‘Motorheads' series review: A flashy ride with unfinished roads

In Ironwood, there are two types of people: those who hit the brakes, and those who hit the gas. That's the ethos at the heart of John A Norris' Motorheads on Prime Video. A teen drama set against the backdrop of a dying town and illegal street racing scene, it sounds like something we have seen before, and to some extent, it is. But there are moments, visually and thematically, where the show edges towards new territories.
Norris, best known for his work on All American (2018), swaps football fields for back-alley racetracks, but his usual focus on teenage identity and legacy is still prevalent. The cast, made up of lesser-known faces, does a commendable job with their respective characters. Ryan and Deacon Phillippe bring an earnestness that helps ground the sometimes chaotic narrative.
Motorheads (English)
Creator: John A. Norris
Cast: Ryan Phillipe, Deacon Phillipe, Michael Cimino, Melissa Collazo, Uriah Shelton & Others
Episodes: 10
Runtime: 50-55 minutes
Storyline: As their town crumbles, a group of teenagers dive into street racing, where high stakes and personal conflicts go full throttle
Set in a crumbling suburban town in Pennsylvania, the series follows twins Caitlyn (Melissa Collazo) and Zac Torres (Michael Cimino) who move to Ironwood – a town their parents grew up in. While Caitlyn starts restoring their father's old Dodge Charger, Zac gets roped into the street racing scene that once defined his father's legacy. Just like their father and uncle, the twins seem to carry different pieces of the past: Caitlyn with a sharp instinct for building and mechanics, like her uncle, and Zac stepping into his father's shoes behind the wheel. The subplot of rebuilding the Dodge Charger works well as a metaphor. It mirrors their desire to rebuild a life in a new town, a fractured family and a connection to the past that lingers on in Ironwoods' streets.
The show leans into visual duality: parallels between generations, choices made then and now, and between two siblings charting different courses through the same inherited world. In this sense, the cinematic structure is one of the biggest strengths. The sequences and flashbacks are vividly cut and some of the racing visuals – especially the bank heist car rollout – are striking and well-paced.
Where Motorheads falters though is in its lack of depth. For all the talk of a 'dying town', there is minimal narrative weight given to its decline or even a comparison factor to emphasise on the fact that it was dying. The town is treated more like a dramatic canvas than a lived-in world. The street racing culture, while glamorised, isn't explored very deeply. There is thrill, yes, but very little sense of community, danger or real subcultural grit.
Caitlyn's almost magical ability to outperform seasoned mechanics feels like a narrative shortcut more than a believable character arc. The most jarring plotline may be the sheriff's: an ex-con posing as a lawman 'attempting' to turn his life around while enabling his son's criminal activities. The presence of corruption isn't as jarring, but the lack of interrogation around it is, creating a vague ethical tension.
With motorsport slowly revving back into public attention in India due to racing ventures being explored and popular actors like Ajith Kumar returning to racing, shows like Motorheads may find a growing audience. It's not groundbreaking television, but it offers just enough momentum to keep viewers buckled in for the ride.
Motorheads is streaming on Prime Video

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

News18

4 hours ago

• News18

Renuka Shahane REACTS To 8-Hr Shift Debate Amid Deepika's Spirit Exit Row: ‘It's A Choice'

As a mother of two, the 58-year-old actress mentioned knowing many working mothers who handle 18-hour shifts on daily soap sets by bringing their children along. She believes it's their choice, and if producers agree, it's their decision. There should be no pressure, as some mothers might want or need to work those long hours. 'I know of a lot of working mothers who are going to work in daily soaps for 18-hour shifts, and they manage their child by taking them to the set, and kind of raising them practically on the set. It is a choice that they have made and who am I to say anything about that? If the producer accepts that, it's their prerogative. There should not be a compulsion as there might be mothers who want or need to work for 18 hours. It's a very individual thing," she said. Renuka also emphasised the importance of mutual understanding between actors and creators in such situations. She said that moving forward is pointless unless everyone involved shares the same understanding. 'Whenever you decide to sign on the dotted line, that has to be something mutual. And that sense of respect has to be there because if there is no respect, you're not going to be able to work with each other at all," she said. On the work front, Renuka Shahane was last seen in Tejas Prabha Vijay Deoskar's Marathi film 'Devmanus' which released in theatres on 25th April. She was also seen as Pushplata Yadav in Prime Video series 'Dupahiya' which premiered on 7th March, 2025. Deepika Padukone's Spirit Exit Row Meanwhile, Deepika Padukone recently exited Sandeep Reddy Vanga's Spirit, leading to intense media scrutiny and speculation. Reports suggest the new mom had requested an 8-hour workday, a significant pay-check and profit-sharing, terms that reportedly didn't align with the filmmaker's expectations. While Deepika didn't directly address the exit, she recently posted about staying true to herself, hinting at her priorities as a new mother.

