it promises an escape from.
Nevertheless, a group on messaging board Reddit called BuyFromEU has 211,000 members.
"Just cancelled my Dropbox and will switch to Proton Drive," read one post.
Mastodon, a decentralised social media service developed by German programmer Eugen Rochko, enjoyed a rush of new users two years ago when Musk bought Twitter, later renamed X. But it remains a niche service.
Signal, a messaging app run by a US nonprofit foundation, has also seen a surge in installations from Europe. Similarweb's data showed a 7% month-on-month increase in
Signal
usage in March, while use of Meta's WhatsApp was static.
Meta declined to comment for this story. Signal did not respond to an e-mailed request for comment.
But this kind of conscious self-organising is unlikely on its own to make a dent in Silicon Valley's European dominance, digital rights activist Robin Berjon told Reuters.
"The market is too captured," he said. "Regulation is needed as well."

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Mint

23 minutes ago

• Mint

US attack on Iranian nuclear sites roils oil market, India braces for possible price surge

New Delhi: Global crude oil prices may face sharp upward pressure when markets open for trade Monday, after the US launched air strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities — Natanz, Fordo and Isfahan — escalating tensions in the Middle East. The strikes have raised concerns of supply disruptions that could hit major importers like India, which depends on overseas oil for more than 85% of its energy needs. In a televised address on Sunday (India time), US President Donald Trump confirmed the direct American assault on Iran's nuclear programme, ending days of speculation about Washington's entry into the Israel-Iran conflict. He warned that further strikes could follow. Read this | Mint Primer: What if the US joins Israel's war with Iran? 'Remember, there are many targets left. Tonight was the most difficult of them all by far, and perhaps the most lethal. But if peace doesn't come quickly we will go to those other targets with precision, speed and skill," Trump said. Hormuz threat puts India's energy security at risk The strikes have amplified fears of a possible Iranian response, particularly threats to block the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow chokepoint through which nearly 20% of global crude oil and liquefied natural gas flows. Energy markets have long feared that any disruption here could trigger a severe supply crunch. 'Concerns remain over whether supplies through the Strait of Hormuz would be blocked. Refiners are keeping a close watch and looking for alternate sources in case supplies through the strait are halted," said an official with a state-run oil marketing company. Read this | Mint Explainer | Strait of Hormuz: Will Iran shut the vital oil artery of the world? Iran currently produces about 3.3 million barrels per day (mbd) of crude oil, exporting 1.8-2.0 mbd. While Iranian oil facilities have reportedly been hit, the extent of damage remains unclear. But the larger risk lies in a broader regional conflict that could pull in other major oil producers in the Gulf, said ratings agency Icra Ltd in a recent report. India could face significant cost pressures even though it no longer buys oil directly from Iran due to US sanctions. Crude supplies from Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates, all routed via the Strait of Hormuz, account for nearly half of India's total imports. About 60% of its natural gas imports also pass through this critical passage. Since 13 June 2025, when the Israel-Iran conflict began, crude prices have risen from $64-65 per barrel to $74-75 per barrel. Oil is likely to average around $70-80 a barrel in FY26, and a sustained rise from current levels risks a reduction in India's growth forecasts, Icra Ratings Ltd had said on Friday. Read this | India concerned about crude oil supply disruptions in Strait of Hormuz as prices surge after Israel's attacks on Iran 'A sustained flare-up in the conflict poses upside risks for estimates of crude oil prices, and India's net oil imports and the current account deficit. A $10/bbl increase in the average price of crude oil for the fiscal will typically push up net oil imports by ~$13-14 billion during the year, enlarging the CAD (current account deficit) by 0.3% of GDP," Icra noted. India's import bill in FY25 stood at $137 billion, according to the Petroleum Planning & Analysis Cell. "Impact on the import bill will depend on how long the elevated prices sustain. However, a 10% increase in crude prices may lead to a 3% increase in the import bill given that crude oil comprises about 30% of India's total imports. With this, the trade deficit may increase to 0.1-0.2% of GDP. There would be some pressure on the currency but an impact on GDP is not seen as of now," said Madan Sabnavis, chief economist at Bank of Baroda. Icra had also said that changes in crude oil prices are likely to translate faster into higher wholesale and consumer inflation. For every 10% increase in crude oil prices, wholesale inflation could rise by 80-100 basis points, while consumer inflation may increase by 20-30 basis points, depending on the extent of pass-through into retail fuel prices. 'Only about 8% of the energy supplies moving through the strait can be rerouted via alternative corridors," said Prashant Vashisht, vice president at Icra. "If the strait is blocked, India would have to source more from regions like Russia and Nigeria." On Friday, Brent crude futures on the Intercontinental Exchange closed at $77 a barrel, down 2.33% amid earlier uncertainty over US military involvement. Oil market volatility is expected to spike when trading resumes, said Rahul Kalantri, vice president for commodities at Mehta Equities. 'We expect a knee-jerk rally potentially pushing Brent to the $80–$85 range or beyond if further conflict escalates," he said, adding that a full blockade of the Strait could drive prices 10–20% higher. Also read | Oil is warming up, but India's inflation may escape the heat Earlier this month, JP Morgan had warned that a major escalation could push crude oil prices as high as $120 a barrel. However, the bank noted that so far, despite multiple historical threats, the Strait of Hormuz has never been fully closed. 'Crucially, for all of recorded history, crude oil continued to flow," JP Morgan wrote. The Indian government is closely monitoring the evolving situation. The petroleum ministry has held consultations with oil marketing companies to assess the state of domestic supplies and build contingency plans.

