Thailand credits prey releases for ‘extraordinary' tiger recovery
The wild tiger population in Thailand's Western Forest Complex has increased almost fivefold, from about 40 in 2007 to between 179 and 223 in 2024. PHOTO: AFP
KAMPHAENG PHET, Thailand - In the thick, steamy forests of western Thailand, 20 skittish sambar deer dart from an enclosure into the undergrowth – unaware they may find themselves in the jaws of one of the habitat's 200 or so endangered tigers.
The release is part of a project run by the government and conservation group WWF to provide tigers with prey to hunt and eat, which has helped the big cat make a remarkable recovery in Thailand.
The wild tiger population in Thailand's Western Forest Complex, near the border with Myanmar, has increased almost fivefold in the last 15 years from about 40 in 2007 to between 179 and 223 in 2024, according to the kingdom's Department of National Parks (DNP).
It is an uptick that WWF's Tigers Alive initiative leader Stuart Chapman calls 'extraordinary', especially as no other country in South-east Asia has seen tiger numbers pick up at all.
The DNP and the WWF have been breeding sambar, which are native to Thailand but classed as vulnerable, and releasing them as prey.
Now in its fifth year, the prey release is a 'very good activity,' says the DNP's Chaiya Danpho, as it addresses the ecosystem's lack of large ungulates for tigers to eat.
Mr Worrapan Phumanee, a research manager for WWF Thailand, says that deer were previously scarce in the area, impacting the tiger population.
But 'since starting the project, we've seen tigers become regular residents here and successfully breed,' he says.
Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam have all lost their native populations of Indochinese tigers, while Myanmar is thought to have just 23 left in the wild, in large part due to poaching and wildlife trafficking.
Over the past century, numbers worldwide have fallen from about 100,000 individuals to an estimated 5,500, according to the IUCN, which classifies tigers as endangered due to habitat loss and overhunting of the species and their natural prey.
But major tiger recoveries have been recorded in India and Nepal, where in recent years numbers of Bengal tigers have grown to 3,600 and 355 respectively thanks to conservation measures.
Sambar deer in an enclosure before being released as part of a joint operation between the Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation (DNP) and World Wildlife Fund (WWF).
PHOTO: AFP
'Incredibly successful'
In a forest clearing in Khlong Lan National Park, DNP staff open the gate of the sambar deer enclosure where 10 males and 10 females have been grazing.
The deer watch cautiously as one brave individual darts out, before the rest follow at speed and disappear into the trees.
Mr Worrapan says prey release programmes – now also happening in Cambodia and Malaysia – are part of wider restoration efforts to 'rebuild ecosystems' in South-east Asia, where they have been adapted for local purposes from similar initiatives that have existed for years in Africa.
The breeding and releases also aim to solve the problem of the sambar deer's own population decline due to hunting, says Mr Worrapan.
'The purpose of releasing deer is not solely to serve as tiger prey but also to restore the deer population,' he says, adding that GPS collar-monitoring has allowed researchers to track their lives after release.
He says despite having only known captivity, the deer show a strong ability to adapt to outside threats.
'(They) don't simply wait passively. They try to evade predators and choose safe areas to thrive.'
Mr Chaiya says only a small number of the released deer end up as predator dinner, with most going on to reproduce.
