
Pakistan proposes Nobel Peace Prize for Donald Trump, says he played ‘pivotal role during India-Pakistan crisis'
Trump met Pakistan army chief earlier this week
Live Events
MORE STORIES FOR YOU
✕
« Back to recommendation stories
I don't want to see these stories because
They are not relevant to me
They disrupt the reading flow
Others
SUBMIT
India dismisses role of external mediation
Trump claims US diplomacy defused crisis
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
Pakistan has proposed that former U.S. President Donald Trump should be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2026. The suggestion, made on social media platform X, cites Trump's "decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership during the recent India-Pakistan crisis" as the reason.This nomination comes despite Indian authorities disputing Trump's claims of playing a significant role in easing tensions between the two nations.Trump himself addressed the Nobel Prize question on Friday, stating he believes he deserves the award for several reasons, including his involvement with India and Pakistan, and for brokering a treaty between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda."I should have gotten it four or five times," the president said. "They won't give me a Nobel Peace Prize because they only give it to liberals."In a rare move, former US President Donald Trump hosted Pakistan's military chief General Asim Munir at the White House on Wednesday. The meeting came shortly after Munir suggested Trump be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. According to White House spokesperson Anna Kelly, Munir credited Trump for helping prevent a possible nuclear conflict between India and Pakistan during their brief military standoff in May.The White House said the meeting was held in response to Munir's comments praising Trump's efforts in calming tensions between the two nuclear-armed nations.Just before Munir's visit, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had a 35-minute phone call with Trump. During the call, Modi made it clear that the ceasefire after the May 7–10 military exchange was achieved through direct talks between Indian and Pakistani military officials, not because of any third-party involvement.Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri later said that Modi repeated India's long-standing position that it does not accept any third-party mediation on its disputes with Pakistan.Despite India's statement, Trump told reporters that his efforts were key in easing the standoff. He said both countries were "going at it" and suggested his outreach played a crucial role in defusing tensions. Trump praised both Prime Minister Modi and General Munir, calling the outcome a shared success, though he said it was largely shaped by US diplomatic efforts.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Operation Sindhu: Flight with 285 evacuees from Iran lands in Delhi; 3 more evacuation planned
Under Operation Sindhu, a special flight carrying 285 Indian nationals from Mashhad, Iran, landed in Delhi late Saturday night. The government plans to operate three more evacuation flights from Iran over the next two to three days, union minister of state for external affairs Pabitra Margherita said on Sunday. The passengers, hailing from states including Bihar, Jammu and Kashmir, Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Gujarat, and Maharashtra, bring the total number of Indians evacuated from Iran to 1,713 so far. Speaking to reporters, Margherita announced that three more evacuation flights from Iran are scheduled over the next two to three days. "We have scheduled to have three more flights from Iran in the next two to three days. In the same way, we are in constant contact with Indian nations in Iran as well as Israel... 162 Indian nationals have crossed the border to Jordan, and within a day or two, they will be brought back to India," the minister said. "Special evacuation flight has arrived in New Delhi Airport... carrying 285 Indian nationals... Mainly from 10 states... Bihar, Jammu and Kashmir, Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Gujarat and Maharashtra... The total number now stands at 1713," he added. In a post on X, the Ministry of External Affairs stated, "India's evacuation efforts continue under Operation Sindhu. MoS Shri Pabitra Margherita received 285 Indian nationals evacuated on a special flight from Mashhad that landed in New Delhi at 2330 hrs on 22 June." "With this, 1,713 Indian nationals have now been brought home from Iran," it added.


