France's toddler screen ban is pure state overreach

The French government is preparing to ban all screen time for children under the age of three. The measure, announced by the Minister of Labour, Health, Solidarity and Families, Catherine Vautrin, will form part of a broader national plan to combat screen use among the very young. Due to be launched in the autumn, the policy will ban tablets, televisions and smartphones in nurseries, hospitals, and other childcare settings, with sanctions for anyone who breaks the rules. The aim, according to the minister, is to change behaviour around early childhood and screen use.
What next? A ban on loud toys? Fines for bedtime past eight o'clock?
'This is how you change things', Vautrin told Le Journal du Dimanche. 'You state a principle, and little by little, it becomes anchored in people's minds.'
A 2022 study by Inserm, France's national medical research body, tracked 14,000 children from birth and found that early screen time, particularly before age two, was associated with delayed speech development and reduced socialisation at nursery school. The same children were more likely to show concentration problems later in primary school. Vautrin cites this research to justify the governments agenda. But what's interesting is that the researchers stopped short of calling for a ban. They pointed instead to the importance of parental interaction and content quality. In other words, common sense.
And there it is. Not content with banning smoking at bus stops and removing outdoor heaters from café terraces, the French state has now decided to parent the parents. And it starts with Teletubbies. The measure may sound harmless, even well intentioned, but it marks yet another step in the Macronist habit of turning private judgement into public regulation.
Nobody disputes that toddlers don't benefit from screen time. The NHS in Britain advises parents to avoid it entirely before age two. But in Britain, such advice remains just that: advice. Ofsted does not bar nurseries from showing a short film or using a digital device if it's part of a wider educational context. The state leaves space for discretion.
France will not. Vautrin's move echoes the earlier French ban on outdoor smoking, not because enforcement is practical, but because stating a principle is seen as a way of reshaping society. The technique is always the same. Issue a prohibition, turn it into a campaign, publish guidelines, introduce fines, and wait for the culture to shift. Screens today, sugar tomorrow, and after that who knows.
It's this compulsive reflex to legislate behaviour that reveals the French state's underlying philosophy. Trust is not part of the equation. Citizens, even parents, are not to be guided or encouraged, but managed. And if we push back, we're branded irresponsible or worse.
The irony is that a government that cannot staff its own schools properly now wants to police what toddlers watch in a hospital waiting room. French nurseries, already under pressure, will now be expected to enforce rules that have little to do with care, and everything to do with performance. The spectacle of state virtue.
By contrast, the UK's approach is more relaxed and arguably more effective. The NHS's guidance on screen use is based on moderation and common sense. The Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health explicitly declined to set arbitrary limits for parents, saying what matters most is context, content and family interaction. British ministers assume most parents are capable of knowing that ten episodes of Teletubbies in a row probably isn't ideal. They don't necessarily reach for the statute book to enforce what can be solved with a bit of judgement.
Of course there'll always be parents who overdo it, who hand over a screen too often or for too long. But why impose rules on everyone else? There are times when giving a child an iPad makes perfect sense. In a waiting room. On a flight. We've all done it. The problem is not the occasional screen. It's turning rare indulgence into routine. And that is something most parents are perfectly capable of managing.
But Macron's France is different. Every issue, however small, becomes a matter for the state. And every household, a target for reform. Behind the screen ban is something bigger. The idea that family life must be shaped, top down, in accordance with the latest official theory on wellbeing, risk and social cohesion. One can only imagine what is next. A ban on loud toys? Fines for bedtime past eight o'clock?
The real risk is that even reasonable advice becomes politicised. What might have worked as a gentle public health message will now land as another round of social engineering. And those who resist will not be engaged, but blamed.
I don't need the government standing over my shoulder while I raise my child. Children belong to their parents, not to the state.
Good parents already know that too much screen time isn't healthy. They do not need a government minister telling them what to do. What they need, what everyone needs, is a government willing to trust them. It's not the screen ban itself that is the problem. It's the belief behind it, the idea that the state always knows better. That's what needs to be switched off.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Western Telegraph

