Unfamiliar calm along Central Asia's long-disputed borders

AI- Generated Image
VORUKH: Bus driver Amrullo Yusupov has long faced challenges navigating the winding mountain passes of Central Asia - but a recent historic border agreement has brought calm to the troubled region.
Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan signed in March the last of a series of deals to formalise the long-disputed borders between the countries in the Fergana Valley, a region that has ignited several violent clashes.
"Everything is calm, now that the borders have been demarcated," Yusupov told AFP.
Navigating the maze of Tajik exclaves -- pockets of territory embedded within Kyrgyzstan -- had been a challenge.
"I used to be afraid to drive here at night. The road was a bit problematic," Yusupov said.
The Fergana Valley, which spans the three countries, has seen hundreds of deadly skirmishes, in disputes over access to roads and water, a precious resource in the arid agricultural region.
L
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Scam Exposed: What They Won't Tell You about zero trust!
Expertinspector
Click Here
Undo
ocal disputes would quickly escalate as troops got involved to protect their citizens and the land on their side of the invisible border.
In brief wars in 2021 and 2022, hundreds of Tajiks and Kyrgyz were killed and wounded, according to official estimates from both sides.
The complicated geography is a legacy of the Soviet Union, with internal borders drawn up based on economic considerations, rather than ethnic, cultural or linguistic dividing lines.
With its collapse, the lines became international frontiers, isolating tens of thousands of people in the exclaves.
Barbed wire fences
Even locals can sometimes be disoriented.
"On the left is Kyrgyzstan and on the right is Tajikistan, yes?" some passengers asked as Yusupov's bus pulled away from Vorukh, a Tajik exclave the size of Paris.
Linking Vorukh to the rest of Tajikistan, his bus travels along a neutral road that passes through Kyrgyz territory but does not stop there.
"Over the past 30 years, we have had several conflicts with the Tajiks," said Raykhan Isakova, who lives in the neighbouring Kyrgyz village of Kapchygay.
"It was very violent, we suffered heavy losses. All the houses were destroyed," the 60 year-old said of the fighting in 2022.
"But thanks to the authorities, we started again from scratch, houses were built," she added.
When AFP visited the village in 2022, it stood in ruins.
Three years later, it is unrecognisable, completely rebuilt -- unlike some other places.
Although peace has returned, AFP journalists who were given rare access to both sides of the border, saw a heavy military presence.
Fences stood where crossing the street used to mean entering a different country.
Locals say erecting a physical border will help bring security.
"Once the barbed wire is up, the borders will be defined and everyone will be at home. People will know that Tajikistan starts here and Kyrgyzstan there," said Shamshidin Kattabekov, 42, from the Kyrgyz border village of Aksai.
Meanwhile, official checkpoints have reopened for the first time in four years.
"I am happy that the border has reopened so that I can come and see my family," said Aitgul Khojamberdieva, a 58-year-old Tajik citizen.
"My mother and uncle died when the border was closed and we couldn't go" to the funeral, she told AFP.
'Eternal friendship'
The reconciliation between Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan was achieved without mediation from Russia, a rare feat in the post-Soviet space that Moscow still considers its own backyard.
The three presidents sealed the border deals with a pact of "eternal friendship" earlier this year.
Huge portraits of the smiling leaders are on display in Tajikistan and a giant friendship monument has also been erected where the three countries meet.
"Once the border work is finished, we believe that peace will reign," said Ashyrali Erkebayev, head of a community of Kyrgyz border municipalities.
So far, the agreements have led to territory swaps, sections of road declared neutral and guarantees to ensure unhindered access to energy infrastructure.
But locals are still concerned about how an agreement to share water more equitably will work -- a crucial challenge given how exposed the region is to climate change.
Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan have agreed a deal for access to the Tortkul reservoir, the only source of fresh water in the area, located in Kyrgyzstan.
"Water for crops is a problem," said Isakova, a farmer.
"There was a pipe before which went to Tajikistan," she added. "Everybody just made a hole and took water from there."

