Reeves's winter fuel raid to raise £1.2bn less than expected

Rachel Reeves's winter fuel raid will raise just £250m, experts have claimed, after the Chancellor was forced into an embarrassing about-turn.
The Treasury previously estimated the controversial decision to axe universal winter fuel payments would raise £1.5bn this year. However, experts on Monday said the real figure would be just £250m, leaving the Chancellor in a £1.25bn deficit.
Ms Reeves announced she would reinstate the benefit for 75pc of pensioners amid mounting pressure from Labour MPs and following the party's abysmal local election performance.
Under than changes, retirees whose annual income is below £35,000 will be entitled to a payment of up to £300.
Revised figures from the Treasury state the policy would still raise £450m, but Sir Steve Webb, a partner at pension consultant LCP, said it had ignored the additional £200m it has spent following a surge in pension credit applications.
It is estimated there were 57,000 additional claims for pension credit following Labour's decision to revoke winter fuel payments from 10 million pensioners last July.
Sir Steve said: 'These changes wipe out most of the extra revenue which the Government was expecting to get from the winter fuel payment policy.
'Not only has the Government knocked more than £1bn off the expected revenue, but it has also had to find more than £200m per year extra because of the surge in pension credit claims.
'Overall, the amount raised looks tiny relative to the political damage which the whole episode has caused to the Government.'
Rachel Vahey, of investment firm AJ Bell, said 'the net saving from the whole exercise is likely to be miniscule', citing the administrative costs of enforcing the new threshold and the rise in successful pension credit applicants.
She said: 'The route it has chosen is the most convoluted and difficult. It will pay out the benefit to every pensioner, but then claim it back from 25pc of them – those with an income of more than £35,0000 – through a tax adjustment.
'This not only creates tax chaos for over a million people, but it creates a cottage industry for the Government to impose the clawback, creating additional admin which will cut into the estimated £450m saving to taxpayers.'
Julian Jessop, of the Institute of Economic Affairs, said: 'It is unclear whether the new plan will deliver any significant savings, but the clawback is certainly more complicated.
'The only positive from all this is that more low-income households who are entitled to pension credit are now claiming this benefit. But this will further reduce any gain for the Treasury.'
Mel Stride, the shadow chancellor, described Ms Reeves as a 'tin foil Chancellor', accusing her reversal of being unfunded and 'policy made on the hoof'.
He said: 'There was no justification for leaving pensioners in the cold last winter. Labour's U-turn on winter fuel shows it was completely unnecessary, and it raises more questions than it answers.
'They already spent the savings from this policy on inflation-busting pay deals for the unions. So where is the £1.25bn needed to pay for this U-turn going to come from? Our tin foil Chancellor says costs will be accounted for at the Budget – in other words, she doesn't yet know.'
Ms Reeves's new threshold means nine million pensioners will now get the annual payment worth £200 per household, or £300 per household where an occupant is aged over 80.
The payment is split between members of a household, however, under the new system pensioners will qualify based on their individual income, a decision Maxwell Marlow, of the Adam Smith Institute, said was 'nothing short of baffling'.
He said: 'Regarding the specific makeup of households, it now appears they are relying on data that differs from that used by the Department for Work and Pensions – the department that is actually responsible for administering the benefit. This discrepancy urgently needs to be addressed to prevent further confusion.
'If I were a pensioner and earned £100,000, whilst my partner earned nothing, we would still receive £100 despite having money to heat the home. This raises serious questions about the fairness of the policy and demonstrates the need for a thorough review.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Daily Mail​

an hour ago

• Daily Mail​

America's queen of jams savages Meghan Markle's latest 'As Ever' fruit spread: 'There's no excuse for this'

The Duchess of Sussex may have set the tills ringing with the latest 'As Ever' merchandise, but her new apricot spread has been savaged by critics – within hours of going on sale. Champion jam-maker Donna Collins said: 'It's a real disappointment that Meghan is selling a fruit spread, which is what you make when your jam fails. In the jam industry a spread is what we call something that didn't work. 'It can have the best ingredients, but if I had a jam that was too runny, I'd slap a label on it and call it a spread. There's no excuse for this. It should be perfect.' Ms Collins, who owns Jelly Queens jam company and has won more than 40 world championship honours in jam-making competitions, also queried the ingredients in Meghan's spread. The jars, sold in keepsake packaging for £10 or plain for £7, list conventionally grown apricots, dried organic apricots, organic pure cane sugar and fruit pectin. 'Why should she include conventionally grown apricots, which will have used pesticides?' said Ms Collins. 'And why is she using pectin, which is a gelling agent, unless it's because her spread was too runny? Most spreads don't use pectin.' Meghan launched her 'As Ever' brand in April with a raspberry spread, which critics attacked for being ill-suited for spreading on bread or toast. Many fans who jumped online the moment Meghan's 'As Ever' products went up for sale on Friday were disappointed to learn the apricot spread had sold out. Ms Collins added: 'Her apricot spread sold out in minutes, just like her earlier raspberry spread, which may mean they only made a small batch. 'I don't know who's making her spread, but we all know it's not Meghan. It sounds like they really don't know what they are doing.' Maureen Foley, owner of Red Hen Cannery near Montecito, said she suspected Meghan wanted to make a spread to take advantage of marketing opportunities. 'She may be smart trying to fill a niche,' said Ms Foley. 'Spreads can be sweet or savoury, and used on dishes for all meals, so perhaps it's just clever marketing.'

