Smokefree 2025: A Promise Gone Up In Smoke
Press Release – Asthma and Respiratory Foundation of New Zealand
As the globe marks World Smokefree Day this Saturday, 31 May, the Asthma and Respiratory Foundation NZ is reminding Kiwis that this was the year New Zealand was meant to become smokefree.
Smokefree 2025 was within reach. Now, it's a milestone we're set to miss.
As the globe marks World Smokefree Day this Saturday, 31 May, the Asthma and Respiratory Foundation NZ is reminding Kiwis that this was the year New Zealand was meant to become smokefree.
'Instead, the Government rolled back the clock and stoked the fire, derailing years of public health progress,' Foundation Chief Executive Ms Letitia Harding says.
Ms Harding says there is little to celebrate and much to be concerned about.
'We were on track to lead the world in tobacco control, now we appear to be leading the world in vaping.
'Our previous Smokefree laws were bold, evidence-based, and targeted at protecting future generations, but the repeal of those measures blindsided everyone.'
The Foundation has been one of the strongest advocates for a smokefree Aotearoa for many years.
It backed policies that would have phased out tobacco sales for future generations, reduced nicotine levels, and supported drastically cutting the number of retailers.
Back in 2021, the Foundation celebrated the bold steps taken toward Smokefree 2025, calling it a 'significant step forward' in reducing respiratory disease and health inequities, particularly for Māori and Pacific communities.
Fast forward to today, and the mood has shifted.
The Foundation has been vocal in its disappointment over the coalition Government's decision to roll back key Smokefree laws, warning about the implications to the health of New Zealanders and a missed opportunity to lead the world in tobacco control.
At the same time, the Foundation is deeply concerned by the new approach to achieving Smokefree Aotearoa – simply shifting the problem to vapes.
'The Government's strategy seems to be 'let's just add vapes to the mix', which is just another product that has harmful health effects and ensures future generations are nicotine dependent,' said Ms Harding.
'As we have said previously, that rationale is like letting stoats in to eradicate rabbits – that's not a solution.
'We're not breaking the cycle of nicotine dependency – we're just redirecting it,' she says.
'Let's free Aotearoa from the shackles of big tobacco, who make money on the back of nicotine dependency.'
The goal shouldn't just be a smokefree New Zealand – it should be vape-free too, Ms Harding says.
'Otherwise, we're just chasing a new kind of addiction – and calling it progress.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
4 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Housed youth commit less crime: study
Having a safe, stable roof overhead appears to be one of the key factors in curbing New Zealand's high rate of youth offending. New research looked at the relationship between emergency housing, public housing, accommodation supplements and the involvement of the youth justice system. Lead author and University of Otago (Wellington) public health research fellow Dr Chang Yu said the study found clear links between housing deprivation and alleged youth offending. "We found offending decreased significantly among young people living in public housing or receiving the accommodation supplement, compared with the general population. "Emergency housing, which provides accommodation for seven nights, remains a highly debated model, attracting both support and criticism. "This study adds to the debate by showing that emergency housing does not appear to reduce youth offending." Dr Yu said the research, published in Urban Policy and Research, underscored the importance of stability in housing assistance. Compared with the general youth population, the study found three years after moving into public housing, alleged offences reduced by 11.7% and court charges among young people reduced by 10.9%. Rates of alleged offending also decreased by 13% among those receiving an accommodation supplement, and court charges decreased by 8.6%. Dr Yu said the study found Māori and Pacific youth faced systemic disadvantages in both the housing and justice systems. "Housing deprivation is closely linked to justice sector involvement. "This suggests that youth offending cannot be addressed in isolation from housing conditions. "Addressing structural inequities in housing is essential for meaningful justice reform." He believed stable housing played a crucial role in promoting social cohesion and reducing risk factors associated with youth offending. "The security provided by guaranteed housing enables young people to more consistently attend school and establish strong community bonds, resulting in them being more engaged at school and better supported socially. "Studies have also shown that having a stable home may lead to parents having more time to spend with their children, resulting in stronger parent-child bonds, and better emotional and physical wellbeing for the child." He said the research had important implications. "Especially as the government restructures Kāinga Ora and considers the future of public housing provision. "A 2019 Ministry of Justice report called for a 'fundamental reshaping of New Zealand's justice system' to reduce harm and support community restoration. "Our findings support this vision." He said the study was "a starting point" for future research in the area and researchers had already started work on analysing how housing assistance impacts perceived quality of life, certain types of youth offending, education and school attendance. "This work could, for example, enable policymakers to prioritise housing assistance for individuals with specific offending histories."