Time of India

31 minutes ago

• Time of India

US strikes on Iran come at fragile moment for the global economy

US strikes on Iran 's three main nuclear facilities come at a fragile moment for the global economy , and the outlook now hinges on how forcefully the Islamic Republic retaliates. The World Bank , the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and the International Monetary Fund have all downgraded their global growth forecasts in recent months. Any significant increases in oil or natural gas prices, or disturbances in trade caused by a further escalation of the conflict, would act as yet another brake on the world economy. 'We'll see how Tehran responds, but the attack likely puts the conflict on a escalatory path,' Bloomberg Economics analysts including Ziad Daoud wrote in a report. 'For the global economy, an expanding conflict adds to the risk of higher oil prices and an upward impulse to inflation.?' The rising geopolitical risks intersect with a potential escalation in tariffs in the coming weeks as President Donald Trump's pauses of his hefty so-called 'reciprocal' levies are due to expire. The biggest economic impact from a prolonged conflict in the Middle East would likely be felt via surging oil prices. Post the US strike, a derivative product that allows investors to speculate on price swings in crude oil surged 8.8% on IG Weekend Markets. If that move were to hold when trading resumes, IG strategist Tony Sycamore said he projects WTI crude oil futures will open at around $80 per barrel. Live Events Much will hinge on near-term events. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said the US attacks are 'outrageous and will have everlasting consequences.' He cited the United Nations Charter on provisions for self-defense and said Iran reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interest and people. Bloomberg Economics sees three options for Iran to respond: Attacks on US personnel and assets in the region Targeting regional energy infrastructure Close the Strait of Hormuz maritime chokepoint using underwater mines or harassing ships passing through In the extreme scenario in which the Strait of Hormuz is shut, crude could soar past $130 per barrel, according to Daoud, Tom Orlik and Jennifer Welch. That could take US CPI near 4% in the summer, prompting the US Federal Reserve and other central banks to push back the timing of future rate cuts. About a fifth of the world's daily oil supply goes through the Strait of Hormuz, which lies between Iran and its Gulf Arab neighbors such as Saudi Arabia. The US is a net exporter of oil. But higher crude prices would only add to the challenges the US economy is already facing. The Fed updated economic projections last week, marking down its forecast for US growth this year to 1.4% from 1.7% as policymakers digested the impact on prices and growth of Trump's tariffs. As the largest buyer of Iranian oil exports, China would face the most obvious consequences from any disruption to the flow of petroleum, though its current stockpiles may offer some respite. Any disruptions to shipping through the Strait of Hormuz would have a significant impact on the global liquefied natural gas market too. Qatar, which makes up around 20% of the global LNG trade, uses this route for exports and has no alternative passage. That would leave the global LNG market extremely tight, pushing European gas prices significantly higher, Bloomberg Economics has noted. While investors may be concerned that supplies could be interrupted if hostilities escalate, OPEC+ members, including de facto group leader Saudi Arabia, still have abundant spare capacity that could be activated. In addition, the International Energy Agency may choose to coordinate the release of emergency stockpiles to try and calm prices. 'The Middle East tensions represent another adverse shock to an already weak global economy,' Ben May, director of global macro research at Oxford Economics, said in a report ahead of the latest escalation. 'Higher oil prices and the associated rise in CPI inflation would provide central banks with a major headache.'

