Emotional MPs react to historic vote to allow assisted dying

When Kim Leadbeater walked out of the chamber of the House of Commons into parliament's central lobby, she was embraced by some campaigners who did not even know if they would be alive when the vote came.
'Overwhelmingly the sense is relief,' she said. Her close colleague, the Labour MP Lizzi Collinge was near to tears. For the Conservative Kit Malthouse, standing nearby, it was the culmination of a decade of campaigning within his own party. More than 20 of his colleagues – more than he expected – backed the bill.
But even in the voting lobbies MPs were texting each other with doubts the bill would pass, so high was the tension on both sides. When the speaker read out the numbers, Keir Starmer, a longtime supporter who has tried to stay studiously neutral, allowed himself a small smile. Some opponents, many of the veteran Labour female MPs, looked deeply shaken.
For Leadbeater, the vote came at a difficult time. Sunday would have been her sister Jo Cox's birthday, and last Monday was the ninth anniversary of the MP's murder.
In the six months since the bill was first voted on, opposition has grown more vocal. Leadbeater feels it personally when MPs whom she hoped would support her have moved against the bill. And the attacks, particularly on social media, have become more personal.
When she voted, Leadbeater said she would think about a lay preacher with terminal cancer she met in Yorkshire – Pamela – who spoke how she believed that the God of her own faith did not want suffering prolonged.
'I'm fully respectful of everybody's views when it comes to their personal faith,' Leadbeater said in her office, speaking to the Guardian in the evening before the vote. 'But the way she spoke about her religion and how that has informed her thoughts as a dying woman, I thought was very, very powerful.'
Leadbeater hopes the bill will get its royal assent by October – but that will be the beginning of a four-year process to implement it, overseen by Whitehall officials. Many questions remain: how it will be funded, whether the NHS will oversee it or private providers and whether it will be free at the point of use.
It will be implemented by the Department of Health and Social Care, although Wes Streeting, the health secretary, has told allies he will not seek to impede it. The day-to-day work will be handed over to the care minister Stephen Kinnock, who backed it.
And there remain some assisted dying supporters in parliament who feel the bill is a missed opportunity, especially for those with neurological disorders such as Parkinson's who will not be eligible.
In the public gallery on Friday, there were rows of campaigners, many of them in tears, with one clasping their hands in prayer. There have been deep bonds formed between both sides in parliament, Leadbeater was surrounded by supporters on the party's left and right, from Jake Richards to John McDonnell.
In front of her were some of the bill's most active and thoughtful opponents, a group of female Labour MPs new to parliament, Jess Asato, Polly Billington and Melanie Ward. Those women each had deeply personal reasons for their opposition, such as having long careers fighting for vulnerable women and disabled people.
Almost all of those who spoke – for and against – talked about some of the hardest moments of their lives, deaths of parents from pancreatic cancer, a sister with brain cancer, friends dying too young.
Some supporters of the bill said they wished at times Leadbeater had taken a harder line. 'Kim has tried to be too constructive with people – you can't negotiate or work with people whose sole intent is to kill the bill. And that's what's frustrating, because whatever you give them, give them an inch and they take a mile,' one MP said.
There is still deep unease among advisers in No 10 about the bill's passing and, until the 11th hour, there was a live discussion over whether Starmer would abstain on the vote – especially given the Iran situation.
But, as some staffers acknowledge, it would have had echoes of Boris Johnson heading to Afghanistan to avoid a vote on Heathrow. The public, whatever the PM says about neutrality, will assume this is a Labour government endeavour. 'Perhaps there is a lesson here about not promising parliamentary time to Esther Rantzen,' one quipped.
The prime minister himself had been deeply conscious of not wanting to appear to influence MPs. He had personally admonished Streeting for doing so before the last vote. But his very presence in the yes lobbies would always be a factor for some.
For some MPs, there is a feeling now that the government should take ownership of the issue, as David Cameron did on equal marriage. 'Why not try and take credit for something good? A lot of people really like it,' one MP said.
For the most passionate, the issue has dominated the last few months in parliament. But they are in the minority. For others, it was in the week of the final vote that they began to turn their minds to whether the agreed-upon safeguards were robust enough.
The message from opponents was that it was no longer a vote on the principle – but on the detail. 'For some of us, this has been our lives for the last six months,' one senior MP said. 'For some colleagues, they just haven't thought about it at all and didn't engage back until this week. How do they really feel about being responsible for wrong or compelled deaths? That was the question put to them.'
Other opponents of the bill raised concerns over the highly imperfect nature of a private member's bill, starting a bill from scratch with no heft of a Whitehall department or legislative experts.
'It's been a shocking indictment of our process generally, MPs are suddenly realising that,' said one. Leadbeater has argued to MPs that the bill has had exactly the same level of expertise and input from civil servants as any other.
Significant practical changes have been made to the bill since November, including the removal of approval being needed from a high court judge.
That was taken out on the demand of the Ministry of Justice, fearful of how it could gum up the courts even further. Now the process will include a panel of psychiatrist, social worker and senior lawyer.
That has been met with concern among some of those professions too. The Royal College of Psychiatrists said it feared clinicians could be tied up with those decisions, rather than helping patients navigate their depression, which might enable them to recover enough to want to live longer.
For some it was these concerns that were crucial to changing their votes. The Labour MP Josh Fenton-Glynn, who previously abstained, said the safeguards were not strong enough.' I don't legislate for me, I legislate for everyone including those with complex disabilities.'
Dr Simon Opher, another Labour MP, said it was clear there would also be people for whom the safeguards would not be robust enough.
'What I realised in the process was that no matter how many safeguards were put in place, almost everyone who was against the bill were steadfast in their views.
For many new MPs, being part of such a defining moment of social change so early in their parliamentary careers has been intense. 'It's been an incredibly emotional and at times overwhelming process to be part of, especially as a new MP,' the Lib Dem MP Tom Gordon said.
The issue has dominated their postbags. But since November, most who spoke to the Guardian have noticed a concerted increase in those who were against the bill.
'It's one of the first issues in my life where I have actually seen signed petitions on paper – people who have gone door to door or passed it round a church group,' one MP said.
In the final hours before the vote, opponents thought they were getting closer. A campaigner even offered to fund a private ambulance for the Alliance MP Sorcha Eastwood, an opponent of the bill, who had Covid and feared she would miss the vote – though she eventually tested negative. But though the majority has been slashed – but is still substantial enough to mean peers are unlikely block its progress.
The bill will now pass to the House of Lords where it is expected to be shepherded by the Labour peer Charlie Falconer. But it is a process that is still very unpredictable.
'I thought the spreadsheet for us was hard,' one MP backing the bill said. 'That is a different level – will they turn up? Do we even know who they are?'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Sky News

