Trump Administration in Talks to Accept New Air Force One as Gift From Qatar
President Trump's administration is in talks with the Qatari government about accepting a luxury Qatari plane for his use as president and potentially beyond, according to people familiar with the matter.
Under the potential arrangement, which is raising legal and ethical concerns, the plane owned by the Qatari royal family would be used as Air Force One while Trump is in office after being retrofitted by a U.S. defense contractor. The U.S. wouldn't pay for the luxury 747-style jumbo jet. It may then be gifted to the Trump presidential library for Trump to use after he leaves office, the people said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US FTC accepts consent order on Omnicom-Interpublic merger
(Reuters) -The U.S. Federal Trade Commission said on Monday it had accepted a proposed consent order to resolve potential anti-competitive coordination in the advertising agency Omnicom's $13.5 billion acquisition of rival Interpublic . "The proposed order imposes restrictions that prevent Omnicom from engaging in collusion or coordination to direct advertising away from media publishers based on the publishers' political or ideological viewpoints," the FTC said in a press release.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott vetoes SB 3, cites proposed state THC ban conflicting with federal law
In the 11th hour until the deadline, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has struck down the proposed THC ban from state lawmakers, giving Texans his reason why. Senate Bill 3, authored by Lubbock Republican Sen. Charles Perry, was set to severely restrict the $8 billion hemp industry in Texas. Others are reading: Texas Gov. Greg Abbott signs historic $20 billion water investment bill, talks state impact Perry, along with Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, on their media press tour around Texas earlier in the month, defended the proposed law, saying it would have closed a loophole in state law that allowed "bad actors" to make synthetic cannabis that is "more powerful and more potent than anything we've ever seen before." In a statement on social media, Patrick criticised Abbott's decision to veto SB 3. "Throughout the legislative session, (Gov. Abbott) remained totally silent on Senate Bill 3, the bill that would have banned dangerous THC products in Texas," Patrick stated. "His late-night veto, on an issue supported by 105 of 108 Republicans in the legislature, strongly backed by law enforcement, many in the medical and education communities, and the families who have seen their loved ones' lives destroyed by these very dangerous drugs, leaves them feeling abandoned." Patrick further stated he would hold a press conference to discuss the bill's failure, but it must be noted that this statement was issued before Abbott announced a special session for lawmakers to address SB 3. Document: Texas Gov. Greg Abbott's Veto Proclamation on SB 3 Abbott also released a four-page proclamation as to why he vetoed the bill, stating that the bill was "well-intentioned" but "would never go into effect because of valid constitutional challenges." Abbott further cited a similar bill in 2023 in Arkansas, which was challenged in the courts and has been left in limbo on whether it can be enforced or not. "If I were to allow Senate Bill 3 to become law, its enforcement would be enjoined for years, leaving existing abuses unaddressed. Texas cannot afford to wait," read Abbott's proclamation. Abbott, a former Texas Supreme Court justice and attorney general, said it would create a showdown between federal and state law with legal ramifications for farmers and pharmacists. The governor also said SB 3 could also take private property unconstitutionally — even if the bill is aimed at so-called "bad actors" exploiting a loophole. "But there are also many Texans conducting business responsibly, who invested millions of dollars planting fields or opening up retail stores in reliance on laws making hemp a lawful product," read Abbott's justification. "While States may restrict the use of dangerous contraband, it is a different thing entirely to change the rules in the middle of the game." Others are reading: What's the difference between marijuana, cannabis? 