Air India Plane Crash: Is It Fair To Blame The Pilots Already? Why Boeing Has Much To Answer To

Last Updated:
Boeing's safety track record has already been under fire, especially after the 737 MAX tragedy that killed 346 people in 2018 and 2019
Thirty seconds. That was all the time the ill-fated Air India flight 171 spent in the air before crashing outside the Ahmedabad airport last week.
Eleven seconds into liftoff at 1.39 pm, Captain Sumeet Sabharwal sent out a chilling call to the ATC saying: 'Mayday, Mayday, no thrust, losing power, unable to lift, going down'. Nineteen seconds later, the plane had crashed after dropping from a height of 650 feet.
It was a clear, hot afternoon with the skies above Ahmedabad shimmering under 40 degrees Celsius. Everything was routine, until it wasn't. Flight 171 became the centre of one of the worst aviation disasters in India.
Let's try decoding the crash, but without any verdict on what may have caused it. For that, we must wait for a detailed air crash investigation.
Investigators are facing a long road ahead in solving this big mystery. The truth will emerge sooner than later from the aircraft's black box. But there are four significant tell-tale signs from the video footage of the takeoff and crash.
Number 1 and the most important – the landing gear was out during the entire 30 seconds that the flight was in the air. Usually, the landing gear is retracted by the pilots within a few seconds of liftoff.
Number 2 – the jury is divided over whether the flaps were extended or retracted. During liftoff, the flaps are extended to aid in lift. But the aircraft's angle during takeoff, being in a nose-up position, and grainy footage makes it difficult to ascertain if the flaps were extended or retracted.
Number 3 – the aircraft had nearly exhausted the 3.5-km runway before liftoff. Was it looking for more thrust? A dust cloud can also be seen in the footage right at takeoff.
Number 4 – the pilot's 'Mayday' message indicates both engines had failed as he reported no thrust or power.
So, what could have happened? Aviation experts have proposed many theories.
The biggest among them is a possible double engine failure due to bird strikes. This is one of the rarest occurrences – last seen in the 2009 case of US Airways Flight 1549, which landed in New York's Hudson River soon after takeoff.
A Dreamliner can fly on one engine. But both failing during takeoff is catastrophic. The dust cloud seen in the footage right at takeoff could be engine-related – possibly birds being ingested, some aviation experts pointed out.
But there are no visible large bird flocks or smoke trails visible in video footage. Other experts said engine stalling due to electrical or software issues in the plane is unlikely, given how sophisticated the Dreamliner is with multiple backups too.
There's also a theory around the aircraft's flaps and landing gear. Captain Steve has suggested that the flaps may have been retracted, reducing lift, while the landing gear remained deployed. He has speculated that the pilots may have pulled up the flaps instead of the landing gear by mistake. Some speculate that maybe only one engine failed but the pilots turned off the live engine by mistake.
But these were experienced pilots with more than 9,000 hours of flying time between them. Captain Sumeet Sabharwal was a veteran at flying the Dreamliner on long-haul flights.
The landing gear and flaps switch in the cockpit is located far apart, other experts pointed out. Switching off a live engine is also something basic training modules alert against.
The pilots committing such cardinal mistakes is unfathomable. There would be an alert in the cockpit if this had happened. Some experts said just the landing gear being down cannot make the plane crash.
Also, it is easy and convenient to blame the pilot, isn't it?
The temperature was within operating conditions for the flight. Fuel contamination is believed to be unlikely too, as per some experts.
So, is it a problem with the aircraft itself? Does Boeing need to answer as well? To be sure, the probe will look into all possibilities, including a cockpit error.
A big breakthrough is the recovery of the black box in a relatively intact condition. The flight data recorder and the cockpit voice recorder will be analysed by the Indian investigating agency, Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB). It will take the help of Boeing and GE, manufacturer of the engines.
A team from the US National Transportation Safety Board will help India in the probe. A team of Boeing officials from the US is going to arrive soon as well.
All 33 of Air India's Boeing 787 Dreamliners, meanwhile, are undergoing safety checks, additional maintenance checks and pre-departure inspections.
Now I come to another big question – is there a pattern with the 787?
Yes, a Dreamliner 787 has never crashed in history since its commercial start in 2011. But there have been some signs of trouble.
Earlier this year, an American Airlines 787 made four emergency landings in one month – some due to faulty wing flaps. The same flaps are now under alleged scrutiny in the AI 171 disaster.
The American Airlines plane was initially forced to return to Amsterdam after a problem with its flaps was detected shortly after takeoff for Philadelphia on January 7. The aircraft dumped fuel over the North Sea before landing at Schiphol airport at a higher-than-normal speed, attributed to the flaps problem.
Later, this American Airlines plane was forced to abort flights to Philadelphia from Dublin, Barcelona, and Zurich.
Boeing's safety track record has already been under fire, especially after the 737 MAX tragedy that killed 346 people in 2018 and 2019. The Ahmedabad crash on June 12 came six years after the loss of two smaller 737 Max planes, which claimed 346 lives and plunged Boeing into a near-existential crisis.
And remember that after the first of these crashes, of Lion Air flight in Jakarta, Boeing had tried to put the blame on the pilots.
The Max, Boeing's top seller, was grounded around the world for more than 18 months after investigators found that the crashes in 2018 and 2019 had been caused by software MCAS meant to improve the aircraft's handling. Instead, the system effectively wrestled control from the pilots, who were unaware of how it worked and how it might be overridden.
The year 2025 has been deadly for aviation. Flight 171 was the second fatal commercial crash of 2025. Earlier on January 30, an American Airlines jet collided midair with a helicopter near Washington, killing all on board.
Other incidents, like a Delta plane flipping on landing and another catching fire mid-air, have raised urgent questions about aviation safety in 2025. An extraordinary event in February saw a Delta Airlines plane flipped upside down after a heavy landing at Toronto airport, though all passengers and crew survived.
In March, an American Airlines plane caught fire developing an engine fault and passengers were seen evacuating the plane onto the wing.
The AI 171 crash, however, is the worst this year and arguably the worst ever in India. Investigators are now combing through wreckage, black box data, and cockpit recordings to uncover what exactly happened in those final seconds.
For most on board, there was no hope. Out of 242 people on board, only one survived. Vishwas Kumar Ramesh, a 40-year-old Londoner seated in 11A, was found alive in the wreckage.
But more were killed on the ground as the plane crashed into residential quarters at the BJ Medical College. The toll could go well over 250.
top videos
View all
Families demand answers. The aviation world demands accountability. The crash not only raises questions for Boeing, but also for global regulators, air traffic safety standards, and aircraft maintenance by airlines.
We must make sure answers come before another disaster strikes.
About the Author
Aman Sharma
Aman Sharma, Executive Editor - National Affairs at CNN-News18, and Bureau Chief at News18 in Delhi, has over two decades of experience in covering the wide spectrum of politics and the Prime Minister's Office....Read More
Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
Ahmedabad Plane Crash Air India boeing
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
June 16, 2025, 07:00 IST
News india Air India Plane Crash: Is It Fair To Blame The Pilots Already? Why Boeing Has Much To Answer To

