Telegraph to be sold to RedBird Capital

The Telegraph is to be sold to a transatlantic consortium led by RedBird Capital Partners under a preliminary deal to end two years of gruelling uncertainty and deliver significant investment in journalism.
Gerry Cardinale, the founder of the US private equity firm, has signed an agreement in principle to acquire control of The Telegraph for £500m from RedBird IMI, an investment vehicle majority backed by the United Arab Emirates.
RedBird IMI was blocked by the Government from taking full ownership last year following a parliamentary outcry over press freedom.
Now, RedBird Capital, which provided a quarter of RedBird IMI's funding, is moving to take direct control of the publication and is expected to be joined in the ownership group by British media investors. They have an ambitious plan to accelerate The Telegraph's growth at home and abroad.
No final agreements are in place, however.
A rival is attempting to disrupt the sale too, and regulatory hurdles await. The Telegraph, which will mark the 170th anniversary of its first edition next month, has effectively been without a proprietor for two years.
Mr Cardinale said: 'This transaction marks the start of a new era for The Telegraph as we look to grow the brand in the UK and internationally, invest in its technology and expand its subscriber base.
'We believe the UK is a great place to invest, and this acquisition is an important part of RedBird's growing portfolio of media and entertainment companies in the UK.'
In recent years The Telegraph has been navigating the decline of printed newspapers by investing in building its base of paying digital subscribers. Initial rapid growth slowed after 2021 when its previous owners, the Barclay family, got into financial difficulties and applied a squeeze to extract cash.
RedBird Capital is expected to allow The Telegraph to reinvest more of its profits, which at the operating level were more than £54m last year.
Mr Cardinale aims for the brand to become a force in US and global journalism, targeting an intelligent centre-Right readership which is not currently well-served. He also aims to expand The Telegraph's successful travel offering and build an events business.
Chris Evans, the editor of The Telegraph, said: 'The Telegraph has made enormous progress in recent years since the launch of its digital subscription strategy, thanks to the hard work of its brilliant staff and valued support of its readers.
'But there is much more that can be achieved. With the right plan and the right investment by ambitious new owners, this venerable title can look forward to an era of unprecedented success.'
Anna Jones, chief executive of Telegraph Media Group, said the company had 'exceptional journalism at its heart'.
She added: 'RedBird Capital Partners have exciting growth plans that build on our success – and will unlock our full potential across the breadth of our business.'
As he works to complete the consortium, Mr Cardinale, 58, is understood to be in detailed talks with the owner of The Daily Mail, Lord Rothermere. In 2023 Lord Rothermere lined up to bid for control of The Telegraph in an abortive auction, but is now said to be discussing taking a stake just shy of 10pc.
Sources close to the talks said a deal would position both titles to capture savings by sharing certain costs while seeking to stay within competition and media plurality rules. Lord Rothermere's company DMGT already sells print advertising space in The Telegraph and is involved in its printing.
More minority investors are expected to be named in the coming weeks before a final deal is submitted to regulators. Sources said Mr Cardinale had lined up more backers among his British contacts in sport and media investing.
The former Goldman Sachs banker has emerged as a significant dealmaker in football in recent years, with RedBird Capital the owner of AC Milan and a shareholder in Fenway Sports, the group behind Liverpool FC.
Mr Cardinale is also poised to become a bigger player in Hollywood as a backer of the $12bn takeover of the producer and broadcaster Paramount, which owns Channel 5 in the UK.
IMI, the UAE's media investment vehicle, is expected to retain a stake in The Telegraph of up to 15pc as part of the plans. Under proposals by Lisa Nandy, the Culture Secretary, an outright ban on foreign states owning shares in newspapers, which blocked RedBird IMI's attempted takeover, is to be relaxed.
The move follows lobbying by Lord Rothermere and Rupert Murdoch. They argued that earlier plans for a more stringent 5pc limit on foreign state investment would cut the news industry off from an important potential source of capital at a time of dizzying change.
The 15pc limit has split the Conservatives, who were in power when the RedBird IMI deal was blocked.
The party's leadership has said it will support the higher figure but Julia Lopez, the media minister at the time of the original ban, branded Labour's decision a 'sell-out'.
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean has said he will back a Liberal Democrat 'fatal motion' to obstruct the legislation and declared foreign state shareholdings a 'systemic threat to a free press'. He claimed the Government had yielded to diplomatic pressure after the UAE took offence at the decision to block RedBird IMI's attempted takeover of The Telegraph.
