Inmate died after ‘restraint-related' incident in prison, inquest hears

Azroy Dawes-Clarke, 28, from Romford, east London, was an inmate at HMP Elmley, on the Isle of Sheppey, when he died after suffering multiple cardiac arrests on November 10 2021.
He is alleged to have attempted to commit suicide by self-strangulation before becoming violent and being 'restrained' by prison staff.
The medical cause of death has been given as hypoxic ischaemic brain injury but it is unclear when and by whom that injury was caused.
On Wednesday, Home Office forensic pathologist Dr Olaf Biedrzycki told jurors at Kent and Medway Coroner's Court in Maidstone that medically, Mr Dawes-Clarke's case was 'about as difficult as it gets' for him.
He said: 'The cause of death is given as hypoxic ischaemic brain injury that's due to either the fact that his heart or lungs stopped working … and that happened very quickly after a period of third-party restraint, which happened shortly after seizure-like activity, which was treated with Diazepam.
'That all followed compression of the neck with a ligature.'
There had been a previous incident where Mr Dawes-Clarke had attempted to self-harm or commit suicide two days before his death, the court heard.
Body-worn camera footage taken in HMP Elmley and shown in court showed four officers kneeling on and next to Mr Dawes-Clarke, who was face down on the floor prior to his first cardiac arrest.
He could be heard yelling repeatedly while restrained, until he was handcuffed and then went limp.
One officer was heard saying, 'Have we got a pulse on him? We're not sure if he's breathing, we're not sure', as Mr Dawes-Clarke lay on the floor.
Medical staff began CPR before he was taken to hospital, he suffered two more cardiac arrests in the ambulance and a fourth upon his arrival at hospital, where he died soon after.
Dr Biedrzycki added that the 'crux' of the inquest would be whether Mr Dawes-Clarke recovered between the suicide attempt and the restraint from prison officers.
'The restraint element is of greater importance if you conclude that the initial ligature compression did not actually cause him to be unconscious and fitting,' he added.
Mr Dawes-Clarke's alleged history of self-harm and suicide attempts whilst in prison was not known to the family; he also had several physical health conditions that required ongoing treatment, the court heard.
His mother, Marcia Neil, was indignant through tears as she told the court: 'Maybe if they'd phoned me, I could have helped!'
Reading a pen portrait, his sister, Shay Inico, said: 'My brother was more than just family; he was my anchor, my confidant, and my unwavering source of support. He was kind-hearted and compassionate, always putting the needs of others before his own.
'Losing him in such a senseless and cruel manner has completely shattered me. The thought of him being restrained, suffering and treated without dignity haunts me every single day.'
Father-of-four Mr Dawes-Clarke liked fantasy films and played semi-professional football, he was in the Arsenal FC academy while he was growing up.
'I share this statement because my brother's story deserves to be heard. He was a person full of love, kindness, and potential. He was not defined by his circumstances, and he deserved so much more than the injustice he faced. His life mattered, and his memory will forever remain in our hearts,' said Ms Inico.
On Wednesday, his mother, sister and uncle were in court to observe proceedings, and his brother appeared via video-link.
Mr Dawes-Clarke was recalled to HMP Elmley on April 23 2020 after breaching his license.
'Where restraint-related deaths do occur, they're invariably erroneously complex cases,' Dr Biedrzycki warned jurors.
He added: 'This is about as difficult as it gets for forensic pathologists, and I don't have all the answers.'
The inquest continues and is listed until July 11.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Daily Mail​

an hour ago

• Daily Mail​

Jamaican drug dealer claims she should be allowed to remain in the UK as her six attempts to stay so far have been bad for her mental health

A Jamaican drug dealer who has applied for asylum six times says repeatedly applying for permission to stay in the UK is bad for her mental health. The woman, who has not been named, arrived in Britain in 2002 and was jailed for six years the following year for selling Class A drugs. Deportation proceedings started but she then made multiple applications to avoid being sent back to the Caribbean island. Following her last appeal, the woman - who suffers from mental health issues including schizophrenia - has been granted 'limited' leave to remain until 2026. She claimed the refusal by the Home Office to grant her indefinite permission to stay was a breach of her human rights and a demanded a judicial review of the decision. The Upper Tribunal of the Immigration and Asylum Chamber denied her request after hearing that Home Secretary Yvette Cooper is already reconsidering her application. The hearing was told that the drug dealer, known only as AXS, was sentenced to six years in prison for supplying Class A drugs in 2003, following which deportation proceedings began. Her asylum claim was initially denied but in May 2008 but she successfully appealed under the European Convention on Human Rights claiming she was at risk of torture or degrading treatment if she was returned to the Caribbean island. A First-tier Tribunal found she would be at risk of ill-treatment in Jamaica on account of her sexual orientation. She made further successful claims in 2010, 2012, 2015, 2019 and 2023, when she was on each occasion granted limited leave to remain. In 2015 her son was allowed to enter the country, with the judge in that case observing that his mother was likely to remain in the UK for the rest of her life. Before the 2023 application, the woman applied for indefinite right to leave but that was refused, with a further limited leave granted until 2026. This decision is now being reviewed by the government, the hearing was told. The tribunal, held in May in London, heard that she had suffered sexual abuse and rape in Jamaica, had been sectioned and was a paranoid schizophrenic. She has an IQ of 61 - classed as mild mental disability. Dr Rachel Thomas, consultant clinical psychologist, deemed that the 'repeated act of applying for further leave was retraumatising the applicant and damaging her mental health'. Dr Thomas was of the opinion that the her mental health was unlikely to improve, and in fact likely to deteriorate significantly, unless she was permitted to remain permanently in the UK, the tribunal heard. Upper Tribunal Judge Mark Blundell decided that there had been no issues with the judicial process in refusing her indefinite leave. He said the tribunal should not intervene until the Home Office has made a new decision when the Secretary of State may 'decide that the impact of refusing ILR would have such a serious impact on her mental health that it cannot now be justified by any relevant countervailing considerations'. Judge Blundell concluded: 'The facts remain very much in dispute, particularly as regards the impact of the denial of IRL (Indefinite Right to Leave) on the applicant's mental health. 'The absence of an extant decision from the Secretary of State is significant, and it is not appropriate, even in this human rights context, for the tribunal to act as the primary decision maker. I accept that these delays are regrettable in a case involving a person with mental health problems.'

