Spokane Valley man leads class-action lawsuit against makers of Gore-Tex
Feb. 12—A Seattle law firm, on behalf of a Spokane Valley man, has filed a class-action civil lawsuit against the maker of Gore-Tex, a synthetic waterproof membrane that revolutionized outdoor gear, over concerns that the company is misleading customers about the presence of harmful "forever chemicals."
The federal suit was filed Tuesday in the Eastern District of Washington in Spokane by the law firm Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro, which has led several high-profile cases, including a $398 million settlement obtained last month following an antitrust suit filed against Tyson Foods Inc., Perdue Farms and others over alleged wage fixing.
In the case filed Tuesday, the lawsuit alleges that the makers of W.L. Gore & Associates, which is based in Newark, Delaware, has engaged in "greenwashing" its products. In other words, the suit accuses W.L. Gore of claiming its products are environmentally safe while they continue to use chemicals that have been shown to cause harmful side effects, such as cancer in humans.
"Gore's greenwashing campaign misleads the public by purporting to be highly committed to environmental responsibility and at the forefront of sustainable manufacturing processes," the complaint states. "But, in truth, Gore continues to produce Gore-Tex Fabric using PFAS, a suite of harmful "forever chemicals" with extremely dangerous health and environmental effects.
"Gore also fails to disclose that its Gore-Tex Fabric sheds PFAS chemicals via ordinary use, which means that outdoor enthusiasts, as well as those simply wearing Gore-Tex Fabric to keep dry, are inadvertently contaminating the environment areas and their water supply when they venture out in their GoreTex gear, as the gear sheds PFAS."
The first plaintiff named in the suit is Micah Mason of Spokane Valley. Efforts to reach Mason on Wednesday were not immediately successful.
But according to the suit, Mason relied on "environmentally sound" advertising and labels when in 2021 he purchased Volcom snow pants that contained the Gore-Tex membrane, a breathable barrier that allows water vapor from sweat to escape but prevents water molecules from penetrating fabric.
Nowhere on the product's labeling did it disclose that Gore-Tex contained PFAS or forever chemicals, the suit states.
"Had Defendant disclosed these practices, Plaintiff would not have purchased the Product or would have paid less for it," the complaint states. "Defendant's unfair, unlawful, and deceptive conduct in manufacturing, marketing, and selling Gore-Tex Fabric as environmentally beneficial has caused Plaintiff out-of-pocket loss."
Waterproof revolution
According to its website, W.L. Gore & Associates was founded by a couple seeking to capitalize on a new invention.
Bill and Vieve Gore started the company in 1958 in their basement in Newark, Delaware, after discovering a potential use for polytetraflouroethylene, or PTFE, that had been developed by Roy Plunkett at Dupont in 1938.
Bill Gore gave up his job as a research chemist at Dupont, and the couple's first experiments in the basement led to a waterproof, three-layer system that propelled the company into one of the 200 largest privately held companies in the U.S., according to its website.
The company employs some 13,000 people worldwide and generates about $4.8 billion in annual revenues. Gore-Tex is used in numerous products, including hunting boots and the uniforms that U.S. service personnel use to stay warm in cold climates.
An email to W.L. Gore & Associates seeking comment was not immediately returned on Wednesday.
Forever chemicals
According to the lawsuit, the company recognized years ago that it may have problems regarding the chemicals it uses to make the waterproof membranes.
The lawsuit includes recent images of company advertising under the heading: "Performance for the people. Performance for the planet. Our performance as a company depends on the sustainable performance of our products, our operations and our people.
"We are working to protect the planet and people because our society, and our business, depends on it," the advertisement reads.
At issue is a group of manmade chemicals, perflouroalkyl and polyflouroalkyl, known as PFAS, that are also knowns "forever chemicals."
Developed in the 1940s, PFAS have been used for multiple consumer products and industrial applications. However, the chemicals take years to degrade in nature.
High levels of the chemicals, the suit states, have since been linked to cancers, heart disease, high cholesterol, thyroid disease, low birth weight and other ailments.
Locally, high levels of PFAS on the West Plains have been traced to firefighting foam used at the Air Force base and Spokane International Airport.
According to the lawsuit filed this week, W.L. Gore realized more than a decade ago that its customers required environmentally safe products.
Gore-Tex, which was first marketed in 1976, works as a three-layer system. The layered systems are then sold to other apparel manufacturers who are required to note the Gore-Tex brand.
In the past, the company acknowledged that it used products that contained APFO, or ammonium salt form of perfluorooctanoic acid, a chemical within the broader group of PFAS. But the federal government in 2014 outlawed its use for manufacturing.
