logo
After Operation Sindoor exposed Pakistan, why is Islamabad turning to German defence?

After Operation Sindoor exposed Pakistan, why is Islamabad turning to German defence?

First Post12-06-2025

After India's Operation Sindoor exposed Pakistan's air defence gaps and Chinese weapons failed to deliver, Islamabad is now eyeing Germany's IRIS-T missile system to counter India's BrahMos. Despite economic distress, the country is prioritising defence upgrades. Why does Germany's system appeal to Pakistan? read more
People walk past a cut-out of BrahMos missile as they arrive to attend the roadshow of Prime Minister Narendra Modi in Ahmedabad, India, May 26, 2025. File Image/Reuters
In the aftermath of India's assertive military response, Pakistan is reassessing its air defence capabilities.
Operation Sindoor, conducted from 7 to 10 May 2025, demonstrated the effectiveness of the Indo-Russian BrahMos cruise missile in penetrating and crippling existing Pakistani air defence infrastructure.
With India's supersonic precision-strike capabilities now proven in operational settings, Pakistan has turned its attention to advanced Western systems — particularly Germany's IRIS-T SLM — hoping to neutralise future threats from weapons like the BrahMos.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The BrahMos not only exposed the vulnerabilities in Pakistan's Comprehensive Layered Integrated Air Defence (CLIAD), but also left 11 out of 13 of Pakistan's Air Force bases compromised.
The missile, with speeds reaching up to Mach 3 and a range between 450 to 800 km, overwhelmed Pakistan's Chinese-supplied HQ-9B and HQ-16 missile defence systems. The accuracy and velocity of BrahMos, combined with its stealth and low radar cross-section, made it a particularly difficult target.
In this context, Islamabad is now reportedly evaluating two advanced air defence options — the German-developed IRIS-T and the Italian CAMM-ER.
However, Pakistan is showing a clear tilt towards the IRIS-T system, manufactured by Diehl Defence, which has seen operational success in Ukraine against Russian cruise missiles.
Why does Pakistan want Germany's IRIS-T?
The IRIS-T (InfraRed Imaging System – Tail/Thrust Vector Controlled), particularly its surface-launched medium-range version IRIS-T SLM, has garnered attention for its ability to tackle fast-moving cruise missiles and drones.
The SLM variant offers a maximum engagement range of 40 km and can target threats up to 20 km in altitude.
Reports from the Ukrainian frontlines suggest that the system successfully intercepted over 60 aerial targets — including missiles similar to India's BrahMos — since its deployment began in October 2022.
Originally designed for Egypt, the IRIS-T SLM batteries were partly redirected to Ukraine during the ongoing conflict, where they have been used to counter Russian P-800 Oniks missiles — an earlier technological sibling of the BrahMos.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Ukrainian officials revealed that in one engagement, the IRIS-T system intercepted eight Russian cruise missiles in just 30 seconds, safeguarding critical infrastructure from damage.
According to the Indian Defence Research Wing, the Oniks, like the BrahMos, flies at low altitudes at high speeds, making it a difficult target. Though the interception rate of the Oniks remains in single digits, the IRIS-T's relative success has reportedly impressed Pakistani military planners.
Each IRIS-T SLM unit comprises a radar, command and control centre, and a set of launchers, all mounted on compact frames for swift deployment. The entire system is modular and transportable, enhancing battlefield flexibility.
At an estimated cost of €178–200 million per battery, the system is expensive, but its proven performance and adaptability make it appealing to Islamabad, which is racing to upgrade its defences despite significant economic pressures.
Can Pakistan afford German defence?
Despite being in the midst of a fiscal crisis, Pakistan has sharply raised its defence expenditure. This year, the defence budget was increased by almost 20 per cent, even as development projects worth 1,000 billion Pakistani rupees were shelved.