Otago Daily Times
5 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Diagnosis is that team work is needed
Gil Barbezat asks what is needed for vital healthcare reform. For many years, New Zealanders have enjoyed state-provided medical services. An ageing and growing population, technological development and practice refinements mean our medical workforce and infrastructure no longer meet evolving needs. Daily media critiques of shortcomings in our healthcare expose serious problems. Decline in access and equity of services Healthcare problems have increased steadily since the 1990s introduction of neoliberal health policies. Recent surveys of OECD countries suggested New Zealand generally provided good care, but problems were identified relating to access and equity. Differences between patients of high- and low-income, urban or rural residence and ethnic and gender issues feature prominently among our troublesome statistics. Politicians of various persuasions have failed to maintain their obligations towards modern patient-based services. Neglecting maintenance of hospital buildings and development for decades is now predictably taking its toll. What is required? • Staffing needs Medical professional education at our two existing medical schools needs greater support. Access to foreign graduates becomes difficult in a competitive healthcare labour market. Patient-related clinical experience in public (not private) hospitals is essential for professional training. Clinic- and hospital-based specialist services should be staffed and equipped to modern standards. Hard decisions are required to determine where these services are made available. Some (e.g., organ transplantation) will remain in major centres. • Working environment Collaborative teamwork at all levels is required for successful staff recruitment and retention. Existing staff are frustrated by insufficient operating and procedure time allocation to meet patient demand. Morbidity and mortality increase, particularly for cancer and heart conditions. Negotiating salary scales with staff who are overworked and have insufficient support while struggling in crumbling facilities is unnecessarily antagonistic. Outsourcing patients to private facilities relies predominantly on the same staff, merely shifting the venue and diluting public hospital staff at increased cost. GPs provide the backbone of our system; more are urgently needed, especially in rural areas. Services should be integrated collaboratively with accessible specialist services (investigations and treatments). The current situation where GP practices become a cul de sac for patients normally requiring specialist care elsewhere is frustrating, dangerous and costs lives. • Operational management Medical professionals provide medical advice at the interface between clinical demands and the community. In the current environment, that treatment or advice is too often futile as it has become unavailable. Crucial decisions are determined by budgets allocated by politicians and implemented by appointed managers, neither of whom have direct contact with patients. Clinicians exceeding budgets are regarded as inefficient. More clinical input is essential in determining budgets. Administrators and politicians laud evidence-based management outputs, but resist attempts to measure the gap between patient demand and service delivery. They evade accountability for service deficiencies by actively avoiding the collection of data on that topic. Budget adjustments — who pays? State-run public healthcare systems are most economical. Private practice remains a choice. Two-tiered healthcare, where timely diagnosis and treatment are available only to those who can afford to pay, is unacceptable. Some claim they would give anything to regain their health and be happy to pay for it. But what happens to those who cannot afford anything beyond their daily living costs? Early care saves future expense. Dollars spent on healthcare return a handsome dividend. Preventive medicine is cost-effective, but requires time and appropriate investment in staff and infrastructure. ACC delivering prompt access to fully funded treatment has improved outcomes. Despite its expense, care is more accessible and equitable compared to that for other medical conditions. Some similar funding stream could be found for other services. Any public-private partnership (PPP) includes investors' profit. PPPs provided rapid improvement to an ailing United Kingdom National Health Service system in the 1990s, only to lead to eventual added expense when inevitable interest payments became increasingly burdensome. Procedures are more expensive in the private sector. Just as wine is far more expensive in a restaurant, healthcare is far more expensive in the private sector. Public service costs could be regarded as wholesale rates, avoiding the markup inevitable in profit-driven systems. Profiteering is not confined to supermarkets. Despite the highest per capita spending on health, the United States has the worst health statistics among most OECD countries. Meeting the health requirements of New Zealanders requires further investment of government funds, but money is not of sole importance. Happy and productive staff deliver the best collaborative and economical care. Better staffed public hospitals serve more contented communities. Our government recently found a large financial cache to increase military spending. Is universal healthcare less important? Revenue generation through some form of equitable, innovative taxation must provide much needed additional funding. Urgent collaborative action required Collaboration beyond party politics is required for equitable access to good clinical care for all Kiwis. Health outcome measurements can monitor the success or failure of their actions. • Gil Barbezat is an emeritus professor of medicine.
NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
Cancer charity Look Good Feel Better gets a wellbeing-focused makeover
For more than 30 years, Look Good Feel Better has been supporting New Zealanders who have cancer. With backing from the cosmetics industry, the charity is best known for its makeover skincare and make-up classes, and has mostly focused on helping women navigate the changes in their appearance caused by