Then in 2021, W.L. Gore announced that it had developed a new Gore-Tex lining that used an expanded polyethelene that does not contain PFAS, according to the suit.
"But Defendant does not disclose that Gore still includes ePTFE in several of its current products and still uses a (durable water repellant) treatment derived from PFAS," the suit states. "Gore also omits disclosure that its Gore-Tex Fabric still sheds PFAS via ordinary use."
The suit alleges that studies have shown that PFAS used in the garments can shed the chemicals as the they degrade with use.
"This means that hikers who are taking their outdoor apparel on the trails are inadvertently shedding PFAS material straight into the pristine environments they are appreciating and seeking to preserve," the complaint reads. "This also means that regular consumers are also inadvertently shedding PFAS into local water supplies while walking on city streets, spending time in their yards, or while enjoying city parks."
In addition to Mason, of Washington, the suit seeks to include anyone who purchased Gore-Tex products from 2018 to 2024 from 27 other states, including California, Idaho and Montana and the District of Columbia.
In the complaint, where it explains why attorneys chose Spokane federal court as the venue, attorneys noted that they were seeking more than $5 million in damages. But the 138-page complaint later asks the judge to determine damages at trial.
Asked whether the firm had a damages figure in mind, Steve Berman, who signed the complaint on behalf of the law firm, said he did not.
"That will be the subject of expert testimony," he wrote in an email.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
2 days ago
- Los Angeles Times
Fat Joe accused of coercion, intimidation, sex with minors in ex-hype man's lawsuit
Terrance 'T.A.' Dixon, once a hype man to rapper Fat Joe, has sued his former employer for $20 million, making some allegations that might blend right in at Sean 'Diddy' Combs' RICO and sex-trafficking trial. The federal lawsuit, filed Thursday in U.S. District Court in the Southern District of New York and reviewed by The Times, alleges that the rapper underpaid Dixon, cut him out of promised pay for contributing to album tracks, defrauded authorities about his income, ditched Dixon in foreign countries without money or transportation home and is running a criminal organization built on intimidation and violence. The lawsuit alleges that Fat Joe forced the hype man — a sort of backing vocalist who pumps up the audience — into approximately 4,000 sex acts with women in front of him and his crew. The 54-year-old rapper, born Joseph Antonio Cartagena, is also accused of having sexual relationships with girls who were 15 and 16. The allegations go back to when the rapper was in his late 30s, the lawsuit says. Fat Joe's song 'She's My Mama,' which has graphically sexual lyrics, was based on what is alleged to have happened with him and one of the girls in real life, the lawsuit says. The lawsuit states that Dixon's role over about 16 years was more than that of the usual hype man. He 'consistently' had duties that included co-writing lyrics, structuring hooks, recording background vocals, performing at more than 200 live shows as Fat Joe's primary onstage counterpart and managing travel logistics, including equipment transport, security and emergency arrangements. The complaint alleges that Dixon also acted as Joe's bodyguard and handler during tours. According to the filing, Dixon wrote or co-wrote tracks including 'Congratulations,' 'Money Over Bitches,' 'Ice Cream,' 'Cupcake,' 'Blackout,' 'Dirty Diana,' 'Porn Star,' 'Okay Okay,''No Problems,' a version of 'All the Way Up,' '300 Brolic,' 'All I Do Is Win (Remix verse),' 'Red Café (Remix),' 'Winding on Me,' 'Cocababy' and 'Get It for Life.' The complaint alleges that Dixon was not properly paid for his efforts, even though he says he was promised certain ownership percentages and documented credit on songs that Fat Joe released commercially. Dixon, who left Fat Joe's team in 2020, was unable to obtain certain evidence of wrongdoing until a person named as 'Accountant Doe' came forward last year with information, the lawsuit says. Fat Joe 'exercised sole control over contracts, budgets, tour management, licensing, and credit attribution and intentionally omitted Plaintiff's name from liner notes, publishing registrations, and royalty structures, despite Plaintiff's direct contributions to these works' creative and commercial success,' the complaint says. Joe Tacopina, an attorney for Fat Joe, called the lawsuit 'a blatant attack of retaliation' and labeled the allegations 'complete fabrications' that his client denies in a statement to Variety. Retaliation referred to the slander lawsuit that the rapper filed against Dixon in April after the former hype man accused him on social media of flying a 16-year-old across state lines for sex. Dixon's attorney, Tyrone Blackburn, is also representing producer Lil Rod (Rodney Jones) in his $30-million federal lawsuit filed last year against Sean 'Diddy' Combs and others in Combs' orbit, in which Lil Rod alleged sexual harassment and sexual assault. A judge tossed out a majority of Lil Rod's allegations against Combs in late March. Both lawsuits include trigger warnings in bright red type ahead of the allegations — something not often seen in such documents. 