Democrats are blowing their opportunity to hammer Trump on tariffs, Washington Post columnist warns
Washington Post columnist Catherine Rampell slammed the Democratic Party on Friday over not being more aggressive in its criticisms of President Donald Trump's tariffs.
In a new piece, the economics columnist argued that liberal lawmakers are not meeting the threat of the tariffs with their "mealymouthed" concerns.
"This has been the mealymouthed critique of President Donald Trump's trade wars from many Democrats this past week. They awkwardly triangulate between bashing Trump's catastrophic ideas and touting support for their own similarly spirited, if scaled-down, ideas. No wonder their message is falling flat," she wrote.
Rampell described how bad the tariffs will be, stating they'll "raise a typical household's annual costs by $2,700," and that because of them, "recession risks have surged, companies have begun furloughing workers, and our once-close allies are flipping us the bird."
She declared that Democratic lawmakers should be having a field day over this, but they're not.
"If this is a curse to the U.S. economy, it should be a windfall for Democratic politicians. Instead, Democrats are blowing their good fortune," she said, adding, "Rather than shouting from the rooftops that trade wars are bad, Democrats babble in 'yes, buts.' Yes, these particular tariffs are costly and regressive, they say, but when Democrats impose tariffs, somehow they present no such downsides."
Rampell mentioned how the party has seemed to contradict itself on tariffs in the past, noting how it "assailed" the first Trump administration's tariffs "in the 2018 midterms and 2020 presidential election — shortly before adopting them as their own."
As the columnist recounted, former President Biden "extended (nearly) all of Trump's existing tariffs," even after denouncing them previously. "In some cases, he expanded them or replaced them with slightly different trade barriers. He did so with vigorous support from his party," she wrote.
Rampell then ripped multiple Democratic Party figures who have had more nuanced talking points about President Trump's tariffs in recent days, including Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, D-Mich., who has met with Trump in the Oval Office multiple times this year to discuss his protectionist policies.
Whitmer has been carefully criticizing Trump's tariffs while also acknowledging and understanding the president's "motivation behind the tariffs" and even agreeing with Trump that we "need to make more stuff in America."
Rampell slammed Whitmer for criticizing the tariffs but providing no real alternative to them.
"On Wednesday, Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D) gave a speech criticizing Trump for wielding tariffs like a 'hammer.' When asked how would she deploy tariffs differently, Whitmer could not answer. 'I don't know how I would have enacted them differently,' she said. 'I haven't really thought about that. What I have thought about, though, is, you know, tariffs are, need to be used like a scalpel, not a hammer.'"
The columnist also slammed Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., for critiquing Trump's tariffs while having supported Biden's. She wrote that Warren's "real problem with Trump's tariffs is that companies will use them as an excuse for 'price gouging' and profiteering. The stock market massacre suggests investors don't agree tariffs will be profitable. But even if Warren's critique were true, the same logic should apply to the Biden-née-Trump tariffs Warren backed."
She also accused "lefty populist thinkers" of only criticizing Trump because the tariffs aren't being used for their agenda. Additionally, Rampell said that the party has backed itself into "a corner" on this topic because they're also trying to appeal to their supporters in pro-tariff constituencies, like unions.
The columnist concluded her points, arguing that since "Americans hate Trump's tariffs," "Democrats should stop pulling their punches."