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Time of India

18 minutes ago

• Time of India

US-Iran tensions: Tehran vows 'proportionate response'; key ways it can retaliate

Iran has promised a 'proportionate response' to what it calls the United States' 'criminal aggression' after President Donald Trump confirmed that American forces had 'obliterated' three of Iran's nuclear facilities. While Trump hailed the strike as a military success, warning there were 'many targets left,' Iran has vowed that its response will come; the only question is when and how. Iran's foreign ministry said the country would 'defend its territory, sovereignty, security and people by all force and means.' The Iranian military is now reportedly in charge of planning a retaliatory strike, according to Iran's UN envoy Amir Saeid Iravani, who told the Security Council that Washington had 'decided to destroy diplomacy.' 'We will take all measures necessary,' Iravani said, adding that Iran's response would be shaped by 'timing, nature and scale' determined solely by its military. Limited strikes or wider confrontation? Iran's dilemma lies in balancing a credible retaliation without triggering a full-scale regional war. It has experience with calibrated responses: following the 2020 US killing of General Qassem Soleimani, Tehran launched missiles at US bases in Iraq after warning them in advance. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo No lives were lost, but the message was clear. This time, however, experts suggest Iran may avoid advance notice. According to the BBC, Tehran retains roughly half of its original 3,000 missiles and has already drawn up a list of some 20 US bases in the region, including key sites like At-Tanf, Ain al-Asad, and Erbil in Iraq and Syria. Proxies could also be activated to carry out these attacks, mirroring past strategies. Sanam Vakil of Chatham House told The New York Times that Iran could strike 'largely evacuated' US bases or re-activate regional partners like the Houthis in Yemen. Such a cautious, asymmetric campaign would allow Iran to maintain its image without escalating into direct confrontation. The Strait of Hormuz and cyber warfare Another option is economic warfare. Tehran could attempt to choke the Strait of Hormuz — the strategic waterway through which nearly a third of global oil flows. The BBC reported that Iran might deploy sea mines or fast-attack boats to block shipping lanes, potentially causing a spike in global oil prices. Cyberattacks also remain a key tool in Iran's arsenal. Alongside China, Russia and North Korea, Iran has cultivated advanced cyber capabilities. Attacks on US infrastructure or commercial entities could inflict damage without triggering immediate military retaliation. 'Iran knew this was coming and will have prepared a chain of responses,' said Ellie Geranmayeh of the European Council on Foreign Relations, warning that attacks 'will be swift and multilayered.' Retaliation could be delayed — or abandoned There are voices within Iran's leadership arguing for restraint. A delayed response striking back when US forces are no longer on high alert could allow Tehran to save face without risking immediate retribution. Symbolic attacks on diplomatic missions or targeted assassinations of US-linked figures abroad are also being considered. However, such a strategy carries its own risks. Doing nothing may spare Iran further losses but risks weakening its domestic credibility. As conservative Tehran analyst Reza Salehi noted: 'If we do not react, the US will not leave us alone.' Some experts argue that the regime may ultimately choose to recalibrate rather than retaliate. This includes restarting diplomacy, potentially via neutral mediators in Muscat or Rome. Yet such a path would demand significant concessions, especially around its nuclear enrichment programme something the regime has historically resisted. The nuclear question looms large According to NYT reporting, Iran's long-term takeaway from the strikes may be the need for a nuclear deterrent. Vali Nasr, an Iran scholar at Johns Hopkins University, said the strikes may push Iran to abandon cooperation with the IAEA and move towards nuclear armament. 'This is the great irony,' Geranmayeh told NYT. 'Although Trump has sought to eliminate the nuclear threat from Iran, he has now made it far more likely that Iran becomes a nuclear state.' Ayatollah Khamenei could authorise withdrawal from the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and expel international inspectors, effectively ending global oversight of Iran's programme. While the International Atomic Energy Agency reported no radiation leakage after the US strikes — implying enriched uranium was likely moved, concerns remain that Iran's stockpile is now hidden and unmonitored. 'Hardliners in the Iranian regime may ultimately win the day' Experts believe Iran now faces two critical choices. Jonathan Panikoff of the Atlantic Council explained: 'Iran can choose to strike US bases in a limited fashion… or it could go all in and trigger a regional war.' Refraining from retaliation may limit further military damage but risks weakening the regime's image. 'If we do not react, the US will not leave us alone,' said conservative Tehran analyst Reza Salehi. A calculated response—such as targeting symbolic US sites—could appease hardliners without escalating to full-scale war. However, given Trump's threats and the severity of the strikes, restraint seems unlikely. 'Hardliners in the Iranian regime may ultimately win the day,' Panikoff noted, adding that asymmetric attacks or overseas terror operations remain a possibility. Iran's past actions, like the Khobar Towers bombing and rocket attacks on US forces in Iraq, show both its capability and intent to retaliate. Its allies, including Yemen's Houthis, have already threatened US naval forces. Regional fallout and US response With over 40,000 American troops stationed across the region, in Bahrain, Qatar, Iraq and elsewhere, Washington is reinforcing its positions. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has confirmed the deployment of additional assets, and non-essential diplomatic staff have been evacuated. Trump, while portraying the US operation as restrained, has made it clear that more force will follow if Iran escalates. 'There will either be peace or there will be tragedy for Iran,' he warned. Still, many in Tehran believe the real tragedy is already unfolding. Iran's UN envoy accused Israel of manipulating US policy, saying Netanyahu had succeeded in dragging the United States into 'yet another costly and baseless war.'

