Protesters warn Scottish Government over Flamingo Land
An emergency meeting is being held in the community on Friday after the Scottish Government reporter upheld an appeal from the Yorkshire-based theme park operator.
The official, however, added 49 conditions to the application.
The Balloch and Haldane Community Council is demanding the Scottish Government reverses its decision to recommend planning permission.
Local MSP Ross Greer said ministers stepped in to help Donald Trump build an Aberdeenshire golf course, which opened in 2012.
He told The Herald: 'Ministers have the power to reject and recall this decision but they won't do it despite having done so previously for developers like Donald Trump. They wont do it when it is Scotland's national environment that needs protecting.'
'Government ministers got directly involved to help Donald Trump build a golf course in Aberdeenshire, but they're refusing to do so here when it's about protecting Scotland's environment.
Read more:
Emergency public meeting called over Flamingo Land decision
MP demands Swinney steps in and recalls Flamingo Land recommendation | The Herald
'It looks like we have a government that is willing to stand up for American billionaires and stand up for big business but won't stand up Scotland's communities or our world famous natural environment.'
Scottish ministers granted planning permission to Mr Trump, despite the local council throwing out the application.
Ministers argued that the economic benefit would outweigh the environmental harm.
Mr Greer added: 'We want government ministers to step in and reject Flamingo Land's application. They are hiding behind a government official.
'The National Park's board unanimously rejected this plan because the evidence against them was overwhelming. They are so destructive.'
He added that Sepa, the Scottish Government's environment watchdog, also rejected the plans over flooding risks.
'Despite that, a government official has overturned that and Scottish Government ministers are allowing them to do so," he added.
Balloch residents Rae and Alison told The Herald the community is prepared to fight the decision "every step of the way".
Rae said: 'Everybody in Balloch is against this. We are all shocked that it was passed again, we didn't even know that it was coming back up to parliament.
'I don't know one person in Balloch, or Dumbarton, or in surrounding areas, that wants this. It is a unanimous no.'
A Scottish Government spokesperson also said at the time: 'An independent reporter has issued a decision intimating that he is minded to grant planning permission in principle for the proposal subject to 49 planning conditions subject to a legal agreement being reached between the national park authority and developer to secure the employment and environment issues that are set out in the Lomond Promise.
'As the appeal remains live, it would not be appropriate to comment further on the merits of the proposed development.'
As part of the conditions, the applicant will now have to reach an agreement with Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park Authority – which rejected the proposals last year – before the application can progress.
Under the £43.5 million proposals, Lomond Banks would see two hotels, more than 100 lodges, a waterpark and monorail built on the site at Balloch, West Dunbartonshire.
The development has been proposed for years, with Lomond Banks pulling out in 2019 before returning with a new application, which has proven controversial with the local community.
Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie accused First Minister John Swinney of backing "greedy developers" instead of the environment.
Mr Swinney, speaking at First Minister's Questions, said it would "not be appropriate" to comment on the ongoing issue.
However, he said he was "absolutely committed" to protecting the natural environment, but added the Scottish Government reporter was "entitled" to come to his decision based on evidence.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
12 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump deploys B-2 stealth bombers as he considers striking Iran
US B-2 stealth bombers have been moved to the American military base in Guam, as Donald Trump prepared to meet with his national security team and discuss whether to join Israel's attacks on Iranian nuclear sites. As many as four B-2 stealth bombers took off from the Whiteman Air Force base in Missouri on Saturday, heading towards the US naval station in the Pacific. The B-2 is designed for long-range missions and is the only aircraft capable of delivering the 30,000-lb 'Massive Ordnance Penetrator' precision-guided bunker busters that could be used to destroy Iran's underground nuclear plant at Fordow. The US president was expected to call a national security meeting on Saturday night as he decides whether or not to join the conflict. The relocation of the B-2 stealth bombers, which puts them in striking distance of Iran with the support of refuelling tankers, appears to be a clear demonstration of US military might as it ramps up pressure on Iran to strike a nuclear deal. From Guam, they could fly to the US base on Diego Garcia, in the Chagos Islands, which is within striking distance of Iran. The movements come amid reports that the US president tried to arrange a meeting with Iranian officials but couldn't get through to Ayatollah Khamenei, the country's supreme leader. Mr Trump and Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the Turkish president, quietly sought to organise face-to-face talks with Iranian officials in Istanbul this week, but efforts collapsed when Khamenei, who is in hiding, could not be reached, three US officials told Axios. The backchannel effort reveals the extent the US president was willing to go to seek a diplomatic solution with Iran and avoid US military intervention. On Saturday, Emmanuel Macron, the French president, vowed that Europe would step up its diplomatic efforts, a day after Mr Trump dismissed European efforts to end the war between Iran and Israel. After speaking with Masoud Pezeshkian, the Iranian president, Mr Macron wrote on X: 'I am convinced that a path exists to end war and avoid even greater dangers. 