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

News18

4 hours ago

• News18

Gaurav Taneja AKA Flying Beast Simulates Air India Flight 171 Crash: 'It Was Scary, I Froze'

Last Updated: Flying Beast Gaurav Taneja simulates Air India Flight 171 crash, discusses overloading, pilot error, and rules out dual engine failure in new YouTube video. Popular YouTuber and pilot Gaurav Taneja, better known as Flying Beast, has released a detailed video analysing the tragic crash of Air India Flight 171 in Ahmedabad. The incident, which resulted in the death of 270 people, shocked the nation and raised questions about what could have gone wrong. In his latest upload, Taneja attempts to understand the crash by recreating it through flight simulations and exploring various theories. Initially, Taneja leaned toward a dual-engine failure being the most likely cause. However, after running simulations, he says his opinion has evolved. He even hinted at a combination of factors — including overloading and potential pilot error — being at play. 'I was fixated on this reason until today evening. In the sim, everything was falling into place. After takeoff, we killed both engines at 100 feet," he said, referring to his simulation scenario. He further explained that he made some adjustments to reflect a more realistic setup for a long-haul international route. 'Usually, this aircraft is 62 tonnes, but considering that it was a long flight to London, I've made it 70 tonnes." The experience during the simulation left a strong impression on him. 'It was scary. I froze. There was nothing that you could do. What could you do? All you can do is pray and watch the ground come at you." Earlier, Taneja had pointed out that because the plane managed to lift off, the aircraft systems were likely functioning properly in the initial seconds. However, the fact that the landing gear was not retracted could be a major indicator that something went wrong immediately after take-off. 'So, if there was no such warning at take-off, that means there was no major error in the aircraft or its systems. Aircraft usually take off as part of a routine, once you cross 100 or 400 feet, you put the autopilot on. In this case, I don't know whether the pilots had time to do that. The landing gear was still down. The usual procedure is: you take off, confirm there is a positive rate of climb, and then the pilot flying calls it out, and the gear is taken up. But here, the gears were left down, indicating that right after take-off there was some emergency. The pilots were distracted, they were trying to solve that problem. There was no time or perhaps no confirmation of a positive rate of climb, and the aircraft was sinking, about 400 feet per minute." With nearly 10 million subscribers on YouTube, Flying Beast's video has sparked fresh conversation around aviation safety, aircraft weight regulations, and cockpit decisions under stress. In the past, Taneja has used his platform to simplify aviation concepts for general audiences, and this latest upload continues in that direction — helping viewers understand the real-life challenges pilots face. First Published:

Indian Express

5 hours ago

• Indian Express

History Headline: 37 years earlier, another air crash in Ahmedabad

Ushaben Patel had just finished helping her son Mileen, 8, with his homework before school on October 19, 1988, when the driver she had sent to Ahmedabad airport to pick up her husband returned to their Naranpura residence without him. Sharadbhai Patel, 35, a finance director at Rexroth, a hydraulic and electrical systems firm, was flying back a day before their elder son Jaysheel's birthday. 'As soon as the driver told me that my husband's plane had crashed, I left for the airport. At the site, I saw bodies on fire. I said a quick prayer for them before fainting,' Ushaben, 75, who lives in Canada now, tells The Indian Express over telephone. At 6.53 am on October 19, 1988, an Indian Airlines flight (a Boeing-737) from Bombay to Ahmedabad with 135 passengers, including six crew members, crashed into a paddy field around 2.5 km from runway 23 of Ahmedabad's Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport. While 130 died on impact, three succumbed to their injuries during treatment. Two men who survived the crash sustained grievous injuries. On June 12 this year — nearly 37 years later — Air India's Boeing-787 Dreamliner departed from runway 23 of the airport with 242 passengers, including 12 crew members, for London. Minutes later, the plane went down, its tail striking the first-floor mess at B J Medical College