Time of India

20 minutes ago

• Time of India

UK's Farage promises non-doms protection from tax on overseas assets

Nigel Farage 's Reform UK party is offering non-doms full exemption from tax on their overseas assets for a fee of £250,000 ($335,000) every 10 years with the revenue redistributed to lower income workers, drawing a new battle line with Britain's traditional parties. Farage's proposal pits him against both the Conservatives, which last year abolished non-dom status for those who live in Britain but have their permanent home abroad, and the Labour government, which went one step further after winning the election last July by imposing inheritance tax on their global wealth. Thousands of people in Britain have left in protest at Labour's inheritance tax measure, including some of the country's wealthiest individuals. Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves is now exploring changes to bring them back. Inheritance tax is charged at 40% in the UK, one of the highest rates in the developed world. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like If You Eat Ginger Everyday for 1 Month This is What Happens Tips and Tricks Undo Farage would reinstate the old non-dom regime that protected them from tax on their overseas income, including inheritance tax, to reverse the exodus of the rich and business elite. Under Reform's so-called 'Britannia Card,' non-doms would have to pay the £250,000 fee. The Times first reported the story. (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) Proceeds from the levy would be transferred directly into the bank accounts of the lowest-earning 10% of workers. Reform estimated about 2.5 million people on a full-time salary of less than £23,000 would get £600 each if 6,000 non-doms paid for the Britannia Card. Live Events You Might Also Like: UK may rethink non-dom inheritance tax as wealthy foreigners exit Reform has become a credible threat to Britain's traditional two party system. It is leading in the polls and Farage is developing a more coherent policy agenda than with his former UKIP and Brexit parties, when he led largely single issue campaigns against the European Union. Critics warn that his plans for big tax cuts on working people paid for by slashing the size of the state could prove undeliverable. Reform's £250,000 'landing fee' is a little cheaper than the former non-dom regime under which there was an annual fixed charge of £30,000 if an individual lived in the UK for seven of the last nine tax years, rising to £60,000 if it was 12 of the last 14 tax years. Restoring the non-dom status would also cost Reform the £33.8 billion of income that the Office for Budget Responsibility estimated the Conservative and Labour changes will generate over this parliament. Companies House data compiled by Bloomberg found evidence of an exodus of more than 4,400 directors of UK businesses since last July. In April alone, when the tax hikes kicked in, departures were up about 75% from 12 months earlier. You Might Also Like: UK replaces passport stickers with eVisas for some: What you need to know if you're planning your travel UK's tougher immigration stance may undermine efforts to meet net zero by 2050

