New Worcestershire walking group for expectant mothers

A new walking group for expectant mothers and their families has been launched, with the aim of creating a safe environment to meet other mums-to-be.The Roaming Birth Tribe meets twice a month, strolling through different parts of Worcestershire each time.It was founded by Abbie Ing, an antenatal and hypnobirthing educator from Malvern, and Cheryl Griffin, a birth and post-natal doula."It's not just expectant mums," said Ms Ing. "It's birth partners, dads, grandparents – basically anyone who wants to know more about what to expect from birth."
Ms Ing launched her professional service after the birth of her second son, when she found women sometimes struggled to find answers to their questions about birth."That lit a bit of a fire in my belly," she said.As for the walks, she stated the physical and mental benefits of walking were well-documented."We just wanted to make a safe place to make people comfortable about having conversations about birth," she said."So often people have quite limited time with their midwives these days – not through any fault of the NHS, they're doing everything they can."We just want to provide a bit of extra space really, for new parents – even experienced parents – just to talk about birth in a really safe place, where they can ask all of those perhaps embarrassing questions that they don't feel comfortable asking their midwife, or that they just don't have time to ask."The Roaming Birth Tribe will be running free drop-in walks on the first and third Wednesday of each month.Full details can be found on this Facebook page.
Follow BBC Hereford & Worcester on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Daily Mail​

an hour ago

• Daily Mail​

Wes Streeting warns there is no money in the NHS for assisted dying and helping people to end their lives will mean cuts to treatment for the living

The Health Secretary has warned that legalising assisted dying could take NHS money away from medical treatment for the living. Wes Streeting, who opposed the suicide law change passed by MPs last week, said getting the system up and running would take 'time and money' away from other parts of the health service. He said that said better end-of-life care was needed to prevent terminally ill people feeling they had no alternative but to end their own life. MPs on Friday voted by a majority of just 23 to allow medical professionals to help people die, under a system expected to start operating by the end of the decade. But having been passed by the Commons the legislation faces a tricky passage through the Lords, which calls for them to either make major changes or block it altogether. Mr Streeting, writing on his Facebook page, said he could not ignore the concerns 'about the risks that come with this Bill' raised by the Royal College of Psychiatrists, the Royal College of Physicians, the Association for Palliative Medicine and charities representing under-privileged groups. He cited a warning from ex-PM Gordon Brown that 'there is no effective freedom to choose' if there is no high quality palliative care available, or if people 'feel under pressure to relieve their relatives of the burden of caring for them'. 'He is right. The truth is that creating those conditions will take time and money,' Mr Streeting wrote. 'Even with the savings that might come from assisted dying if people take up the service – and it feels uncomfortable talking about savings in this context to be honest – setting up this service will also take time and money that is in short supply. 'There isn't a budget for this. Politics is about prioritising. It is a daily series of choices and trade-offs. I fear we've made the wrong one.' The Government is neutral on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill which cleared the Commons with a majority of 23 votes on Friday. Mr Streeting said his Department of Health and Social Care 'will continue to work constructively with Parliament to assist on technical aspects of the Bill' as it goes through the House of Lords. Last week assisted dying campaigner Dame Esther Rantzen urged peers not to block the landmark legislation. Dame Esther told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'I don't need to teach the House of Lords how to do their job. 'They know it very well, and they know that laws are produced by the elected chamber. 'Their job is to scrutinise, to ask questions, but not to oppose. 'So yes, people who are adamantly opposed to this Bill, and they have a perfect right to oppose it, will try and stop it going through the Lords, but the Lords themselves, their duty is to make sure that law is actually created by the elected chamber, which is the House of Commons who have voted this through.' Dame Esther, who turns 85 on Sunday and has terminal cancer, acknowledged the legislation would probably not become law in time for her to use it and she would have to 'buzz off to Zurich' to use the Dignitas clinic. Paralympian and crossbench peer Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson told BBC Breakfast: 'We're getting ready for it to come to the Lords and from my personal point of view, about amending it to make it stronger. 'We've been told it's the strongest Bill in the world, but to be honest, it's not a very high bar for other legislation. 'So I do think there are a lot more safeguards that could be put in.' Conservative peer and disability rights campaigner Lord Shinkwin said the narrow Commons majority underlined the need for peers to take a close look at the legislation. He told Today 'I think the House of Lords has a duty to expose and to subject this Bill to forensic scrutiny' but 'I don't think it's a question of blocking it so much as performing our duty as a revising chamber'. Lord Shinkwin added: 'The margin yesterday was so close that many MPs would appreciate the opportunity to look at this again in respect of safeguards as they relate to those who feel vulnerable, whether that's disabled people or older people.' Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, who steered the Bill through the Commons, said she hoped peers would not seek to derail the legislation, which could run out of parliamentary time if it is held up in the Lords. She said: 'I would be upset to think that anybody was playing games with such an important and such an emotional issue.'