'To achieve this, we will accelerate the negotiations led by France and its European partners with Iran.' 'Iran must never acquire nuclear weapons,' he added. 'It is up to Iran to provide full guarantees that its intentions are peaceful.' His comments followed criticism from Mr Trump, who dismissed the role of European partners in brokering a ceasefire after Friday's talks with top Iranian officials ended with no breakthrough. Mr Trump told reporters: 'Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us.' Iran and Israel continued to trade missile barrages on Saturday, with a senior Israeli military official saying that IDF strikes would continue for 'as long as possible' and anyone saying otherwise was making 'empty promises'. Israeli government officials had originally publicised a 'two-week' time frame for the campaign, saying its objectives could be met in that period. Overnight on Friday, 50 Israeli jets hit targets across Iran with 150 munitions, killing three senior Iranian military commanders, including the new commander of its drone force. The three senior Iranian commanders killed were named by the IDF as Saeed Izadi, head of the Palestinian Division in the IRGC Quds Force, Behnam Shahriyari, head of the Quds Force's Unit 190, and Aminpour Joudaki, head of the IRGC Aerospace Force's drone unit. Izadi had been killed 'hiding' in a location that was not his home, indicating the power of Israel's intelligence, said the IDF. Israel also hit the Isfahan nuclear site in Iran for the second time, further degrading its capacity to manufacture the centrifuges required to produce weapons-grade uranium. A senior military official said Israel had dealt a 'severe blow to centrifuge production' in Iran and had taken out '50 per cent or more' of its ballistic missile launchers. They added that missile launchers were a 'bottleneck' for Iran, with the country having many more missiles than launchers. Israeli officials trumpeted the success of their air strikes, claiming they had set back Tehran's development of nuclear weapons by 'years'. 'According to the assessment we hear, we already delayed for at least two or three years the possibility for them to have a nuclear bomb,' Gideon Saar, Israel's foreign minister, said in an interview with Bild on Saturday. Streaks of smoke were also visible in the sky over Tel Aviv on Saturday as Israel's air defence responded to a fresh onslaught of projectiles from Tehran. During the barrage, an Iranian drone hit a home in Israel's Beit She'an valley region, marking the first time a drone has hit a residential area in Israel since the conflict began on June 13. In a message to American officials, Iran's top diplomat warned that it would be 'very dangerous for everybody' if the US were to join Israel's strikes. Speaking on his way back from talks in Geneva, Abbas Araghchi, Iran's foreign minister, said: 'Unfortunately, we have heard that the US may join this aggression. 'That would be very unfortunate and very, very dangerous for everybody.' The Islamic Republic has so far ruled out further nuclear talks with the US until Israel halts its attacks. In a sign of how precarious the current conflict has left the Iranian regime, the supreme leader is said to have named three senior clerics as candidates to succeed him should he be killed, according to The New York Times. Buried 300ft inside a mountain, the Fordow enrichment plant is one of three key pieces of nuclear infrastructure in Iran, alongside the Natanz enrichment plant and research facilities in Isfahan. If the US were to launch a strike on the nuclear plant from Diego Garcia, it would need permission from the UK, which maintains sovereignty over the islands. On Thursday, Mr Trump said that the decision on whether to strike Iran would be made 'in the next two weeks'.
Economist
an hour ago
- Economist
Europe wants to show it's ready for war. Would anyone show up to fight?
Nice tanks you got there, Europe—got anyone to drive 'em? Such are the taunts the continent's generals might have to endure following the announcement of a splurge in defence spending expected from the NATO summit in The Hague on June 24th-25th. Assuming European governments don't bin their commitments to bigger defence budgets once some kind of peace is agreed to in Ukraine—or Donald Trump leaves the White House—spending on their armed forces will roughly double within a decade. A disproportionate slug of the jump from a 2% of GDP spending target to 3.5% will go towards purchasing equipment. But armies are about people, too. Attracting youngsters to a career that involves getting shot at has never been easy; a bit of forceful nagging (known in military jargon as 'conscription') is already on the cards in some countries. Even dragooning recalcitrant teens into uniform will not solve a problem that is lurking deep in the continent's psyche. Europeans are proud of their peaceful ways. If war breaks out there, will anybody be there to fight it?
Economist
an hour ago
- Economist
An explosive moment of truth for Iran and Israel
THE SECOND week of Israel's war on Iran may be even more dangerous than the first. In Iran the destruction is relentless: on June 21st there were strikes on its Isfahan nuclear facility and more assassinations. For Israel, after a dazzling display of prowess, the coming days threaten to expose horribly the limits of its military power, with a long-distance air campaign suffering diminishing returns and Iran's regime recovering its poise. A war that peters out would leave the regime intact and with greater incentives to race for a bomb. That nightmarish prospect may lead Israel to escalate in the pursuit of a knock-out blow or to draw in America. President Donald Trump was due to meet his national security team on June 21st and B-2 stealth bombers are being moved out of America. Iran is ramping-up threats. On June 21st it warned American involvemen t would be 'very, very dangerous for everybody'.