34 minutes ago

• Sky News

Sir Keir Starmer tries to contain rebellion among Labour MPs over welfare reforms

Sir Keir Starmer had a series of one-on-one meetings with Labour MPs on Friday to try to contain a rebellion on the government's welfare reforms. Ahead of the assisted dying vote, the prime minister met privately with some of the dozens of MPs with concerns about the proposed cuts to sickness and disability benefits. The first vote on the legislation, which the chancellor says will save £5bn a year from the welfare bill, will be held in early July. The prime minister's involvement at this stage suggests a major effort is underway to quell a potential rebellion. Cabinet ministers say they do not expect mass resignations, but one junior minister told Sky News that opposition to the reforms was "pretty strong". One frontbencher, government whip Vicky Foxcroft, resigned her post yesterday, writing that she understood "the need to address the ever-increasing welfare bill" but did not believe the proposed cuts "should be part of the solution". Other junior ministers and whips have not, as yet, moved to follow her. But one government insider said: "It's difficult to tell if the mood will harden as we get closer. There's a lot of work going on." The package of reforms is aimed at encouraging more people off sickness benefits and into work, but dozens of Labour rebels said last month that the proposals were "impossible to support". 1:34 Welfare secretary Liz Kendall is also meeting individually with MPs. She said earlier this week that the welfare system is "at a crossroads" and the bill was about "compassion, opportunity and dignity". Ministers are trying to convince MPs that a £1bn fund to support disabled people into work, and the scrapping of the Work Capability Assessment, a key demand of disability groups, make the cuts package worth voting for. They insist that 90% of current claimants of personal independence payment (PIP) will not lose the benefit. But disability groups say the cuts will have a "disastrous" effect on vulnerable people.

