Government files appeal after Kilmar Abrego Garcia ordered released by federal judge
The government on Sunday appealed a federal judge's order to release of Kilmar Abrego Garcia pending trial on human smuggling charges, another chapter in the saga of the Maryland father who had been erroneously deported to El Salvador.
The Trump administration admitted having mistakenly deported Abrego Garcia in March, and the Supreme Court ordered it to facilitate his return.
Upon his return this month, though, Abrego Garcia was hit with federal charges of conspiracy to unlawfully transport illegal immigrants for financial gain and unlawful transportation of illegal immigrants for monetary gain. He pleaded not guilty.
'Abrego, like every person arrested on federal criminal charges, is entitled to a full and fair determination of whether he must remain in federal custody pending trial,' U.S. Magistrate Barbara D. Holmes of the Middle District of Tennessee wrote in her opinion Sunday. 'The Court will give Abrego the due process that he is guaranteed.'
The government quickly filed a request to stay the order and keep Abrego Garcia in custody, a filing that made it clear it would again subject him to deportation proceedings.
The government argued that a stay, or pause, would allow the court 'to conduct meaningful review' of custody ahead of the judge's ruling on a separate court filing.
'He will remain in custody pending deportation and Judge Holmes' release order would not immediately release him to the community under any circumstance,' Justice Department lawyers said in request for a stay Sunday.
In concluding Abrego Garcia should be released pending trial, with certain conditions, Holmes faulted the government for its language surrounding the case and indicated he has been so far denied ordinary due process that might come to any defendant.
She noted that government lawyers have used the terms "human smuggling" and "human trafficking" interchangeably, though the former refers to helping someone willfully enter a country, while the latter refers to bringing someone to a country against their will.
She also noted that the government accused Abrego Garcia of being "involved" in transporting a minor as part of the alleged smuggling — without solid and specific evidence of such.
Holmes set a hearing for Wednesday to discuss terms of Abrego Garcia's release and ordered federal authorities to produce him for the event.
She held out little hope that Abrego Garcia would actually be free, however, noting that immigration authorities were likely to detain him upon release because he is alleged to be in the United States without permission.
"Either Abrego will remain in the custody of the Attorney General or her designee pending trial if detained under the Bail Reform Act or he will likely remain in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement ('ICE') custody subject to anticipated removal proceedings that are outside the jurisdiction of this Court," she wrote in her decision.
"That suggests the Court's determination of the detention issues is little more than an academic exercise," Holmes said.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Foreign Terror Has a Price in US Courts
I doubt that anyone was surprised on Friday when the US Supreme Court voted unanimously to reinstate lawsuits against the Palestinian Authority and the Palestine Liberation Organization by victims and families of victims injured in terror attacks in Israel. The lower courts dismissed the cases on the ground that they lacked jurisdiction over the defendants. The Supreme Court disagreed — a disagreement that has an important constitutional dimension, and which, in the current fraught international atmosphere, is likely to have consequences both for lawsuits and future statutes. To cut through the procedural complexity of the case, the plaintiffs in the two consolidated cases sued the PLO and the PA under the Anti-Terrorism Act of 1990, which grants treble damages to those harmed by 'an act of international terror.' More important to the case, under the Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act (PSJVTA), which was passed by Congress in 2019, both the PLO and the PA would be 'deemed' to have consented to the jurisdiction of US courts if they made payments to families or other designees of those who were imprisoned for or died while committing an act of terrorism 'that injured or killed a national of the United States,' if the payment was in connection with the act or the death.