Under the planned laws, the UAE will be barred from involvement in the running of The Telegraph as a purely passive shareholder. The Culture Secretary will have a duty to trigger an investigation of potential breaches and powers to force the country to exit its investment if it is found to have exercised influence.
Mr Cardinale's agreement in principle with IMI, which is ultimately controlled by Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the deputy prime minister of the UAE, is expected to call time on a protracted parallel sale process overseen by the investment bank Robey Warshaw.
An IMI spokesman said: 'We're delighted with this announcement and know that The Telegraph has a bright future under the control of Gerry Cardinale and RedBird Capital.
'This will end the uncertainty that has been facing The Telegraph, secure its future and enable it to thrive and grow for years to come.'
Lord Fox, the Liberal Democrat peer behind the fatal motion against a 15pc limit, warned that the announcment of agreement between RedBird Capital and IMI before the law is finalised 'puts the cart before the horse'.
He said: 'We don't believe in letting overseas states buy their way in to influencing the news we read. We'll move to block the law as soon as it reaches the Lords - and can win the vote if the Conservatives do the right thing and stand with us.
'The new permissions for foreign ownership of newspapers simply don't exist yet, and there's many lawmakers who don't believe they should.'
Robey Warshaw ran a sale process last year that was eventually nicknamed 'the newspaper auction from hell'. It was the second in the saga since the Barclay family lost control of The Telegraph in early June 2023 following a dispute with Lloyds Banking Group over £1.2bn of overdue debt.
Dovid Efune, the publisher of The New York Sun, emerged as the winning bidder under the Robey Warshaw process last October, but subsequently struggled to raise the necessary funds. He has persisted in what some bankers and media executives view as a quixotic quest to finance his offer, however, and last weekend made a surprise return to the fray.
Mr Efune's latest bid includes support from the former cabinet minister Nadhim Zahawi, who is well-connected in the UAE and was involved in the original deal between the Barclay family and RedBird IMI, and hedge fund chief Jeremy Hosking, who is the main donor to the Right-wing populist Reclaim party led by the controversial actor Laurence Fox.
The Efune consortium are pitching their gate-crashing attempt as a 'British bid' in contrast with RedBird Capital's more international outlook. Sources close to the process said Mr Efune's fundraising was still not complete and that the bid included a level of debt that would be difficult to support, although he remains in discussions to sign up more supporters.
Mr Cardinale's consortium is expected to rely on debt of little over £100m, or around two years' of The Telegraph's underlying profits. The current level of borrowing is around £60m.
In recent days the two men have both been meeting influential figures in London to drum up support as the battle over The Telegraph seemingly reaches its climax. In one potentially comic scene, Mr Cardinale and Mr Efune this week ran into each other in Parliament as they met different peers interested in the issues.
While Mr Cardinale appears favourite to prevail, there remain hurdles to completing a deal.
Following RedBird Capital's announcement, in a post on X Mr Efune said: 'While a deal with RedBird Capital was announced this morning, it's clear that this bid yet has significant hurdles to overcome.
'Since The Telegraph first came on the market I've dedicated much time and resources to finding a solution.
'It's been a turbulent undertaking and has faced unwelcome interference along the way. I'm pleased to say, though, that we are now within sight of the finish line, with the bulk of the needed funding committed.
'I would urge all of The Telegraph's stakeholders to hold on just a little longer and make known your support for the British bid.'
Mr Efune may review legal options over the Government's handling of the lengthy process, for instance. Meanwhile regulators are likely to closely scrutinise all members of the RedBird Capital consortium and their sources of funding. Mr Cardinale is also yet to secure final commitments from his planned co-investors.
The likely involvement of a rival newspaper publisher in DMGT will also pose questions about competition and media plurality that could further complicate and lengthen the path. A full investigation by the Competition and Markets Authority could take 24 weeks, although Ms Nandy has discretion to opt for a quicker process.
Mr Cardinale has already met senior commercial and editorial executives at The Telegraph to build relationships and discuss business plans, including utilising RedBird Capital's technology experts.
He said: 'Having now spent time with Chris Evans, Anna Jones and the entire senior management team at The Telegraph, we have tremendous conviction in the growth potential of this incredibly important cultural institution.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