and Hospital, located a kilometre from the airport. While 241 persons onboard and several others on the ground were killed, one passenger survived the crash. A report dated October 20, 1988, in The Indian Express states that the Boeing, 'acquired in 1971…apparently lost height before landing and went shearing through branches of babul trees, hit a neem tree and also snapped a high tension power line before crashing'. Initially, five persons had survived the 1988 crash — Vinod Tripathi, Parag Vasavada, Jaikrishna Kaushik Rav, Ashok Agarwal and Rajiv. News reports say that these survivors, seated in the tail portion of the plane, were 'thrown out' after the aircraft broke into three parts on impact. At 13, Jaikrishna was the youngest survivor, but he lost his parents and brother in the crash. Residents of Sabarkantha district's Idar, the family had come to Gujarat nearly a decade after shifting to Zambia. In 1988, Dr M F Shaikh, then 30, was an assistant professor in the General Surgery and Plastic Surgery Department of BJ Medical College, which is affiliated with and located on the Civil Hospital campus. 'Jaikrishna had fractured his right femur (the strongest bone in the human body) and had burn injuries. A week after his treatment at the hospital, he was airlifted to Mumbai's Hinduja Hospital. However, he succumbed to his injuries within two days,' says Dr Shaikh, who retired as the Head of the Plastic Surgery Department. Besides Jaikrishna, Parag Vasavada and Rajiv too died during the course of treatment. Of the two survivors, Tripathi, then Gujarat Vidyapith Registrar, passed away in 2003, while Agrawal, a textile businessman, died in March 2020. The first to treat the Registrar, Dr Shaikh says Tripathi 'ran from the blazing plane despite burns in both legs'. Tripathi, who retired as Vice-Chancellor, was carrying 170 degrees to get them signed by then Chancellor Morarji Desai. The Vidyapith reissued these degrees. Agarwal's family, which has moved to another area in Ahmedabad, declined requests by The Indian Express to talk about the incident. One of his old neighbours says, 'He lost his wife Abha, 22, and their daughter Ruhi, 11 months, in the crash. He never recovered from the loss of his family.' Dr Drupad Chhatrapati, 92, then medical superintendent at the Civil Hospital, recalls, 'Within 48 hours of the post-mortem, we emptied out a ward at the hospital. The bodies, covered in white sheets, were lined up there for identification. Since there was no DNA testing then, families were asked to identify the remains.' According to reports, bodies, luggage and plane debris were found strewn over a radius of half a kilometre near the Kotarpur Water Works, under construction then. Pinakin Dikshit, then Deputy Commissioner, Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation, says, 'It was a foggy morning. Construction lights were on at the water works compound. The pilot could have mistaken those for landing lights.' Today, a memorial — a concrete airplane on a 10×10 platform — stands at the crash site, located inside the compound. Since 1990, victims' families have been visiting the site annually on October 19 to pay their respects. A rusted board near the memorial, with the words 'Smriti Van' painted in white, leads to a 'mini forest', where the families had planted 133 saplings in 1991. Anil Pathak, 75, a reporter who had done stories on the crash, recalls, 'Among the belongings recovered was a potli (cloth bundle) of gold. I remember the parents of a Mumbai-based cabin crew member wandering around the site in search of their daughter for months. They were convinced that she had survived the crash.' The crash posed many challenges, says ex-Chief Secretary P K Laheri, then Principal Secretary to CM Amarsinh Chaudhary. 'There were no mobile phones then. The police control room called me 20 minutes after the crash. Limited resources meant we had to call the fire brigade from Vadodara (around 100 km away). There were no rescue teams then. All rescue work was undertaken by the fire department,' he says. US resident Pankesh Patel, 64, lost his brother Rakesh and sister-in-law Bhavnaben, both 24, in the crash. He says, 'The June 12 crash revived memories of the 1988 incident— the shock and how my parents were left devastated. Like us, these families too will go through the same trauma.' Though the authorities had announced a compensation of Rs 2 lakh per victim of the 1988 crash, their families have been fighting a legal battle for 'fair' compensation based on a victim's age and income . The writer is an Assistant Editor, The Indian Express

