A new COVID-19 subvariant has emerged. Here is why experts in Ontario say there is no reason to panic
A new subvariant of COVID-19 that has been circulating in some parts of the world for months has now made its way to the United States but experts say that there is no cause for concern just yet.
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), NB.1.8.1 derives from the recombinant variant XDV.1.5.1 and is one of six current 'variants under monitoring' due to its mutations and global spread.
Dr. Fahad Razak, Canada Research Chair at the University of Toronto and internal medicine physician at St. Michael's Hospital, tells CTV News Toronto that a variant under monitoring—or a VUM—is different from variant of concerns, which often resulted in an exponential rise in transmission when they emerged and quickly became dominant during the pandemic.
The key difference between both variant types, Razak says, is that VUMs will likely not swamp the health-care system or cause more severe illness like variants of concern will.
'Over the last couple of years, despite seeing many mutations, we have not had a new variant of concern emerge and this current variant, NB.1.8.1 is being called a variant (under) monitoring, meaning that it is clearly spreading, but it is not showing any of those concerning features that make us more worried,' Razak said.
Here's what we know about the new subvariant so far:
What is NB.1.8.1?
The WHO says NB.1.8.1 has been detected in 22 countries as of May 18. This represented 10.7 per cent of COVID cases seen worldwide in the last full week of April, which the WHO says is a notable rise from the 2.5 per cent noted in the first week of April.
Compared to other co-circulating variants, the number of cases related to NB.1.8.1 is growing faster—however, the WHO notes its expansion has only recently started to rise and that some regions have not yet detected it.
Has it made its way to Ontario?
Based on the latest data from the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC), which breaks down the percentage of COVID-19 cases by variant grouping on a weekly basis, there are no cases of NB.1.8.1. recorded in the country.
Both Razak and Infectious diseases expert Dr. Isaac Bogoch say it is likely the new variant will make its way here eventually but Razak notes Canada does not provide a 'reliable estimate across the country anymore.'
'We used to do regular testing for sequence across the country. They would be coordinated by public health labs in each province and then collated federally,' Razak said. 'That was done during the peak of the pandemic and (had) a lot of value in helping us understand the degree of spread, especially when we had these variants of concern.'
If there was a new variant that showed more severe disease, a high degree of spread or evading the vaccine, Razak thinks many parts of the world would be vulnerable since the level of monitoring is not what it used to be.
'We don't have the level of uptake of vaccines that we had two or three years ago, and so those factors would mean you could have something spread and you would have lower levels of protection, and so you could have a lot of people sick,' Razak said.
But, Razak says, that there hasn't been a major variant of concern in years.
Public Health Ontario tells CTV News Toronto that, to date, this variant has not been included in its reporting but note its next report will be published next week.
Toronto Public Health, meanwhile, does not break down what variants of COVID-19 are seen in in the city. It does provide general data for how prevalent the virus is at this time.
The latest epidemiological data from TPH shows a 1.8 per cent positivity rate from May 11 to May 17, showing the activity levels of the virus are currently 'low.'
Are the symptoms any different?
Bogoch says the symptoms from NB.1.8.1. are similar to what one would get if they contracted any Omicron sub-lineage in the last three years, which could cause fever, fatigue, cough, and shortness of breath.
'There's a well-trodden path of who's at greater risk for more severe manifestations of the virus, namely, people on the older end of the spectrum and people with underlying medical comorbidities,' Bogoch said. 'So, it doesn't sound like, apart from a subtle genetic change, it doesn't sound like there's anything new about this (variant) in terms of clinical presentation, risk factors for severity of illness (and) transmission.'
The guidance on how to protect yourself also remains unchanged, Razak says.
'When you have periods like this, like, let's say we have started to see a high degree of spread in Canada, the advice that we've given the last few years would hold just as strongly. If your vaccine hasn't been updated, update your vaccine,' Razak said.
Masking in crowded places, frequently washing hands and enhancing air circulation when indoors are also other methods to prevent the virus from spreading between person to person.
What if you haven't had a recent vaccine?
Bogoch says that, for some time now, the COVID-19 vaccines 'doesn't protect against infection nearly to the same extent as it once did.'