an hour ago

• Yahoo

Sir Mark Rowley ‘shocked' at planned protest in support of Palestine Action

Sir Mark Rowley said he was 'shocked and frustrated' at a planned protest in support of Palestine Action, as the Government moves to ban the group. The Metropolitan Police Commissioner said a protest supporting the 'organised extremist criminal group' was due to take place in Westminster on Monday. He said until the group is proscribed the force has 'no power in law' to prevent the protest taking place, adding that breaches of the law would be 'dealt with robustly'. The act of vandalism committed at RAF Brize Norton is disgraceful. Our Armed Forces represent the very best of Britain and put their lives on the line for us every day. It is our responsibility to support those who defend us. — Keir Starmer (@Keir_Starmer) June 20, 2025 The Home Secretary will update Parliament on Monday on the Government's plan to ban Palestine Action following the group's vandalism of two planes at an RAF base. Yvette Cooper will provide MPs with more details on the move to proscribe the group, making it a criminal offence to belong to or support it, in a written ministerial statement. The decision comes after the group posted footage online showing two people inside the base at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire. The clip shows one person riding an electric scooter up to an Airbus Voyager air-to-air refuelling tanker and appearing to spray paint into its jet engine. The incident is being investigated by counter-terror police. In a statement on Sunday, Sir Mark said: 'I'm sure many people will be as shocked and frustrated as I am to see a protest taking place tomorrow in support of Palestine Action. 'This is an organised extremist criminal group, whose proscription as terrorists is being actively considered. 'Members are alleged to have caused millions of pounds of criminal damage, assaulted a police officer with a sledgehammer and last week claimed responsibility for breaking into an airbase and damaging aircraft. Multiple members of the group are awaiting trial accused of serious offences. 'The right to protest is essential and we will always defend it, but actions in support of such a group go beyond what most would see as legitimate protest. 'Thousands of people attend protests of a different character every week without clashing with the law or with the police. The criminal charges faced by Palestine Action members, in contrast, represent a form of extremism that I believe the overwhelming majority of the public rejects. 'We have laid out to Government the operational basis on which to consider proscribing this group. If that happens we will be determined to target those who continue to act in its name and those who show support for it. 'Until then we have no power in law to prevent tomorrow's protest taking place. We do, however, have the power to impose conditions on it to prevent disorder, damage, and serious disruption to the community, including to Parliament, to elected representatives moving around Westminster and to ordinary Londoners. 'Breaches of the law will be dealt with robustly.' A spokesperson for Palestine Action previously accused the UK of failing to meet its obligation to prevent or punish genocide. The spokesperson said: 'When our Government fails to uphold their moral and legal obligations, it is the responsibility of ordinary citizens to take direct action. The terrorists are the ones committing a genocide, not those who break the tools used to commit it.' Cabinet minister Jonathan Reynolds said he could not rule out the possibility of a foreign power being behind Palestine Action. The Business and Trade Secretary told the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg: 'It is extremely concerning they gained access to that base and the Defence Secretary is doing an immediate review of how that happened. 'The actions that they undertook at Brize Norton were also completely unacceptable and it's not the first. It's the fourth attack by that group on a key piece of UK defence infrastructure.' The Home Secretary has the power to proscribe an organisation under the Terrorism Act of 2000 if she believes it is 'concerned in terrorism'. Don't forget about Gaza. While the world is distracted, almost 400 people – queueing for food – have been gunned down by Israeli forces. You don't accidentally kill 400 people waiting for aid, they have been deliberately massacred. The UK must end all arms sales to Israel now. — Humza Yousaf (@HumzaYousaf) June 19, 2025 Proscription will require Ms Cooper to lay an order in Parliament, which must then be debated and approved by both MPs and peers. Some 81 organisations have been proscribed under the 2000 Act, including Islamist terrorist groups such as Hamas and al Qaida, far-right groups such as National Action, and Russian private military company the Wagner Group. Former justice secretary Lord Charlie Falconer said vandalising aircraft at RAF Brize Norton would not solely provide legal justification for proscribing the group. Asked whether the group's actions were commensurate with proscription, Lord Falconer told Sky News's Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips: 'I am not aware of what Palestine Action has done beyond the painting of things on the planes in Brize Norton, they may have done other things I didn't know. 'But generally, that sort of demonstration wouldn't justify proscription so there must be something else that I don't know about.' Former Scottish first minister Humza Yousaf said the Government was 'abusing' anti-terror laws against pro-Palestine activists, as tens of thousands of protesters marched in London on Saturday. Belonging to or expressing support for a proscribed organisation, along with a number of other actions, are criminal offences carrying a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison. Home Secretary @YvetteCooperMP is banning Palestine Action. We are pleased that the Home Secretary has listened to our representations over the last week. Nobody should be surprised that those who vandalised Jewish premises with impunity have now been emboldened to sabotage RAF… — Campaign Against Antisemitism (@antisemitism) June 20, 2025 The Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) welcomed the news that Ms Cooper intended to proscribe Palestine Action, saying: 'Nobody should be surprised that those who vandalised Jewish premises with impunity have now been emboldened to sabotage RAF jets.' Former home secretary Suella Braverman also said it was 'absolutely the correct decision'. A pro-Palestine protester at Saturday's march in central London said it was 'absolutely horrendous' that the Government was preparing to ban Palestine Action. Artist Hannah Woodhouse, 61, told the PA news agency: 'Counter-terrorism measures, it seems, are being used against non-violent peace protesters. 'The peace activists are trying to do the Government's job, which is to disarm Israel.' Palestine Action has staged a series of demonstrations in recent months, including spraying the London offices of Allianz Insurance with red paint over its alleged links to Israeli defence company Elbit, and vandalising Donald Trump's Turnberry golf course in South Ayrshire.

