More clarity on impacts of gold mining called for
About 180 people attended a meeting opposing Central Otago's upcoming gold-mining project, as they called for more transparency on potential impacts.
Local group Sustainable Tarras has held meetings in Dunedin and Wanaka over the past week and garnered significant support from the community in its opposition to the Bendigo-Ophir Gold Project located in Tarras.
The project is being carried out by Australian-based mining company Santana Minerals and will establish an open pit and underground gold mine on Bendigo and Ardgour Stations in Central Otago. The open pit will be 1000m long, 850m wide and 200m deep.
The meeting held by Sustainable Tarras at the Wanaka Presbyterian Church on Thursday evening was attended by the Otago Daily Times, and featured industry experts and residents showing their opposition to the project.
Sustainable Tarras chairwoman Suze Keith said about 100 people had indicated they would attend the meeting, but the turnout exceeded expectations, an estimated 180 people turning up.
"It really reinforces that we're not on our own, because we are a small community, and that the Wanaka community do care beyond the boundary of their town," she said.
The meeting also included videos sent in from Green MPs Scott Willis and Lan Pham as well as Dunedin MP Rachel Brooking, who all showed their support for the work the group was doing.
One of the main speakers at the meeting was Sustainable Tarras member Rob van der Mark.
Concerned about the impacts of the project, the Tarras local took it upon himself to do a deep dive into the impacts of this project several months ago and said he felt there were many gaps in the information available.
Throughout his speech, he highlighted the lack of clear communication and transparency he faced when he approached Santana Minerals.
"We've had good dialogue with Santana in the past ... We don't learn a lot, but I think they learn a lot from us," he said.
Major concerns discussed at the meeting included concerns chemicals such as arsenic and cyanide could potentially be released into the air or seep into the ground and local creeks.
The processing plant for the mine will be located in the lower Shepherds Valley and chemicals used to process gold such as cyanide will be held at a tailings storage facility.
The storage facility is set to be 260m wide and will include a tailings dam.
"Santana will do their best to clean it up ... but everybody who has large dams knows that dams leak and it's that long-term risk that we will be left with," Mr van der Mark said.
In a statement released on the same day as the Sustainable Tarras Wanaka meeting, Santana Minerals said the processing plant would ensure cyanide concentrations were below the level deemed safe for wildlife before chemicals were discharged into the tailings storage facility.
As the company prepares to finish its fast-track application, it stated many environmental assessments had been completed and several key ecological reports were still in progress.
The Sustainable Tarras team are calling for the company to further involve the community by being more open about the reports it is undertaking.
"They're telling their shareholders they've completed all these background reports. Well, when we ask for them, we get stonewalled," Mr van der Mark said.
Santana Minerals said feedback from its regular drop-in sessions had been largely positive, and the company was committed to ensuring the project was beneficial to the community.
"For many of our team this is our home too, and our focus is on listening, refining and working together to build a project that Central Otago can be proud of for generations to come," Santana Minerals chief executive Damian Spring said in a statement.
rawan.saadi@odt.co.nz
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
38 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
New Zealand hints at support for US over Iran
There are several points of contrast. First are NZ's Opposition parties, which soon after the bombing declared it contrary to international law and called on the Government to say so as well. Second is Australia, which came out yesterday and supported the bombing. But it is more likely that NZ will continue to follow the example of Britain and Canada. That is to avoid the issue of whether it supports or opposes the bombing of three nuclear facilities, to stay silent on whether it was justified or unjustified, not to offer a view as to whether it was lawful or unlawful under international law, and to emphasise what should happen from now on: de-escalation and diplomacy. Unlike NZ, in the 24 hours after the bombing, the Australian Government came under domestic pressure from its highly vocal defence hawks to unequivocally support the bombing. And it did so today. 