India's granaries overflow as rice stocks hit record, wheat surges
By Rajendra Jadhav
MUMBAI (Reuters) -India's rice stocks in government warehouses rose 18% from a year ago to a record high for the start of June, while wheat stocks have hit their highest level in four years on higher procurement from farmers, official data showed on Wednesday.
Record rice stocks will help the world's biggest exporter increase shipments, while an improvement in wheat inventories will help the federal government tame any price spikes later this year by increasing open market sales.
State reserves of rice, including unmilled paddy, totalled a record 59.5 million metric tons as of June 1, far exceeding the government's target of 13.5 million tons for July 1.
Wheat stocks stood at 36.9 million tons on June 1, well above the government's target of 27.6 million tons, the data showed.
"Rice stocks have piled up way too much. The government really needs to bring them down before the next buying season kicks off in October," said a New Delhi-based dealer at a global trading firm.
India, which accounts for around 40% of global rice exports, removed the last of its export curbs on the grain in March 2025, with the initial restrictions having been imposed in 2022.
Wheat stocks have risen to a comfortable position mainly because of higher procurement, which will help New Delhi sell more wheat to bulk consumers during the lean supply season, said a Mumbai-based dealer.
The government has so far brought 30 million tons of wheat from farmers, the most in four years, according to data compiled by Food Corporation of India (FCI).
Disappointing harvests in the past three years and lower purchases by the FCI had pushed up prices of the staple grain and raised expectations that India may be forced to import wheat for the first time in seven years.
But the buildup in stocks this year means the country should be able to meet domestic demand without imports.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
42 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Popular HomeGoods rival shuttering dozens of locations
Retail businesses are shutting down at a rate so alarmingly fast in 2025, you may feel like you could blink and realize another has vanished. Perhaps the saddest story of a brand that called it quits in 2025 so far is Joann, a craft and fabric store beloved by its loyal customers. Joann was founded in 1943, so after 82 years of business, it was a shame to watch it close its doors. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Another chain that was incredibly strange to see go was Party City. After 40 years in business, the retailer announced in December 2024 that it would file for bankruptcy and cease operations. Related: Major retailer scores huge benefit from Joann bankruptcy At Home is the most recent major retail chain to file for bankruptcy, announcing it would close 26 underperforming stores by September 30. However, the business hasn't winked out of existence yet, as it's just entered into a Restructuring Support Agreement (RSA) with lenders holding more than 95% of its debt to eliminate the nearly $2 billion in funded debt and provide financing of $200 million that aims to support the retailer through its restructuring process. Now another longtime home goods store is making drastic moves to keep itself afloat in a challenging economic climate. Kirkland's (KIRK) , a Tennessee-based home good retailer that was founded in 1966 by Carl Kirkland and Robert Kirkland, has announced it will close at least two dozen of its 313 store locations. Kirkland's has not yet confirmed which locations will close. TheStreet has reached out to request more information. The closings are part of a rebranding process Kirkland's confirmed on June 17, where the company says it will change its name to The Brand House Collective. This move comes after Beyond Inc., parent company of both Bed, Bath & Beyond and Overstock, acquired Kirkland's IP in a $5 million acquisition. Related: IKEA suddenly closing more stores amid concerning customer trend While store closings typically sound like a bad thing, in this case they seem to be more of a strategic move in step with the company's other brands. Beyond plans to open the first of six Bed, Bath & Beyond Home stores in August 2025, with the first being in Brentwood, Tennessee. Some existing Kirkland stores will also be converted into Bed, Bath & Beyond Home stores, although the specific locations were not named. Kirkland's name will formally change after shareholder approval during its next annual meeting in July, which will also change its ticker from KIRK to TBHC. As consumers navigate an uncertain climate with the threat of tariffs looming, many have pulled back on nonessential purchases this year across many sectors, from food to clothing. Retail sales fell sharply in May, with sales at retail stores and restaurants dropping 0.9%, the Commerce Department reported. However, a few retailers are still seeing shoppers come their way. One is discount home retailer HomeGoods, which reported during its Q1 earnings call in May that comparable sales were up 4% year over year. "Bucking a trend in the home industry now is our home business, especially HomeGoods. We're quite proud the way they're beginning Q2 as well," TJX CEO Ernie Herrman told investors during the call. Related: Beloved local Mexican chain closes locations without warning The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Entrepreneur
4 hours ago
- Entrepreneur
Guardians Of Digital Trust
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. You're reading Entrepreneur India, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media. As India's digital penetration deepens across Tier I to Tier III cities, the digital economy is thriving, but so are digital frauds. According to the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) annual report, digital payment fraud surged more than fivefold to INR 14.57 billion (USD 175 million) in the fiscal year ending March 2024. KYC (Know Your Customer) scams are on the rise, with cases like a 73-year-old Mumbai woman losing INR 2 lakh and an RTO clerk duped of INR 4.35 lakh, exposing the growing vulnerabilities in the system. Amidst this landscape, IDfy is stepping up to combat fraud with Artificial Intelligence (AI) solutions. "We power about 60 per cent of all video KYCs in India," says Ashok Hariharan, Co-founder and CEO of IDfy. The company provides end-to-end verification services for banks, insurance providers, credit card issuers, and online merchants from employee onboarding to authenticating transactions. Yet, as Ashok points out, fraudsters are constantly evolving. "Fraudsters are always finding holes in the lock