VAT on private school fees is ‘wrong tax', says father in legal challenge
Putting VAT on private school fees is a 'wrong tax', one of the parents taking legal action against the Government has said.
Several private schools, children who attend them and their parents are bringing legal action against the Treasury, claiming the policy of applying VAT to fees is discriminatory and unlawful.
This includes children and families at faith-based schools, and families who have sent their children with special educational needs (SEN) to private school.
The Treasury is defending the challenges, with HMRC and the Department for Education (DfE) also taking part.
Father of six Stephen White, whose eldest four children are at Bradford Christian School, a private Christian school in West Yorkshire, is one of the people bringing the challenge at the High Court in London.
Speaking outside of the Royal Courts of Justice, Mr White said the policy was a 'wrong tax'.
He said: 'I would think that this is morally wrong whether I was affected by it or not.
'I think it is wrong to tax the education of children, full stop, so I would disagree with it, but it does affect us personally.'
The High Court in London was told that Mr White and his family have made 'great sacrifices' to move close to the school and meet the fees.
Outside the court, the self-employed father said that 'everyone makes sacrifices' at the school his children attend.
He continued: 'Every single teacher at our school would make more money at the poorest job in a state school, or they make a sacrifice to teach there. We all make a sacrifice to send them there, and it's wrong, because we're actually saving the state a load of money.
'Every child that we send to our private school means this government doesn't have to pay anything for their education. We pay it all and we're happy to pay it, we just don't think we should pay extra taxation on top of the good things we're already doing.'
Mr White's 14-year-old son Josiah, who is also part of the legal challenge, is due to take his GCSEs next year but may need to drop some subjects if he has to leave his school due to the VAT policy, the court was also told.
Mr White said: 'If we can't afford to send them to Bradford Christian School next year, we will have to home educate, because my convictions don't allow me to send them to a state school, and so that would have an effect on his education, which is why he's a named claimant in this case, because he's going to be directly affected if this law carries on.'
Sir James Eadie KC, representing the Treasury, HMRC and the DfE, said in written submissions for the three-day hearing that parents who opt out of the state education system 'are free to choose any private education for their child that they can afford, or to educate their child at home'.
Sir James later said that the obligation to respect the religious convictions of parents is not impacted by the VAT policy.
He continued: 'The existence of such convictions does not require the state to finance an education system to comply with such convictions, still less to refrain from taxing the provision of that or any private education.'
The hearing before Dame Victoria Sharp, Lord Justice Newey and Mr Justice Chamberlain is due to conclude on Thursday with a decision expected at a later date.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
8 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Families face £20billion tax sting as Government borrowing soars to second highest May level on record
Labour have been accused of 'spending recklessly' TAX YIKES Families face £20billion tax sting as Government borrowing soars to second highest May level on record Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) FAMILIES face a £20billion tax hit after Government borrowing jumped last month, experts warned. The second highest figure on record for May, beaten only during the pandemic, saw borrowing surge to £17.7 billion, higher than forecast by the independent watchdog. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up Receipts for the Treasury were up to £82 billion due to higher income tax and the NI increase that kicked in from April. But with sluggish growth and the high borrowing costs could mean Rachel Reeves could lose her £10 billion financial cushion by the Budget. Thomas Pugh, economist at RSM UK, said the Chancellor may have to raise taxes between £10-£20 billion. He added: 'The under-performance of the economy and higher borrowing costs mean the Chancellor may already have lost the £9.9bn of fiscal headroom that she clawed back in March.' Shadow Chancellor, Sir Mel Stride said: 'Labour is spending recklessly, with no plan to pay for it. "Debt interest now costs us £100bn a year - that's almost twice the defence budget. 'Having turned on the spending taps, Labour have left themselves with only one option and that's to put up your taxes. Treasury Minister Darren Jones insisted the government had 'stabilised the economy and the public finances'. Growth forecast SLASHED in Spring Statement - sparking fears of MORE tax rises
NBC News
9 hours ago
- NBC News
Louisiana's Ten Commandments law in public schools blocked by federal appeals court