'The world has long agreed that Iran cannot be allowed to get a nuclear weapon, and we support action to prevent that - that is what this is,' Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said. Even if it is a bit squirmish about the legalities of America's unilateral strike, Australia's status as an ally is baked into not just Anzus but into the $368 billion Aukus submarine supply deal. And with Aukus currently under review by the Trump Administration, it is not hard to see why Labor might have seen it as against its national interest to quibble about whether the US acted contrary to international law. No wonder the general response to Albanese and Foreign Minister Penny Wong was why had it taken Australia 24 hours to say that. Britain, although equally the No 1 ally to the US with Australia, is in a different position. While it too has come under pressure from the Conservative opposition to back the US action, the UK Labour Government has stronger grounds for resisting. Its position as an intermediary between Iran and the US – not to mention between Europe and the US - is important. Britain, along with France and Germany, was meeting with the Iranian Foreign Minister in Geneva the day before the bombing. Despite US President Donald Trump dismissing their attempts at mediation, it will be important to keep those channels open. And if the UK and European players are to maintain credibility with Iran in such a role, they cannot afford to be cheerleading the US against such Iranian humiliation. Minister of Defence Judith Collins and Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters announce an operation to assist New Zealanders stranded in Iran and Israel at RNZAF Base, Whenuapai, on Sunday. Photo / Sylvie Whinray Foreign Minister Winston Peters on Sunday and Monday morning took a non-committal position on the basis of not having enough information. You could tell that well-established US hawk was itching to back the US, but he resisted. He is, after all, part of a three-party Coalition, and with the Prime Minister on the other side of the world for a Nato summit, he and his officials needed time to work on their positioning. But no amount of waiting for information is going to change the fact that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) recorded in May that Iran's nuclear stockpiles include 400kg of uranium enriched up to 60% - beyond what it required for supposedly civilian use. No amount of denial by Iran is going to persuade leaders of most Western countries that Iran was not far away – possibly months - from producing a nuclear weapon. And no amount of extra information is going to change the claim by the US that its actions were of collective self-defence and were lawful. NZ is committed to the 'international rules-based order'. Whenever it calls out Russia for its invasion of Ukraine, it describes it as 'illegal.' But whether something is lawful or unlawful under international law is often debatable, especially when it involves the US. When Peters talks about wanting more information, he is not referring to waiting for the final piece of legal advice that will tip the scales and have NZ declare the US actions unlawful. The only direction in which he would want to shift is further towards supporting the US, not criticising it. By 3pm yesterday, Peters had issued a fuller statement calling for diplomacy and dialogue, and noting the US statement to the UN Security Council in defence of its actions. It also noted NZ's history of advocating for disarmament, opposing Iran's nuclear programme, and stated more bluntly than he has stated before: 'Iran cannot be allowed to develop nuclear weapons'. That may not be an unequivocal statement of NZ's support for the US action, but it certainly moves closer to it. And perhaps that is where NZ's position will rest.
Scoop
18 hours ago
- Scoop
New Analysis Details Government Annual Gift Of $119m To Multinational Gambling Company
Greyhound Racing New Zealand has released new analysis detailing the extent to which the Government is financially supporting a multinational gambling giant. It comes as the Government is expected this week to pass the Racing Industry Amendment Bill into law, creating a digital monopoly on gambling for Entain. The analysis, prepared by an independent consultant, details the financial help required for Entain to meet its funding guarantee of $150m per year to the racing industry. The funding guarantee, combined with a guarantee to retain approximately 450 TAB staff until June 2025, were set under the terms of the agreement when the TAB's betting business was outsourced to Entain in 2023. The analysis estimates in dollar terms the value of the Government's support to bail out Entain so it can limit its losses in meeting the terms of its deal until 2029. The passage of legislation to block New Zealanders from gambling offshore will boost Entain annual revenues by at least $75m per year. The retention of gambling on Australian greyhounds after the ban comes into effect, will preserve Entain gross betting revenues of approximately $44m per year. Without these actions by the Government, Entain would be faced with an estimated revenue deficit of $26m per year. Greyhound Racing New Zealand CEO Edward Renell said: 'The Government has chosen to bail out a multinational gambling company at the expense of ordinary Kiwis. 'It will shamelessly pass laws and create digital monopolies so Entain can meet its funding guarantees and obligations to private shareholders. 'Entain won't need to compete to win new revenue as it was brought in to do. It will be gifted it by banning Kiwis from using non-Entain betting providers and retaining gambling on Australian greyhound racing. 'The decision to keep taking money from Australian greyhound races, but strip thousands of regional Kiwis of their livelihoods and passion, is depressingly cynical and hypocritical. 'Gross income of $44 million dollars each year will now be sliced up between the Government, Entain and the equine codes and not go to the thousands of trainers, owners, and breeders involved in greyhound racing. 'It's a reverse Robin Hood. The Government is taking money from the provinces to save face on a bad deal and keep the money flowing into Entain, thoroughbred and harness racing.' Notes: Timeline of Entain – TAB deal: March 2023: TAB and Entain agreed to enter a strategic partnership agreement where TAB has delegated its betting and wagering functions to Entain. May 2023: The partnership was approved by then Racing Minister Labour's Kieran McAnulty, outsourcing TAB's monopoly betting operation to Entain for 25 years, a UK-listed multinational. 