4/20 terms to know. But the reality of the issue does not go unnoticed by the governor, who gave lawmakers the task of creating a law that protects public safety, aligns with federal law, has a "fully funded enforcement structure," and can go into effect without delay. "Passing a law is not the same thing as actually solving a problem," read Abbott's message. "Texas needs a bill that is enforceable and will make our communities safer today, rather than years from now." After the governor's veto, hemp industry leaders released statements praising the governor for his decision but also warning that the issues at hand still need to be addressed more meaningfully. "We respect Governor Abbott's decision and understand his concerns about unintended consequences. That said, the rapid proliferation of high‑potency hemp products in Texas has highlighted a regulatory gap that simply can't be ignored. I hope this signals a renewed commitment to crafting thoughtful legislation that effectively addresses public health and youth protection, without undermining safety," said Jason Vedadi, CEO of Story Cannabis. Others are reading: Delta what? Here's how to understand the difference between Delta 8, 9 and 10 "While the bill's failure to move forward keeps the status quo in place, it should not be mistaken for a long-term solution. There is growing concern around unregulated psychoactive hemp products being marketed without proper safeguards or age restrictions. Lawmakers will need to revisit this issue soon to ensure Texas has a cannabis framework that prioritizes transparency, accountability, and public health. Consumers deserve better than loophole-driven policies," said Sara Gullickson, CEO of Cannabis Business Advisors. "We applaud Governor Abbott's decision regarding Senate Bill 3, which recognizes that sensible regulation is superior to outright prohibition. This outcome preserves thousands of Texas jobs and billions in economic activity while maintaining the state's ability to implement appropriate safeguards. The hemp industry has consistently supported responsible regulation, including strict age verification, product testing, and transparent labeling," said Reid Stewart, CEO of Frozen Fields. As stated above by the governor, lawmakers will be able to address the shortcomings — rather the overreach of SB 3 in a special session in July. The special session is set to convene in Austin on July 21, 2025 and will last 30 days. Mateo Rosiles is the Government & Public Policy reporter for the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal. Got a news tip for him? Email him: mrosiles@ This article originally appeared on Lubbock Avalanche-Journal: Texas Gov. Abbott calls special session to address proposed THC ban
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mountain West Reached Revenue High Ahead of Pac-12 Showdown
The Mountain West Conference came close to cracking nine-figure revenue in fiscal year 2024, pulling in a record-setting $92.8 million—up from $78.2 million the year prior—just as it entered a high-stakes, increasingly adversarial engagement with the Pac-12. According to the conference's latest tax filings obtained by Sportico, commissioner Gloria Nevarez earned $1.02 million in base compensation during her first year on the job. Nevarez, who took over in January 2023 from long-serving predecessor Craig Thompson, has since presided over a volatile period for the league. Advertisement More from Total expenditures for the year hit $96.2 million, resulting in a year-over-year decline in net assets. A Mountain West spokesperson attributed much of the shortfall to an atypical distribution to San Diego State, which received both its FY23 and FY24 payments—totaling $12.9 million—within the same fiscal period. Most other member institutions received over $6 million, with Boise State ($8.7 million) and Hawaii ($2.1 million) serving as financial outliers. The league's legal expenses for the fiscal year totaled $756,741—costs incurred before it began litigating with the Pac-12. Among the conference's highest-paid independent contractors in FY24 were Wasserman Media Group ($1.08 million for media rights consulting), law firm Wilkie Farr & Gallagher ($748,516) and Huron Consulting ($346,105). The past fiscal cycle closed just before Washington State and Oregon State commenced a temporary football scheduling agreement with Mountain West schools for the 2024–25 season—a move that sparked further conflict when five MWC programs, including Boise State and San Diego State, later announced plans to join the Pac-12. In response, the Mountain West invoked its so-called 'poaching penalties,' a clause in the scheduling pact that imposed $10 million damages on the Pac-12 for bringing aboard a MWC school, with escalating charges for each additional member. Advertisement This led to a federal antitrust lawsuit filed by the Pac-12 last September, alleging the penalties violated antitrust laws and that the conference had been unfairly preyed upon in its 'weakened state.' The two sides are now in mediation over a financial dispute that, on paper, could total as much as $145 million in obligations from the Pac-12 to the MWC. Amid last year's upheaval, the Mountain West awarded full membership to both Hawaii and UTEP, added Northern Illinois as a football-only member starting in 2026, and welcomed UC Davis as a full, non-football member for the 2026–27 academic year. The newly configured conference also retained Air Force, UNLV, New Mexico, Nevada, San Jose State and Wyoming, each of which committed to remain last year. Best of Sign up for Sportico's Newsletter. For the latest news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.
