Senate Passes A 'No Tax On Tips' Bill—Here's How It Differs From House Version
The Senate's version of the bill would cap the deduction at $25,000.
getty
In a surprise move, the Senate passed the No Tax on Tips Act. The vote was unanimous.
The bill was originally introduced by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) to little fanfare. However, on May 20, Sen. Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.), one of seven cosponsors of the bipartisan bill, brought it to the Senate floor, where it passed by unanimous consent. Unanimous consent is a procedural tool that is exactly what it sounds like—it requires the unanimous agreement of all Senators. You don't typically see it used in tax bills, as it's generally used for noncontroversial resolutions and simple requests, neither of which typically falls into the tax policy basket.
Rosen noted that no tax on tips was a campaign pledge made by President Donald Trump. 'And I am not afraid to embrace a good idea wherever it comes from,' she said on the Senate floor, noting that Nevada has more tipped workers per capita than any other state.
The bill would allow a federal income tax deduction for workers who typically receive tips as part of their compensation—think hairdressers and food service employees. The income must be reported for tax purposes and would still be subject to payroll taxes (more on that in a moment).
Highly compensated employees (those who make over $160,000 in 2025) would be excluded. And to curb abuse, Treasury is directed to craft regulations or other guidance to 'prevent reclassification of income as qualified tips... to prevent abuse of the deduction.'
It's important to note that this is a federal income tax deduction, not an exclusion. That means that tips would still be reportable—and taxable at the state and local level. It also means that tips would remain subject to payroll taxes, including Social Security and Medicare, for employees.
The bill now heads to the U.S. House of Representatives as a standalone piece of legislation. It largely mirrors the 'no tax on tips' text found in the 'big, beautiful bill' moving forward in the House. So why carve it out?
Politics. Rosen told her colleagues, 'The problem is that the House Republicans have included a version of the No Tax on Tips Act in their bigger budget bill—a bill that cuts Medicaid, SNAP, and other programs families rely on, to give more tax breaks for billionaires and the ultrawealthy. So we shouldn't be forcing working families to choose between keeping their healthcare or keeping their tips, which is why we want this bipartisan bill to pass on its own—on its own—not part of a harmful, extreme budget bill.'
There are some differences between the two versions. As proposed in the House, the deduction would only be for tax years 2025 through 2028—for individuals who work in what are considered 'traditionally and customarily tipped industries.' (According to the proposal, that would only include industries that accepted tips on or before December 31, 2024—Treasury is directed to make a list of those that qualify.) The Senate version of the bill, as passed, is effective for tax years beginning in 2025—there's no proposed end date.
The Senate bill caps the deduction at $25,000, while the House version has no cap. The House version allows a full deduction of 'an amount equal to the qualified tips received during the taxable year that are included on statements furnished to the individual.'
A final—and important distinction—is that the Senate bill does not appear to apply to self-employed persons. While the House version includes language specifically including tips received in the course of a trade or business in the definition of qualified tips, that section is noticeably absent from the Senate version of the bill.
The likely reason for those differences? Cost. The House version of the bill is cheaper, something that fiscal conservatives in the House and Senate will be mindful of as conversations about the growing federal deficit continue.
Both versions of the bill would allow employers a break via a tip credit. The deduction, which has been in place since 1993 for restaurants, is known as the 45B credit and allows for a rebate on the entire employer side of payroll taxes on tips. The instructions for claiming the 45B credit made clear it covers tips to employers involved in "providing, delivering, or serving food or beverages for consumption." The result is that tips provided elsewhere—like in salons—are subject to payroll taxes for both employees and employers, even though not a penny goes to the salon.
The Senate and House bills propose to change that by extending the benefit to the beauty industry. Under the amendment, section 45B would be amended to include barbers and hair care, nail care, esthetics, and body and spa treatments.
Confused about the employer versus employee sides of payroll taxes? For wage earners, Social Security and Medicare taxes are called FICA (Federal Insurance Contributions Act) and are taken out of your paycheck. Taxes on self-employment income are sometimes called SECA (Self-Employment Contributions Act) taxes since self-employed persons pay both the employee and employer contributions.
If you're employed, you pay Social Security tax at a rate of 6.2% as the employee, and your employer pays the same tax rate on your behalf. If you're self-employed, you are responsible for both parts.
Social Security taxes are subject to a wage cap. That means you pay Social Security taxes on your earnings until you hit the magic number. After that, your wages are no longer subject to Social Security taxes. For 2025, the magic number is $176,100. That means that whether you make $1,000 or $100,000, you will pay Social Security taxes on your income. But if you earn $176,101? You'll pay Social Security taxes on the first $176,100, but not on the extra dollar. And if you earn $1,176,100? Same result: you'll pay Social Security taxes on $176,100, but not on the extra million.
In contrast, all wages are subject to Medicare taxes. If you're employed, you pay Medicare tax of 1.45% as the employee, and your employer kicks in tax at the same rate. As before, if you're self-employed, you'll pay both portions, for a total tax rate of 2.9%.