Telegraph

4 hours ago

• Telegraph

Drug dealer says repeated asylum claims damaging her mental health

A convicted drug dealer has claimed repeatedly applying for asylum in the UK has damaged her mental health. The Jamaican woman, who was jailed for six years for selling class A drugs, has applied for asylum six times to avoid being sent back to the Caribbean island. She has secured 'limited' leave to remain until 2026 after her latest appeal, but Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, is reconsidering a claim for permanent residence. Dr Rachel Thomas, consultant clinical psychologist, told the tribunal the 'repeated act of applying for further leave was retraumatising the applicant and damaging her mental health '. The case, disclosed in court papers, is the latest example uncovered by The Telegraph where illegal migrants or convicted foreign criminals have been able to remain in the UK or halt their deportations largely on human rights grounds. Ministers are proposing to raise the threshold to make it harder for judges to grant the right to remain based on Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which protects the right to a family life, and Article 3, which protects against torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. The drug dealer, known only as BXS, came to the UK from Jamaica in 2002. The Home Office ordered her deportation after she was convicted for drug dealing in 2003, just a year after she arrived. Her asylum claim was initially denied, but in May 2008, she successfully appealed against it under Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights claiming she was at risk of torture or degrading treatment if she was returned to the Caribbean island. She made further successful claims in 2010, 2012, 2015, 2019 and 2023. In 2015, her son was allowed to enter the country, signalling that she was likely to stay. Before the 2023 application, she applied for an indefinite right for leave to remain but that was refused, with a further limited leave granted until 2026. This decision is being reviewed by the Government, the hearing was told. The tribunal, held in May in London, heard she had suffered sexual abuse and rape in Jamaica, had been sectioned and was a paranoid schizophrenic. She has an IQ of 61 – classed as mild mental disability. Upper Tribunal Judge Mark Blundell decided there had been no issues with the judicial process in refusing her indefinite leave to remain. He said the tribunal should not intervene until the Home Office had completed its reconsideration of her case. Judge Blundell concluded: 'The facts remain very much in dispute, particularly as regards the impact of the denial of IRL (Indefinite Right to Leave) on the applicant's mental health. 'The absence of an extant decision from the Secretary of State is significant, and it is not appropriate, even in this human rights context, for the tribunal to act as the primary decision maker. 'This is not a case in which the tribunal is called upon to make a freestanding assessment on a point of law. It is necessary to consider the time and expense which having the tribunal consider matters would entail. 'If the Secretary of State is permitted to decide the application first, there will be no further cost to the taxpayer and no further expenditure of court time. If the case is permitted to go to trial on the issues set out above, there will be a lengthy hearing. 'I accept that these delays are regrettable in a case involving a person with mental health problems.'

Leader Live

a day ago

• Leader Live

Iran already carrying out ‘wholly unacceptable' actions in UK, Reynolds warns

Jonathan Reynolds said Iranian activity in the UK is already substantial and it would be 'naive' to think it will not escalate. The Business Secretary said 'not a week goes by' without Iran targeting cyber attacks on the UK's critical national infrastructure. Both MI5 and the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) have warned about Iran's activities. The head of MI5, Ken McCallum, said in October that authorities had stopped 20 state-backed plots hatched by Iran in the UK since 2022. He warned of an 'unprecedented pace and scale' of plots posing 'potentially lethal threats' to British citizens and UK residents. The NCSC has warned Iran 'is developing its cyber capabilities and is willing to target the UK to fulfil its disruptive and destructive objectives'. Mr Reynolds told Sky News the risk from Iran in the UK is 'not hypothetical'. He said: 'There is not a week goes by without some sort of Iranian cyber attack on a key part of the UK's critical national infrastructure. There is Iranian activity on the streets of the UK, which is wholly unacceptable. 'It's already at a significant level. I think it would be naive to say that that wouldn't potentially increase. The number of state threat investigations run by MI5 has jumped by 48% in the last year. Countries like Iran use proxies to carry out lethal plots on UK soil – we must act. Those carrying out activity for Iran in the UK must declare it or risk facing up to 5 years in prison. — Home Office (@ukhomeoffice) March 6, 2025 'But again, there's a choice here for Iran: Do they want to continue being an agent of instability in the region and the wider world? Where has that got them? Where has it got the Iranian people? 'There's a better course of action for Iran to take here, and I think they should consider that.' Iran was the first foreign power to be listed on the enhanced tier of the foreign influence registration scheme, aimed at protecting the UK from malign foreign influence. It means anyone who is directed by Iran to carry out activities in the UK must declare it or face five years in prison. The scheme is due to come into force in July. The Home Office will also introduce new laws that will allow the UK to proscribe state-based groups such as Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. In the latest sign of Iran's actions against the UK, it emerged on Saturday that authorities in Cyprus have arrested a Briton alleged to have been carrying out surveillance of the RAF Akrotiri base on the island.