logo
Power ministry announces additional ₹5,400 cr VGF for 30 GWh battery energy storage

Power ministry announces additional ₹5,400 cr VGF for 30 GWh battery energy storage

Mint10-06-2025

New Delhi: Union minister for power Manohar Lal on Tuesday said the government will roll out an additional viability gap funding (VGF) worth ₹ 5,400 crore for setting up 30 GWh of battery energy storage systems (BESS).
Addressing journalists, the minister announced several plans to meet rising power demand and achieve India's ambitious net zero target of 2070. The incentive will be over and above the existing incentive worth ₹ 3,700 crore VGF under which 13.2 GWh of BESS is currently under implementation.
The initiative will attract investments worth ₹ 33,000 crore, he said. Under the scheme 15 states will receive allocations for 25 GWh of storage capacity and state-run NTPC Ltd will get 5 GWh. The Union minister said the first round of tender for the new VGF will be floated within 3 months.
"India is targeting 393 GW of renewable energy capacity (293 GW solar and 100 GW wind) by 2030. But renewable energy is highly intermittent and needs energy storage solutions to ensure round the clock power supply and grid stability. Hence, BESS is essential especially to meet peak demand during non-solar hours," Lal told reporters.
Solar and wind are intermittent sources of renewable energy and India is targeting 500 GW of non-fossil capacity by 2030. Storage systems including BESS and pump storage plants (PSP) are expected to play a key role in stabilizing power supply and the grid.
According to the India Energy Storage Alliance, an industry grouping, the country's energy storage sector is likely to attract ₹ 4.79 trillion investment by 2032. The CEA estimates a project requirement of 411.4 GWh (175.18 GWh from PSP and 236.22 GWh from BESS) of energy storage systems by FY32.
"The first tender under the new VGF allocation would be launched in three months," the minster said.
Lal also said that during the recent conflict with Pakistan, the power sector in the country, largely the state load dispatch centres (SLDC) faced a number of cyber-attacks which were thwarted adequately via firewalls in the Indian power system.
On 3 May, Mint reported that India has stepped up the security of its national power grid as heightened tensions with Pakistan revive memories of cyberattacks in recent years and the power ministry has tightened security protocols at the load dispatch centres which manage the demand and supply of power.
He said that work is underway to set up undersea transmission cables to the UAE and Saudi Arabia with an estimated capex of ₹ 90,000 crore. High-Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) sub-sea transmission cables of 1,400 kilometres and 1,600 kilometres would be established from India to Saudi Arabia and the UAE respectively. India has already signed agreements with both the countries for the inter-connectivity of the power grids.
Further, as government aims to boost nuclear energy in the country in order to increase the base load capacity to maintain grid stability amid rising renewable energy capacity, the minister said that the Centre has suggested states, which are not in the Seismic zone 5 (Very High Damage Risk Zone due to earthquake), to set up nuclear power projects. Currently, India has over 8 GW of installed nuclear power capacity and aims to reach 22 GW by 2032 and 100 GW by 2047.
In another development, the power minister said that the government has decided to standardize temperatures of air conditioners in the country and mandate a range.
"The temperature in ACs will be set between 20 degree celsius and 28 degree celsius," he said, adding that guidelines on this would be released soon.
The move is aimed at energy conversation, energy efficiency and curbing climate change. Cooling requirements is a key factor for the country's peak power demand touching record levels in the past three years.
Last year, India witnessed its highest-ever peak power demand of 250 GW. This year, it has hit 241 GW so far, on 5 June. The Central Electricity Authority has projected a peak of 270 GW this summer season.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Centre, Karnataka govt to share price gap relief for mango farmers
Centre, Karnataka govt to share price gap relief for mango farmers

Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • Indian Express

Centre, Karnataka govt to share price gap relief for mango farmers

In a major relief to mango farmers in Karnataka, the Centre and the state government have agreed to jointly bear the cost of the price difference being faced by producers due to a sharp fall in market rates. The decision was announced following a video conference held on Saturday between Union Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan and Karnataka Agriculture Minister N Chaluvaraya Swamy. As part of the agreement, both governments will compensate farmers for the price gap on up to 2.5 lakh metric tonnes of mangoes. The financial support will be extended under a central government scheme and shared equally by the Union and state governments. The move came after the Karnataka government submitted a proposal to the Centre, highlighting the steady decline in prices of both tomatoes and mangoes – especially the Totapuri variety. Union Agriculture Secretary Devesh Chaturvedi also participated in the virtual meeting. During the discussion, Minister Chaluvaraya Swamy noted that while tomato prices were also a concern earlier, they have since stabilised and do not require immediate intervention. 'The decision to provide this relief will greatly help mango farmers who have been struggling due to low market prices,' Chaluvaraya Swamy said, thanking the Union minister for his support. Officials said details regarding the implementation mechanism, including how the differential price will be calculated and disbursed, will be announced soon. On Thursday, the state cabinet resolved to urge the Centre for greater support, flagging crises in major mango-producing regions such as Kolar and Chikkaballapura. The Karnataka government has been facing the heat of mango growers of Chikkaballapura and Kolar districts, who have been demanding a Minimum Support Price (MSP) of Rs 10,000 to Rs 15,000 per quintal for their produce. The prices crashed due to the ban on the 'Totapuri' variety of Karnataka mangoes in Andhra Pradesh for having more water content. Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah had written twice – once to Union Agriculture Minister Chouhan requesting implementation of the Price Deficiency Payment Scheme (PDPS) and Market Intervention Scheme (MIS), and once to Andhra Pradesh CM Chandrababu Naidu urging the rollback of AP's ban on Karnataka Totapuri mangoes entering Chittoor. The letter highlighted plummeting prices (from Rs 12,000 to Rs 3,000 per quintal) versus cultivation costs (Rs 5,466 per quintal). Andhra Pradesh's import ban on Totapuri mangoes had stranded Karnataka produce at the border, cutting access to processing units and amplifying the price slump. Farmers were demanding an MSP and immediate state intervention as lorry-loads remained blocked. On Tuesday, Janata Dal (Secular) MLAs Samruddhi Manjunath and Venkatashiva Reddy staged a dharna at the Gandhi statue on the premises of Vidhana Soudha in Bengaluru to protest against the government for 'ignoring' the demands of mango farmers. In Srinivasapura under Kolar district, farmers also dumped tonnes of mangoes on roads to protest against the slump in prices. A mango trader in Srinivasapura died reportedly from a heart attack after suffering heavy losses. He had invested Rs 30 lakh in produce, which dropped in value due to the ban and market slump.

When diversification backfires: Four Indian companies walking a fine line
When diversification backfires: Four Indian companies walking a fine line

