Tougher academic standards ahead for Virginia students
The Virginia Board of Education hears from experts on setting performance levels for K-12 students at Reynolds Community College on Feb. 26, 2025 (Photo by Nathaniel Cline/Virginia Mercury)
Virginia students may soon face tougher academic benchmarks as the state aligns its performance levels with the higher standards of a national assessment.
Starting next month, the Virginia Board of Education will begin adjusting its cut scores — used to determine whether K-12 students are meeting proficiency levels — to better match the rigor of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).
Student performance is typically categorized as 'below basic,' 'basic,' 'proficient' or'advanced,' reflecting their knowledge and skills in core subjects.
Since 1998, Virginia has relied on its Standards of Learning (SOL) assessments to gauge proficiency in areas like reading and math. However, NAEP, a widely recognized national organization, has often been used to assess smaller student groups, such as fourth and eighth graders.
'The NAEP assessment provides a common benchmark that states can then use to look at the relative rigor of their own assessment cut scores,' said Lesley Muldoon, executive director of the National Assessment Governing Board, during a work session Wednesday.
Gov. Glenn Youngkin's administration has frequently pointed to NAEP data to highlight what it calls the 'honesty gap' — the disparity between state-level proficiency standards and the more stringent NAEP benchmarks.
Virginia's learning recovery falls short as NAEP scores show mixed results
Between 2017-2022, Virginia's fourth-grade reading and math results showed a staggering 40-percentage-point gap between the state's SOL and NAEP assessments. That disparity does not provide an 'accurate picture of student performance,' said Em Cooper, deputy superintendent of teaching and learning, during Wednesday's work session.
In response, the board has begun discussing plans to revise the cut scores — the threshold for determining student proficiency — in key subjects. The effort is a cornerstone of Youngkin's broader push to 'restore excellence in education,' which includes raising standards in core subjects, increasing transparency and accountability, and overhauling the state's assessment system.
Youngkin has argued that Virginia's current proficiency standards are the result of the previous Board of Education lowering cut scores and altering school accreditation standards.
However, Anne Holton, a former state education secretary and an appointee of former Democratic Gov. Ralph Northam, defended the previous board's approach. She noted that Virginia's pass rates aligned with the NAEP's 'basic' achievement level, which reflects 'partial mastery of the knowledge and skills that are fundamental for proficient work at a given grade,' according to NAEP.
The Youngkin administration, however, is pushing for Virginia to meet NAEP's 'proficient' standard — defined as a student demonstrating a deeper understanding of complex topics and the ability to apply them in real-world situations.
Virginia Explained: The debate over student expectations
Board member Amber Northern, a Youngkin appointee, argued that achieving NAEP proficiency is linked to better long-term outcomes, including higher graduation rates and increased job earnings compared to students who score at the NAEP 'basic' level.
'NAEP proficiency matters in terms of long-term outcomes for kids [and] I know this because I study it,' Northern said.
She dismissed political finger-pointing over the state's current standards, urging the board to focus on the benefits of higher expectations.
'I don't care about the politics, I don't care about 'well we did this, and we did this,' … nobody knows why we are in the situation we're in, we just know that we're in it and we're not about pointing fingers. What we're about saying is, okay, this is what NAEP proficiency does for our kids, and we should actually have that as our goal to do right by them.'
But Holton pushed back, questioning whether realigning Virginia's SOL to match NAEP would lead to actual student improvement. While she acknowledged that strong SOL and NAEP scores correlate with better outcomes, she argued that no research supports the idea that adjusting cut scores alone drives success.
'The research shows there's no impact of realigning our cut scores,' Holton said. 'We need our students to do well on the test, but where the line is is irrelevant.'
Previously, cut score adjustments went through a multi-step review involving a standard-setting committee, an articulation committee, and the state superintendent before final recommendations were presented to the Board of Education.
On Wednesday, the Virginia Department of Education staff outlined the board's new approach, which includes selecting and training committee members, assessment date, and ultimately making recommendations on cut scores.
Under the process proposal, committees will primarily consist of education experts, including teachers and instructional specialists, while the remainder will include community stakeholders such as parents and business leaders.
