‘Beast of Birkenhead' moniker came after murder that shocked community
Peter Sullivan was dubbed the 'Beast of Birkenhead' after the murder of Diane Sindall sent shockwaves through a community.
Mr Sullivan, who spent 38 years in prison, was jailed in 1987 for killing the 21-year-old.
Miss Sindall, a florist who was working part-time as a barmaid while she saved up for her wedding, was raped and brutally murdered as she walked along Borough Road in Birkenhead, Wirral, in the early hours of August 2 1986.
Mr Sullivan was convicted of her murder the following year and bite marks found on her body, used as part of the case against him, led to him being called the 'Beast of Birkenhead', the 'Wolfman' and the 'Mersey Ripper'.
Speaking outside court after his conviction was quashed, Mr Sullivan's sister Kim Smith said: 'Peter was called so many different names and that all needs to be squashed now because Peter was never anything of what he was being called in the first place.'
The murder became a 'catalyst for action' for women, who set up Wirral Rape Crisis Counselling Service in its aftermath, which still operates today as Rape and Sexual Abuse Support (RASA) Merseyside.
According to the service, it was after Miss Sindall's death that it was decided 'enough was enough'.
The charity said: 'With local women angry at the nature of Diane's death and how easily it could have been prevented, a change in attitude and the very first 'Reclaim the Night' march in Liverpool presented the perfect opportunity to strike.
Police said Miss Sindall suffered extensive injuries in the attack, with her cause of death established as a cerebral haemorrhage following multiple blows.
The high-profile crime was featured on Crimewatch in the weeks after her murder.
On Tuesday, Merseyside Police found itself again appealing for help to find the man who killed her.
Detective Chief Superintendent Karen Jaundrill said: 'Diane's murder sent shockwaves through Birkenhead when it happened and I would appeal to anyone who lived in the area at the time, and has any information which could help us with our inquiries, to come forward.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Grandmother of missing N.S. kids shares her story — and her son's
Six weeks after Lilly and Jack Sullivan went missing, their grandmother has decided to share her family's story. She spoke with the CBC's Kayla Hounsell.
The Hill
6 days ago
- The Hill
Trump twists and turns to get his 34-count conviction wiped clean
The breadth of presidential immunity has come back to haunt us, as President Trump continues maneuvering to overturn his New York state court criminal conviction. Last spring, a New York jury convicted him on 34 counts of falsification of business records to conceal a hush-money payment to the porn actress Stormy Daniels in 2017, as part of a deal made in the runup to the 2016 election. Trump wants to move the appeal of his conviction to the federal courts, which he sees as a more favorable forum to overturn the jury verdict. Amazingly, four Supreme Court justices have already signaled that they might lean towards accepting his argument. Trump cannot pardon himself from a state conviction — if he can pardon himself at all, as it is well settled that no one can be the judge in his own cause. Can a payoff to a porn actress be an official act, because Trump happened to be in the Oval Office when he signed the checks on a personal bank account? The argument sounds absurd on its face. It has already been rejected twice by a federal court in the same case. Before trial, Trump tried to move the prosecution to federal court, and District Judge Alvin Hellerstein, a respected jurist, flatly rejected the argument, holding once and again that a hush money payoff simply cannot be an official presidential act. Last week, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard oral argument on appeal from Hellerstein's decision. Trump's legal team at the trial, Todd Blanche and Emil Bove, are now top-ranking officials in the Justice Department, so they could no longer represent him. This time around, Jeffrey B. Wall, a partner in the Washington office of the storied Sullivan & Cromwell firm, represented Trump. Sullivan & Cromwell was not among Trump's targeted firms of DEI-inclined lawyers, so we cannot say that the representation involved the rendering of pro bono services as a peace offering to avoid blacklisting. Trump has become closely identified with its managing partner, Robert Giuffre, who helped negotiate the settlement between the president and the targeted law firm of Paul Weiss. Wall argued that there was reason to move the case, which he disparaged as an 'anomalous, one-of-its-kind prosecution.' He contended that prosecutors had relied on evidence from Trump's first term as president. One of the judges, Obama-appointed Susan L. Carney, acknowledged that any decision would need to weigh the interests of the presidency against those of New York State. And so it will. If Trump fails in his appeal to the federal court, the state case would be appealed to New York's intermediate appellate court, and after that to its court of last resort — and eventually to the U.S. Supreme Court. Trump seeks to avoid having to roll the rock up that steep hill. During the 2024 oral argument in the D.C. Circuit in U.S. v. Trump, related to Trump's claim of absolute immunity from prosecution for the events of Jan. 6, 2021, Judge Florence Y. Pan presented a hypothetical scenario to Trump's attorney, D. John Sauer (now the U.S. Solicitor General). 'A president could sell pardons, could sell military secrets, could order SEAL Team 6 to assassinate a political rival?' Judge Pan asked. 