India.com

4 hours ago

• India.com

This 3-episode crime series will leave you numb, 18 women were hunted by..., climax will send chills down your spine, series is...

OTT platforms keep dropping a bunch of web shows, films, and a few docuseries every now and then, and we are here to help you binge-watch them. And today, we will be sharing another docuseries that will crawl under your skin and stay there. Some stories aren't just disturbing; they're nightmarishly real. Indian Predator: Beast of Bangalore, released in 2022, is one of them. An unflinching look into the twisted life of Karnataka's most feared serial killer: Umesh Reddy. Once a man in uniform, Umesh turned predator, hunting and brutally murdering women between 1996 and 2002. While 18 lives were reportedly lost to his savagery, he was convicted in just nine cases. Bengaluru's years of fear Reddy's crimes weren't just about murder—they were layered with horrifying details: sexual assaults, the chilling pattern of stealing women's clothes, and multiple escapes from police custody. He didn't just commit crimes—he haunted an entire city. His most infamous act? The 1998 murder of a widow in Peenya gripped Bengaluru in a wave of panic. The docuseries captures the fear and chaos through testimonies from victims' families, journalists, and police officers who witnessed the horror unfold firsthand. About the docuseries Directed by Ashwin Rai Shetty and produced by Vice Studios, the three-part docuseries uses dramatic reenactments to immerse viewers in the tense atmosphere of late-'90s Bengaluru. While some viewers felt the dramatisations lacked punch, the series succeeds in tracing Reddy's deeply disturbed psyche and the institutional lapses that let him slip through the cracks more than once. Streaming on… Each episode runs about 40–45 minutes and is available in multiple languages, including Hindi, English, Kannada, Tamil, Telugu, and Malayalam. With a modest IMDb rating of 6.2, it may not be flawless, but it's a hard-hitting chronicle of crime, fear, and a city held hostage by one man's monstrous instincts.

Indian Express

5 hours ago

• Indian Express

Once a promising young talent, her relationship with director who launched her led to Bollywood actor's downfall and ‘murder'; the case remains open