BBC News

4 hours ago

• BBC News

Protesters gather to demand hospice reopens and question funding

Campaigners have returned to a hospice inpatient unit in Liverpool a year after it was shut to stage another protest to demand the facility reopen as soon as possible. The 26-bed unit at Marie Curie in Woolton, Liverpool, closed in July 2024 because of a shortage of specialised nursing decision sparked immediate concern and a campaign group, Save our Hospice, formed to demand a u-turn. A Marie Curie spokesman said it was in talks with the NHS Cheshire & Merseyside Integrated Care Board (ICB), which commissions end-of-life care in Liverpool, to agree a "sustainable long-term plan" for the unit's future. A large group of campaigners gathered outside the unit on Saturday afternoon and held placards criticising Marie Curie for not "taking up our offer" to fundraise for the unit. Some wore yellow t-shirts with the slogans "Save our Hospice" and "Save our Ward". Independent Liverpool councillor Lucy Williams, who attended a protest at the unit on Saturday, told the BBC: "It's been a year since they closed their doors to the inpatient unit and it's been a year that they've continued to receive funding from the ICB."So we're here today to ask where has that money gone and why haven't they delivered that service that they're getting commissioned to provide."Williams worked at the hospice as a palliative care nurse for two years, and said: "People's relatives and loved ones have died here and a lot of them have committed their time to fundraising for this hospice."We found out over this year that money doesn't come to this hospice, it goes into a national pot - so throughout the closure this fundraising has continued and people haven't been aware that the inpatient unit in Liverpool has been closed." 'Get the ward open' Williams said an "easy" resolution was to immediately re-open the ward. She said: "They're receiving the funding to have the ward open, surely they can have one or two beds? That's better than none at all. "So get the ward open and if Marie Curie aren't competent to provide the service then the ICB need to commission someone who is."The Marie Curie spokesperson said the charity hoped to reach an agreement with the NHS integrated care board "as soon as possible".While admissions to the inpatient unit "had been paused", the hospice had remained open and was providing palliative and end of life care to "thousands of people in Liverpool in different ways", they added. The spokesperson said the ICB was aware its funding was being used to provide these services. Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.