'The vaccines can provide a little bit of protection against infection for a short period of time—they can—but the real role of the vaccine is to significantly reduce the risk of severe illness that is primarily in those with risk factors for severe illness,' Bogoch said. 'Long are the days where the vaccine was a formidable force in preventing infection and subsequent onward transmission. We haven't been that era in years.'
The vaccine can reduce the risk of infection but after about six months, its protection starts to wane, Razak says.
'Our National Advisory Committee on Immunization, they have continued to say that high-risk individuals—for example, older individuals, people who are immunosuppressed, people who are being treated for rheumatologic illness or cancer where their immune systems are notworking—they would benefit from getting their updates every six months,' Razak said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
'It's not scary': Initiative to engage public with science finds new meaning post-COVID
Social Sharing The COVID-19 pandemic led to a lot of attacks on science. There were protests against public-health mandates, some people harassed health officials and others used social media to share scientific misinformation. But on Saturday, 10 scientists on the Halifax Waterfront put themselves in front of the public — standing on literal soapboxes — to discuss their work. "I think there's a little bit more skepticism with the public in general about science, so I think it's making these events even more important," said Kim Brewer, an associate professor at Dalhousie University's School of Biomedical Engineering who helped organize the Halifax Soapbox Science event. Soapbox Science is an international initiative that started in London, England, in 2011 and has hosted events across Canada since 2017. The events highlight the work of women and non-binary people in science while giving people "the opportunity to enjoy, learn from, heckle, question, probe [and] interact with" scientists, according to the group's website. The event has been held in Halifax before and returned last year for the first time since the start of the pandemic when science and scientists were constantly being challenged. "It's not scary," said Brewer. "It's not this weird thing that is done by strangers in labs far away." 'Fun challenge' to get people to understand science Sarah Martell was one of the researchers who took part of the event. She spoke about her work in hydrogen generation as a potential clean energy source. Martell, who works in a chemistry lab after recently finishing her PhD at Dalhousie University, said some of her environmental work has been subject to "wild" comments online. "I think that's what makes science communication and events like this really important," she said. Engaging with people in person is a lot easier than trying to get your point across to someone on the Internet, Martell said. She said people who stopped by the event Saturday seemed genuinely interested and asked good questions. As for how to communicate such complex topics to the average person, she said that's part of the job sometimes. "I think it's a fun challenge and, I think as a scientist, I sort of feel like it's my responsibility to take that challenge on."
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Pricey TikTok skin care routines for kids raise alarms in new study
Children as young as seven are making TikTok videos about their meticulous and pricey skin care routines. Known as 'Sephora Kids,' they are the focus of a new study that raises alarms about the trend. 'We found that the skin care routines posted by creators aged 18 and under were complicated, costly, and time consuming,' lead author and dermatologist Dr. Molly Hales told 'The skin care routines offered few benefits to the young people that they were targeting, and they carried risks of irritation, skin allergy, and sun sensitivity.' Hales is a postdoctoral research fellow at Northwestern University's medical school in Chicago. For the study, Hales and another researcher created new TikTok accounts posing as 13-year-olds. They analyzed 100 skin care videos by content creators ages 7 to 18, and recorded the number and types of products that were used, as well as the total cost of each skin care regimen. On average, the content creators used six products per video. The average cost of the products used in each regimen was US$168 while the most expensive exceeded $500. The videos the researchers analyzed had an average of 1.1 million views. The 25 most-viewed videos featured products with an average of 11, and a maximum of 21, ingredients that could potentially lead to skin irritation, sun sensitivity or skin allergy. 'We found significant dermatologic risks associated with these regimens, including a very high risk of irritation,' Hales added in a news release from Northwestern University. 'That high risk of irritation came from both using multiple active ingredients at the same time, such as hydroxy acids, as well as applying the same active ingredient unknowingly over and over again when that active ingredient was found in three, four, five different products.' Only a quarter (26.2 per cent) of daytime skin regimens included sunscreen, which Hales says is an incredibly important product for young and old skin alike. 