Ultron's role revealed in Marvel Rivals Season 2.5: Leaked ability breakdown
Ultron's role and abilities in Marvel Rivals Season 2.5 (Image via NetEase Games)
In the latest
Marvel Rivals Art Vision Vol. 1
video, NetEase Games has subtly confirmed the role of the upcoming new hero,
Ultron
. Ultron was earlier confirmed to be the new hero coming in Marvel Rivals Season 2.5, with the Season 2 launch trailer highlighting him alongside Emma Frost.
Ultron is the main villain in the current Marvel Rivals Season 2 lore. The AI robot has been featured extensively in the comics and the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Being a rather well-known Marvel character, fans have anticipated him being a playable character ever since the game's launch. Leaks dating back to December 2024 had already suggested Ultron's abilities and role, but there was no official confirmation up until now.
This article will brief you on the latest news on Ultron's role and abilities, and what to expect in Marvel Rivals Season 2.5.
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Your Finger Shape Says a Lot About Your Personality, Read Now
Tips and Tricks
Undo
Marvel Rivals Art Vision video confirms Ultron's role
Art Vision video in Marvel Rivals Season 2.5 (Image via NetEase Games)
NetEase Games has recently released the
Art Vision Vol.1 // The Genesis of Style: GUI & Video | Marvel Rivals
video, enlightening the community on the process behind the unique art style and animations of the game. In the UI design section of the video, they showed the updated Season 2.5 hero select screen, where Ultron was seen among the Strategists in Marvel Rivals. This confirms that Ultron will be the new strategist in Marvel Rivals Season 2.5.
Marvel Rivals Ultron abilities
Marvel Rivals data miner X0XLEAK had earlier revealed the full set of Ultron's abilities. While none of these have been officially confirmed, the leaked sources have proven to be rather accurate, giving the players an idea of what to expect. Having said that, let's take a look at all the leaked Ultron abilities in Marvel Rivals.
Ability Name
Key Input
Description
Encephalo Ray
Left Click
Unleashes a burning energy beam to damage enemies.
Rage of Ultron
Q (Ultimate)
Summons Ultron Drones that fire Encephalo Rays, damaging enemies or healing allies.
Dynamic Flight
LShift
Dashes quickly in the movement direction and enters free-flight mode.
Imperative: Patch
E
Summons a giant healing drone that follows a chosen ally, healing in an area with bonus healing for that ally.
Imperative: Firewall
Right Click
Deploys drones that grant bonus Health to nearby allies, especially boosting the Imperative: Patch target.
Algorithm Correction
Passive (Hold Space)
Hold Space while airborne to fall slowly, allowing better control during flight.
Also read:
Elixir leaked as the new hero in Marvel Rivals Season 3 - Full ability breakdown
Jean Grey (Phoenix) and Elixir teased for Marvel Rivals Season 3 - Leaks, abilities, voicelines, and more
Get the latest
IPL 2025
updates on
Times of India
, including
match schedules
,
team squads
,
points table
and
IPL live score
for
CSK
,
MI
,
RCB
,
KKR
,
SRH
,
LSG
,
DC
,
GT
,
PBKS
, and
RR
. Don't miss the list of players in the race for
IPL Orange Cap
and
IPL Purple cap
.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
US strikes Iran: How Tom Cruise's Top Gun: Maverick eerily predicted Donald Trump's Operation Midnight Hammer
When Top Gun: Maverick stormed theatres in 2022, it wasn't just a sequel—it was a resurrection. It defied every law of modern franchise gravity. No multiverse. No Marvel. No brooding they-them anti-hero. Just the return of a square-jawed cis-American icon doing exactly what he did 36 years ago—only faster, louder, and with a bigger sonic boom, looking like the folks at Scientology had finally found the Fountain of Youth. What made it work? First, it respected the original. No irony. No winks. No smug Gen Z subtext. Tom Cruise didn't hand over the keys—he repossessed the plane, flew it through a canyon at Mach 1.6, and landed it on an aircraft carrier with his grin cryogenically preserved in confidence. Kenny Loggins was still on standby. The soundtrack still slapped. The opening still had that slow-mo montage of jets and muscle, set to a synth-and-snare build-up so patriotic it practically handed you a Coors Light and called you "sir. " There was shirtless beach football. Beer without guilt. Bros being bros in the golden light of American masculinity. Maverick didn't just bring back a movie—it brought back a memory. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Eat 1 Teaspoon Every Night, See What Happens A Week Later [Video] getfittoday Undo Of the good old days, before drone warfare, before greyzone psyops, before movies needed three disclaimers and a trigger warning. A time when war was sexy, the rules were simple, and the only labels that mattered were 'friendly' and 'bogey on your six.' Second, it was real. Practical stunts. Real G-forces. No Marvel mush or green-screen gibberish. You felt every dive, every roll, every breath in a cockpit that looked more like a coffin. In an age of CGI fatigue, Maverick reminded viewers what cinema used to feel like—sweaty palms and pounding heartbeats, set to the scream of a jet engine. But above all, Top Gun: Maverick gave audiences something even rarer: sincerity. It wasn't cynical. It wasn't ashamed of heroism. It put on aviators, turned up the volume, and said: "Let's go." Top Gun Maverick Beach Scene 4K IMAX And go it did—straight into the heart of America's foreign policy theatre. Because what looked like a nostalgia-fuelled testosterone trip in 2022 now feels like something far more uncanny in 2025. As President Donald Trump orders a massive stealth strike on Iran's Fordow nuclear facility, Maverick doesn't look like a movie anymore. It looks like a propehcy. A daring pre-emptive strike. An underground uranium plant. A ticking clock. A threat not to America, but to unnamed "allies in the region." What once felt like high-octane fantasy is now playing out, almost scene for scene, in the skies above the Middle East. And Tom Cruise? He wasn't just making a sequel. He was filming the trailer for Trump's next war. The Anti-Woke Hit That Soared When Maverick dropped, it didn't just break box-office records—it broke Hollywood's progressive chokehold on patriotism. No identity politics. No postmodern angst. No war guilt disguised as character development. Just raw American adrenaline, jet-fuelled storytelling, and Tom Cruise doing what Tom Cruise does best—defying gravity and cultural trends alike. Even Jon Hamm showed up, having shed the whiskey-soaked aura of Don Draper to play a tight-laced, by-the-book commander who looked like he personally banned pronouns from the base. You could almost smell the Aqua Velva. The cast was tailor-made for culture-war glory. Miles Teller stepped in as Rooster—Goose's mustachioed legacy—looking like he belonged on a recruitment poster for bros who bench for liberty. Monica Barbaro played Phoenix, the token female pilot who neither lectured nor got lectured—just flew like hell and left feminism on mute. Glen Powell's Hangman was Iceman 2.0: arrogant, tanned, and ready to drop a snide remark along with his payload. Jennifer Connelly was there too, ageless and cool, running a bar where no one talks politics. No lectures. No apologies. Just call signs, dogfights, and sweat-drenched montages scored to the sound of American confidence. Reagan Redux: Top Gun Was Always Propaganda Top Gun (1986) Official Trailer - Tom Cruise Movie The 1986 Top Gun wasn't just a movie—it was Cold War propaganda with better hair. The Pentagon handed over carriers, jets, and script suggestions. Hollywood returned the favour by air-dropping a generation of recruits into Navy flight school. It was recruitment wrapped in romance and set to guitar riffs. Maverick followed the same flight path. The military offered full support. The Navy looked like gods. But this time, there was a twist: the enemy was unnamed. No Soviet MiGs. No al-Qaeda. Just a faceless rogue nation with a uranium facility in the mountains. The target? An underground enrichment site. The mission? Destroy it before it becomes operational. The threat? Not to America—but to our unnamed "allies in the region." Nobody said Iran. Nobody said Israel. And yet everybody knew. That narrative sleight of hand—so brazen in its vagueness—would soon feel less like creative license and more like strategic foreshadowing. Scene for Scene: Trump's Iran Strike Mirrors the Film In June 2025, President Trump—new term, same instincts—ordered a real-world operation that bore eerie resemblance to Maverick. Seven B-2 bombers took off from the US under the cloak of midnight. The mission: Operation Midnight Hammer. The target: Iran's Fordow uranium enrichment facility, buried in the mountains near Qom. A site designed to withstand everything short of Armageddon. A site built for this very moment. In Maverick, the enemy is never named, but the target is clear: a uranium plant in a GPS-jammed valley, surrounded by surface-to-air missiles and fifth-gen fighters. In real life, Fordow sits in a mountainous fortress, shielded by SAM batteries, jamming tech, and hardened bunkers. In the film: three weeks become ten days become go-time. In reality: intel warned that Iran's enrichment programme was just days from a critical threshold. And in both