Spectator

5 hours ago

• Spectator

The truth about palliative care

Watching MPs debate the Terminally Ill Adults Bill in recent weeks has left me and fellow clinicians wondering how many of them have been to a specialist palliative care unit. It has raised a concern about whether people understand what palliative care actually provides, and what we clinicians actually do. How many people have an idea about what hospices and palliative care teams can help with, and would knowing more about such services strengthen calls to make them core parts of NHS provision? Palliative care and assisted dying have seemed in opposition in recent weeks, with people picking sides as though they were rival football teams. I work in a sector that has had to rely heavily on charity and fundraising, which only goes so far. Last year was one of the worst in terms of fundraising for one of our local hospice charities. Palliative care is about living, joy, fun and thinking about your legacy Specialist palliative care in all settings is in a crisis of under-resourcing. We know that palliative care provision is patchy, and inequitable, with some geographies, settings and patient groups receiving completely unacceptable levels of care. Many don't have seven-day on-call cover, when the reality is that crises at the end of life can occur at any time of a given week. Palliative care is not all about inpatient hospices for those who are in the last days of life. We have (in some parts of England and Wales) community teams, outpatient clinics, support teams in general hospitals, day services and out-of-hours on-call provision. We often get involved from diagnosis onward, get to know some patients over several years, and even discharge them again if they feel better and their symptoms improve. And when it comes to dying, most deaths are uncomplicated. Many will not require much more involvement than good local district nursing teams and their usual GP care if systems are working locally. We in palliative care probably need to do far more to dispel some of the narratives that many recent bad death anecdotes have brought up in the assisted dying debate. Yes, bad deaths certainly happen, but many people die peacefully each week, and such 'ordinary dying' is, of course, not reported on. In England and Wales in 2023, over 500,000 deaths were registered. Even ten bad deaths amongst those would be newsworthy, of course, but it does not constitute a norm. It was different when I was a junior doctor in the early 2000's, when I saw some very bad deaths and there was zero palliative care provision in some of the English hospitals I worked in. Hospices being described as full of dying patients, their pain poorly controlled and their senses dulled with high-dose morphine drips, is not the reality. The '20 bad deaths a day' statistic that was highlighted by assisted dying pressure groups has been debunked as unreliable. And faecal vomiting, so vividly described by some MPs, is more talked and written about than it is actually seen on wards and in communities. When I worked at our local hospice, over half the inpatients would be discharged back home again after they had received help with their symptoms. This was often a surprise to them, because many appeared to assume that you never really leave a hospice alive. Some of the older images of hospices full of dying people seem to prevail in the collective memories, when in fact modern-day 'palliative care inpatient units' actually have a rather different role. The same goes for palliative care more generally: much of it happens in the community. I have seen many of my palliative clinic patients for years, and they live life alongside their terminal illness. Always knowing that time may be short, perhaps one pneumonia away from potentially dying, but equally living life to the full whilst they still can, jetting off on holiday, or going clubbing, hiking, cycling and working, and generally being part of their local communities. One of my younger patients recently told me in a video consultation that she just doesn't fit the 'image of a cancer/palliative patient' that people in her environment have come to expect. Many of my patients hold jobs and are on reasonable doses of morphine or oxycodone, without too much in the way of side effects, so they can actually get on with their lives. They drive their cars, perfectly legally. We also review whether they still require the meds, sometimes weaning them off opioids once a reversible pain crisis is over. All this makes predicting a diagnosis of less than six months with any form of accuracy quite hard. The recent debates have made many of us working in this area feel somewhat downhearted, partly because there are a lot of clichés about this area of work that will just never go away. But it has made us think about ordinary 'living with dying' in our society, and how we show that it can be done well. Some of us try our best to frame this world in a more positive light, and I know quite a few patients who are quite happy to help in this, which of course is a good start. A number of my patients have agreed to become part of information campaigns to talk far more positively about palliative care and living with dying, including good advance and future care planning for when their illnesses progress. We have produced videos together on why you may want to consider having a plan for when you become less able to communicate your views, or are getting closer to the end. Sound dreary? Not if you take my patient Keith's approach to it, who sold tickets to his own funeral party. A lot of palliative care clinicians, including Dr Kathryn Mannix with her books (including With the End in Mind) have sought to demystify this area of life and also to inject a bit of much-needed humour and warmth into 'ordinary dying'. It's poorly understood, and people like to brush it away. With assisted suicide, it now risks being medicalised even further and also brought forward quite considerably for some people. News and media narratives don't always help: 'All the medical care stopped and then the patient was for palliation only' or 'They were then just for palliative care'. If 'no longer for active care' means they are now for palliative care, I invite anyone to join our very active ward rounds with patients who receive blood transfusions, iv antibiotics, immunotherapy and scans, all within balance and reason and in close consultation with patients and families. We actively review and discharge some of our patients because, whilst they may have a disease that will likely be life-limiting and their risk of dying is that bit higher, they may still have years ahead of them. Amongst some of my patients and their families, this sometimes raises a chuckle. 'We thought: palliative care, that's it, just a few more days…' Not so. Recent heated debates may have left some with the impression that most deaths in the UK are bad, that palliative care cannot do anything and that hospices are ghoulish places that only give morphine infusions. Think opium den, just with doctors and nurses. This is completely wrong. Palliative care is evidence-based, follows guidelines and reduces strong opioids as much as it starts or increases them (careful titration according to evidence-based guidelines). Palliative care can bring cheer; it brings out the best in people, thinking outside multiple boxes and helping people focus on important achievements in life: getting rid of a nasty infection with intravenous antibiotics, getting a blood transfusion to improve anaemia, receiving immunotherapy from the oncologists, radiotherapy, being pain-free to go for a bracing walk in the Cotswolds, getting to a Millwall game, getting married in Vegas, getting to a Slipknot concert, just being yourself. Whether you've got six days, six weeks, six months or six years left to live (and who knows?). Wherever you stand on matters like assisted dying, good palliative and end-of-life care should never be under-prioritised. We need better funding and in parallel we need to convey very clearly that palliative care is about living, joy, fun, thinking about your legacy and working with a team to get on top of the big challenges. It's only a little bit about dying. Let's call it assisted living.