Educators applying to serve must complete an application demonstrating their understanding of grade level content and assessments. Community members will undergo a selection process led by the board and the governor's office.
The committees are set to convene in late May once enough assessment data from the 2025 assessment cycle is available. Their proposed cut scores will go before the board for an initial review in June, with a final decision expected in July.
On Thursday, the board will vote on the proposed review process. If approved, the updated performance standards will not take effect until spring 2026.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
26 minutes ago
- Newsweek
War Powers Act Explained as Thomas Massie, Ro Khanna Push House Resolution
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A bipartisan group of House lawmakers, led by Republican Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Democratic Representative Ro Khanna of California introduced a War Powers Resolution Tuesday, just days before President Donald Trump authorized a military strike on three key nuclear facilities in Iran. The War Powers Resolution of 1973 was enacted to limit the president's ability to commit U.S. armed forces to hostilities abroad without Congressional consent. The current legislative push invokes the act's provisions and highlights persistent congressional frustration over what many see as executive overreach in the deployment of military force. Khanna called for Congress to return to Washington, D.C., to vote on the measure, which he said Sunday had up to 50 co-sponsors across both parties. Why It Matters The House resolution spotlights a critical debate over constitutional war powers at a moment when U.S. involvement in Middle Eastern conflicts risks escalation. Lawmakers are seeking to reinforce Congress's authority to declare war amid rising tensions between Iran and Israel and amid U.S. military actions that, according to critics, may exceed presidential powers. The House initiative mirrors concurrent moves in the Senate, where Democratic Virginia Senator Tim Kaine and others have advanced parallel resolutions to restrict executive military action in Iran without legislative consent. This legislative surge reflects mounting concerns about the scope and legality of recent U.S. military activity abroad. United States Capitol Building, Washington DC, October 27, 2024. United States Capitol Building, Washington DC, October 27, 2024. Getty What To Know Massie introduced the War Powers Resolution on Tuesday, emphasizing that the U.S. Constitution vests the power to declare war with Congress, not the President. Massie invited participation from lawmakers across the aisle, underscoring bipartisan concern about unauthorized military actions, Newsweek previously reported. Khanna quickly co-sponsored the measure and publicly called for Congress to reconvene and vote. "Stopping Iran from having a nuclear bomb is a top priority, but dragging the U.S. into another Middle East war is not the solution," Khanna said in a press release. "Trump's strikes are unconstitutional and put Americans, especially our troops, at risk," Khanna said. "Congress needs to come back to DC immediately to vote on Rep. Thomas Massie and my bipartisan War Powers Resolution to ensure there is no further conflict and escalation." "Americans want diplomacy, not more costly wars. We need to deescalate and pursue a path of peace," Rep. Khanna concluded. The resolution has garnered support from 50 House members, including Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Rashida Tlaib, and Pramila Jayapal. The list remains heavily Democrat, though more Republicans may break with the party in the coming days as the aftermath of Trump's military strikes continue to play out. What People Are Saying Rep. Ro Khanna, Democrat of California, said in an official statement "Stopping Iran from having a nuclear bomb is a top priority, but dragging the U.S. into another Middle East war is not the solution. Trump's strikes are unconstitutional and put Americans, especially our troops, at risk. Congress needs to come back to DC immediately to vote on Rep. Thomas Massie and my bipartisan War Powers Resolution to ensure there is no further conflict and escalation. Americans want diplomacy, not more costly wars. We need to deescalate and pursue a path of peace." President Donald Trump wrote in a Truth Social post, in part: "Congressman Thomas Massie of Kentucky is not MAGA, even though he likes to say he is. Actually, MAGA doesn't want him, doesn't know him, and doesn't respect him. He is a negative force who almost always Votes "NO," no matter how good something may be. He's a simple minded "grandstander" who thinks it's good politics for Iran to have the highest level Nuclear weapon, while at the same time yelling "DEATH TO AMERICA" at every chance they get." What Happens Next The House War Powers Resolution is scheduled for a mandatory floor vote within 15 days under the chamber's rules. Parallel debates are ongoing in the Senate. As U.S. lawmakers weigh the resolution, the outcome may set new precedents for executive military authority and the balance of war powers between Congress and the White House.
an hour ago
Top Republican members were given details ahead of Iran strikes
Democratic congresswoman Dina Titus of Nevada joins ABC News Live to discuss Congress' involvement in President Donald Trump's decision to strike Iran.
Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
How South Florida's congressional delegation reacted to U.S. bombing of Iran
President Donald Trump is receiving something approaching bipartisan support from South Florida's congressional delegation after the United States bombed Iran late Saturday, though Democrats are taking a more cautious tone than their GOP counterparts. Nationally, some members of Congress have expressed concerns about Trump acting without their approval, with some strongly opposing U.S. involvement in a bombing campaign first launched by Israel. But here, most of the South Florida congressional delegation is either celebrating the attack on Iranian nuclear facilities or at least avoiding criticism. U.S. Rep. Jared Moskowitz, a Coral Springs Democrat, said on X Saturday night that the bombing of three facilities 'appears to be a targeted strike to defend the U.S., Israel, and allies throughout the region and the world.' 'Now, Iran must come to the table to finally make a deal,' Moskowitz wrote. 'Their regime has had multiple opportunities to pursue diplomacy, and perhaps today's events will push them to a safer path.' Moskowitz was in support of Israel's initial attacks on Iran. So was fellow Democratic Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz. She joined Moskowitz on X Saturday night in saying that 'Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon.' However, both Wasserman Schultz and Moskowitz wrote that they hoped the Trump administration would contain any escalation of the conflict. They also noted Congress' role in overseeing and authorizing U.S. military action. Wasserman Schultz told Local 10 that she was not in support of any further military action against Iran without that approval. The tone from the two Democrats was less celebratory than Republicans in the South Florida delegation, who were in full support on their social media accounts. Rep. Maria Elvira Salazar wrote she was grateful for Trump's decision. Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart said he was 'proud of our exceptional military' and 'proud to stand by our ally Israel.' 'I FULLY BACK PRESIDENT TRUMP's DECISIVE ACTIONS & SUPPORT MORE STRIKES AGAINST IRAN's POLITICAL STRUCTURE IF THEY DO NOT SURRENDER!' Rep. Carlos Giminez, another Miami Republican, wrote on X. But South Florida's congressional Democrats were also less critical than others in their party. On Sunday, Florida Democratic Party Chairwoman Nikki Fried said that 'Trump is not the leader we need at this moment,' and said he oversees 'an administration that operates lawlessly and runs on chaos, lies, and ignorance…' 'It's shameful that he is politicizing a critical moment in world history by excluding Democratic leadership and only including Republicans in the war decision,' Fried said. 'Iran must not have a nuclear weapon, but Donald Trump cannot be trusted to choose what is best for our country.' Referencing the party's leadership conference that took place Saturday evening at the Seminole Hard Rock Hotel and Casino Hollywood, where news that the United States had bombed Iran rippled through the audience, she said she 'saw the shock and fear on the faces of my colleagues backstage as we tried to process the gravity of what had just happened.' Moskowitz and Wasserman Schultz were at the event. Moskowitz gave a speech after the bombing was first reported, but did not mention the attack, nor did the speakers that followed, including U.S. Sen. Cory Booker, of New Jersey. Wasserman Schultz also spoke, but before reports of the attack emerged. Some members of the House and Senate have argued that authority to authorize military action against another country belongs to Congress, not Trump. 'The procedure should have been that Congress was briefed before we enter war, and that we had a vote on it,' Ro Khanna, a Democratic congressman from California, said Sunday on Face the Nation. Khanna and Republican U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky are calling on Congress to vote Monday on a war-powers resolution that would call on Trump 'to terminate the use of United States Armed Forces from hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran or any part of its government or military, unless explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or specific authorization for use of military force against Iran.' U.S. Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick, a Democrat who represents a district that includes parts of Broward and Palm Beach counties, issued a statement with a similar message, writing: 'The Constitution is clear: only Congress has the power to authorize war.' She wrote that any further action would be 'troubling overreach,' but stopped short of criticizing Trump's actions directly. Democratic U.S. Rep. Frederica Wilson had not issued a statement on the bombing as of 1 p.m. Sunday. Her office did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment.