Hamilton Spectator
2 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
How covering your face became a constitutional matter: Mask debate tests free speech rights
CHICAGO (AP) — Many of the protesters who flooded the streets of Los Angeles to oppose President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown wore masks or other face coverings, drawing scorn from him. 'MASKS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED to be worn at protests,' Trump posted on his social media platform, adding that mask-wearing protesters should be arrested. Protesters and their supporters argue Trump's comments and repeated calls by the Republican president's allies to ban masks at protests are an attempt to stifle popular dissent. They also note a double standard at play: In Los Angeles and elsewhere, protesters were at times confronted by officers who had their faces covered. And some U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents have worn masks while carrying out high-profile raids in Los Angeles and other cities. All of which begs the question: Can something that covers your mouth protect free speech? Protesters say the answer is an emphatic yes. Several legal experts say it's only a matter of time before the issue returns to the courts. 'What do these people have to hide, and why?' Trump's post calling for a ban on masks came after immigration raids sparked protests , which included some reports of vandalism and violence toward police. 'What do these people have to hide, and why?' he asked on Truth Social on June 8. The next day, Trump raged against the anti-ICE protests, calling for the arrest of people in face masks. It's not a new idea. Legal experts and First Amendment advocates warn of a rising number of laws banning masks being wielded against protesters and their impacts on people's right to protest and privacy amid mounting surveillance. The legal question became even more complicated when Democratic lawmakers in California introduced legislation aiming to stop federal agents and local police officers from wearing face masks. That came amid concerns ICE agents were attempting to hide their identities and avoid accountability for potential misconduct. 'The recent federal operations in California have created an environment of profound terror,' state Sen. Scott Wiener said in a press release. Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin called the California bill 'despicable.' 'While ICE officers are being assaulted by rioters and having rocks and Molotov cocktails thrown at them, a sanctuary politician is trying to outlaw officers wearing masks to protect themselves from being doxed and targeted by known and suspected terrorist sympathizers,' McLaughlin said in a statement. State restrictions on mask-wearing At least 18 states and Washington, D.C., have laws that restrict masks and other face coverings, said Elly Page, senior legal adviser with the International Center for Not-For-Profit Law. Since October 2023, at least 16 bills have been introduced in eight states and Congress to restrict masks at protests, the center says. The laws aren't just remnants of the coronavirus pandemic. Many date back to the 1940s and '50s, when many states passed anti-mask laws as a response to the Ku Klux Klan, whose members hid their identities while terrorizing victims. Amid protests against the war in Gaza and Trump's immigration policies , Page said there have been attempts to revive these rarely used laws to target protesters. Page also raised concerns about the laws being enforced inconsistently and only against movements the federal government doesn't like. In May, North Carolina Senate Republicans passed a plan to repeal a pandemic-era law that allowed the wearing of masks in public for health reasons, a move spurred in part by demonstrations against the war in Gaza where some protesters wore masks. The suburban New York county of Nassau passed legislation in August to ban wearing masks in public. Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, a Republican, last month sent a letter to the state's public universities stating protesters could be charged with a felony under the state's anti-mask law. Administrators at the University of North Carolina have warned protesters that wearing masks violates the state's anti-mask law, and University of Florida students arrested during a protest were charged with wearing masks in public. An unresolved First Amendment question People may want to cover their faces while protesting for a variety of reasons, including to protect their health, for religious reasons, to avoid government retaliation, to prevent surveillance and doxing, or to protect themselves from tear gas, said Tim Zick, law professor at William and Mary Law School. 'Protecting protesters' ability to wear masks is part of protecting our First Amendment right to peacefully protest,' Zick said. Geoffrey Stone, a University of Chicago law professor, said the federal government and Republican state lawmakers assert that the laws are intended not to restrict speech but to 'restrict unlawful conduct that people would be more likely to engage in if they can wear masks and that would make it more difficult for law enforcement to investigate if people are wearing masks.' Conversely, he said, First Amendment advocates oppose such laws because they deter people from protesting if they fear retaliation. Stone said the issue is an 'unresolved First Amendment question' that has yet to be addressed by the U.S. Supreme Court , but the court 'has made clear that there is a right to anonymity protected by the First Amendment.' Few of these laws have been challenged in court, Stone said. And lower-court decisions on mask bans are mixed, though several courts have struck down broader anti-mask laws for criminalizing peaceful expression. Aaron Terr, director of public advocacy at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, said the right to speak anonymously has 'deep roots in the nation's founding, including when anonymous pamphlets criticizing British rule circulated in the colonies.' Federal agents wearing masks 'The right to speak anonymously allows Americans to express dissenting or unpopular opinions without exposing themselves to retaliation or harassment from the government,' Terr said. First Amendment advocacy groups and Democratic lawmakers have called the masks an attempt by ICE agents to escape accountability and intimidate immigrants. During a June 12 congressional hearing, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, a Democrat, criticized ICE agents wearing masks during raids, saying: 'Don't wear masks. Identify who you are.' Viral videos appeared to show residents of Martha's Vineyard in Massachusetts confronting federal agents , asking them to identify themselves and explain why they were wearing masks. U.S. Rep. Bill Keating, a Democrat who represents Cape Cod, decried 'the decision to use unmarked vehicles, plain clothed officers and masks' in a June 2 letter to federal officials. Republican federal officials, meanwhile, have maintained that masks protect agents from doxing. 