an hour ago

• Western Telegraph

Murray hails ‘brilliant opportunities' of UK Government's industrial strategy

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer unveiled the document on Monday, pinpointing key industries believed to have the most potential for growth such as artificial intelligence, offshore wind and batteries for electric vehicles. The 160-page document put Scotland 'at the heart of the UK's energy transition', as well as talking up commitments to a £750 million supercomputer in Edinburgh and £200 million in development funding for the Acorn carbon capture and storage facility in Aberdeenshire. The Prime Minister also announced a cut to electricity bills for industrial businesses, £30 million for the video games sector – with a number of high profile developers based in Scotland – and £30 million for research and development for each of the devolved nations. Delighted to be in Cockenzie, East Lothian for the launch of the UK Industrial Strategy today. Lots of brilliant opportunities for Scotland from the 8 growth sectors. Jobs, investment, regeneration and skills. — Ian Murray MP (@IanMurrayMP) June 23, 2025 In a post on X following a visit to the promote the strategy, the Scottish Secretary said: 'Delighted to be in Cockenzie, East Lothian, for the launch of the UK industrial strategy today. 'Lots of brilliant opportunities for Scotland from the eight growth sectors. 'Jobs, investment, regeneration and skills.' The strategy was also praised by Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar. 'Labour's industrial strategy delivers for Scotland – unlocking economic potential, raising wages, boosting living standards, and delivering the growth we need,' he said. Asked about his response to the UK Government's announcement on Monday, First Minister John Swinney touted his own Government's work on industry. 'Of course, we have in Scotland our own approach to industrial strategy, which involves working with our universities, with our economic development agencies to ensure that we attract investment and can support development within the economy,' he told the PA news agency. 'Last week, we saw that Scotland, for the 10th year in a row, was the most successful part of the United Kingdom for the attraction of inward investment other than London and the south east. 'So that's an indication that the Scottish Government's got its priorities correct, its focus correct on the attraction of investment, because we're contributing to make Scotland an incredibly successful investment location.'

The Independent

an hour ago

• The Independent

Will Labour's industrial strategy go down as the moment Britain finally turned a corner?

Britain finally has a government willing to treat industrial strategy seriously. Labour's new policy – a 10-year plan to boost investment, create skilled jobs, bring down energy bills and make the UK a better place to do business – is bold, well-resourced and refreshingly focused. It is also a marked shift from the half-measures and warm words of the past 50 years. For too long – since the governments of Harold Wilson, I'd wager – 'industrial strategy' has meant glossy documents and little else. Labour's version, however, has weight behind it – in both ambition and investment, and is genuinely welcomed by business. In short, the idea is to target vast state resources to help "take the brakes off" key sectors, from advanced manufacturing (which can then be put to use in more cutting-edge industries such as aerospace and pharmaceutical) to clean energy, life sciences and financial services, in a bid to kickstart growth in the British economy as a whole. But, wait, I hear you say, don't we already have an industrial strategy? Well, yes – David Cameron launched one. It created the British Business Bank, into which Labour is pumping resources So, indeed, did Theresa May. Trouble is, the earlier plans went longer on words than they did action. The Starmer government's stab at this couldn't be accused of that. It is genuinely ambitious – not just with rhetoric but with resources. The Cameron government's 'Industrial Strategy Explained' booklet has a couple of billion-pound announcements. Starmer's is splattered with them. Even if you allow for the usual double counting of things that have already been announced, it has firepower. It also shows – and this is just as important – some evidence of ministerial ears are listening. Perhaps the best example of the latter comes in the form of the package of measures designed to cut the ruinous energy bills faced by energy intensive manufacturers. There will be 'Network Charging Compensation' of 90 per cent, to mitigate the high costs of electricity costs for energy intensive industries, helping them remain competitive in the global market by matching what Germany and France offer to theirs. An indirect compensation scheme to ease the burden of carbon taxes on the steel industry will be renewed. The 'British Industrial Competitiveness Scheme' is intended to further reduce the burden of green taxes. 'The Industrial Strategy is a step in the right direction towards competitive electricity prices and a better, more effective business landscape,' said trade body UK Steel. This doesn't mean all is sweetness and light. The UK's over-reliance on natural gas means that businesses – which don't enjoy the benefits of the Ofgem consumer price cap – will continue to face some of the world's highest electricity bills even after these measures. It is an issue in need of addressing – one not amenable to a quick fix. But Gareth Stace, director general at UK Steel, was nonetheless encouraged to state that 'we are climbing slowly up the foothills of the mountain we need to climb'. Under the plans, eight sectors will receive backing and largesse – they're being referred to as the 'IS8'. Snappy, huh? We'll hear that repeated a lot, at Prime Minister's Questions and beyond. The lucky eight are advanced manufacturing, clean energy industries, creative industries, defence, digital and technologies, financial services, life sciences, and professional and business services. For the record, Cameron's document had five. The government has been reluctant to engage in 'picking winners', which involves directing resources towards specific industrial sector – this was prevalent in the 1970s and repeatedly went badly. But this is an example of that, whether ministers want to admit it or not. That said, these are all fairly obvious targets to focus on – partly because they include obvious existing strengths. Life sciences and creative industries, for example. Even tech. There is also a nod towards the ever-vexed subject of tax in there: a commitment to cap corporation tax at 25 per cent and a promise to retain the tax breaks for business investment, first brought in by Rishi Sunak. However, as the decision to hike taxes on jobs through higher employer national insurance contributions (NICs) shows, that is far from the only business levy. And with the potential of a tax-raising budget looming, there are questions to be raised here. The strategy states the need to 'ensure our tax system supports growth'. How that squares with the nation's shaky public finances remains to be seen. I confess that the packaging made me chuckle: the document has so many swooshes that you wonder if they asked the chap who draws DC Comics' The Flash for advice on the design. You can almost see the ghostly image of a high-speed locomotive on the front cover – ghostly because, well, are we ever going to see them running? Britain's equivalent of a bullet train service is being built at the speed of a dyspeptic tortoise, with grotesque cost overruns, disputes and good old-fashioned British can't-do spirit cramping any style it might have had. These are issues that need to be overcome. The promises on deregulation – cutting red tape – also need to be seen in context. How often have we heard governments banging on about this, only to see big-money projects getting gummed up in process and politics? The CBI's plea for further streamlining of the ' Development Consent Order (DCO) ' process, for obtaining consent for nationally significant infrastructure projects (NSIPs) in England and Wales, is well made. Ditto the need for a long-term skills plan for infrastructure development 'that embraces innovation'. Skills are also among those things Britain's politicians like to vent copious quantities of hot air on, without much in the way of progress when it comes to closing the skills gap. The general consensus among business groups, however, is that the strategy nonetheless represents a good start – something to build on. And I would agree with that. Trouble is, it is one thing to get a service in without the umpire calling 'fault' – quite another to win a match. That will only happen if the government succeeds with implementation. And its record to date is sketchy. Business secretary Jonathan Reynolds, whose name comes after Starmer and Rachel Reeves on the document, has looked like one of the more quietly competent ministers in a government not overly blessed with that commodity. This should help – particularly if he has Starmer's ear. But the government still has an awful lot to prove.