High-income taxpayers are also subject to an additional Medicare tax of 0.9% tacked onto wages that exceed $200,000 for single filers—those thresholds are $125,000 for married taxpayers filing separately and $250,000 for married taxpayers filing jointly.
If you're a wage earner, your employer collects your Social Security and Medicare payments and remits both their portion and your share to the government. Self-employed persons pay the IRS directly. Retaining payroll taxes on tips and overtime may mean a bigger bite at tax time, but there is an upside: No matter who pays, these taxes are credited toward your retirement benefits.
The House version of the bill is still working its way to the floor. To become law, the language in the two versions must match exactly. Considering the cost considerations, that could prove to be a challenge.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
32 minutes ago
- Fox News
Eric Dane celebrates the wins following ALS diagnosis
All times eastern FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: Sen Sanders holds 'Fighting Oligarchy' rally in McAllen, Texas
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
JD Vance wades into the immigration thicket: From the Politics Desk
Welcome to the online version of From the Politics Desk, an evening newsletter that brings you the NBC News Politics team's latest reporting and analysis from the White House, Capitol Hill and the campaign trail. Happy first day of summer! In today's edition, Jonathan Allen explores the challenges awaiting Vice President JD Vance as he lands in Los Angeles. Plus, we dive into President Donald Trump's penchant for a giving a two-week timetable on big issues. And Dylan Ebs answers this week's reader question on ranked choice voting. Sign up to receive this newsletter in your inbox every weekday here. — Adam Wollner Vice President JD Vance is wading into the immigration thicket today by traveling to Los Angeles, where Marines and National Guard forces have been deployed to provide backup for federal agents executing raids. For Vance, it's tricky territory because President Donald Trump keeps changing his mind — or at least his rhetoric — on immigration enforcement. On one hand, Trump is anxious to fulfill a campaign promise to deport millions of undocumented immigrants. The MAGA base demands it. And Vance, who hopes to inherit the MAGA base, seldom strays far from its orthodoxy. But on the other hand, Trump has wavered on parts of his own mass deportation plan. After Trump said that workers in certain sectors — farming, hotels and restaurants — would not be targeted in raids, he quickly reversed that policy. Vance finds himself taking on a more visible role just as the MAGA movement is feeling the strain of a president torn between ideology and popularity. It's nothing new for a vice president to land in the middle of a vexing issue. Kamala Harris had the border portfolio in Joe Biden's administration. If Trump's immigration policies end up being a success, Vance will no doubt profit from it. But if they don't, he may suffer. Read more: Appeals court says Trump can keep control of California National Guard troops, by Dennis Romero President Donald Trump's two-week timeline to decide on whether the U.S. will strike Iran's nuclear sites is a familiar one. 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks,' he said in a statement issued through White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt. Since the beginning of May, Trump has promised action on questions or decisions in 'two weeks' around 10 times — and he used the same timeline repeatedly during his first term in office. 'We're going to be announcing something, I would say over the next two or three weeks, that will be phenomenal in terms of tax and developing our aviation infrastructure,' Trump said of tax overhaul plans on Feb. 9, 2017. He released a one-page outline of the plan 11 weeks later, according to a Bloomberg review that year. He went on to repeatedly cite the time frame for impending actions on health care and infrastructure that never materialized during his first four years in office. Trump's use of the timing prediction has accelerated in recent weeks — and he's used it on items ranging from trade deals and tariffs to the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Much of what he's predicted hasn't come to pass, with questions he's said he'd answer remaining unanswered. Read more on Trump's frequent two-week timeline → Catch up on our latest reporting on the Israel-Iran conflict: Trump is relying on a small circle of advisers as he weighs Iran strikes, by Courtney Kube, Carol E. Lee, Garrett Haake and Dan De Luce What could happen if Trump does decide to bomb Iran's main nuclear site, by Alexander Smith Iran not sure it can trust America after Israeli attack, Iran's foreign minister tells NBC News, by Dan De Luce 'She's wrong': Trump breaks with Gabbard on Iran assessment, by Vaughn Hillyard Follow live updates → Thanks to everyone who emailed us! This week's question comes from Thomas Gysegem: 'Will there be ranked voting in the New York City mayoral primary? Please explain how ranked voting works.' To answer that, we turned to our intern, Dylan Ebs, who just put together a helpful explainer on the process. Ranked choice voting, which New York is utilizing for next week's mayoral primary election, is a system that lets voters rank candidates in order of preference rather than pick just one. The number of candidates voters can rank depends on the specific rules in an area. In New York City, voters can rank up to five in one race. Voters don't have to fill their ballots, though. A voter whose heart is set on only one candidate can pick just one. But if that candidate doesn't get the most votes, that voter won't have a say in later rounds of counting. After the votes are tabulated, the last-place candidate is eliminated. Ballots from voters who supported that candidate then have the next choice counted. If no candidate has hit 50%, then counting continues, eliminating another last-place candidate and counting the next-ranked choices on all those ballots