In the same time frame, Islamabad secured nearly $1.8 billion in financial assistance from the International Monetary Fund and the Asian Development Bank.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Criticism has followed. New Delhi raised objections to Islamabad's rising military spending while continuing to receive international loans, pointing out that 'the loan amount would be used for terror financing rather than their intended use for development.'
One complicating factor is Diehl Defence's existing collaboration with India. The company, along with Thyssenkrupp Marine Systems, is involved in supplying the Interactive Defence and Attack System (IDAS) for India's Rs 70,000 crore Project 75I submarine initiative.
If Germany chooses to proceed with arms sales to Pakistan, it could trigger diplomatic friction with New Delhi, which may view it as undermining India's strategic edge.
Nevertheless, Germany and Pakistan have a history of defence and economic cooperation. The 2011 Pak-Germany Strategic Dialogue and a bilateral trade volume of €3.3 billion in 2023 form the backdrop for discreet German outreach to Islamabad through the European Security and Stability Initiative (ESSI).
Why is Islamabad leaning towards Germany?
While Italy's CAMM-ER system, developed by MBDA, is also under consideration by Pakistan, it appears to fall short in key operational parameters when compared to the IRIS-T.
The CAMM-ER has a maximum range of 45 km and is designed to engage aircraft and cruise missiles at altitudes up to 20 km.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
It uses a 'fire-and-forget' guidance system with a two-way datalink for mid-course correction, making it robust against electronic jamming. According to Resonant News, Its vertical launch capability reduces thermal signatures, offering a level of survivability.
However, the CAMM-ER's interception capabilities may be insufficient against the BrahMos's supersonic speed and sea-skimming trajectory.
While more affordable and compatible with Nato-standard systems, the Italian system has not undergone the same level of combat testing as the IRIS-T, particularly against missiles sharing the BrahMos' performance envelope.
Moreover, geopolitical alignment plays a role. Italy's close ties with Nato and a stronger relationship with India could complicate any direct sale of CAMM-ER systems to Pakistan.
In contrast, Germany's strategic balancing and economic focus are seen as more conducive to defence dealings with Islamabad. There are also reports that Pakistan might explore options to locally produce or assemble the IRIS-T system, which could alleviate stockpile concerns and potentially lower long-term costs.
Why does Pakistan think it is a necessary move?
For Pakistan, acquiring a robust, modular, and combat-proven system like the IRIS-T is not just about replacing obsolete defences — it's about restoring deterrence in the face of India's growing missile capabilities.
India's deployment of the BrahMos Extended-Range Land Attack Cruise Missile (BrahMos-ER LACM) has significantly altered the regional power dynamic. With a range now extended to 450 km and beyond, and with pinpoint accuracy of under one metre, the BrahMos has emerged as a cornerstone of India's offensive capability.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Indian Army's Brahmos missile system showcased at New Delhi, India. File Image/AFP
Pakistan's military establishment sees the IRIS-T SLM as one of the few systems capable of responding to this threat. Its infrared seeker and thrust-vector control allow for agile interceptions of fast, evasive threats.
Its multi-layered variants (SLS, SLM, SLX) offer integration options with Pakistan's Chinese and Western air defence components, giving Islamabad the flexibility it seeks.
However, acquisition comes with both strategic and financial risks. Each system would only cover a limited area, necessitating multiple deployments to safeguard key military and civilian infrastructure.
Even if deployed, the IRIS-T's 40 km range would still require supplementary systems — such as the longer-range HQ-9B — to offer a more comprehensive shield.
And yet, in the current post-Sindoor landscape, it appears that Pakistan is prioritising its defence over its growing economic crisis.
Also Watch:
With inputs from agencies