one area, they'll find a backdoor." Phishing, digital arrest scams, and mule accounts have proliferated, exploiting weaknesses in systems that rely heavily on physical KYC or less sophisticated technologies. "They target cooperative banks with weaker systems, often colluding with branch managers to bypass manual verification," Ashok adds. AI, however, is proving to be a formidable defense. "Deepfake detection, device mimicry, and intrusion attacks – we can catch all of this today," Ashok explains. By using AI models that analyse anomalies, IDfy can flag suspicious transactions such as a low-income applicant seeking a high-value loan. "A person living in Dharavi applying for a INR 10 crore loan that's anomalous," he highlights. IDfy's platform operates on four fundamental questions: Does the individual exist? Is the person the one transacting? Have they committed fraud before? Are they likely to commit fraud in the future? With AI, the company matches PAN card selfies to live photos, preventing fraudsters from impersonating others. It also cross-references court records and prior transactions to strengthen fraud detection. The need for such rigorous checks is clear. "In a test with cab aggregator platforms, seven per cent of vehicles we flagged were linked to drivers with criminal records or vehicles involved in hit-and-run cases," Ashok reveals.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘I just want finality': GOP greets newest TikTok extension with resignation
President Donald Trump's latest move to keep TikTok alive is yet again frustrating congressional Republicans, many of whom object to China's continued involvement in the popular app but just want to be done with the whole drama. 'Not my favorite thing,' Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), along-time proponent of the ban, deadpanned, when asked about the president's plan to issue another extension. He spoke a day before the White House confirmed Trump signed a 90-day suspension of enforcement of the law requiring TikTok to divest from ByteDance, its China-based parent company, throwing another lifeline to the short-form video app. By Friday, some House lawmakers registered a note of resigned irritation. The extension — Trump's third since the law went into effect on Jan. 19 — is a unilateral decision not envisioned in the bipartisan law passed by Congress and upheld last year by the Supreme Court. Rep. Darin LaHood (R-Ill.), a member of the House Intelligence and China committees, told POLITICO. 'The national security concerns and vulnerabilities are still there, and they have not gone away. I would argue they've almost become more enhanced in many ways." But Trump's extension of the TikTok law largely boxed out Republicans in both chambers who have shown little inclination — beyond stern words — to prevent him from making these postponements almost routine. Many GOP lawmakers saw themselves as granting the president space to cut a promised deal while the White House deals with urgent priorities, like trade negotiations and the Israel-Iran conflict. 'In light of everything going on, I think he did the right thing,' Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), a China hawk who voted for the ban, told POLITICO of Trump. 'I have concerns about all kinds of things — that [the extension] is on the list — but it's not at the top of the list.' Though Trump has promised his TikTok negotiations areclosely tied to trade talks with China, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent testified last week to a Senate panel that TikTok's sale wasnot currently a part of the negotiations with China, raising a further potential obstacle to Trump inking a deal in the near future. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), a close ally of the president and longtime national-security hawk said earlier in the week: 'The sooner we get that issue solved, the better,' without offering any ideas for further enforcement. 'I just want finality,' Senate Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) told POLITICO. 'I want some certainty and just know that the Congress isn't being played when we make a decision [that the app] be sold.' Another member of the House China Committee, Rep. Zach Nunn (R-Iowa), told POLITICO, 'No more extensions. It's time to follow through.' Rep. Dan Newhouse (R-Wash.), also a member of the China panel, noted in a post on X Thursday the law only allows one extension of the compliance deadline, adding, 'I was proud to support the ban of TikTok and believe the law should be implemented as written.' With their comments, the lawmakers echoed House China Chair John Moolenaar (R-Mich.), who in early June called for the U.S. to 'let [TikTok] go dark' to bring China to the table to negotiate. He reiterated that stance on Friday. 'Delays only embolden the Chinese Communist Party,' Moolenaar said in a statement to POLITICO. 'I urge the administration to enforce the law as written and protect the American people from this growing national security threat." Still, observers say Republicans are not exercising their leverage to demand the White House enforce the law they helped write, for example by withholding funding or congressional oversight hearings. "I keep reading that Republicans are 'frustrated' and 'impatient' about their TikTok law being ignored, but they should stop complaining to reporters and take it up with Trump,' said Adam Kovacevich, founder and CEO of the pro-tech Chamber of Progress. Among the Republicans being undercut by the president is his own secretary of state. Marco Rubio — who as senator was one of the loudest critics of TikTok's ties to China, and a huge backer of the app's ban — has been conspicuously silent as Trump has repeatedly granted more time to strike a deal for its sale. 'You have to decide what's more important, our national security and the threat that it poses to our national security,' Rubio told POLITICO in March 2023, as Congress was considering a ban. 'You have to weigh that against what you might think the electoral consequences of it are. For me, it's an easy balancing act. I mean, there is no balance. I'm always going to be for our national security.' A spokesperson for Rubio at the State Department did not respond to a request for comment. Democrats — even those who support keeping TikTok online — say Trump's approach is the wrong one. 'These endless extensions are not only illegal, but they also put TikTok's fate in the hands of risk-averse corporate shareholders,' Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) told POLITICO in a statement. 'This is deeply unfair to TikTok's creators and users. I'm prepared to work towards a solution, but Trump isn't coming to the table.'