The Sun

an hour ago

• The Sun

Heads must roll over pro-Palestinian thugs break-in at RAF Brize Norton

Brize idiots HOW on earth did pro-Palestinian thugs manage to break into RAF Brize Norton to damage two military planes? Breaking through the perimeter fencing is one thing. 1 But why weren't they stopped in their tracks by armed guards before they got anywhere near military assets? Instead, the first hapless commanders heard of it was when Palestine Action gleefully posted their footage online. It's beyond belief that security could be so lax at a time when the base is on high alert over Iran and Russia. Results of a full investigation must be made public and, if necessary, heads should roll. Meanwhile, this wasn't a harmless stunt by a cosy protest group. Palestine Action is made up of dangerous fanatics bent on attacking our country from within on behalf of a foreign cause. Lord Walney, the Government's ex-adviser on political violence, recommended it be outlawed as an extremist political group more than a year ago. The militants have since gone on to terrorise workers at weapons factories and people outside Crown courts. We welcome Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's decision to now proscribe the hate-filled group. The question is: Why did it take so long? Shock moment pro-Palestine protesters break into RAF Brize Norton & spray 2 military planes with paint before escaping Dead loss ASSISTED dying is a deeply emotive and complex issue. In brutal terms, it amounts to state-sanctioned killing. On that basis, it's deeply worrying that Kim Leadbeater's ill-considered private members' bill is now set to become law. It simply does not have enough safeguards, particularly for the vulnerable, poor and disabled. During yesterday's debate, the idea it might allow families to coerce elderly relatives into early deaths was brushed aside as though such a thing could never happen. Fears from hospice carers were also dismissed. The Government has been absent throughout the legislative process and nearly 150 MPs ducked the decision and abstained. Crime associated with illegal migration is of significant public interest and concern in the wake of the Casey report into grooming gangs.

Times

an hour ago

• Times

A dozen ministers could quit over Starmer's disability welfare cuts

As many as a dozen members of government are prepared to resign rather than support Sir Keir Starmer's controversial welfare reforms, it has been claimed, as backbench critics accused ministers of betraying Labour values. A senior government figure told The Times that about 12 of their colleagues had privately indicated they would find it impossible to support the measures that are due to be voted on a week on Wednesday. Another leading opponent said that as many as 80 Labour MPs were 'holding firm' in opposition to the plans and believed the government would ultimately have to pull the vote. • No concessions on benefits reform, Starmer tells rebels 'If this goes through this will be our version of tuition fees,' they said. 'The optics of taking away money from people who find it difficult to go to the toilet are terrible.' The government has a working majority of 165, meaning that 83 Labour MPs would have to rebel for Starmer to lose a vote. Whips are warning potential rebels that they will be blacklisted for any future government job for as long as Starmer is prime minister — even if they simply abstain. Anyone openly opposing the plans faces a threat of having the whip suspended entirely amid growing concern in No 10 that the vote could slip away from the government. But one government source suggested that contingency plans to pull the vote altogether were being prepared, in case Starmer's team concluded that they did not have the numbers. Any move to back down would have implications for the government's finances as the £5 billion of savings from the changes have already been 'banked' by Rachel Reeves in the government's spending plans. Those prepared to walk away from their jobs are understood to be a mixture of junior ministers and parliamentary private secretaries — the MPs who act as the eyes and ears of cabinet ministers in Westminster. A few are said to be new MPs only elected last year. On Thursday Vicky Foxcroft, the MP for Lewisham North, resigned as a government whip and said she could not vote for the reforms. 'I have wrestled with whether I should resign or remain in the government and fight for change from within,' she told Starmer. 'Sadly it now seems that we are not going to get the changes I desperately wanted to see.' • Three months' grace for claimants about to lose disability benefits MPs are due to debate changes to welfare on July 1, which include a tightening of the criteria for the personal independence payment (PIP), the main disability payment in England and Wales. Ministers also want to cut the sickness-related element of universal credit, and delay access to it, so only those aged 22 and over can claim. The package of reforms is aimed at encouraging more people off sickness benefits and into work, but dozens of Labour rebels said last month that the proposals were 'impossible to support'. A number of MPs spoke out in support of Foxcroft after her resignation. Jonathan Brash, the MP for Hartlepool, said he had 'utmost respect for her and her principled stand here', adding: 'She's right. Our welfare system does need change, but the cuts proposed are not the right way to do it.' Connor Naismith, the MP for Crewe & Nantwich, added: 'This must have been an incredibly difficult decision but she should be commended for standing by her principles. I agree with her that reducing the welfare bill is the right ambition, but cuts to universal credit and PIP should not be part of the solution.' Asked about the resignation on Times Radio, Lisa Nandy, the culture secretary said that it was 'up to every MP to look to their conscience and vote the way that they believe is right'. 'If you can't stick with collective responsibility in government, you have to resign,' she said. 'She's done the honourable thing. It will enable her to have a voice.'