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How much damage US strikes did on Iran's nuclear facilities: Satellite pics
How much damage US strikes did on Iran's nuclear facilities: Satellite pics

Business Standard

time24 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

How much damage US strikes did on Iran's nuclear facilities: Satellite pics

The United States carried out coordinated strikes on three of Iran's most significant nuclear facilities: Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan on June 22. The operation, involving B-2 stealth bombers, submarine-launched cruise missiles and precision-guided munitions, was one of the most complex missions in recent US military history. The Pentagon described the 25-minute window of strikes, executed between 2.10 am and 2.35 am Iran time, as the largest B-2 combat operation ever conducted. President Donald Trump hailed the mission as 'spectacularly successful', claiming the sites were 'totally obliterated.' Iranian officials disputed this, saying key facilities had been evacuated in advance and that nuclear activities would resume without interruption. Fordow: Deep-strike hits on hardened facility The Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant, buried deep within a mountain near Qom, was hit by at least 14 GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators, a 30,000lb 'bunker busters' designed for hardened underground targets. The strike was part of 'Operation Midnight Hammer' and executed by B-2 bombers flying under radio silence. Satellite imagery reviewed by Al Jazeera's Sanad unit shows multiple impact craters and damage to nearby air defence systems. Fordow had previously housed centrifuges capable of enriching uranium to weapons-grade levels. Iran maintains the facility was dedicated to peaceful research and had been under International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) supervision until recently. Natanz: Disabling support systems At Natanz, Iran's largest enrichment complex, the US targeted above-ground infrastructure, including power distribution systems and support facilities. The site had already suffered damage in an Israeli airstrike on June 15. Although the fortified underground cascade hall appears intact, disruption to power systems may have impaired centrifuge operations. The IAEA had previously confirmed enrichment at Natanz had reached 60 per cent purity, just short of the 90 per cent threshold for weapons-grade material. Isfahan: Precision cruise missile barrage Over two dozen Tomahawk cruise missiles, launched from a US Navy submarine, struck the Isfahan Nuclear Technology Centre. This was the third strike on the site since Israeli raids began on June 13. While no enrichment occurs at Isfahan, the facility plays a critical role in uranium conversion and nuclear research. Iranian authorities reported no radiation leaks, a claim echoed by the IAEA, which confirmed it had detected no contamination and continued to monitor all three sites. Satellite image shows an overview of Isfahan Nuclear Technology Center, before (left) and after (right) it was hit by US airstrikes, in Isfahan, Iran, June 22, 2025. | Photo: Reuters Satellite image shows a close up of a crater over the underground facility of Natanz Enrichment Facility, after it was hit by US airstrikes, near Natanz, Iran, June 22, 2025. | Photo: Reuters How the strikes unfolded According to US military sources cited by Al Jazeera, the mission began shortly after midnight with seven B-2 bombers supported by over 125 aircraft, including fighters, tankers and surveillance planes. A decoy bomber group flew westward over the Pacific to divert Iranian defences, while the main strike team approached from the east under radio silence. Cruise missile launches on Isfahan began at 5 pm (EST), followed by B-2 strikes on Fordow and Natanz by 6.40 pm. US forces in the region were placed on high alert ahead of the operation amid fears of Iranian retaliation. The B-2 stealth bomber has an intercontinental range that can fly at high subsonic speed and can carry a maximum payload of 40,000 pounds (18,144 kilograms) Strategic context: Delay, not destruction The US strikes expand on Israel's multi-day offensive targeting Iran's nuclear programme. While the damage appears significant, military analysts suggest the operation is likely to delay rather than dismantle Iran's nuclear capabilities. In the attack, Iran threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz, a key oil transit chokepoint. Although such a move requires approval from the Supreme National Security Council, this is the first time Iran has moved to close the strait during a conflict. Tehran insists its nuclear activities are peaceful, citing energy and medical research as primary goals. However, uranium enrichment resumed following the US withdrawal from the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) has drawn international concern. As of May, the IAEA estimated Iran held around 400kg of uranium enriched to 60 per cent.