'Fat Joe is Sean Combs minus the Tusi [pink cocaine],' Blackburn said in a statement to the Independent. 'He learned nothing from his 2013 federal conviction,' the attorney added, referencing Fat Joe's four-month sentence and $15,000 fine in a plea deal for failure to file a tax return in multiple years on more than $3.3 million in income. In addition to Fat Joe, defendants in the new lawsuit include Peter 'Pistol Pete' Torres, Richard 'Rich Player' Jospitre, Erica Juliana Moreira and several companies —including Roc Nation — that are affiliated with the rapper. Dixon is asking for a jury trial.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Gas prices in Canada book biggest weekly spike of 2025 amid Israel-Iran conflict
Canada's gas price average booked its biggest seven-day gain of 2025 this week, according to data from Kalibrate. The jump at the pumps comes as Israel and Iran clashed with airstrikes, missiles and drones in a series of deadly attacks. The average price of regular gasoline climbed 5.7 cents per litre to $1.474 between June 12 and June 19. The largest weekly increases were in Ontario, led by a 18.3 cent gain in North Bay. At this time last year, the average price in Canada was $1.657. Adding to the uncertainty, U.S. President Donald Trump said on Thursday that he will decide whether to join Israel's strikes on Iran within the next two weeks. So far, gas price analysts are calling for rising prices to be short-lived. 'As long as tensions in the Middle East continue to escalate, the risk of further impacts on oil prices remains high," Patrick De Haan, head of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy, wrote in a blog earlier this week. "Motorists should prepare for what will likely be modest price increases — for now — but the situation has the potential to worsen at any moment.' "Ultimately, gasoline prices are headed sharply lower by the last 100 days of 2025," said Tom Kloza, chief market analyst at Turner, Mason & Co. "But for the moment, the drops have been arrested and prices will wobble a bit higher." Follow Yahoo Finance Canada for more weekly gas price updates. Scroll below to find your nearest city. (All figures in CAD cents) Location June 12 June 19 Price Change Canada Average (V) 141.7 147.4 5.7 WHITEHORSE 161.9 161.9 0 VANCOUVER* 165 172.9 7.9 VICTORIA 168.2 167.8 -0.4 PRINCE GEORGE 130.9 137.5 6.6 KAMLOOPS 147.9 146.2 -1.7 KELOWNA 139.8 149.1 9.3 FORT ST. JOHN 138.4 147.9 9.5 ABBOTSFORD 154.5 157.3 2.8 YELLOWKNIFE 144.7 144.7 0 CALGARY* 129.7 135.3 5.6 RED DEER 131 133.6 2.6 EDMONTON 128.7 131.4 2.7 LETHBRIDGE 126.4 128.4 2 LLOYDMINSTER 125.9 127.9 2 GRANDE PRAIRIE 131.5 132.5 1 REGINA* 132.8 132.5 -0.3 SASKATOON 135.3 135.4 0.1 PRINCE ALBERT 132.4 132.9 0.5 MOOSE JAW 135.6 135.6 0 WINNIPEG * 130 134.9 4.9 BRANDON 128.4 134.9 6.5 CITY OF TORONTO* 134.2 140 5.8 BRAMPTON 134.4 140.6 6.2 ETOBICOKE 134 139.7 5.7 MISSISSAUGA 133.1 140 6.9 NORTH YORK 134.6 140.7 6.1 SCARBOROUGH 133.6 139.7 6.1 VAUGHAN/MARKHAM 134.2 140.4 6.2 OTTAWA 132.7 137.9 5.2 KINGSTON 123.5 130.4 6.9 PETERBOROUGH 120.4 133.1 12.7 WINDSOR 133.1 139.2 6.1 LONDON 134 140.4 6.4 SUDBURY 136.1 139.6 3.5 SAULT STE MARIE 128.1 129.4 1.3 THUNDER BAY 126.6 143.9 17.3 NORTH BAY 122.8 141.1 18.3 TIMMINS 144.7 144.6 -0.1 HAMILTON 132.1 137.5 5.4 ST. CATHARINES 131.2 137.2 6 BARRIE 132.8 139.2 6.4 BRANTFORD 133 139 6 GUELPH 133.8 139.5 5.7 KITCHENER 132.3 137.8 5.5 OSHAWA 134.5 139.9 5.4 SARNIA 125.1 126.6 1.5 MONTRÉAL* 156.5 163.3 6.8 QUÉBEC 154.7 153.8 -0.9 SHERBROOKE 151.9 151.6 -0.3 GASPÉ 157.4 157.4 0 CHICOUTIMI 141 137.3 -3.7 RIMOUSKI 151.4 151.4 0 TROIS RIVIÈRES 154.2 153.9 -0.3 DRUMMONDVILLE 150.7 150.6 -0.1 VAL D'OR 159.6 159.4 -0.2 GATINEAU 137.5 136.8 -0.7 SAINT JOHN* 137.8 137.5 -0.3 FREDERICTON 138.4 138.8 0.4 MONCTON 138.5 138.9 0.4 BATHURST 138.8 138.8 0 EDMUNDSTON 137.4 137.4 0 MIRAMICHI 139.9 139.8 -0.1 CAMPBELLTON 139.7 139.7 0 SUSSEX 138.3 138.2 -0.1 WOODSTOCK 139.6 140 0.4 HALIFAX* 138.1 139.3 1.2 SYDNEY 140.1 141.2 1.1 YARMOUTH 139.2 140.3 1.1 TRURO 139.3 140.4 1.1 KENTVILLE 138.7 139.9 1.2 NEW GLASGOW 139.3 140.4 1.1 CHARLOTTETOWN* 143.3 149.6 6.3 ST JOHNS* 147.7 148.9 1.2 GANDER 151.5 152.7 1.2 LABRADOR CITY 154.9 156.1 1.2 CORNER BROOK 148.8 149.9 1.1 GRAND FALLS 151.5 152.7 1.2 SOURCE: KALIBRATE • All figures in CAD cents (*) Denotes markets used in Volume Weighted Canada Average Jeff Lagerquist is a senior reporter at Yahoo Finance Canada. Follow him on Twitter @jefflagerquist. Download the Yahoo Finance app, available for Apple and Android.