'I'm sorry if people are offended by them wearing masks, but I'm not going to let my officers and agents go out there and put their lives on the line and their family on the line because people don't like what immigration enforcement is,' ICE acting Director Todd Lyons said. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump tariffs live updates: Canada, EU deal talks in focus; Supreme Court declines to speed up legal challenge
President Trump firmed up a trade deal with the United Kingdom last week, and its European Union neighbors are apparently pushing for a similarly styled deal despite fits and starts in talks. According to reports, the EU now expects a 10% "reciprocal" tariff to be the starting point for an US-EU trade deal. The FT reported last Thursday that the EU is pushing for a deal modeled on the US-UK agreement. Trump has threatened tariffs of up to 50% on EU imports after various tariff "pauses" lapse July 9. Starting Monday, Trump's tariffs will affect washing machines, fridges and ovens. This could mean higher prices for everyday items in the US. Meanwhile, in Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney's government threatened to hike tariffs by late July on US imports of steel and aluminum, weeks after Trump ballooned US levies on those metals to 50%. At the G7 this week, Trump and Carney both expressed optimism on a trade deal between the countries. The furious push follows Trump's recent warning that he would soon send letters setting unilateral tariff rates, raising questions about the status of negotiations and a return to his "Liberation Day" tariffs that roiled markets. Trump instituted a pause on his most punishing duties that expires July 9. Trump also secured a small legal victory on Friday, when the Supreme Court declined to expedite a challenge from two family-owned businesses before lower courts have weighed in. Learning Resources, a family-owned toy company, had asked the high court to take the unusual step of taking up the case before an appeals court ruled. The case is one of several legal challenges working its way through the court system. Meanwhile, the US economy is still figuring out the effects of the tariffs. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said as the central bank held interest rates steady last week that the Fed is still waiting to see the effects of the tariffs on prices. "We're beginning to see some effects, and we do expect to see more of them over the coming months," he said. He said the Fed needs more data, saying "the pass-through of tariffs to consumer price inflation is a whole process that's very uncertain." Read more: What Trump's tariffs mean for the economy and your wallet Here are the latest updates as the policy reverberates around the world. Starting Monday, President Trump's tariffs will affect washing machines, fridges and ovens. This could mean higher prices for everyday items in the US. According to the US Commerce department, the new tariffs are in addition to Trump's existing 50% tariffs on imports of steel and some steel items and will apply to the steel content of goods. The FT reports: Read more here. Amazon (AMZN) may have found a way to offset tariffs for Prime Day — by focusing on luxury goods. Reuters reports: Read more here. The Federal Reserve's preferred inflation measure is expected to show a slight uptick in price pressures in May, with prices going up more broadly, as Trump's tariffs start to affect US costs. The FT reports: Read more here. Early trade data for June from South Korea has shown the biggest rise in exports to the US so far this year. This is an indication that manufacturers may have rushed shipments ahead of a July deadline that will see broad tariff rates double. Bloomberg News reports: Read more here. The UK's private sector grew slightly faster in June, easing fears of a second-quarter slowdown. This is the first sign if stability since President Trump's tariffs began impacting global trade. Bloomberg News reports: Read more here. The US Supreme Court on Friday denied an appeal by two family-owned companies to put a legal challenge to President Trump's tariffs on a fast track. Per Reuters: Read more here. German auto group, Volkswagen (VWAGY) may build a new factory in the US. On Friday, Reuters reported that VW's luxury brand Audi could open the plant. This is just one option being looked at to ease tensions with President Trump over tariffs. Reuters reports: Read more here. Bloomberg News reports: Read more here. German car makers have been hit with around $535 million in costs due to President Trump's tariffs, the VDA auto industry revealed on Friday. Reuters reports: Read more here. Tariff hikes from the US on small packages from China triggered a slump in shipments in May, contributing to a huge drop in bilateral trade and causing problems for exporters such as Shein. Bloomberg News reports: Read more here. Norway's shock rate cut on Thursday has highlighted how uncertain investors have become about the economic environment. US tariffs, conflict between Israel and Iran, and a shaky dollar have made global monetary policy and inflation harder to predict. Reuters reports: Read more here. Japan's trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa said on Friday that negotiations remained "in a fog" despite both sides seeking to make a deal. Akazawa also said that Japan is not fixated on the July 9 deadline, which is when reciprocal tariffs return to higher levels. Japan was keen to speak to President Trump at the G-7 summit this week, but Trump's early exit meant this discussion never took place. Tokyo has failed so far to clinch a trade deal with Washington and fulfil its goal of convincing