Daily Mail​

an hour ago

• Daily Mail​

ESPN star Jay Harris shares major update amid devastating cancer battle

SportsCenter host and popular ESPN anchor Jay Harris received good news after his recent prostate cancer surgery. 'My doctor said the surgery went really well – so well, in fact, that the cancer that was in my prostate stayed there,' the 60-year-old married father said in a self-shot social media video. 'Didn't spread to any surrounding areas. So when he took the prostate out, he took that with it. So it's all good. There are other details that I won't bore you with. The main thing is, we're all good and looking forward to July 12, getting back to SportsCenter, getting back to work. 'Just home, resting up, chilling,' he continued. 'Appreciate the prayers and the thoughts and the messages and the calls and the deliveries. Thank you so much. Appreciate all the love and I will holler.' Harris' t-shirt in the clip is emblazed with the image of wrestling legend Ric Flair, who recently revealed his second battle with skin cancer. Harris recently announced his prostate cancer diagnosis and his planned surgery on ABC's Good Morning America earlier this month. 'My doctor's quite optimistic, per my last scan, nothing has spread,' he told ABC host and former New York Giants star Michael Strahan. 'So, once we take out the prostate, hopefully that will be it. That's the goal.' So far, so good, as Harris revealed Monday. Harris told Strahan he came forward with his diagnosis to help other men, especially African Americans, see the signs of the disease and get themselves checked. 'Because we don't talk. I was at a golf trip with some buddies of mine and we were just sitting around talking about things that I probably can't talk about on television right now. And I mentioned the news to them, I told them what was going on with me. And then the conversation from there was fantastic,' Harris added. 'By not talking about them, I hate to be morbid, but we sentenced ourselves to death for not talking. They had no idea until I brought it up.' Harris also revealed that his dad had the same disease. The broadcaster also stated that men should take a cue from women and get regular health check-ups. Harris' frequent co-anchor Hannah Storm was diagnosed with an early form of breast cancer last year and has been checking in on her on-screen partner throughout the process. Fellow ESPNer and former Showtime boxing announcer Brian Custer has also been a help after undergoing a similar surgery, Harris said.