50% revenue share between Entain and the TAB. May 2023: TAB sought a variation to its authorisation of its arrangements with Tabcorp to reflect strategic partnership with Entain. June 2023: The partnership officially started on June 1, 2023. Entain Guarantees under the terms of sale: Entain provided TAB $150 million upfront a with a guaranteed $150 million for the first five years. $10 million sponsorship for racing carnivals. On passage of the Racing Amendment bill into law: $100 million payment from Entain, $80 million to be shared between thoroughbred and harness racing Entain committed to no forced redundancies for first 24 months of the agreement, due to expire this month (June 2025). Book value of Entain's TAB licence assets, if the Racing Amendment legislation goes through: According to Entain's March 2025 annual report, the estimated value of the New Zealand TAB licence assets was $2.7 billion NZD, including the potential introduction of the legislation. About GRNZ Greyhound Racing New Zealand is the governing body for greyhound racing in New Zealand and provides governance, support and assistance to the affiliated clubs in the sport of greyhound racing. The decision to end greyhound racing has significant economic and social consequences. The sport provides 1,054 full-time equivalent jobs and contributed $159.2 million to the economy in FY23. The Government announced on 10 December 2024, an intention to legislate to ban greyhound racing in New Zealand from 31 July 2026. Visit for more information.
Otago Daily Times
2 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
More clarity on impacts of gold mining called for
About 180 people attended a meeting opposing Central Otago's upcoming gold-mining project, as they called for more transparency on potential impacts. Local group Sustainable Tarras has held meetings in Dunedin and Wanaka over the past week and garnered significant support from the community in its opposition to the Bendigo-Ophir Gold Project located in Tarras. The project is being carried out by Australian-based mining company Santana Minerals and will establish an open pit and underground gold mine on Bendigo and Ardgour Stations in Central Otago. The open pit will be 1000m long, 850m wide and 200m deep. The meeting held by Sustainable Tarras at the Wanaka Presbyterian Church on Thursday evening was attended by the Otago Daily Times, and featured industry experts and residents showing their opposition to the project. Sustainable Tarras chairwoman Suze Keith said about 100 people had indicated they would attend the meeting, but the turnout exceeded expectations, an estimated 180 people turning up. "It really reinforces that we're not on our own, because we are a small community, and that the Wanaka community do care beyond the boundary of their town," she said. The meeting also included videos sent in from Green MPs Scott Willis and Lan Pham as well as Dunedin MP Rachel Brooking, who all showed their support for the work the group was doing. One of the main speakers at the meeting was Sustainable Tarras member Rob van der Mark. Concerned about the impacts of the project, the Tarras local took it upon himself to do a deep dive into the impacts of this project several months ago and said he felt there were many gaps in the information available. Throughout his speech, he highlighted the lack of clear communication and transparency he faced when he approached Santana Minerals. "We've had good dialogue with Santana in the past ... We don't learn a lot, but I think they learn a lot from us," he said. Major concerns discussed at the meeting included concerns chemicals such as arsenic and cyanide could potentially be released into the air or seep into the ground and local creeks. The processing plant for the mine will be located in the lower Shepherds Valley and chemicals used to process gold such as cyanide will be held at a tailings storage facility. The storage facility is set to be 260m wide and will include a tailings dam. "Santana will do their best to clean it up ... but everybody who has large dams knows that dams leak and it's that long-term risk that we will be left with," Mr van der Mark said. In a statement released on the same day as the Sustainable Tarras Wanaka meeting, Santana Minerals said the processing plant would ensure cyanide concentrations were below the level deemed safe for wildlife before chemicals were discharged into the tailings storage facility. As the company prepares to finish its fast-track application, it stated many environmental assessments had been completed and several key ecological reports were still in progress. The Sustainable Tarras team are calling for the company to further involve the community by being more open about the reports it is undertaking. "They're telling their shareholders they've completed all these background reports. Well, when we ask for them, we get stonewalled," Mr van der Mark said. Santana Minerals said feedback from its regular drop-in sessions had been largely positive, and the company was committed to ensuring the project was beneficial to the community. "For many of our team this is our home too, and our focus is on listening, refining and working together to build a project that Central Otago can be proud of for generations to come," Santana Minerals chief executive Damian Spring said in a statement.