'It's really the only product that is recommended in this age group for those who don't have a known skin condition such as acne or eczema,' Hales told 'It's particularly important given that we found in our study that the most popular active ingredients in these youth skin care routines are alpha hydroxy acids, which are known to increase sun sensitivity.' In one video, a content creator applied 10 products to her face in six minutes – and quickly regretted it. 'You can see that she's turning bright red,' Hales said. 'She wraps up the video by saying, 'If anyone knows how to get it to stop burning, that would be greatly appreciated because it actually hurts a lot.'' Senior author and pharmacist Dr. Tara Lagu also noted potential harms that went beyond just product ingredients. 'We saw that there was preferential, encoded racial language in some cases that really emphasized lighter, brighter skin,'Lagu, an adjunct lecturer at Northwestern University, said in the news release. 'I think there also were real associations between use of these regimens and consumerism.' Lagu got the idea for the study after asking her 12-year-old niece what she wanted for Christmas and getting a list of $300 worth of skin care products. 'After digging around a bit, she realized that nobody had done a formal study of the skin care routines that were circulating among teens and pre-teens on social media,' Hales told 'She approached me about a potential collaboration, knowing that I'm both a dermatologist and a medical anthropologist with a background in digital and social media.' Published in the American Academy of Pediatrics, it is the first peer-reviewed study of its kind. The study's authors conclude that the videos offer little to no benefit for their young audience. They also note that it can hard for parents to track what their children are viewing on TikTok because of age-based algorithms. 'I would encourage parents to make sure that their kids understand that they don't need to be using tons of costly products in order to have healthy skin, or to take care of themselves and their skin,'Hales told 'These skin care videos can be fun and playful, and given their popularity, they likely aren't going away anytime soon. But it's troubling when this content sets an unrealistic standard of beauty and then promotes it in the name of 'health.'' Dr. Elena Hope, the head of pediatric dermatology at SickKids hospital in Toronto, was not involved in the study but echoed its recommendations. She said children should avoid using products with fragrances, essential oils and retinoids, urging parents to educate themselves about potentially harmful ingredients. 'Daily moisturizers that have been tested for tolerability and sunscreens are the only recommendations we have for children,' Hope said in an email to 'All other preparations are not needed and may be harmful.'
CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
As corporate sponsors walk away from Pride, some call for a return to its activist roots
Despite major sponsors pulling their support from this year's Toronto Pride festivities, one advocate says that it might actually be a chance to put a new focus on Pride's raison d'etre. "The focus of Pride as an overall event must be ... the people," Nicki Ward, an advocate who's worked on 2SLGBTQ+ housing and disability issues in Canada for over 25 years, told CBC Radio's Day 6. "Maybe it's time for a little more authenticity. And if company XYZ doesn't want to get involved, well then, too bad." Earlier this month, Pride Toronto said it's facing a $900,000 funding gap due to sponsors — including Google, Nissan, Home Depot and Clorox — pulling support, and the rising costs of running the festival. Executive director Kojo Modeste linked the corporate withdrawals to backlash against diversity, equity and inclusion efforts in the United States under President Donald Trump's administration. Toronto isn't the only city with Pride festivals facing similar challenges. Organizations across Canada are grappling with a chilled enthusiasm among sponsors and donors this year, even as a new poll suggests Canadian support for 2SLGBTQ+ rights hasn't waned. Now, organizers are forced to search for the delicate balance between growing Pride's audience and staying true to its activist roots fighting for 2SLGBTQ+ rights Zac Rempel, managing director of the Vancouver Pride Society, says their sponsorships this year are down about 50 per cent compared to last year. Their programming has been cut from a 10-day festival last year to a three-day weekend because of the lack of funds. "We are running on a skeleton crew right now," said Rempel. In a statement posted online, Halifax Pride says it chose to part ways with some longtime sponsors and parade participants, while others stepped back "for reasons we weren't told, but we can read the room." In the U.S., major corporations like MasterCard, Pepsi and Deloitte pulled out of Pride events in New York, Washington, D.C., and San Francisco. According to research cited by Axios, a majority of the corporations surveyed about their reasons for pulling out cited the Trump administration, and conservative activists and policymakers. Corporate