"What the country needs is an unequivocal, full-throated condemnation of pandering protectionism," she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Black America Web
34 minutes ago
- Black America Web
Trump Complains About Juneteenth, X Shows Off His Hypocrisy
Source: Sean Rayford / Getty President Donald Trump's complaint about federal holidays on Juneteenth prompted social media to show his past support for it while campaigning. As the nation observed Juneteenth on Thursday (June 19), the most noticable action — or inaction — was in the federal government save for a Truth Social post by President Donald Trump. He stated that he would get rid of 'non-working holidays', complaining that 'Soon we'll end up having a holiday for every once working day of the year,' without acknowledging Juneteenth by name, concluding 'It must change if we are going to, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!' Juneteenth observes June 19th, 1865, the day when those Black Americans enslaved in Galveston, Texas were informed by a Union Army general that the Civil War had ended and that they had been freed by President Abraham Lincoln's signing of the Emancipation Proclamation two and a half years before. It was made a federal holiday by President Joe Biden in 2021, and it cannot be revoked without an act of Congress. Trump's stance was echoed by White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt during her press conference. After answering a question concerning a potential proclamation for Juneteenth, she replied: 'I'm not tracking his signature on a proclamation today. I want to thank all of you for showing up to work. We are certainly here.' Trump had signed up to eleven proclamations in the past week alone for Father's Day, Flag Day as well as the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army, which are not among the 11 annual federal holidays. According to reporting from The Guardian, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth requested a 'passive approach to Juneteenth messaging' in an email sent out earlier this week. The news comes after Hegseth has obeyed orders from Trump to carry out his elimination of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI), seen in renaming military installations like Fort Bragg and warships such as one named after the slain Civil Rights leader Medgar Evers. But Trump's social media post was swiftly called out by many on social media who noted that during his presidential campaign in 2020, he promoted Juneteenth becoming a federal holiday as part of his 'Platinum Plan' geared towards earning votes among the Black community. Former President Joe Biden spent the day on Galveston Island, attending the Juneteenth Emancipation March and Service held at Reedy Chapel AME, where he also paid homage to the late Texas Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee who worked to make Juneteenth a federal holiday. Trump Complains About Juneteenth, X Shows Off His Hypocrisy was originally published on Black America Web Featured Video CLOSE
41 minutes ago
How the US bombarded Iranian nuclear sites without detection
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates -- It was an unprecedented attack years in the making, with some last-minute misdirection meant to give the operation a powerful element of surprise. U.S. pilots dropped 30,000-pound bombs early Sunday on two key underground uranium enrichment plants in Iran, delivering what American military leaders believe is a knockout blow to a nuclear program that Israel views as an existential threat and has been pummeling for more than a week. American sailors bolstered the surprise mission by firing dozens of cruise missiles from a submarine toward at least one other site. Dubbed Operation Midnight Hammer, U.S. officials say the plan was characterized by a 'precision strike' that 'devastated the Iranian nuclear program,' even as they acknowledged an assessment was ongoing. For its part, Iran denied that any significant damage had been done, and the Islamic Republic pledged to retaliate. Taking off from the U.S. heartland, B-2 stealth bombers delivered a total of 420,000 pounds of explosives, aided by an armada of refueling tankers and fighter jets — some of which launched their own weapons. U.S. officials said Iran neither detected the inbound fusillade, nor mustered a shot at the stealthy American jets. The operation relied on a series of deceptive tactics and decoys to maintain the secrecy, U.S. officials said hours after the attack, which was preceded by nine days of Israeli attacks that debilitated Iran's military leadership and air defenses. Even before the planes took off, elements of misdirection were already in play. After setting parts of the plan in motion, Trump publicly announced Thursday that he'd make a decision within two weeks on whether to strike Iran — ostensibly to allow additional time for negotiations, but in actuality masking the impending attack. One group of B-2 stealth bombers traveled west from Missouri on Saturday as decoys, drawing the attention of amateur plane spotters, government officials and some media as they headed toward a U.S. air base in the Pacific. At the same time, seven other B-2s carrying two 'bunker buster' bombs apiece flew eastward, keeping communications to a minimum so as not to draw any attention. Air Force Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said at Sunday's briefing that it was all "part of a plan to