Mint

40 minutes ago

• Mint

Trump has a big, beautiful reason to push for lower rates

The Federal Reserve held its policy interest rate steady this past week and maintained its median projection of two quarter-point rate cuts by year end, exactly as expected. And nearly as predictably, President Donald Trump renewed his tirade against Fed Chair Jerome Powell for not slashing rates, adding increasingly personal insults and calling him 'stupid" and 'truly one of the dumbest, and most destructive, people in Government." Such taunts have brought past rivals to heel (such as 'Little Marco" Rubio, now serving as Secretary of State), but the tactic is unlikely to work with the Fed. While nearly every president has preferred lower interest rates to bolster the economy on their watch, Trump's motivation in pushing for lower interest rates relates to his administration's top domestic policy priorities on taxes and spending. With the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill passed by the House of Representatives estimated to boost the nation's debt by an additional $3 trillion, the most intractable part of the budget is the interest expense on that burgeoning debt. In a post on Truth Social Thursday, Trump asserted that rates 'should be 2.5 points lower, and save $BILLIONS on all of Biden's Short Term Debt." The previous administration under former Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen tilted borrowing to Treasury bills after the bond market sent the benchmark 10-year yield to close to 5% in October 2023, creating worries about absorbing the supply of intermediate- and long-term debt. This was criticized by, among others, the current Treasury secretary, Scott Bessent. The chart here shows the sharp ascent in the federal government's interest tab. That rise is the result of the surge in the total debt, which passed $37 trillion this past week, and the increase in short-term interest rates, from near zero percent at the beginning of the decade. The average cost of the Treasury's overall debt has more than doubled from the low of early 2022, to 3.35% at the end of March. Drawing on his years of experience as a heavily leveraged real estate operator, Trump said on Wednesday that he would 'go very 'til this guy gets out, get the rates way down, and then go long-term." That presumably would be when Powell's term as Fed Chair ends next May, at which point Trump could install his own choice to lead the central bank. (The White House and the Treasury didn't respond to Barron's queries about coming changes in government borrowing plans. Treasury Deputy Secretary Michael Faulkender told Barron's colleague Matt Peterson on Friday that the department will continue to work with the Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee to set the best mix of maturities without specifying any changes.) Even if the Fed under Trump's next pick were to sharply lower its short-term rate target, there is no certainty that intermediate- and long-term Treasury yields would follow. Indeed, after the Fed cut its federal-funds target a full percentage point last year, to the current range of 4.25% to 4.5%, the benchmark 10-year yield rose more than a full point. The president's focus on interest rates and their role in the massive federal budget deficit has been a topic here for months. Just after November's presidential election, this column foresaw that the president-elect would lean on the Fed to curb Uncle Sam's mounting interest expense and the rising tide of red ink. Trump's badgering is having no discernible effect so far, however. The new Summary of Economic Projections from the Federal Open Market Committee, released this past Wednesday, showed no change in the median expectation of a total of two quarter-point fed-funds rate cuts by the end of 2025. But the so-called dot plot of guesses showed that seven Fed officials were anticipating no change, with eight looking for two cuts. In the previous SEP released in March, there was a tighter consensus around two cuts by year end. Other presidents have been notably more successful in getting the Fed on board with them. When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, he acceded to the advice of then-Fed Chair Alan Greenspan to curb the budget deficit, which Greenspan suggested would lower long-term interest rates. Clinton privately railed that his policies were subject to the whims of a bunch of 'f—ing bond traders," according to Sebastian Mallaby's biography of Greenspan, The Man Who Knew. Still, Clinton went along, supporting the Fed's independence along with a strong dollar, and left office with a budget surplus after the dot-com boom. One prominent Fed governor, Christopher Waller, said on Friday that a rate cut could be on the table as early as the July 29-30 Federal Open Market Committee meeting. In a CNBC interview, Waller noted that recent inflation readings have been well contained while the Trump tariffs may be a one-time price boost, rather than indicative of sustained inflation, and that the labor market may be vulnerable to slowing. Waller, formerly the research director at the St. Louis Fed, was nominated by Trump to the Fed in 2020, and has been mentioned as a possible successor to Powell. The Fed's semiannual report to Congress, released on Friday, said that the job market was in 'solid shape," with labor supply constrained by slower immigration and lower labor-force participation, points emphasized by Powell in his post-FOMC press conference. He will be grilled by the House Financial Services Committee on this and other topics on Tuesday, followed by testimony before the Senate Banking Committee the next day. Congressional inquisitors surely will want to know about how the Fed will deal with White House pressures on monetary policy. Write to Randall W. Forsyth