Who should employ health inspectors?

Department of health admits to shortage but says it is the responsibility of municipalities to hire them.
Health inspectors, together with police, Gauteng traffic wardens, officials from home affairs and Growing Gauteng Together 2030 visit spaza shops in Soweto to check if owners comply with regulations. Picture: AFP
South Africa has a shortage of public health inspectors, according to officials, but it is not clear who should employ them.
Public health inspectors' roles are vital as their job includes the enforcement of health, safety and sanitation regulations to protect the public.
They play a vital role in protecting the public against foodborne diseases such as food poisoning incidents that engulfed the country last year and claimed the lives of 22 children, leaving hundreds hospitalised.
Recently, a group of unemployed health inspectors accused government of failing to fulfil its promise to employ more than 500 of them.
After the foodborne disease outbreak was declared a national disaster last year, government said Treasury would allocate more than R200 million for the employment of inspectors.
Who should hire inspectors?
Department of health spokesperson Foster Mohale admitted there was a shortage, but said it was the responsibility of municipalities to hire them.
'There is a shortage, the relevant institutions are being engaged to see how they can prioritise the appointment of inspectors. It must be noted that this may not address the staff shortage, but will make the situation better.
'The department has been conducting assessments and advising municipalities to plan, budget and appoint inspectors to address shortages.
'But this cannot be achieved overnight. It will require a focused plan and allocation of resources. Appointment of inspectors is not the only function municipalities are expected to do, as it is one of many services that municipalities should prioritise and balance with other services,' said Mohale.
Even though Mohale said it was not his department's responsibility to employ the practitioners, he denied that government had promised to employ 520 health inspectors.
ALSO READ: Food safety crisis looms
He said Treasury had not allocated any funds to the department for the appointment of health inspectors.
'The national department has never contradicted any of its laws. Municipal health services is a function devolved to district and metropolitan municipalities in terms of the National Health Act. The department is the custodian of health in SA, which includes oversight of preventative health services such as environmental health,' said Mohale.
He added that according to the constitution, the responsibility for municipal health services, including environmental health services, as defined in the National Health Act, rested with local government.
'Metropolitan and district municipalities are therefore mandated to provide these services and are responsible for appointing the inspectors.'
Request to Treasury
Mohale said a request had been submitted to Treasury to explore funding for the temporary appointment of the inspectors, while legislative processes were considered to review the assignment of the food control function.
Discussions with Treasury were ongoing and the outcome pending, he said.
'A joint circular has been issued to all 52 district and metropolitan municipalities by the departments of health and cooperative governance and traditional affairs, urging the immediate prioritisation of the inspectors' appointments.'
He agreed that the shortage of inspectors was one of the issues compounding the foodborne illness outbreak.
But cooperative governance and traditional affairs spokesperson Legadima Leso denied it was his department's responsibility to employ the practitioners and referred questions back to the department of health.
NOW READ: Spaza shops: Joburg and Tshwane have far fewer health inspectors than recommended

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

IOL News

3 hours ago

• IOL News

Puff, Puff, Pass. . . Outside? – Backlash brews over new proposed smoking laws

The Department of Health's proposed changes to tobacco laws could see smokers face jail time for smoking entjies and e-cigarettes indoors and failing to adhere to other prohibited smoking legislation. Image: Thirdman/Pexels South African liquor traders have raised serious objections to proposed new smoking legislation that would require significant changes to bars, taverns, and restaurants across the country. The legislation, currently being processed by the Department of Health, aims to ban the display advertising of tobacco products, standardise packaging, and introduce stricter controls on e-cigarettes and vaping. While the proposed changes affect the wider hospitality industry, including the ban on vending machines, the biggest challenge lies in where people can smoke. Under the new Tobacco Products and Electronic Delivery Systems Control Bill, smoking would be outlawed indoors and in certain public spaces, forcing patrons to move outside. New regulations also stipulate that designated smoking areas must be located a specific distance from windows, ventilation points, and entryways. The Gauteng Liquor Traders Association (GLTA) expressed concern that this requirement would be completely unworkable in township environments, where many smaller taverns operate. The association said that businesses had already invested in creating compliant smoking spaces after the last revision of the smoking laws, designating 25% of their floor space for this purpose. The new legislation, it argued, would force businesses to spend even more to build new spaces or risk falling foul of the regulations. 'The Minister has discretion over this distance, but the Department of Health previously suggested 10 metres. This provision is totally unworkable in a township environment,' the GLTA said. The association added that staff would be required to leave the building to smoke, potentially leaving the venue vulnerable to security threats and affecting employee productivity. Similar concerns apply to patrons, who might be forced to move to isolated areas where they could be at risk of crime. Although the GLTA focused its concerns on smaller, informal traders, it warned that all businesses with designated smoking areas would be impacted, regardless of their location, and would face increased costs. The impact on the illicit cigarette trade Business Against Crime South Africa (BACSA) argued that making it harder for businesses to operate legally could drive more traders towards the black market. According to BACSA, the illicit tobacco market already accounts for 60–70% of sales, costing the national budget roughly R18bn each year. The group warned that the draft legislation lacks enforcement measures to combat the illegal trade and does not provide tools such as track‑and‑trace systems or improved border controls. The GLTA also pointed out that the new laws create the risk of increased corruption, especially given that certain elements within the police have been known to solicit bribes. It stated that making it a criminal offence for businesses to fail to spot an errant smoker would only create further opportunities for exploitation. Penalties 'The penalty for smoking in a banned area is three months in prison, and/or a fine. The penalty for smoking near a non‑smoking employee is ten years in prison and/or a fine." The association noted that there are more serious crimes for the authorities to focus on in South Africa. IOL Lifestyle Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel.