cases, the justification was identical: not America-first, but ally-defence. In Maverick, it's the vague protection of "our friends in the region." In 2025, Trump didn't even bother with euphemism—Israel was the subtext and subtext became text. It wasn't a shot-for-shot remake. But it was close enough to make even Cruise raise an eyebrow behind his aviators. Whose War Is It Anyway? What made Maverick eerie in hindsight was how little it bothered to justify the mission. No American hostages. No nukes pointed at New York. Just an unspoken understanding that someone else's red line was worth flying into. And that's what the Right is now debating. Why should American pilots risk their lives for foreign bunkers? Why should billion-dollar aircraft be dispatched to send messages on behalf of another democracy? Maverick doesn't ask "why." It only asks: "Can it be done?" That question, in 2025, is no longer rhetorical. The Real Finale: A Flag, a Flyby… and a Fade to Black Maverick ends like every great American military fantasy: mission accomplished, uranium plant obliterated, and Tom Cruise strutting across the tarmac with his abs and aircraft intact. The jets land. The music swells. The flag flutters in cinematic slow motion. It could have been lifted straight from the closing scene of Operation Midnight Hammer. But imagine for a second that Maverick didn't make it. That he was shot down in that snowy canyon, dying for a target that never threatened his home, buried in a country he couldn't name, on a mission no one would claim. Would the audience still cheer? Would they even remember who the war was for? This is the question now circling Washington like an unarmed drone—silent, discomfiting, and impossible to shoot down. When the justification for war is wrapped in vagueness, when the enemy is unnamed, and when "defending our allies" becomes the only plotline—how long before audiences, and voters, stop watching the show? After all, wasn't this the very premise Trump once campaigned against? That MAGA would not behave like Bush-era neocons salivating for another war? That America's sons and daughters would no longer be deployed as global hall monitors in faraway deserts? Only last month in Saudi Arabia, Trump, trying to draw a red line between himself and Dubya, declared: 'In the end, the so-called nation builders wrecked far more nations than they built. ' As David Remnick pointed out in a recent piece in New Yorker , Trump once echoed Bannon and Tucker Carlson when he said: 'In recent years, far too many American Presidents have been afflicted with the notion that it's our job to look into the souls of foreign leaders and use U.S. policy to dispense justice for their sins.' Top Gun: Maverick (2022) Dagger Attack Scene And yet, here we are—seven stealth bombers later. A highly classified mission. A decoy formation. A multi-theatre deployment. A strike not to defend American cities, but to send a message on behalf of regional allies. It may have looked like surgical precision from the skies—but on the ground, it's a policy contradiction wrapped in cinematic déjà vu. Even the bill Trump signed to fund the strike—what he called a 'big, beautiful defence package'—flies in the face of MAGA's small-government gospel. This wasn't lean governance. It was big-budget interventionism, scored by swelling violins and paid for with a trillion-dollar cheque. It ignited a backlash from his base—and a very public falling out with Elon Musk, who accused Trump of abandoning fiscal discipline for Pentagon theatrics. Because it didn't start with a movie. It started with a massacre. On October 7, 2023, Hamas fighters paraglided into southern Israel, launching the deadliest attack in the country's history. That single morning shattered illusions across the region. It led to a brutal war in Gaza. It provoked the Houthis to enter the fray. It drew Hezbollah closer to the edge. And it hardened Israel's posture, setting off a chain reaction that eventually led the US to launch Operation Midnight Hammer. From beach football to bunker busters, from afterburners to actual airstrikes—Top Gun began as propaganda. Maverick upgraded it into spectacle. And Trump's Operation Midnight Hammer may be the moment the reel became real. The movie always had the jets. Reality just pressed play. And if that doesn't make you pause—even if you're wearing aviators—just remember: Not even Tom Cruise can outrun a B-2 bomber. Though, to be fair, he'd probably try. On foot. While dangling off a missile. Smiling. As for the true MAGA believers—those who rallied behind promises of no more endless wars and a return to fiscal sanity—they're left asking the same question Maverick once did: Whose mission was this anyway?