India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Regime change? Trump says it's inevitable if leaders fail to make Iran great again
A day after striking Iran's nuclear facilities, US President Donald Trump questioned whether there could be a change of government in Iran. In a series of social media posts, Trump praised the US military for the successful operation and stated the current Iranian regime may not be capable to make "MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN.""It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!" Trump wrote on Truth Social, referring to his slogan "Make Iran Great Again." advertisementTRUMP PRAISES US MILITARY, CONFIRMS B-2 RETURNS HOME SAFELYTrump congratulated the US military, saying, "There is not another military in the World that could have done this. NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE! Thank you for your attention to this matter." Trump also confirmed that the B-2 stealth bombers used in the operation had landed safely back in Missouri. "The GREAT B-2 pilots have just landed, safely, in Missouri. Thank you for a job well done!!! DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES!" he posted. He added that the damage caused by the strikes was major. "The damage to the Nuclear sites in Iran is said to be 'monumental.' The hits were hard and accurate. Great skill was shown by our military. Thank you!" he Trump confirmed that the US military had bombed three major nuclear sites in Iran: Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. He said the strikes were carried out with precision and strength."We have completed our very successful attack on the three nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. All planes are now outside of Iran air space. A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow. All planes are safely on their way home," he RISE AS IRAN, ISRAEL EXCHANGE MISSILE FIREAfter the strikes, tensions in the Middle East rose sharply. The world is now watching closely to see how Iran will respond to the US attack on its nuclear facilities. According to reports, Tehran has promised to defend itself "at all costs."Meanwhile, missile exchanges between Iran and Israel have continued. An explosion in western Iran reportedly killed at least six military personnel, according to Iranian news outlets. On the other side, earlier Iranian missile strikes caused heavy damage in Tel Aviv, injuring many people and destroying the growing conflict, anti-war protesters have gathered in US cities, urging the government to avoid further CLAIMS IRAN RACING TOWARD NUCLEAR WEAPONSIsraeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also addressed the situation, saying Israel has "interesting intelligence" about the location of Iran's stockpile of uranium enriched to 60 percent. He claimed Iran is rushing toward developing nuclear weapons and must be had to act," Netanyahu said, adding that Iran's goal to produce 300 ballistic missiles per month made the situation even more defended the US and Israeli strikes on Iran, stating they were necessary to stop what he described as a growing threat to regional and global Watch


Deccan Herald
an hour ago
- Deccan Herald
Shah's anti-English position harms India
Union Home Minister Amit Shah's denunciation of the English language is ill-conceived and uninformed, and will only work against the country's unity and development. Speaking at the launch of a book by a former civil servant in Delhi on Thursday, Shah said, ''The time is not far away for people speaking in English in the country to feel ashamed'. The prejudice against English is part of the ideology and politics of his party, and Shah has only given expression to it. He is right in saying that the languages of our country are the jewels of our culture, but wrong in dismissing the role of English as a linking and unifying language. He is also right in saying that we should take pride in our languages, but pride in one's own language need not translate into shame about another language. Languages are not zero sum games, and the knowledge of another language does not mean degradation or devaluation of the mother tongue. Languages gain by interaction. All Indian languages have enriched themselves from their interaction with English. .English not a shame but power: Rahul Gandhi hits back at Amit Shah's remarks, says discouraging it to deny opportunities .English is spoken by over 100 million people in the country, and the number exceeds the number of speakers of most other languages. It is the official language in many states. India is also said to have the second largest English-speaking population in the world. English has served as the official and link language for centuries in our country, which speaks richly diverse languages. It is difficult to imagine English losing its status in the near future, going by the people's attitude towards it. The usefulness and popularity of a language don't always depend on government policies. People's relationship with language is a sensitive matter and governments should handle it with care and caution. .Shah's tirade against English should also be seen in context of the efforts of the central government and the BJP to promote Hindi aggressively. This has resulted in apprehensions about domination of Hindi in non-Hindi states. English was the language of power in India during colonial times but after the British left, it serves as a link language, with an equal relationship with all languages of the country. The replacement of English would lead to its place being taken up by Hindi, which comes with political baggage. English is also India's window to the world in every respect, and closing that window would hurt and set the country back. Shah says India cannot be imagined with a foreign language. But the idea of India is not static--it has room for English, which is no longer considered a foreign language.