Los Angeles Times
3 days ago
- Los Angeles Times
Social Security is still in good shape but faces challenges — from Trump
The annual reports of the Social Security and Medicare trustees provide yearly opportunities for misunderstandings by politicians, the media, and the general public about the health of these programs. This year is no exception. A case in point is the response by House Budget Committee Chairman Jodey Arrington (R-Tex.) to the Social Security and Medicare trustees' projections about the depletion of the programs' reserves: 'Doing nothing to address the solvency of these programs will result in an immediate, automatic, and catastrophic cut to benefits for the nearly 70 million seniors who rely on them.' The reports say nothing about an 'immediate' cut to benefits. They talk about cuts that might happen in 2034 and 2033, when there still would be enough money coming in to pay 89% of scheduled Medicare benefits and 81% of scheduled Social Security benefits. House Ways and Means Committee chairman Jason Smith (R-Mo.) used the release of the reports to plump for the budget resolution that the House narrowly passed on orders from President Trump and that is currently being masticated by several Senate committees. The reports, Smith said, make clear 'how much we need pro-growth tax and economic policies that unleash our nation's growth, increase wages, and create new jobs.' The budget bill 'would do just that,' he said. Neither Arrington nor Smith mentioned the leading threats to the programs coming from the White House. In Social Security's case, that's Trump's immigration, taxation and tariff policies, which work directly against the program's solvency. For Medicare, the major threat is a rise in healthcare costs. But those have flattened out as a percentage of gross domestic product since 2010, when the enactment of the Affordable Care Act brought better access to medical care to millions of Americans. That trend is jeopardized by Republican healthcare proposals, which encompass throwing millions of Americans off Medicaid. Policy proposals by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. such as discouraging vaccinations can only drive healthcare costs higher. Let's take a closer look. (The Social Security trustees are Kennedy, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer and newly confirmed Social Security Commissioner Frank Bisignano, all of whom serve ex officio; two seats for public trustees are vacant. The Medicare trustees are the same, plus Mehmet Oz, administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.) The trust funds are built up from payroll taxes paid by workers and employers, along with interest paid on the treasury bonds the programs hold. At the end of this year, the Medicare trust fund will hold about $245 billion, and the Social Security fund — actually two funds, consisting of reserves for the old-age and disability programs, but typically considered as one — more than $2.3 trillion. Trump has consistently promised that he won't touch Social Security and Medicare, but actions speak louder than words. 'Trump's tariffs and mass deportation program will accelerate the depletion of the trust fund,' Kathleen Romig of the Center on Budget and Policy priorities observed after the release of the trustees' reports this week. 'The Trump administration's actions are weakening the country's economic outlook and Social Security's financial footing.' Immigration benefits the program in several ways. Because 'benefits paid out today are funded from payroll taxes collected from today's workers,' notes CBPP's Kiran Rachamallu, 'more workers paying into the system benefits the program's finances.' In the U.S., he writes, 'immigrants are more likely to be of working age and have higher rates of labor force participation, compared to U.S.