Mint

timean hour ago

  • Mint

When diversification backfires: Four Indian companies walking a fine line

Diversification is a well-worn corporate strategy. Done right, it can help companies de-risk operations, tap new revenue streams, and create lasting shareholder value. Done poorly, it can distract management, strain capital, and ultimately erode core businesses—a phenomenon legendary investor Peter Lynch once dubbed "diworsification." Several marquee Indian companies are now testing that fine line between smart expansion and costly distraction. Grasim's recent move into paints, UltraTech's foray into cables and wires, and IndiGo's venture into hotels have raised eyebrows. But in each case, there's a strategic logic: Grasim and UltraTech can leverage their existing cement distribution networks, while IndiGo's established travel brand can extend naturally into hospitality. Others, however, have ventured into businesses far afield from their core competencies—often with damaging results. Read this | Company Outsider: The Gensol-BluSmart fiasco shows the dangers of reckless diversification Here are four listed Indian companies that show how overextension can strain even established businesses. Unitech: Diversification derailed the core By the early 2000s, Unitech had cemented its position among India's top real estate developers, with residential complexes, commercial projects, and amusement parks sprawled across more than 14,500 acres. Following India's 2005 liberalization of foreign investment in real estate, Unitech drew substantial foreign interest and saw its stock soar by 3000% in a year. Flush with cash, the company ventured into telecom in 2007. But the global financial crisis hit its real estate business hard, and the telecom bet proved disastrous. The venture saddled Unitech with crippling debt. The 2G spectrum scandal that followed led to cancelled licences, criminal charges against its promoters, and the forced sale of its telecom operations. At its peak, the company owed ₹8,000 crore in debt. The collapse spilled into its core real estate business: stalled projects, mounting client complaints, regulatory interventions, and severe brand erosion. Though Unitech has since pivoted back to real estate, it faces a long road to recovery from the debt burden, reputational damage, and years lost chasing an ill-fated diversification. OK Play India: Stretching to thin OK Play began as a manufacturer of water tanks, but over time expanded into a disparate set of businesses: toys, auto components, delivery boxes, mannequins, and electric three-wheelers. Management has cited plastic as the common thread—but the reality has been less convincing. The company struggled to leverage any synergies between these businesses, failing to transfer brand strength, manufacturing capabilities, or distribution scale across segments. Its core toy business continues to drive most of its revenues, while newer ventures have mostly added losses and distraction. Despite management's stated goal of doubling toy revenues annually and targeting 15-20% growth in other segments, its history of losses casts doubt on such projections. Recent expansions into home décor and air purifiers only raise further concerns. For OK Play, focus on profitable segments rather than new distractions appears critical. Patanjali Foods: Early signs of overreach Investor favourite Patanjali Foods, once an edible oil company, has successfully transformed into a broader FMCG player by acquiring foods and home & personal care businesses from its parent. Today, it ranks as India's third-largest FMCG company by revenue. However, while it has climbed the revenue ranks, profitability remains a weak spot. Revenues have also been vulnerable to volatile edible oil prices. The growing contribution of higher-margin segments has eased some of those concerns, and after several years of underperformance, the stock has been outperforming since June 2023. But recent moves have raised concerns that Patanjali may be drifting into 'diworsification." Its investment in wind power generation has already resulted in intermittent losses. Even if that can be justified as captive green energy for its core operations, its more recent forays into construction and infrastructure with KBC Global, and insurance with Magma General Insurance, mark clear departures from its core strengths. How management navigates these ventures remains to be seen. Balmer Lawrie: Overdiversification hits PSUs too Established in the pre-independence era, Balmer Lawrie is now a central PSU under the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, classified as a Miniratna-I company. As the company itself puts it, there is scarcely a business it hasn't ventured into. It has ventured into tea, shipping, insurance, banking, and manufacturing over the years. Today, it operates across eight strategic businesses spanning manufacturing and services. Its manufacturing portfolio includes industrial packaging, greases and lubricants, and chemicals, alongside refinery and oil field services. While some of these businesses are adjacent, the company's sprawling portfolio suggests an overextension of its operating focus. Read this | How ITC and BAT's divergent diversification strategies flipped the narrative In its travel vertical, Balmer Lawrie offers services ranging from travel planning, ticketing, forex, and hotel bookings to visa processing and travel insurance. It also runs logistics operations, including cold chain logistics and door-to-door freight forwarding. While logistics contributes a fifth of the company's revenues, its subsidiary, Visakhapatnam Port Logistics Park, has been a drag on profitability. The travel vertical has limited revenue contribution, with a bulk of the business still being driven by industrial packaging, and greases and lubricants. Result? Distractions from multiple fronts have kept profits volatile. When diversification Becomes diworsification Diversification isn't inherently negative. Expanding into upstream or downstream segments can lower costs, while entering adjacent businesses can help de-risk operations and cushion against business-cycle or seasonal fluctuations. Also read | Why some Indian companies are paying dividends despite posting losses The real concern arises when companies venture into industries entirely unrelated to their core strengths. Done well, such moves can mark the early stages of building a diversified conglomerate—as seen with Reliance Industries Ltd or ITC Ltd. But execution is critical, and professionally managed firms are better equipped to navigate the risks. Even then, conglomerates often trade at a discount, with the whole valued less than the sum of their parts. If a company has proven its strength in its core business, investors may be willing to back unrelated diversification—Patanjali Foods being one example. But when companies already struggling at the core venture into unrelated businesses, they risk spreading themselves too thin. Bull markets may temporarily lift such stocks on a wave of optimism, but when sentiment cools and fundamentals reassert themselves, these weaknesses are quickly exposed. For more such analyses, read Profit Pulse. Ananya Roy is the founder of Credibull Capital, a Sebi-registered investment adviser. X: @ananyaroycfa Disclosure: The author does not hold shares of the companies discussed. The views expressed are for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and consult a financial professional before making any investment decisions.

FATF flags Pak case to sound global weapons funding alarm
FATF flags Pak case to sound global weapons funding alarm