maintain tactical surprise' and that only 'an extremely small number of planners and key leaders' knew about it in Washington and Florida, where U.S. Central Command is based. After 18 hours of furtive flying that required aerial refueling, the armed B-2 Spirit bombers, each with two crew members, arrived on time and without detection in the Eastern Mediterranean, from where they launched their attack runs. Before crossing into Iran, the B-2s were escorted by stealthy U.S. fighter jets and reconnaissance aircraft. A graphic released by the Pentagon showed the flight route as passing over Lebanon, Syria and Iraq. It was unclear whether those countries were notified of the U.S. overflight in advance. Most U.S. lawmakers were also kept in the dark, with some Republicans saying they were provided a brief heads-up by the White House before the strike. 'Our B-2s went in and out and back without the world knowing at all,' Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth told reporters Sunday. About an hour before the B-2s entered Iran, Caine said that a U.S. submarine in the region launched more than two dozen Tomahawk cruise missiles against key targets, including a site in Isfahan where uranium is prepared for enrichment. As the U.S. bombers approached their targets, they watched out for Iranian fighter jets and surface-to-air missiles, but encountered none. At 6:40 p.m. in Washington and 2:10 a.m. in Tehran, the first B-2 bomber dropped its pair of GBU-57 massive ordnance penetrators on the deeply buried Fordo uranium enrichment plant. It was the first time these so-called 'bunker busters' had ever been used in combat. Each 30,000-pound bomb is designed to burrow into the ground before detonating a massive warhead. The Fordo site received the bulk of the bombardment, though a couple of the enormous bombs were also dropped on a uranium enrichment site at Natanz. The U.S. bombs fell for about half an hour, with cruise missiles fired from submarines being the last American weapons to hit their targets, which included a third nuclear site at Isfahan, Caine said. Both Iran and the U.N. nuclear watchdog said there were no immediate signs of radioactive contamination around the sites. The mission included: — 75 precision-guided weapons: these included 14 GBU-57 'bunker buster' bombs deployed by the seven B-2 Spirit stealth bombers, and more than two-dozen Tomahawk cruise missiles launched from a U.S. submarine. — 125 aircraft, including the B-2 bombers, fighter jets and refueling planes. Hegseth said Sunday that 'our boys in those bombers are on their way home right now.' But a U.S. official said one woman was among those piloting the B-2 bombers. The official spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak about the mission publicly. Caine said the use of the bunker-buster bombs made the mission historic, as did other elements. 'This was the largest B-2 operational strike in U.S. history, and the second longest B-2 mission ever flown, exceeded only by those in the days following 9/11," he told reporters Sunday. ___
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
President Lee picks South Korea's first civilian defense chief in 64 years
SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — South Korean President Lee Jae Myung nominated a five-term liberal lawmaker as defense minister Monday, breaking with a tradition of appointing retired military generals. The announcement came as several prominent former defense officials, including ex-Defense Minister Kim Yong Hyun, face high-profile criminal trials over their roles in carrying out martial law last year under then-President Yoon Suk Yeol, who was indicted on rebellion charges and removed from office. Ahn Gyu-back, a lawmaker from Lee's Democratic Party, has served on the National Assembly's defense committee and chaired a legislative panel that investigated the circumstances surrounding Yoon's martial law decree. Yoon's authoritarian move involved deploying hundreds of heavily armed troops to the National Assembly and election commission offices in what prosecutors described as an illegal attempt to shut down the legislature and arrest political opponents and election officials. That sparked calls to strengthen civilian control over the military, and Lee promised during his election campaign to appoint a defense minister with a civilian background. Since a 1961 coup that brought military dictator Park Chung-hee to power, all of South Korea's defense ministers have come from the military — a trend that continued even after the country's democratization in the late 1980s. While Ahn will face a legislative hearing, the process is likely to be a formality, since the Democrats hold a comfortable majority in the National Assembly and legislative consent isn't required for Lee to appoint him. Among Cabinet appointments, Lee only needs legislative consent for prime minister, Seoul's nominal No. 2 job. 'As the first civilian Minister of National Defense in 64 years, he will be responsible for leading and overseeing the transformation of the military after its mobilization in martial law,' Kang Hoon-sik, Lee's chief of staff, said in a briefing. Ahn was among 11 ministers nominated by Lee on Monday, with longtime diplomat Cho Hyun selected as foreign minister and five-term lawmaker Chung Dong-young returning for another stint as unification minister — a position he held from 2004 to 2005 as Seoul's point man for relations with North Korea.