The sambar deer and their offspring 'play a role in the food chain within the ecosystem, serving as prey for predators,' he says. AFP
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
14 hours ago
- Straits Times
Thailand credits prey releases for ‘extraordinary' tiger recovery
The wild tiger population in Thailand's Western Forest Complex has increased almost fivefold, from about 40 in 2007 to between 179 and 223 in 2024. PHOTO: AFP KAMPHAENG PHET, Thailand - In the thick, steamy forests of western Thailand, 20 skittish sambar deer dart from an enclosure into the undergrowth – unaware they may find themselves in the jaws of one of the habitat's 200 or so endangered tigers. The release is part of a project run by the government and conservation group WWF to provide tigers with prey to hunt and eat, which has helped the big cat make a remarkable recovery in Thailand. The wild tiger population in Thailand's Western Forest Complex, near the border with Myanmar, has increased almost fivefold in the last 15 years from about 40 in 2007 to between 179 and 223 in 2024, according to the kingdom's Department of National Parks (DNP). It is an uptick that WWF's Tigers Alive initiative leader Stuart Chapman calls 'extraordinary', especially as no other country in South-east Asia has seen tiger numbers pick up at all. The DNP and the WWF have been breeding sambar, which are native to Thailand but classed as vulnerable, and releasing them as prey. Now in its fifth year, the prey release is a 'very good activity,' says the DNP's Chaiya Danpho, as it addresses the ecosystem's lack of large ungulates for tigers to eat. Mr Worrapan Phumanee, a research manager for WWF Thailand, says that deer were previously scarce in the area, impacting the tiger population. But 'since starting the project, we've seen tigers become regular residents here and successfully breed,' he says. Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam have all lost their native populations of Indochinese tigers, while Myanmar is thought to have just 23 left in the wild, in large part due to poaching and wildlife trafficking. Over the past century, numbers worldwide have fallen from about 100,000 individuals to an estimated 5,500, according to the IUCN, which classifies tigers as endangered due to habitat loss and overhunting of the species and their natural prey. But major tiger recoveries have been recorded in India and Nepal, where in recent years numbers of Bengal tigers have grown to 3,600 and 355 respectively thanks to conservation measures. Sambar deer in an enclosure before being released as part of a joint operation between the Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation (DNP) and World Wildlife Fund (WWF). PHOTO: AFP 'Incredibly successful' In a forest clearing in Khlong Lan National Park, DNP staff open the gate of the sambar deer enclosure where 10 males and 10 females have been grazing. The deer watch cautiously as one brave individual darts out, before the rest follow at speed and disappear into the trees. Mr Worrapan says prey release programmes – now also happening in Cambodia and Malaysia – are part of wider restoration efforts to 'rebuild ecosystems' in South-east Asia, where they have been adapted for local purposes from similar initiatives that have existed for years in Africa. The breeding and releases also aim to solve the problem of the sambar deer's own population decline due to hunting, says Mr Worrapan. 'The purpose of releasing deer is not solely to serve as tiger prey but also to restore the deer population,' he says, adding that GPS collar-monitoring has allowed researchers to track their lives after release. He says despite having only known captivity, the deer show a strong ability to adapt to outside threats. '(They) don't simply wait passively. They try to evade predators and choose safe areas to thrive.' Mr Chaiya says only a small number of the released deer end up as predator dinner, with most going on to reproduce. The sambar deer and their offspring 'play a role in the food chain within the ecosystem, serving as prey for predators,' he says. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
a day ago
- Straits Times
2,000-year-old Roman wall paintings unearthed in London
A Museum of London Archaeology photo on June 19 shows sections of bird decorations from the Roman remains. PHOTO: AFP LONDON - Archaeologists have unearthed one of the largest collections of painted Roman wall plaster ever found in London and painstakingly pieced the fragments together, they said on June 19. The plaster, which was discovered on a construction site in 2021, once decorated around 20 internal walls of a high-status early Roman (AD 43-150) building in Southwark, south of the River Thames, the Museum of London Archaeology (MOLA) said. The plaster was found dumped in a large pit, having been smashed into thousands of pieces during Roman demolition works that took place some time before AD 200. MOLA senior building material specialist Han Li has spent the last three months laying out the fragments and reconstructing the designs. 'This has been a once in a lifetime moment, so I felt a mix of excitement and nervousness when I started to lay the plaster out,' he explained. 'Many of the fragments were very delicate and pieces from different walls had been jumbled together when the building was demolished, so it was like assembling the world's most difficult jigsaw puzzle. 'The result was seeing wall paintings that even individuals of the late Roman period in London would not have seen,' he added. The reconstruction revealed bright yellow panel designs decorated with images of birds, fruit, flowers, and lyres not seen for 1800 years. Among the fragments is evidence of a painter's signature, although their name is not among the pieces, as well as unusual graffiti of the ancient Greek alphabet. Another fragment features the face of a crying woman with a Flavian period (AD 69-96) hairstyle. The construction site has already yielded mosaics and a rare Roman mausoleum. AFP MOLA senior building material specialist Han Li lays out Roman plaster fragments from the collection found in London. PHOTO: AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