Time of India
9 hours ago
- Time of India
Iran-US War Begins? Araghchi SCREAMS 'Retaliation' As Trump Bombs Iran; 'Criminal Behavior Will...'
Govinda's Dashing New Look Sparks Internet Frenzy | Fans Beg for Bollywood Comeback Bollywood icon Govinda is back in the spotlight with a stylish new look that has fans buzzing. The 61-year-old actor, known for hits like Hero No.1 and Coolie No.1, shared a suave Instagram video flaunting a sleek moustache and oversized shades. The post instantly went viral, with fans urging the superstar to return to the big screen. Is this fresh avatar a teaser for a new project? Watch now to see the look that's got everyone talking. 4.5K views | 20 hours ago
Time of India
10 hours ago
- Time of India
Karisma Kapoor's love story: Once engaged to Abhishek Bachchan, later married Sunjay Kapur as his second wife
Karisma Kapoor is known for her high-end legacy, being born into the Kapoor family, but her journey has been anything but a fairy tale. Karisma became the first female member of her family to pursue acting. She made her debut at just 17 with 'Prem Qaidi'. Raised by her mother – former actress Babita – Karisma's early life took a turn after her parents' separation. Babita brought up Karisma and her younger sister Kareena almost single-handedly, facing financial hardships that included selling personal assets to support her daughters' ambitions. Rising Stardom and Critical Acclaim Karisma's rise in Bollywood was meteoric. With iconic roles in Dil To Pagal Hai, Biwi No. 1, Fiza, and Raja Hindustani, she not only ruled the box office but also earned critical acclaim. Heartbreaks and Hurdles in Her Personal Life Despite her professional success, Karisma's personal life was riddled with challenges. Her early romantic involvement with actor Ajay Devgn ended on a bitter note amid rumours of a love triangle. Karisma Kapoor's ex-husband Sunjay Kapur and wife Priya Sachdev blessed with a baby boy Her most high-profile relationship was with Abhishek Bachchan , whom she dated for several years. Their engagement, announced at Amitabh Bachchan 's 60th birthday celebration in 2002, was called off just months later, with no official explanation from either family. Speculation was rife about family pressures, career differences, and financial disagreements. There were reports of demands from Karisma's family that reportedly did not sit well with the Bachchans. A Marriage That Unravelled In 2003, Karisma married Delhi-based businessman Sanjay Kapur in a grand ceremony but got divorced seven years later. They officially ended their marriage in 2016 after welcoming two children. Karisma returned to Mumbai with her kids after the divorce and chose to raise them independently. Sunjay was earlier married to Nandita Mahtani in 1999. The couple separated in 2000. Life After Stardom Karisma took a break from the industry and decided to focus on motherhood and selective projects. Though she found companionship again with businessman Sandeep Toshniwal, reports suggested that the relationship ended on mutual terms. Karisma chose to prioritise her children and personal space over remarrying. Sunjay Kapur's Demise Karisma's ex-husband, Sunjay Kapur, left the family heartbroken with his untimely demise on June 12, 2025. Karisma's work front On the work front, Karisma was last seen in 'Murder Mubarak' last year.
