Shamefully, the UK has denied Gaza's injured children treatment in Britain

'I am proud that the UK is offering lifesaving medical care to these Ukrainian children, who have been forced out of their home country by the Russian invasion while undergoing medical treatment,' Sajid Javid, then the UK health secretary, said in March 2022.
Within weeks of Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine, the UK government had facilitated the evacuation of 21 Ukrainian children with cancer, and coordinated their treatment through the National Health Service (NHS).
In contrast, last week - after 17 months of persistent lobbying - only two children from Gaza were finally permitted to enter the UK for medical treatment.
They were chosen not because they are among those most severely injured by Israel's onslaught in Gaza; quite the opposite. Their diagnoses appear more politically neutral, involving congenital conditions not directly related to Israel's ongoing violence in Gaza.
Behind what some might frame as a triumph of British humanitarianism lies a much darker reality. These are the only two Palestinian children in need of medical care that the UK government has agreed to receive since Israel accelerated its assault on Gaza in October 2023.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Their care hasn't been coordinated by the Foreign Office, nor will it be provided by the NHS. Rather, their treatment was arranged privately, funded entirely by donations and facilitated by a coalition of doctors, lawyers and volunteers through the NGO Project Pure Hope.
The UK government hasn't just failed to help; it has actively blocked efforts to transfer severely injured children - those with blast wounds, amputations and burns - to UK hospitals for essential treatment.
Political obstruction
Officials from both the Home Office and Foreign Office have consistently denied visas, citing supposed logistical, medical or security reasons. These excuses collapse under minimal scrutiny, since we know that the UK government has rightly facilitated the transfer and treatment of children from Ukraine, Syria and Afghanistan in recent years.
These obstructions remained, despite the readiness of several UK hospitals. Major paediatric centres in London, Birmingham and Manchester have offered to provide world-class care in trauma, orthopaedics, plastic surgery and rehabilitation. Surgeons and other specialists have volunteered, charitable funding has been secured - and still the UK government has stood in the way.
Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war
Even Conservative peer Baroness Arminka Helic condemned the UK government's inaction, calling it a clear case of 'double standards'.
This isn't a bureaucratic failure; it's overt political obstruction. Of the tens of thousands of children wounded by Israeli military violence in Gaza, all have been excluded, while a couple of children whose medical conditions were less likely to raise uncomfortable questions about Israel's indiscriminate attacks were eventually admitted.
To admit just two children, while the UK continues to support Israel's violence in Gaza, is not an act of compassion. It is tokenism aiming to distract from the UK government's complicity in the ongoing genocide, and from its political and legal responsibilities.
Why are injured children from Gaza being denied treatment in British hospitals? The answer is now clear: because their wounds carry political weight
Since the care of these wounded children would be paid for by charities, the UK's refusal to issue visas amounts to a political blockade on access to treatment. By withholding paperwork, the British government leaves these children with untreated injuries and wounds - in some cases with fatal consequences.
As far as we are aware, there was no official response from the government as of yet.
In such situations, we often assume moral cowardice. But the deeper, more disturbing truth appears to be a form of depraved agreement; a belief that Palestinian children are less deserving of care, and that the provision of assistance would undermine the collusion of many states in the suffering inflicted upon Palestinians. This is the consequence of decades of dehumanisation and anti-Palestinian racism.
This is not humanitarianism. It is the humanitarian alibi in full force; a superficial performance of care that distracts from political responsibilities and true accountability.
Health system collapsed
Meanwhile, Gaza's health system collapsed in October 2023 and has never been able to recover. More than 18,000 children have been killed. Thousands more are living with catastrophic injuries - without access to antibiotics, anaesthesia, surgical care, or even food, as Israel's total blockade and forced starvation now compound their suffering.
Still, the barriers remain in place. In February 2024, then-Foreign Secretary David Cameron told parliament that the UK was ready to help medically vulnerable children. Encouraged by this, charities submitted visa applications. One was for a child with a double lower-limb amputation, accepted by a UK hospital and fully funded.
The government ignored it. No reply came. Then, on 13 May 2024 - two months after the submission - a Home Office minister told parliament that no such applications had been received, but that any future applications would be treated seriously.
First children from Gaza arrive in UK for medical treatment after 17-month struggle Read More »
The Home Office told ITV News that applications are only judged as submitted when a child or their parents travel to a visa application centre for passport and visa checks. This is impossible for families in genocide-afflicted Gaza.
As a coalition of doctors with direct experience working alongside our Palestinian colleagues in Gaza's hospitals during the genocide - along with colleagues advocating from the UK - we have seen just how far the government has gone to deflect responsibility. Every part of the evacuation process - permits, escorts, transport, surgery - has been managed by civil society groups and volunteers. The government has not contributed a single pound.
And yet, in public, British politicians attempt to maintain the facade of compassion. In February 2024, a UK newspaper asked: why are injured children from Gaza being denied treatment in British hospitals? The answer is now clear: because their wounds carry political weight. Because allowing them into the country would exposes the UK's passive inaction and active complicity. Because their suffering is inconvenient.
Children's lives should never be politicised, but this is the reality for all Palestinian children. Two were permitted into the UK - not because they were the most in need, but because they posed no threat to the western narrative. In doing so, the UK government made its humanitarian red lines brutally clear - and showed us exactly who it deems worthy of care.
Everyone except Palestinians.
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Middle East Eye