in the next round. The process continues until a candidate reaches majority support and wins. ⚖️ In the courts: A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to release pro-Palestinian activist and Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil from immigration custody. Read more → ⚖️ In the courts, cont.: A federal judge in Massachusetts again blocked the government's attempt to revoke Harvard's ability to enroll international students. Read more → ⚖️ SCOTUS watch: The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that victims of terrorism can sue Palestinian entities in U.S. courts. Read more → ⚖️ SCOTUS watch, cont.: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson criticized her colleagues in a scathing dissent in a case involving vehicle emissions regulations. Read more → 🚗 Road rage arrest: An Ohio man who allegedly ran GOP Rep. Max Miller off the road while waving a Palestinian flag and hurling antisemitic threats has been arrested. Read more → 🗽 Big Apple showdown: Progressive candidates in New York City's mayoral election are banding together in an effort to stop former Gov. Andrew Cuomo's comeback tour. Read more → ➡️ Split screen: Trump did not formally mark Juneteenth yesterday and said the U.S. has 'too many non-working holidays,' while his predecessor, Joe Biden, celebrated the occasion at a Black church in Texas. Read more → 🗳️ Running it back: Trump called for a special prosecutor to investigate the 2020 election, which he lost to Biden more than four years ago. Read more → That's all From the Politics Desk for now. Today's newsletter was compiled by Adam Wollner and Dylan Ebs. If you have feedback — likes or dislikes — email us at politicsnewsletter@ And if you're a fan, please share with everyone and anyone. They can sign up here. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fox News Poll: Voters distrust Biden administration on president's mental fitness
Voters say they were aware of former President Joe Biden's decline, and believe the administration lacked honesty and transparency about his mental fitness, with many wanting Congress to investigate the matter. A new Fox News survey finds more than half, 52%, think it is important to investigate whether Biden advisors used an autopen without the president's awareness, while 46% say it's time to move on. House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer is pursuing investigations against former Biden administration staff for allegedly covering up Biden's mental decline and using an autopen for executive actions. Views are split on whether advisors should be scrutinized for making key presidential decisions on behalf of Biden (50% investigate vs. 49% move on), while a majority opposes investigating whether Biden advisors covered up his decline (44% investigate vs. 55% move on). Fox News Poll: Voters Think Iran Poses A Real Threat To Us Security, But Split Oj Israel's Strike Among Democrats, one in five supports investigating whether there was a cover-up, while roughly one in four feels that way about using the autopen and making presidential decisions. Read On The Fox News App Overall, 68% of voters believe the previous administration was dishonest about Biden's condition, including 52% of Democrats, 75% of Independents, and 81% of Republicans. Fox News Poll: Economic Pessimism Abates Slightly As Voters Reflect On The Economy Yet, while a majority agree there was a cover-up, they weren't fooled. Nearly 7 in 10 say they were aware of Biden's cognitive condition even before his jaw-droppingly bad debate performance in June 2024. Some 28% say they knew he was in decline as soon as he took office, 21% say a couple of years into his term, and 19% after he started running for re-election. Another 20% knew of Biden's decline after his debate with Donald Trump. Fewer than 1 in 10 say he wasn't in decline (9%). These numbers are consistent with what voters said throughout Biden's term. As early as November 2021, only one year after Biden was elected, Fox News surveys found that a 53% majority thought his age was interfering with his job as president, including more than one-quarter of Democrats. By the 2022 midterms, our Fox News Voter Analysis election survey found 57% of voters felt Biden lacked the mental capability to serve and, by July 2024, that grew to 65%. "Somewhat lost in the kerfuffle about the exact timing of Biden's decline is the fact that most knew he was losing it and had factored this into their vote choice long before the presidential debate," says Daron Shaw, a Republican who conducts the Fox News survey along with Democrat Chris Anderson. "Still, Biden's reputation and legacy are clearly taking a hit as the real history of his administration is revealed." Biden's current personal favorability is underwater by 13 points (43% favorable, 56% unfavorable), compared to -19 points in January. During the early days of his presidency, his ratings were net positive by 10 points (54% favorable, 44% unfavorable, April 2021). Today, 75% of Democrats have a positive view of Biden, down from 95% four years ago. CLICK HERE FOR Crosstabs AND Topline Conducted June 13-16, 2025, under the direction of Beacon Research (D) and Shaw & Company Research (R), this Fox News survey includes interviews with a sample of 1,003 registered voters randomly selected from a national voter file. Respondents spoke with live interviewers on landlines (149) and cellphones (566) or completed the survey online after receiving a text (288). Results based on the full sample have a margin of sampling error of ±3 percentage points. Sampling error for results among subgroups is higher. In addition to sampling error, question wording and order can influence results. Weights are generally applied to age, race, education, and area variables to ensure the demographics are representative of the registered voter population. Sources for developing weight targets include the American Community Survey, Fox News Voter Analysis, and voter file data. Fox News' Victoria Balara contributed to this article source: Fox News Poll: Voters distrust Biden administration on president's mental fitness