'Would such a president be subject to criminal prosecution if he's not impeached?' Pan pressed for a 'yes or no' answer. Sauer stated that his response was a 'qualified yes,' reasoning that a president would need to undergo the House impeachment and Senate conviction process before criminal liability could apply. Sauer also suggested that a president who ordered an assassination would likely be impeached 'speedily.' Really? Would a concealed payoff to a porn star or the falsification of business records before taking office ever qualify as a 'high crime and misdemeanor,' the constitutional standard for impeachment? Special Counsel James Pearce, representing the government, described Sauer's theory as 'frightening.' King George III was above the law. That is why the Founders made the American president the law's servant. Eventually, the case reached the Supreme Court, and, as we all know, the court upheld in a 6-to-3 decision a broad presidential immunity from prosecution for actions taken in exercise of his core constitutional duties. Writing in the opinion, Chief Justice Roberts stated that 'the interests that underlie presidential immunity seek to protect not the president himself, but the institution of the presidency.' Roberts, however, in a gesture toward the principle that no one is above the law, said that private schemes with private actors, unconnected to any statutory or constitutional authority or executive function, are unofficial acts for which the president could be prosecuted after he left office. In what has become a problematic footnote to the court's opinion, Roberts said that in a case regarding private acts that were connected to official acts — for example, the venal selling of a pardon — prosecutors would not be allowed to use official documents not in the public domain or oral communications with the president connected to the exercise of the pardon power. Although prosecutors could of course present evidence of the bribe payment, they would be barred from using presidential communications about the illegal act being taken in exchange for the bribe — for example, official evidence that the president knew there was no basis for the pardon or that advisers had recommended against granting it. On this, Justice Amy Coney Barrett pushed back in a blistering concurring opinion. As she put it, 'To make sense of charges alleging a quid pro quo, the jury must be allowed to hear about both the quid and the quo, even if the quo, standing alone could not be a basis for the president's criminal liability.' Barrett, chagrined at Roberts' thinking, wrote that such a rule would 'hamstring the prosecution.' So, can it be the law that a president's hush-money payoffs to a porn actress is an executive action authorized by the Constitution, because he happened to sign the checks in the Oval Office? Not bloody likely — but with this Supreme Court, who knows? James D. Zirin, author and legal analyst, is a former federal prosecutor in New York's Southern District. He is also the host of the public television talk show and podcast Conversations with Jim Zirin.
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Republicans criticize Dem congressional candidate's '86 47' post as call for 'political violence'
Republicans in swing state New Hampshire are criticizing the move by a Democratic congressional candidate to post a photo of herself next to an "86 47" sign, which some in the GOP see as a shorthand message suggesting violence against President Donald Trump. Maura Sullivan, a former Marine Corps officer who deployed in the Iraq War and later served at the Pentagon and the Veterans Administration under former President Barack Obama, attended a "No Kings" protest this past weekend in her hometown of Portsmouth, New Hampshire. Demonstrators at thousands of rallies nationwide on Saturday protested what they call the president's anti-democratic actions and authoritarian tendencies. Sullivan, while at the rally, posted on social media a photo of herself standing next to a fellow veteran who was holding a sign that read "Veterans for Democracy." But the sign also included the phrase "Foxtrot Delta Tango," as well as the message "86 47." House Gop Resolution Criticizes Comey Over '86 47' Post "Foxtrot Delta Tango" is a military-style phrase in the NATO phonetic alphabet that spells out the letters "FDT," which is seen as a derogatory term towards Trump. Read On The Fox News App While "86" is a term long used in restaurants to signify when they are out of a food item on a menu, or in bars or military circles to get rid of something – or someone. And of late, some Republicans perceive it as a message to have Trump eliminated. Minnesota Lawmakers Shooting Suspect Had Cache Of Weapons, Hit List, In His Vehicle The Secret Service continues to investigate former FBI director James Comey after he earlier this year posted on social media an image of seashells arranged to spell "86 47." Comey, following a conservative uproar, took down his post and apologized. The social media post by Sullivan, one of two top Democrats running to succeed Rep. Chris Pappas in New Hampshire's 1st Congressional District, came hours after the horrific shootings of two leading Minnesota Democratic state lawmakers - one of them fatal. State Rep. Melissa Hortman, the former speaker of the Minnesota state House, and her spouse were killed, and Sen. John Hoffman and his spouse were severely wounded in the shootings, which appear to be politically motivated attacks. Sullivan's congressional campaign, in a statement to Fox News, pointed to the Minnesota shootings. Marine Vet Criticizes Trump, Musk, As She Launches Congressional Run "Maura is outraged and heartbroken about the assassination of a public servant in Minnesota. She believes that there is absolutely no place for violence in our politics, regardless of party or affiliation," Sullivan campaign manager Nick London said. London added that on Saturday, "Maura joined thousands of Granite Staters and millions of Americans in peacefully protesting Donald Trump's use of our servicemembers as props for his political agenda. If the President cared about our veterans, he would be focused on improving healthcare at the VA, expanding mental health services and supporting our military families." Republicans in New Hampshire quickly criticized Sullivan over her post. "I knew Maura was cozying up with the extreme radical left, but this is a step too far. Calls for political violence like this have no place in New Hampshire," New Hampshire GOP chair Jim MacEachern said in a statement. And NHGOP vice chair Hollie Novoletsky, who came in second in the 2024 GOP congressional primary in the 1st District, said in a statement, "Whether the target of an assassination is President Trump or a Democrat State Rep in MN, it is unacceptable. You'd think as a 'Veteran for Democracy,' Maura would know that." The National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC), the campaign arm of the House GOP, which is trying to flip the district for the first time in eight years, went further. "Political violence has no place in our country – and posing with propaganda calling for the assassination of President Trump is dangerous and disqualifying," NRCC spokeswoman Maureen O'Toole argued. "Maura Sullivan must apologize, take down the photo, and take herself out of the running for New Hampshire's First Congressional District."Original article source: Republicans criticize Dem congressional candidate's '86 47' post as call for 'political violence'