A federal appeals court on Friday ruled, in a unanimous decision, in favor of a coalition of Louisiana parents who sued to block a state law that requires public schools and colleges to display the Ten Commandments in classrooms. The appellate court's decision upholds a lower court's ruling in November declaring Louisiana's law as "facially unconstitutional." 'Parents and students challenge a statute requiring public schools to permanently display the Ten Commandments in every classroom in Louisiana. The district court found the statute facially unconstitutional and preliminarily enjoined its enforcement. We affirm,' the court said in its ruling. Now, the case moves closer to potentially going before the U.S. Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority. 'We are grateful for this decision, which honors the religious diversity and religious-freedom rights of public school families across Louisiana,' said the Rev. Darcy Roake, who is a plaintiff in the case. Louisiana's law went into effect this year at public K-12 schools and state-funded universities. State officials issued guidance on how posters of the Ten Commandments could be designed and hung up in classrooms for educational purposes. While the law applies to the majority of school districts throughout the state, the five school districts that have parents who are plaintiffs in the original lawsuit are exempt while the litigation plays out. It's unclear how many, if any, school districts have begun to comply, and questions remain about what might happen to educators who ultimately don't cooperate. During the federal appeals court hearing in January, Louisiana Solicitor General Benjamin Aguiñaga argued that the plaintiffs' lawsuit was filed too early — before any posters have been displayed. "The plaintiffs seek to challenge hypothetical displays that do not exist and that they have never seen," Aguiñaga said. "The plaintiffs jumped the gun here and filed an unripe case," he said. But Jonathan Youngwood, a lawyer for the coalition of parents representing Jewish, Christian, Unitarian Universalist and nonreligious backgrounds said the purpose of the law is tied to religion and violates a separation of church and state. "What makes this so significant is the requirement that it be in every single (classroom) throughout your 13 years in public school, 177 days a year," Youngwood said. "It can't be avoided. It can't be averted." The American Civil Liberties Union, the American Civil Liberties Union of Louisiana, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, the Freedom from Religion Foundation, and Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP are supporting the plaintiffs. Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill has said no public funds would be required to be spent on printing the posters and they can be supplied through private donations. The law dictates the posters must be at least 11 by 14 inches and include a "context statement" that provides historical context for the commandments, which the state believes makes its law constitutional. In a Facebook post in January, Murrill said the state contends that federal courts "have no jurisdiction to decide this case." "The Constitution does not bar our Legislature's attempt to teach our students what the Supreme Court has repeatedly said: The Ten Commandments have historical significance as a foundation of our legal system," Murrill said. But U.S. District Judge John deGravelles of the Middle District of Louisiana disagreed with the state in his ruling in November, in which he wrote that there is no "constitutional way to display the Ten Commandments in accordance with the minimum requirements of the Act." The Supreme Court has also taken up the issue previously, when the justices ruled 5-4 in 1980 that Kentucky's posting of the Ten Commandments in public schools was unconstitutional. Still, President Donald Trump endorsed Louisiana's law during his campaign. Louisiana and other Republican-led states have pushed for new bills and policies that are testing the bounds of religion in public schools. That has included Oklahoma ordering public schools grades five through 12 to incorporate the Bible into lesson plans and Texas allowing public school districts to opt in to a new elementary school curriculum featuring Bible-based lessons. In April, the Supreme Court heard a bid by Oklahoma officials to approve the nation's first publicly funded religious charter school. Meanwhile, Republican leaders in other states, such as Alabama and Texas, are supporting legislation similar to Louisiana's that would allow for the Ten Commandments in public schools. In April, Arkansas legislation requiring the Ten Commandments to be posted in all public schools' classrooms and libraries became law just days after the GOP-controlled Legislature passed it.
Telegraph
a day ago
- Telegraph
Treasury borrows more than expected despite rising tax revenues
The Treasury borrowed more than expected during the month of May, official figures show, despite increasing receipts from Rachel Reeves's tax raid. Public sector net borrowing was £17.7bn last month, which was £600m higher than the £17.1bn that had been forecast by the Office for Budget Responsibility. It was also £700m higher than May last year despite Rachel Reeves's Budget tax raid aimed at shoring up the nation's finances. The rise comes despite central government's tax receipts hitting £82.5bn in May, which was £5.3bn more than in the same month last year. Darren Jones, the Chief Secretary to the Treasury, insisted the latest borrowing figures showed the Government has 'stabilised the economy and the public finances'. Treasury borrowing was higher than OBR forecasts in May but was better than expected during the first two months of the financial year. Public sector borrowing was reached £37.7bn in April and May, which was £1.6bn more than the same period last year but £2.9bn less than the £40.7bn forecast by the OBR. Darren Jones said: 'Since taking office, we have taken the right decisions to protect working people, begin repairing the NHS, and fix the foundations to rebuild Britain. We stabilised the economy and the public finances; now we need to ensure that the British economy delivers for working people. 'Last week's Spending Review showed how we are investing in the UK's security, health, and the economy through our Plan for Change, so that people are better off.'