Trump to scrap a 25% tariff on Japanese cars, as well as a 24% reciprocal tariff on other Japanese imports that has been paused until July 9. Bloomberg News reports: Read more here. Bloomberg reports: Read more here. Tariffs and conflict have clouded the outlook for central banks. President Trump's sweeping tariff threats and the escalating Israel-Iran conflict have left central banks steering policy amid rare global economic uncertainty. Reuters reports: Read more here. A study from Bain & Co. on Thursday, has shown that global sales of personal luxury goods will slow, but not collapse. AP reports: Read more here. Reuters reports: Read more here. According to the FT, the EU is pushing for a UK-style trade deal with the US. This would allow for some tariffs to remain in place after President Trump's July 9 deadline and would prevent any further retaliation against Washington. The FT reports: Read more here. European officials now expect a 10% "reciprocal" tariff to be the starting point in any US-EU trade deal, according to five sources close to the talks. According to Reuters, EU negotiators are still pushing for the rate to be lower than 10%. However, ine of the sources, an EU official, said negotiating this had become harder since the US started drawing reve from its global tariffs. Reuters reports: Read more here. President Trump's first five months in office have been dominated by his trade war. Despite having some recent wins, Trump is running out of time to "seal the deal." CNN reports: Read more here. Over 70% of Japanese firms say the business impact of US tariffs is as expected and have not adjusted their investment plans, a Reuters survey shows. Reuters reports: Read more here. Starting Monday, President Trump's tariffs will affect washing machines, fridges and ovens. This could mean higher prices for everyday items in the US. According to the US Commerce department, the new tariffs are in addition to Trump's existing 50% tariffs on imports of steel and some steel items and will apply to the steel content of goods. The FT reports: Read more here. Amazon (AMZN) may have found a way to offset tariffs for Prime Day — by focusing on luxury goods. Reuters reports: Read more here. The Federal Reserve's preferred inflation measure is expected to show a slight uptick in price pressures in May, with prices going up more broadly, as Trump's tariffs start to affect US costs. The FT reports: Read more here. Early trade data for June from South Korea has shown the biggest rise in exports to the US so far this year. This is an indication that manufacturers may have rushed shipments ahead of a July deadline that will see broad tariff rates double. Bloomberg News reports: Read more here. The UK's private sector grew slightly faster in June, easing fears of a second-quarter slowdown. This is the first sign if stability since President Trump's tariffs began impacting global trade. Bloomberg News reports: Read more here. The US Supreme Court on Friday denied an appeal by two family-owned companies to put a legal challenge to President Trump's tariffs on a fast track. Per Reuters: Read more here. German auto group, Volkswagen (VWAGY) may build a new factory in the US. On Friday, Reuters reported that VW's luxury brand Audi could open the plant. This is just one option being looked at to ease tensions with President Trump over tariffs. Reuters reports: Read more here. Bloomberg News reports: Read more here. German car makers have been hit with around $535 million in costs due to President Trump's tariffs, the VDA auto industry revealed on Friday. Reuters reports: Read more here. Tariff hikes from the US on small packages from China triggered a slump in shipments in May, contributing to a huge drop in bilateral trade and causing problems for exporters such as Shein. Bloomberg News reports: Read more here. Norway's shock rate cut on Thursday has highlighted how uncertain investors have become about the economic environment. US tariffs, conflict between Israel and Iran, and a shaky dollar have made global monetary policy and inflation harder to predict. Reuters reports: Read more here. Japan's trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa said on Friday that negotiations remained "in a fog" despite both sides seeking to make a deal. Akazawa also said that Japan is not fixated on the July 9 deadline, which is when reciprocal tariffs return to higher levels. Japan was keen to speak to President Trump at the G-7 summit this week, but Trump's early exit meant this discussion never took place. Tokyo has failed so far to clinch a trade deal with Washington and fulfil its goal of convincing Trump to scrap a 25% tariff on Japanese cars, as well as a 24% reciprocal tariff on other Japanese imports that has been paused until July 9. Bloomberg News reports: Read more here. Bloomberg reports: Read more here. Tariffs and conflict have clouded the outlook for central banks. President Trump's sweeping tariff threats and the escalating Israel-Iran conflict have left central banks steering policy amid rare global economic uncertainty. Reuters reports: Read more here. A study from Bain & Co. on Thursday, has shown that global sales of personal luxury goods will slow, but not collapse. AP reports: Read more here. Reuters reports: Read more here. According to the FT, the EU is pushing for a UK-style trade deal with the US. This would allow for some tariffs to remain in place after President Trump's July 9 deadline and would prevent any further retaliation against Washington. The FT reports: Read more here. European officials now expect a 10% "reciprocal" tariff to be the starting point in any US-EU trade deal, according to five sources close to the talks. According to Reuters, EU negotiators are still pushing for the rate to be lower than 10%. However, ine of the sources, an EU official, said negotiating this had become harder since the US started drawing reve from its global tariffs. Reuters reports: Read more here. President Trump's first five months in office have been dominated by his trade war. Despite having some recent wins, Trump is running out of time to "seal the deal." CNN reports: Read more here. Over 70% of Japanese firms say the business impact of US tariffs is as expected and have not adjusted their investment plans, a Reuters survey shows. Reuters reports: Read more here. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