Yahoo

an hour ago

• Yahoo

Pregnant Woman Says Her Husband 'Is Very Excited' to Take a Low-Paying Job with Tons of Travel — But She's ‘Pretty Annoyed'

A pregnant woman says that her husband is considering taking a job that does not pay well and would require lots of travel She says that she is 'pretty annoyed,' and that he doesn't seem to see how the timing 'isn't ideal' The woman detailed her story on a popular community forum in order to get input from others about whether or not she's being unreasonableA pregnant woman says that her husband is thinking about taking a low-paying job that requires lots of travel — and says he doesn't seem to understand why this 'isn't ideal.' The woman detailed her story on the 'Am I Being Unreasonable' forum on the U.K.-based community site a place where women can go to seek advice from other women about interpersonal issues. In her post, the woman — who says she is expecting her first child — explains that her husband was recently let go from his job. 'Not ideal but he got a great payout, and I earn really good money (I'm by far the higher earner),' she adds. The original poster (OP) goes on to say that her husband was 'nonetheless getting to the point where he was getting worried about the fact he didn't yet have a new job,' and thus was 'very excited' when a friend recently offered him a 'business opportunity.' She says that the job would require 'traveling a lot,' and 'he would not be earning anywhere near enough for me to give up my job.' 'So I'm looking at having a baby, a full-time job and an absentee partner while I spend evenings alone,' she says, adding that she has no nearby familial support. The PEOPLE Puzzler crossword is here! How quickly can you solve it? Play now! The OP says that she is 'pretty annoyed,' and 'definitely didn't react well' to the initial conversation about the new opportunity. However, she also says that her husband 'does not see how this isn't ideal.' 'Obviously, I want to support his next career move, but surely the timing has to be considered?' she goes on to say, adding, 'I'd rather he didn't work at all than take a job where he was hardly going to be around when we have a baby.' The majority of post commenters reassured the OP that her feelings about the situation are not unreasonable. 'No, he shouldn't be considering a job with unknown amounts of travel at this point. That's crazy,' one person said. Another person added, 'Some may see it as 'controlling,' but I've always categorically let my [husband] know I will not accept a relationship where he travels a lot for work or works long hours as the norm. It's not the life I want, and I'm not going to parent that way. He is free to accept that or leave!' 'YANBU [you are not being unreasonable] at all,' said someone else, adding, 'Is he perhaps feeling worried about being able to provide for his family, so grasping at anything that comes his way?' Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. The same person said, 'I think you could empathize a bit more with what's going on for him, so you can come to a consensus about what's right for both of you together.' Read the original article on People

Yahoo

an hour ago

• Yahoo

Florian Wirtz deal forces €80m forward to Saudi Arabia

Diaz tipped for Liverpool exit Although Wirtz is an attacking midfielder by trade, the player tends to drift left. That will lessen the need for an out-and-out wide man like Diaz. Combine the Wirtz deal with the arrival of Milos Kerkez - an attack-minded left-back - and you can see how Diaz might be squeezed out of Arne Slot's first-team plans. Advertisement And there's also Diaz's contract to consider. The Colombia international is out of contract in 2027, currently earning a reported £55k per week. Following his excellent campaign, Diaz might feel like he's entitled to a bumper pay rise. So far however, sporting director Richard Hughes has refused to sanction it. With Diaz's terms ticking down, it means Liverpool might well be tempted to cash in if a decent offer arrives. It's clear that Barcelona won't come up with the requisite amount - said to be €80m - which leaves Saudi Arabian sides in the equation. © IMAGO Liverpool back away from Diaz talks Al-Nassr are reportedly keen on Diaz and it's likely that the player ends up in the Saudi Pro League as soon as this summer. That's according to a new report from TBR Football - which suggests Liverpool have WALKED AWAY from Diaz's contract talks. Advertisement 'Liverpool have backed away from contract talks with Diaz,' the report reads. 'The Colombian will move to Saudi Arabia.' Of the left-wing position: "Wirtz will end up playing there," the report reads. They've got Gakpo as well." Trent Alexander-Arnold and Caoimhin Kelleher have already departed while Jarell Quansah is soon expected to go.