Business Standard

42 minutes ago

• Business Standard

Trump hints at regime change, says 'Make Iran Great Again': Top points

US President Donald Trump has made another U-turn on his stance on the Israel-Iran conflict, suggesting the possibility of a regime change in Tehran days after denying it. In a post on X, Trump wrote: "It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!" On Sunday, the US launched strikes on three key nuclear programme sites in Iran, with Trump saying that the sites were 'completely and fully obliterated'. Iran vowed retaliation, with the country's parliament approving the closure of the Strait of Hormuz to Western ships. Here are the top developments on the Israel-Iran conflict: 1. Hostilities between Israel and Iran continued on Monday, with both countries exchanging missile strikes. According to an Israeli military spokesperson, Israeli fighter jets targeted military positions in western Iran. Earlier, Iranian missile attacks caused significant damage in Tel Aviv, injuring numerous civilians and destroying buildings. 2. The Israeli military announced that its forces had targeted several Iranian military locations on Sunday. "Approximately 20 (Israeli air force) fighter jets conducted intelligence-based strikes using over 30 munitions on military targets in Iran," the Israeli army stated on Telegram, as reported by AFP. The strikes focused on 'storage and missile launching infrastructure sites', in addition to 'military satellites and radar sites'. Amid reports of strikes in Tehran, air defence systems were activated in central areas of the Iranian capital, according to local media cited by Reuters. 3. At a UN Security Council emergency session, Acting US Ambassador Dorothy Shea reiterated Trump's warning that any Iranian aggression — either direct or through its proxies — against American personnel or assets would result in strong retaliation. 4. Russia's UN envoy Vassily Nebenzia condemned the US airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, warning they had opened a 'Pandora's box' with unpredictable outcomes. He said Moscow had offered to mediate but claimed the US showed no interest in peaceful dialogue. Nebenzia warned of a potential large-scale conflict with dangerous global consequences if de-escalation efforts failed. 5. Iran accused the US of derailing diplomatic efforts by bombing its nuclear infrastructure. Amir Saeid Iravani, Iran's envoy to the UN, said the Iranian military would determine the 'timing, nature and scale of Iran's proportionate response". He also alleged that Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu had influenced President Trump to escalate tensions and involve the US in another costly regional conflict. 6. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Rafael Grossi voiced concern over the rising tensions, warning that the US strikes could worsen the Israel-Iran standoff. However, he said that diplomacy remained possible and called on Iran to permit inspectors to verify the country's 4,400 kg stockpile of uranium enriched to 60 per cent. 7. Amid growing regional instability, India's evacuation drive continued. The Ministry of External Affairs confirmed the safe return of 311 Indian nationals from Mashhad to New Delhi on June 22. This brings the total number of evacuated citizens to 1,428. 8. Global oil markets reacted sharply, with Brent crude prices surging up to 5.7 per cent, hitting $81.40 a barrel. The US strikes on Iran's main nuclear sites sparked fears of potential disruptions in energy supply from West Asia. 9. US Vice President JD Vance said that the United States was targeting Iran's nuclear programme — not the country itself. 'We're not at war with Iran. We're at war with Iran's nuclear programme,' Vance said on NBC's Meet the Press with Kristen Welker. He credited the strikes with setting Iran's nuclear ambitions back by several years and criticised Tehran for failing to negotiate in good faith. 10. On Saturday, Iran's Health Ministry reported that Israeli strikes had resulted in around 400 deaths and left around 3,056 people injured. (With agency inputs)