IOL News

3 hours ago

• IOL News

South African taverns and bars voice strong opposition to new anti-smoking regulations

The Department of Health's proposed changes to tobacco laws could see smokers face jail time for smoking entjies and e-cigarettes indoors and failing to adhere to other prohibited smoking legislation. South African liquor traders have raised serious objections to proposed new smoking legislation that would require significant changes to bars, taverns, and restaurants across the country. The legislation, currently being processed by the Department of Health, aims to ban the display advertising of tobacco products, standardise packaging, and introduce stricter controls on e-cigarettes and vaping. While the proposed changes affect the wider hospitality industry, including the ban on vending machines, the biggest challenge lies in where people can smoke. Under the new Tobacco Products and Electronic Delivery Systems Control Bill, smoking would be outlawed indoors and in certain public spaces, forcing patrons to move outside. New regulations also stipulate that designated smoking areas must be located a specific distance from windows, ventilation points, and entryways. The Gauteng Liquor Traders Association (GLTA) expressed concern that this requirement would be completely unworkable in township environments, where many smaller taverns operate. The association said that businesses had already invested in creating compliant smoking spaces after the last revision of the smoking laws, designating 25% of their floor space for this purpose. The new legislation, it argued, would force businesses to spend even more to build new spaces or risk falling foul of the regulations. 'The Minister has discretion over this distance, but the Department of Health previously suggested 10 metres. This provision is totally unworkable in a township environment,' the GLTA said. The association added that staff would be required to leave the building to smoke, potentially leaving the venue vulnerable to security threats and affecting employee productivity. Similar concerns apply to patrons, who might be forced to move to isolated areas where they could be at risk of crime. Although the GLTA focused its concerns on smaller, informal traders, it warned that all businesses with designated smoking areas would be impacted, regardless of their location, and would face increased costs.

The Citizen

2 days ago

• The Citizen

Health department urges 21 000 missing HIV/Aids patients to come forward

About 21 000 HIV/Aids patients in Mpumalanga have disappearing without a trace. HIV/Aids patients who have stopped taking their treatment and disappeared without a trace have been urged to come forward and get assistance to prevent the spread of the virus. This comes after it was recently revealed that more than 20 000 patients who tested positive in Mpumalanga discontinued treatment and disappeared without a trace. Health Department tries to find missing HIV patients Speaking to The Citizen on Friday, Department of Health spokesperson Foster Mohale said: 'There are many people who tested positive for HIV, but never continue with lifesaving ARVs, hence we have recently launched a campaign to find 1.1 million of them and put them in treatment by 31 December 2025. 'I can confirm that so far, we have already reached 520 700 and initiated treatment, which includes women, men and children. This is more than 50% of the target we set ourselves to reach by the end of the year.' ALSO READ: Mpumalanga silent on 21 000 missing HIV patients Be that as it may, Mohale said the campaign was not solely about finding the missing HIV patients. Still, the country's efforts to reach a target of 95% of HIV-positive people knowing their status includes putting those infected on treatment to avoid further infection. Why patients stop their HIV/Aids treatment Addressing the problem last year, the Treatment Action Campaign (TAC) said some of the patients discontinued their treatment because they were annoyed that they had to collect their medication every three months, instead of being given medication for six months. Some patients also blamed the clinics. 'Many have started on treatment and then stopped because of the poor conditions and unwelcoming environment in clinics,' said the TAC's Morongwa Ntini. ALSO READ: Groundbreaking HIV trial shows patients can control virus without ART Ntini said offering a six-month plan will motivate patients to stay on treatment as there will be no need for them to visit clinics as often, while the clinic staff will not have to deal with long queues. In Mpumalanga, it recently transpired that more than 20,000 patients who tested positive discontinued treatment and disappeared without a trace.