pinkwashing According to Ward, the transformation of many Pride festivals from a protest march to a major parade with corporate sponsors, including some flying their company logos at a parade, didn't happen overnight. Some of the earliest companies to sponsor Pride events were local breweries or other alcohol businesses, simply because the marches and parades were also big parties. "Later on, some of the banks got involved, which I actually think they came with good hearts, to try to make sure that their employees felt that they could bring their whole selves to work," she said. Later, however, corporate motives became more capitalistic as Pride's audience and the amount of money involved increased. "People would pay, basically, to pinkwash their companies and be gay for a day. [As if to say], 'Yeah, sure, we tolerate them,'" she said. Pinkwashing is a term used to describe corporations appealing to 2SLGBTQ+ communities, despite engaging in activities or practices that might harm those communities. That's led to tensions between multiple camps who disagree about what Pride should look like. In Montreal, for example, several 2SLGBTQ+ groups cut ties with Fierté Montréal, accusing it of prioritizing image over activism. Tom Hooper, an assistant professor in the department of human rights and equity studies at York University, said he thinks major corporations sponsoring or marching in Pride events gave many people in the 2SLGBTQ+ community a sense of acceptance and even safety, especially for people who worked at those corporations. But when they pull out en masse, it puts doubt on why they joined in the first place. "Did they just see us as this market to feed their bottom line? Was this just an opportunity to advertise?" he said. 'Pride is not just a party' Fiona Kerr, executive director of Halifax Pride, thinks so — especially when it comes to the bigger, multinational corporations who aren't as vulnerable to financial constraints as smaller sponsors with ties to their local communities. "I think a lot of larger sponsors are reckoning with the fact that Pride is not just a party and are choosing to walk away because of it. It's not the happy, fun dance party they originally signed up for," Kerr said in an email. "A lot of Pride organizations are taking stronger political stances and active steps to protect our community, and those are things these companies don't want to truly align themselves with." WATCH: Is Trump's anti-DEI agenda hurting Pride funding in Canada? Pride Toronto links funding woes to Trump's anti-DEI agenda 10 days ago Duration 2:01 Pride Toronto says the festival faces a major financial shortfall after multiple corporate sponsors pulled their support, which the festival's executive director links to American companies moving away from DEI efforts under the Trump administration. Hooper said that while the Trump factor looms large on the situation, it shouldn't be seen as the only factor. "We have our own Canadian versions of attacks on diversity, equity and inclusion," he said, noting that some political candidates in the spring's election took aim at so-called "woke" policies. "Canada's not immune from a lot of these policies that are aimed at gender-affirming care, that are aimed at school curriculum. We're having these same debates," he said. Meanwhile, an Ipsos poll released Friday suggests that a majority of Canadians support 2SLGBT+ visibility, rights and protections, at rates "far higher" than the average of 26 countries covered in the poll. Seventy-eight per cent of Canadians surveyed said that same-sex couples should be allowed to marry legally, and 79 per cent supported protections for 2SLGBT+ against discrimination in employment, housing and access to businesses. The poll, conducted online with about 1,000 participants in each country from April 25 to May 9, did find support for specific transgender protections, such as for health insurance coverage of gender transition, was divided. It also found that women were largely more supportive of 2SLGBT+ rights than men, and that difference was greatest among respondents under 35 years old. A parade? A march? Both? Ward and others told CBC that while the latest challenges have forced a rethink about what partnerships Pride festivals take on in the future, they're not ruling them out entirely. Kerr says Halifax Pride held community consultations on how to fill funding gaps that, while they "wouldn't totally fill the gap" left by sponsors who have withdrawn their support or might do so in the future, will help them be less dependent on corporate sponsors. "Money and spirituality can mix, but boy, it's awfully tricky," said Ward. She believes "a less commercial, more people-based Pride" could work, and even attract audiences who yearn for "a more authentic, less gaudy but more fabulous" festival compared to recent years. She said Toronto's Trans March has managed to keep its "spiritual centre" because it's still a walking march and not a parade with floats or other accoutrements. But that doesn't mean wiping away the parades, parties and fun of Pride entirely — in fact, it's a deeply important part of its DNA. "They want that celebration. They want that joy, which is completely valid," said Rempel. "Joy is radical in and of itself."