an hour ago

• Middle East Eye

Over 500 Palestinian patients die due to Israeli medical transfer delays

At least 500 patients and wounded Palestinians in Gaza have died as a result of delays in medical referrals amid Israel's ongoing restrictions on medical travel, according to Dr Ahmed Al-Farra, head of the paediatrics and maternity department at Nasser Medical Complex. Speaking to loca media, Dr Al-Farra accused Israeli forces of deliberately targeting Gaza's healthcare system 'in all its components,' describing the attacks as part of an effort to break the resilience of the Palestinian people. 'Under international law, every patient has the right to travel for treatment,' he said. 'But the occupation continues to violate these rights without consequence.' Medical professionals in Gaza have repeatedly warned that restrictions on patient movement and attacks on health infrastructure are creating a humanitarian catastrophe, particularly for those with chronic or life-threatening conditions.

Gulf Today

5 hours ago

• Gulf Today

UK debate on assisted dying law was sharp

British lawmakers debated whether to allow assisted dying for terminally ill people ahead of a knife-edge vote on Friday that could see the country take a major step towards legalising euthanasia. The bill was successfully passed and the pro -euthanasia group relaxed. Protesters for and against the legislation demonstrated outside parliament, as inside MPs packed out the lower House of Commons chamber to consider one of Britain's most emotive and significant bills in years. MPs will either approve sending the legislation to the upper House of Lords for the next step — and further scrutiny 1 or end it entirely during a crucial vote expected around 2:30 pm (1330 GMT). Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, who has proposed the bill, said changing the law would 'offer a compassionate and safe choice' for terminally ill people. The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill would allow assisted suicide in England and Wales for adults with an incurable illness who have a life expectancy of fewer than six months. They would have to be able to administer the life-ending substance themselves, and any patient's wish to die would have to be signed off by two doctors and a panel of experts. A change in the law would see Britain emulate several other countries in Europe and elsewhere that allow some form of assisted dying, including Belgium and the Netherlands. Supporters say euthanasia would give the terminally ill greater protections and choice at the end of their lives, but critics worry that vulnerable people could be coerced into dying. Outside in Parliament Square, protesters waved placards with slogans including 'Let us choose' and 'Don't make doctors killers'. David Walker, 82, said he supported changing the law because he saw his wife of 60 years suffer for three years at the end of her life. 'That's why I'm here, because I can't help her anymore, but I can help other people who are going through the same thing, because if you have no quality of life, you have nothing,' he told the media. Elizabeth Burden, a 52-year-old doctor, said she feared the bill could open 'a floodgate' of people being forced to end their lives and urged the government to focus on providing palliative care instead. 'It is a slippery slope. Once we allow this. Everything will slip down because dementia patients, all patients... are vulnerable,' she told the media. A YouGov poll of 2,003 adults, surveyed last month and published on Thursday, suggested the public overwhelmingly supports changing the law, with 73 percent in favour. MPs backed the proposed legislation by 330 to 275 votes at an initial vote in parliament last November. Since then the bill has undergone several changes, including applying a ban on adverts for assisted dying and allowing all health workers to opt out of helping someone end their life. MPs have also added a safeguard which would prevent a person being eligible 'solely as a result of voluntarily stopping eating or drinking', ruling out people with anorexia. Several lawmakers in the 650-seat parliament have subsequently switched positions, and parties are not telling them how to vote, making the outcome difficult to predict. An ITV News tracker of around half the parliamentarians estimates that 162 MPs plan to vote for changing the law, with 152 against. Some 22 remain undecided with another 23 due to abstain. Both the House of Commons and the House of Lords need to approve the legislation before the end of the current parliamentary year, likely sometime in the autumn, or the bill will fail. If it passes and receives royal assent, then it would be four years before an assisted dying service is implemented. A government impact assessment published this month estimated that approximately 160 to 640 assisted deaths could take place in the first year, rising to a possible 4,500 in a decade. If he votes, Prime Minister Keir Starmer is expected to vote in favour but several of his top ministerial team, including the health and justice secretaries, have publicly opposed changing the law. Assisted suicide currently carries a maximum prison sentence of 14 years in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Separate legislation is going through the devolved Scottish parliament, while the Isle of Man at the end of March became the first British territory to pass an assisted dying bill. UK MPs last considered changing the law in 2015 and Leadbeater warned it could be another decade before the issue returns to parliament if MPs reject her bill.

Dubai Eye

8 hours ago

• Dubai Eye

Watch: UAE airlifts Palestinian child from Gaza for life-saving treatment

A critically injured Palestinian child has been airlifted from Gaza to the UAE for urgent medical treatment, as part of the country's ongoing humanitarian mission, Operation Chivalrous Knight 3. Three-year-old Hatim Awad suffered severe second- and third-degree burns during an airstrike that tragically claimed the lives of his entire family. Now receiving care at Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City in Abu Dhabi, doctors say he is responding well to treatment. Dr. Abdulqader Almessabi, Chief Medical Officer at the hospital, confirmed that Hatim arrived on June 12 and is under a comprehensive care plan. The evacuation highlights the UAE's commitment to supporting vulnerable civilians in Gaza, especially children, by providing advanced medical care and relief aid. The mission was carried out in coordination with relevant authorities to ensure the child's safety throughout the journey. #UAE evacuates critically injured Palestinian child from #Gaza for treatment #WamNews — WAM English (@WAMNEWS_ENG) June 21, 2025