CNA
3 days ago
- CNA
Commentary: Endangered eels in unagi dishes reflect deeper issues in seafood industry
SINGAPORE: When I explain my research on the conservation status of the grilled eels Singaporeans eat, people are confused. 'Why would this matter?' or 'Eels can't be endangered, right?' Before I learned about the lucrative illegal eel smuggling industry and the various environmental threats eels face, that was also my response. But, as my recently-published study showed, virtually all of the unagi sold in Singapore consists of endangered freshwater eels (anguillids) – likely moving the American eel toward critical endangerment. Beyond unagi, many other seafood dishes in Singapore have less than savoury environmental impacts. WWF Singapore highlighted in 2021 that 75 per cent of the seafood species consumed in Singapore are unsustainable, with 120,000 tonnes of seafood eaten per year. The problem of eel thus speaks to wider issues we face as consumers of seafood. WE DON'T KNOW WHAT WE'RE EATING When we eat seafood in Singapore, we often don't know what we're eating and how it's produced. Singapore imports over 90 per cent of the food we consume, and in 2024, 6 per cent of consumed seafood came from local farms. Many things make identifying seafood difficult. Even when we can see what the animal is, like at wet markets or supermarkets' whole fish sections, they can still be difficult to tell apart visually. It's easy to tell if a whole, live eel is an anguillid rather than a moray, but less easy to visually differentiate certain anguillid species. Seafood also can reach us far removed from how it once looked. For instance, unagi mostly arrives as fillets that are seasoned and grilled, eliminating all the features you'd use to figure out what species you're eating – like colour, fin shape or body shape. This issue plagues not only eels. It can be hard to realise we're threatening vulnerable shark species like hammerheads when purchasing dried shark fin, or endangered whiprays when eating grilled sambal stingray. The same is true of heavily processed products like fish- or shrimp balls, which sometimes contain pork or lack the crustaceans they are named for. Furthermore, ambiguous labelling is part of the issue. Vague general names like 'eel', 'stingray' or 'shrimp' can obfuscate the species we're consuming. Less valuable seafood can be upsold under the guise of more premium products. For instance, fish roe could be sold as prawn roe, and farmed salmon sold as wild-caught salmon. Besides not knowing what's in our seafood dishes, we also do not know what journeys they took to reach our plates. When asked where eel products came from, most sellers told me the eels were 'farmed in Taiwan'. However, given the fact that eels can't be bred at industrial scales, the eels grown to saleable size in East Asian farms are always wild-caught and likely from illegal or unregulated fisheries. The many steps involved in fishery supply chains can hide unsustainable practices like destructive bottom trawling (silver pomfret), overfishing (many regional groupers), and even slave-like conditions on fishing boats (Thai prawn and squid). LEARN TO BE CURIOUS One thing we can do as consumers is to be curious. When we eat seafood, we can ask 'What am I eating?', 'Where is it from?', and 'How is the animal fished?' Labels from organisations like the Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC) and Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) help identify products that are more sustainable. One can also turn to resources like the WWF Singapore Seafood Guide, or news articles and scientific papers on commonly eaten seafood. Unfortunately, there is only so much individual consumer choice can do when labels are vague or misleading – which is where regulations and science can help. For instance, Taiwanese scientists who studied tuna mislabelling highlighted that it is common practice in the European Union to label seafood with scientific names. It's necessary to create standardised lists of seafood products' scientific names alongside approved common names and widely used vernacular names according to the 'one species-one name' principle. Researchers and government or international regulatory bodies can use molecular biology to accurately identify seafood, but forensics techniques have their limits. Deep-fried or extensively heat-damaged samples are not easy to analyse, and some fish populations including anguillid eels interbreed so internationally that it's difficult to split them up by geographical range based on their DNA. It's therefore important to lobby for larger-scale changes to seafood markets, through supporting more sustainable food production and demanding more supply chain transparency including better labelling. Returning to anguillid eels, conversations about eel trafficking by the media and scientists went a long way toward making the eels' plight visible to unagi-eaters. Having faced my research findings and those of other eel researchers, I've stopped eating unagi and encourage others to stop or reduce their unagi consumption. As our seas face the triple threat of unsustainable resource use, the climate crisis and ocean acidification, it will be important for us to talk about the animals that seem ugly or not worth our time, and to fight against the current for change.