9 killed, over a dozen injured in Russian missile attacks on Ukraine
9 killed, over a dozen injured in Russian missile attacks on Ukraine

Business Standard

time27 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

9 killed, over a dozen injured in Russian missile attacks on Ukraine

A Russian drone and missile attack on Ukraine's capital overnight killed at least nine people and injured others, according to local officials, as rescue workers and firefighters sought to remove people they believed trapped under debris in a partially collapsed apartment building. Elsewhere in Ukraine, a Russian short-range drone attack killed two people and wounded 10 more in the Chernihiv region late Sunday night, authorities said. According to the regional administration head, Viacheslav Chaus, three children were among the wounded. Another person was killed and eight wounded overnight in the city of Bila Tserkva, around 85 kilometers (53 miles) southwest of the capital. The strikes came nearly a week after a combined Russian attack on Ukraine last Tuesday killed 28 people in Kyiv, 23 of them in a residential building that collapsed after sustaining a direct hit by a missile. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy called that attack one of the biggest bombardments of the war, now in its fourth year. In the early hours of Monday, drones and missiles hit residential areas, hospitals and sports infrastructure in numerous districts across Kyiv, emergency services said, with the most severe damage occurring in the Shevchenkivskyi district, where one section of a five-story apartment building collapsed. Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko said six people were confirmed dead in the Shevchenkivskyi district. Ten others, including a pregnant woman, were rescued from a nearby high-rise that also sustained heavy damage in the blast. Dozens of vehicles, some burned out and others mangled by flying debris from the blast, formed a snarl in the courtyard in front of the building, which had collapsed down to the second floor. Onlookers, some wrapped in blankets, watched tearfully as the cleanup operation took place. Dozens of volunteers worked to remove broken glass, downed tree branches and other debris. Klitschko told reporters from the scene that we very much hope that the death toll will not increase, but that rescue workers were still searching the collapsed building for further casualties. Russia fired a total of 352 exploding drones and decoys overnight, Ukraine's air force said. Russia also launched 11 ballistic missiles and five cruise missiles. Air defences intercepted or jammed 339 drones and 15 missiles before they could reach their targets, the statement said. Meanwhile, Russia's Defence Ministry said its air defences shot down 23 Ukrainian drones overnight into Monday.

We are responsible for ‘Network …' message on Donald Trump's Truth Social platform, claim Iranian-aligned hackers
We are responsible for ‘Network …' message on Donald Trump's Truth Social platform, claim Iranian-aligned hackers

Time of India

time27 minutes ago

  • Time of India

We are responsible for ‘Network …' message on Donald Trump's Truth Social platform, claim Iranian-aligned hackers

AI-generated image (Representative purpose only) Truth Social suffered a brief outage last week after President Donald Trump announced a US attack on Iranian nuclear facilities. Days later, a group of hackers aligned with Iran - 313 Team has claimed responsibility for the social media platform's malfunction. The group claims that it carried out a Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attack that briefly took down the platform on Saturday (June 21) night. The non-profit Center for Internet Security (CIS) and several social media watchdogs confirmed the claim, says a report by Mediaite. Truth Social outage after Trump's post Trump posted around 7.46 pm ET that the United States had entered Israel's war against Iran stating that the US had waged a 'very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan.' Some screenshots suggest API congestion as the cause of the disruption. Truth Social became inaccessible shortly after 8 p.m. ET (5:30am IST), soon after Trump used the platform to announce the US strikes on Iran. Users saw error messages while accessing the platform: 'Network failed… Please try again.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Flein: GEERS sucht 700 Testhörer für Hörgeräte ohne Zuzahlung GEERS Undo Who is 313 Team The '313 Team' is said to be part of a wider network of pro-Russian and pro-Palestinian hacktivists known for targeting public infrastructure, government websites, and tech firms in Israel and elsewhere. This cyberattack claim comes amid growing concerns about digital retaliation from Iran. Last week, the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a bulletin warning that Iranian-linked hackers may look to target American networks in response to US support for Israeli airstrikes. 'Iranian government-affiliated cyber actors will probably prioritize retaliatory attacks against Israeli targets in the short term but may target U.S. networks due to their perception of U.S. support for Israeli strikes,' the DHS said. 6 Awesome New Features Coming in Android 16!

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store