-born individuals.' The Social Security trustees' fiscal projections are based on average net immigration of about 1.2 million people per year. Higher immigration will help build the trust fund balances, and immigration lower than that will 'increase the funding shortfall.' All told, 'the Trump administration's plans to drastically cut immigration and increase deportations would significantly worsen Social Security's financial outlook.' A less uplifting aspect of immigration involves undocumented workers. To get jobs, they often submit false Social Security numbers to employers — so payroll taxes are deducted from their paychecks, but they're unlikely ever to be able to collect benefits. In 2022, Rachamallu noted, undocumented workers paid about $25.7 billion in Social Security taxes. Trump's tariffs, meanwhile, could affect Social Security by generating inflation and slowing the economy. Higher inflation means larger annual cost-of-living increases on benefits, raising the program's costs. If they provoke a recession, that would weigh further on Social Security's fiscal condition. Trump also has talked about eliminating taxes on Social Security benefits. But since at least half of those tax revenues flow directly into Social Security's reserves, they would need to be replaced somehow. Trump has never stated where the substitute revenues could be found. Major news organizations tend to focus on the depletion date of the trust funds without delving too deeply into their significance or, more important, their cause. It's not unusual for otherwise responsible news organizations to parrot right-wing tropes about Social Security running out of money or 'going broke' in the near future, which is untrue but can unnecessarily unnerve workers and retirees. The question raised but largely unaddressed by the trustee reports is how to reduce the shortfall. The Republican answer generally involves cutting benefits, either by outright reductions or such options as raising the full retirement age, which is currently set between 66 and 67 for those born in 1952-1959 and 67 for everyone born in 1960 or later. As I've reported, raising the retirement age is a benefit cut by another name. It's also discriminatory, for average life expectancy is lower for some racial and ethnic groups than for others. For all Americans, average life expectancy at age 65 has risen since the 1930s by about 6.6 years, to about 84 and a half. The increase has been about the same for white workers. But for Black people in general, the gain is just over five years, to an average of a bit over 83, and for Black men it's less than four years and two months, to an average of about 81 and four months. Life expectancy is also related to income: Better-paid workers have longer average lifespans than lower-income workers. The other option, obviously, is to leave benefits alone but increase the programs' revenues. This is almost invariably dismissed by the GOP, but its power is compelling. The revenue shortfall experienced by Social Security is almost entirely the product of rising economic inequality in the U.S. At Social Security's inception, the payroll tax was set at a rate that would cover about 92% of taxable wage earnings. Today, rising income among the rich has reduced that ratio to only about 82%. That could mean hundreds of billions of dollars in lost revenues. The payroll tax is highly regressive. Those earning up to $176,100 this year pay the full tax of 12.4% on wage earnings (half deducted directly from their paychecks and half paid by their employers). Those earning more than that sum in wages pay nothing on the excess. To put it in perspective, the payroll tax bite on someone earning $500,000 in wages this year would pay not 12.4% in payroll tax (counting both halves of the levy), but about 4.4%. Eliminating the cap on wages, according to the Social Security actuaries, would eliminate half to three-quarters of the expected shortfall in revenues over the next 75 years, depending on whether benefits were raised for the highest earners. Taxing investment income — the source of at least half the income collected by the wealthiest Americans — at the 12.4% level rather than leaving it entirely untaxed for Social Security would reduce the shortfall by an additional 38%. Combining these two options would eliminate the entire shortfall. Social Security has already been hobbled by the Trump administration, Trump's promises notwithstanding. Elon Musk's DOGE vandals ran roughshod through the program, cutting staff and closing field offices, and generally instilling fears among workers and retirees that the program might not be around long enough to serve them. In moral terms, that's a crime. Those are the choices facing America: Cutting benefits is a dagger pointed directly at the neediest Americans. Social Security benefits account for 50% or more of the income nearly 42% of all beneficiaries, and 90% or more of the income of nearly 15% of beneficiaries. The wealthiest Americans, on the other hand, have been coasting along without paying their fair share of the program. Could the equities be any clearer than that?