Hindustan Times

5 hours ago

• Hindustan Times

AI plane crash: Last rites of crew member Irfan Shaikh held in Pimpri-Chinchwad

Jun 22, 2025 06:50 AM IST Relatives and friends gave an emotional farewell to Irfan Shaikh, crew member of the ill-fated Air India-171 flight that crashed in Ahmedabad last week, as his remains were laid to rest at Pimpri-Chinchwad on Saturday. The Shaikh family received 22-year-old Irfan's remains after a DNA match on Friday, and they were brought to Pune in the early hours of the day. The family includes his grandparents, parents, and brother. (HT PHOTO) The Shaikh family received 22-year-old Irfan's remains after a DNA match on Friday, and they were brought to Pune in the early hours of the day. The family includes his grandparents, parents, and brother. The final rites were held at Hazrat Bilal burial ground in Nehrunagar in the presence of family, neighbours, friends, and leaders from across political parties at around 9.30 am. Irfan was on board the London-bound Air India flight, AI 171, that crashed into a building in a medical college complex moments after take-off from the Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport in Ahmedabad on June 12. A total of 241 persons on board the Boeing 787 Dreamliner aircraft were killed in the crash, along with 29 others on the ground. 'Irfan joined the aviation industry as a cabin crew member two years ago after completing a course at a private institute in Pune. He initially worked with Vistara, and after the Air India-Vistara merger, he began flying on international routes. Irfan's father Salim Shaikh runs a small shop in Tukaramnagar and his brother works in a software company,' said Firoz Shaikh, Irfan's relative. The youngster had big dreams and was determined to excel in the field, but the crash shattered all those dreams, he said.