In Bollywood's rich and extensive history, built by thousands of actors and technicians, there exist certain persons whose personal lives have been more staggering than their professional ones. Not merely due to controversies, but because of the way their lives unfolded and, at times, ended. They have shaken people more deeply with their personal lives than their careers ever did. Actor Priya Rajvansh's story is one such, as she is remembered more for the tragedy that eventually struck her than for the performances she delivered. For the unversed, she was allegedly murdered by people she believed were her own. Born in Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, Priya Rajvansh's (née Vera Sunder Singh) father, Sunder Singh, worked in the Forest Department, and his mother was an English woman from whom she inherited her anglicised accent. Vera was a star even in her school days, long before she entered the film industry. By the time she reached college, her fame had only grown as she excelled in every competition she participated in; be it debates, declamations or dramatics. 'She was free and frank with almost everybody in the know of her, but we young students called her a 'freak flirt', of course in whispered tones,' RP Chaddah, who studied in the same college that she did, wrote in The Tribune in April 2000. 'Some city lotharios were so smitten by her youth, charm, energy and beautiful gait, that they started penning paeans of praise in the form of poems and dedicated their books to Vera,' he added. By the time Vera completed college, she had completely fallen in love with theatre and acting. Thus, she joined the Royal Academy of Dramatic Art (RADA) in London and honed her craft under the guidance of actor-director Laurence Olivier, columnist Shriniwas Joshi noted in The Tribune. During her time in London, a photo of hers somehow found its way to renowned director Chetan Anand, younger brother of Bollywood legend Dev Anand. This changed her life forever. Soon, Chetan launched her as an actor in his war drama Haqeeqat (1964), rechristening her as Priya Rajvansh. The film, starring Dharmendra in the lead role, received widespread acclaim, and Priya's performance, in particular, impressed many. 'Priya unconsciously followed the method school of acting of Stanislavski much before Smita Patil, Shabana Azmi, Naseeruddin Shah or Om Puri,' Chaddah noted. However, Haqeeqat also marked the beginning of her much-publicised and somewhat scandalous relationship with the then-recently-separated Chetan Anand. In/voluntarily, she remained bound to that relationship and did not appear in any film for six years after Haqeeqat. She returned only in Heer Raanjha (1970), again directed by Chetan. In fact, in her 22-year career, she acted in only seven films; all under his direction. Her younger brother, Gullu Singh, has described Chetan Anand as a double-edged sword in her life, even going as far as to calling him 'the biggest tragedy' she ever faced. 'Chetan Anand was the man who made Priya, and also the man who marred her. In fact, he was the biggest tragedy that could ever happen to her. Chetan would never allow Priya to be directed by anyone else. The result was fatal for her career. She was cast in Haqeeqat when she was just 22 and then in Heer Ranjha when she was five years older. Time was passing Priya by, but she could never hear its footsteps. My sister's only problem was her sense of over-commitment to Chetan. She lived with him and his inclinations for over 30 years.' Nonetheless, her performance in Heer Raanjha also received praise. She went on to play notable roles in Chetan's subsequent films such as Hindustan Ki Kasam (1973), Hanste Zakhm (1973), Saheb Bahadur (1977), Kudrat (1981) and Haathon Ki Lakeeren (1986) too. However, according to Joshi, 'her anglicised accent and western femininity did not click with the Indian audience.' Thus, Haathon Ki Lakeeren became her final movie and the Shimla-born woman who loved acting more than anything else ultimately gave up on her dreams. Though she continued her relationship with Chetan, Gullu said she never wanted to marry him. They lived together for nearly 30 years without formalising the relationship. 'She was not a live-in; she was too classy and dignified to be termed a mistress. She could be at best called his companion and true lover,' film journalist Sheila Vesuna wrote in An inherently reclusive person, Chetan's death in 1997 caused Priya Rajvansh to withdraw even further into solitude. But his passing was only the beginning of the tragedies that lay ahead in her life. According to The Print, Chetan left behind a will naming Priya and his two sons from his first marriage, Ketan and Vivek Anand, as joint owners of his Juhu bungalow. Though she owned her own apartment in Mumbai, Priya spent most of her time at Chetan's residence. On March 27, 2000, just three years after his passing, she was found dead at the same bungalow under mysterious circumstances. While many theories, including suicide, emerged, the post-mortem confirmed the cause of death as 'asphyxia due to strangulation'. The investigation soon led to Priya Rajvansh's maid, Mala Choudhary, who lived at the bungalow with her three children. During interrogation, she confessed to the crime and revealed that she committed it with the help of her cousin, Ashok Chinnaswami. But the probe didn't end there. It was reportedly discovered that Mala had an 'illicit relationship' with Ketan and had received Rs 4,000 from a 'close family member' to kill Priya. Apparently, the actor had been facing financial issues and was urging Ketan and Vivek to sell the property. Eventually, the investigation implicated the Anand brothers as well. According to a 2002 PTI report, police alleged that the brothers conspired to kill the actor to deprive her of her one-third share of the property. On July 31, 2002, a sessions court sentenced all four accused, including Ketan and Vivek, to life imprisonment. 'The pain is irreversible, but there is still some solace at hand. I still remember the day Chetan's sons, their maid Mala and his aide Ashok were sentenced to life imprisonment for killing my sister. You would not believe how a very close relation of the conspirators turned hostile towards them. The case reversed when the boy who had blown off the fuse on the day of the murder deposed for Priya. He stood up for a woman he never knew. Actually, it was Priya claiming justice from her grave,' Gullu said, following the verdict. However, in November 2002, the Bombay High Court granted bail to the Anand brothers. Reportedly, in 2011, the High Court accepted their appeals against the guilty verdict. According to a 2024 News18 report, the Priya Rajvansh murder case remains open, with no clear motive or confirmed perpetrators in custody. Though she was intensely private, Gullu Singh once remarked that Priya Rajvansh would never be forgotten, particularly owing to the grace with which she lived. 'She was adored by everybody, right from peons to the top bosses. There is no way her memory can go away. Her elegance, her grace and her dignity will always last,' he said. In conversation with Times of India, he recalled, 'She was the Greta Garbo of the Indian screen, a complete recluse but a better actress and more beautiful than Garbo. She was an elegant woman, a real beauty.'