Daily Mail​

an hour ago

• Daily Mail​

Gloom grows in UK boardrooms as bosses lament 'hostile' economy

Pessimism is deepening in boardrooms across the UK as bosses prepare for economic conditions at home and globally to worsen, a new report suggests. Around 70 per cent of boardroom leaders expect worldwide economic conditions to worsen in the year ahead, while just 5.4 per cent believe they will improve, according to a survey by The Chartered Governance Institute UK & Ireland. By contrast, only 22.2 per cent in 2024 anticipated a deterioration in global economic conditions, and exactly double that percentage forecast them getting better. Nearly two-thirds of respondents also think the UK's economic circumstances will weaken further, compared to just a quarter asked the same question last year. CGI said executives are concerned UK competitiveness would not improve in the months ahead, due to factors like US trade tariffs and UK Government policy. President Donald Trump has slapped a 10 per cent baseline tariff on most US imports, as well as a 25 per cent import tax on car parts and a 50 per cent levy on foreign steel and aluminium. The tariffs have heightened anxieties about economic growth slowing, both in the UK and internationally, and inflationary pressures for consumers and businesses magnifying. Meanwhile, the proportion of boardroom leaders who said their firms plan on cutting capital expenditure over the next year rose to over a quarter, while none are forecasting a 'considerable' increase. 'The results remind us that boardroom decision-making has rarely been more challenging,' said the report. 'Organisations of every type are operating in a fluid, and often, hostile environment that (this year particularly) offers few certainties and elevated risk,' it added. The biggest concern for most boards is cybersecurity, with 71 per cent of governance professionals predicting cyber risks will grow this year. However, a smaller proportion of boards - 66 per cent - intend to raise spending on IT security, against 80 per cent in 2024/25. Among significant worry is regulation; most quoted governance professionals believe rules are 'slightly excessive'. Peter Swabey, policy and research director at CGI UK & Ireland, said: 'Governance professionals, always in tune with board sentiments, reveal a boardroom mood of caution and recalibration. 'While AI and cyber resilience are climbing the agenda, confidence in the UK's economic outlook and regulatory environment remains fragile. 'The Government's industrial strategy will need to address these concerns if it is to unlock long-term investment.' Having originally set to be announced this spring, Britain's industrial strategy is now set to be published in the last week of June. Defence, digital infrastructure, clean energy and advanced manufacturing comprised the top four priorities for the industrial strategy among the CGI survey's interviewees. The strategy is also set to include details on the creative, financial services, life sciences, and professional and business services sectors. CGI's survey was based on the full responses of 96 participants from organisations either based in or operating in the UK. Governance professionals in private businesses and members of quoted firms each comprised 35 per cent of the responses. The remaining 30 per cent were from representatives of the public sector, charities and other ownership structures.

The Sun

an hour ago

• The Sun

Rail minister Peter Hendy facing private prosecution for texting while driving vintage double-decker bus

RAIL minister Peter Hendy is facing a private prosecution for texting while driving a busload of sightseers. Police dropped the case against Lord Hendy citing 'insufficient evidence' — despite him apologising. But passenger John Sarson, 68, who made the initial complaint to cops, has applied to prosecute. The businessman said he saw Lord Hendy texting at the wheel of a vintage double-decker bus near Westminster Bridge in central London on March 28. In April, a spokesman for the 72-year-old peer said: 'Last month Peter Hendy used his phone while driving. He has apologised in full for this error of judgment and has contacted the police.' A source said: 'John is baffled over how someone can admit to police he committed an offence but not face prosecution.' The Met Police initially said in April the case had been closed because of a lack of evidence. But Lord Hendy then reported himself to the Met which reopened the case before closing it again last month. John is waiting to hear from the City of London magistrates' court if his legal bid is successful. Lord Hendy was approached for comment. 1