Hindustan Times

time2 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

FATF flags Pak case to sound global weapons funding alarm

A new report by the global financial crimes watchdog has cited India's seizure of equipment with military use bound for Pakistan in 2020 as evidence of widespread failures in preventing weapons proliferation financing, a problem that poses significant threats to world security and the integrity of the international financial system. FATF flags Pak case to sound global weapons funding alarm The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) report, published late on Friday, found that 84% of assessed countries demonstrated inadequate controls despite what FATF described as the 'grave threat' posed by such activities. The report featured a case study detailing how Indian customs authorities in 2020 intercepted dual-use items that were mis-declared as medical equipment but were actually destined for Pakistan's ballistic missile programme. 'Indian custom authorities seized an Asian-flagged ship bound for Pakistan. During an investigation, Indian authorities confirmed that documents mis-declared the shipment's dual-use items,' the FATF report titled Complex Proliferation Financing and Sanctions Evasion Schemes stated. The items were listed as autoclaves, which are 'used for sensitive high energy materials and for insulation and chemical coating of missile motors.' A senior Indian government official described the study as 'the most comprehensive and updated survey of risks related to proliferation financing,' noting that it identifies Pakistan alongside North Korea and Iran as countries where proliferation financing risks 'are inherent.' The FATF categorised the incident as 'non-declaration of dual use goods under the prescribed export laws of the exporting country.' Though the report did not name the exporting country, the ship was intercepted in Indian waters while travelling from China's Jiangyin port to Pakistan's Karachi port, as reported by Indian media, including HT, at the time. What was not reported till now, and referenced in the FATF report, is the link of the shipment to Pakistan's National Development Complex, a defence and aerospace agency under the Pakistan government. 'The Bill of Lading of the seized cargo provided evidence of the link between the importer and the National Development Complex, which is involved in the development of long-range ballistic missiles,' the report stated. Officials said the timing strengthens India's position as it prepares to oppose the World Bank's $20 billion lending commitment to Pakistan over 10 years. India will oppose development funding to Pakistan at the World Bank's upcoming meetings, one of these people said, asking not to be named. 'India is not against multilateral agencies such as the IMF and World Bank extending financial support for the development of the people of Pakistan. However, there is ample evidence that these development funds are diverted by Islamabad from development projects to arm purchase and terror funding,' said one of these officials, asking not to be named. In May, finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman contacted IMF leadership directly, presenting evidence of Pakistan's alleged misuse of development funds for military purchases. Despite India's intervention, the IMF executive board approved a $1.4 billion loan for Pakistan under climate resilience funding, though it later imposed 11 strict conditions following New Delhi's objections. 'Pakistan is unlikely to meet those conditions and thus it would not be able to avail the IMF funding,' the official added. Citing data available with multilateral agencies, this official explained: 'Pakistan spends on average around 18% of its general budget on 'defence affairs and services', while even the conflict-affected countries spend on average far less (10-14% of their general budget expenditure). Further, Pakistan's arms imports increased dramatically from 1980 to 2023 by over 20% on average in the years when it received IMF disbursements in comparison to years when it did not receive the same'. A second official said the latest report very nearly 'clubs Pakistan with rogue countries like North Korea.' 'This report will help India in pushing it for placing Pakistan in the grey list again.' The report also comes days after FATF condemned the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, saying it could not have occurred without means to move funds between terrorist supporters, which Indian officials described as a positive step in New Delhi's renewed attempts to put Pakistan back on the grey list. The FATF report highlighted significant vulnerabilities across the global financial system in countering the financing of weapons of mass destruction. It revealed that only 16% of countries worldwide have demonstrated effective implementation of UN sanctions designed to prevent weapons of mass destruction financing. The report cited North Korea as 'the most significant actor' in proliferation financing — having 'generated billions of dollars through cyberattacks targeting virtual asset-related companies, such as the theft of USD 1.5 billion from ByBit in February 2025,' according to the FBI. The report identified four primary methods used to evade sanctions: employing intermediaries, concealing beneficial ownership, exploiting virtual assets and manipulating shipping sectors. In the 2020 incident, the merchant vessel Da Cui Yun, sailing under Hong Kong flag, was stopped by India's customs department at Kandla port in Gujarat on February 3 for wrongly declaring an autoclave as an 'industrial dryer.' An autoclave -- a device that uses high-pressure steam and heat to sterilise materials -- is used in hospitals for sterilising medical equipment, but also helps in the manufacture of specialised materials for missile components under controlled high-pressure and temperature conditions. The interception was following an intelligence tip-off, and experts from the Defence Research and Development Organisation, including nuclear scientists, examined the 18x4-metre autoclave and determined it was dual-use equipment that could serve civilian or military purposes. The vessel was allowed to leave after the autoclave was seized. Reports suggested the Da Cui Yun had made multiple voyages from China to Karachi via Indian ports carrying machinery. The report underscores that 'unless both the public and private sectors urgently bolster technical compliance and effectiveness, those seeking to finance WMD proliferation will continue to exploit weaknesses in existing controls.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store