Surge in death cap mushrooms in NSW and SA as scientists warn some deadly fungi look like supermarket varieties

New South Wales and South Australia residents have been warned to stay away from wild mushrooms after a surge in the detection of highly poisonous death caps, including in Sydney.
Amanita phalloides, commonly known as death cap mushrooms, have been found growing in Sydney, the southern highlands, southern NSW and the Adelaide hills after high rainfall, health officials say. . They warn that children are particularly at risk.
NSW Health did not disclose exact areas where the death caps had been found, so people would not seek them out.
The chief scientist at the Botanic Gardens of Sydney, Prof Brett Summerell, said some poisonous varieties could look 'just like a mushroom you'd buy from the supermarket', making them extremely dangerous to forage.
'They're usually associated with the roots of oak trees and exotics, as well as cooler areas,' he said. 'In Sydney we've found them in areas with established trees.'
It is estimated that half a death cap mushroom can kill an adult, and the species has caused 90% of the world's mushroom-related fatalities. Last year 23 people were hospitalised for the toxic effect of ingested mushrooms in NSW and the Australian Capital Territory, including two children under five.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
Amid coverage of the high-profile Victorian mushroom trial, Summerell said there had been a rise in people uploading sightings on websites like iNaturalist, where users identify plants and other living organisms.
'People are taking more notice of mushrooms,' he said. 'The notoriety helps to get people interested.'
Originating in Europe, death caps were first confirmed to be growing in Australia in the 1960s, initially in Canberra and then Melbourne in the 1970s. The species has spread to Asia, southern Africa and the Americas, probably on the roots of imported trees.
Wild mushrooms typically grow from late summer to early winter in wet and damp weather.
Summerell said as oak trees were generally propagated in Victoria, they could have been transported to NSW that way, or grown undetected.
'After the 2019/2020 fires, there's been year after year of intense rain, so there may have been a combination of good mushroom seasons and propagation,' he said.
The NSW Poisons Information Centre (PIC) said it had responded to 363 calls for exposure to wild mushrooms across NSW and the ACT in 2024, up 26% from 2023. In the year to 31 May 2025, there had been 190 calls related to wild mushroom exposure.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
Most cases involved symptoms of poisoning, the medical director of NSW PIC, Dr Darren Roberts said. More than half (196) of calls in 2024 related to children under five who had ingested mushrooms while playing outside in NSW and the ACT. The SA PIC took 100 mushroom-related calls last year, with 23 hospitalisations. Almost half of calls related to children under five.
Roberts said the volume of calls about young children was a 'concern'.
'Wild mushrooms can pop up overnight, so it is really important parents check any outdoor spaces where their child plays and remove wild mushrooms as they appear.'
Genevieve Adamo, a senior specialist at the NSW centre, said symptoms of mushroom poisoning included stomach cramps, vomiting and diarrhoea.
At least 10 deaths in Australia have been attributed to death caps, including a 98-year-old Melbourne woman who picked them from her garden in 2024 and three lunch guests in Leongatha, Victoria, in 2023.
Adamo said the onset of symptoms could occur up to 24 hours after ingestion, depending on the type and amount eaten. Early treatment was 'vital' to survival, she said.
'As young children have a tendency to put things in their mouths, they can be at risk,' she said. 'Watch your children … especially around large trees in parks or your garden at home where mushrooms may grow.'
If you worried that mushroom poisoning may have occurred, do not wait for symptoms to appear. Call the Poisons Information Centre immediately on 13 11 26

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Guardian

an hour ago

• The Guardian

Australia risks losing ‘war on nicotine' in same way as war on drugs as illegal tobacco sales explode

Australia is now waging a 'de facto war on nicotine' that is doomed to fail in the same way as previous prohibition-style policies, experts say, amid a growing debate about how to respond to an explosion in the illicit tobacco trade. As health experts warn against changes that would undermine decades of fighting to bring down smoking rates, James Martin, a criminology lecturer at Deakin University, and Edward Jegasothy, an epidemiologist at the University of Sydney's School of Public Health, have called for a major overhaul in how we tax tobacco and regulate vaping products. They argue that unaffordable legal cigarettes and an effective ban on retail e-cigarette sales are responsible for the explosion in black market trade for both products. 'Australia's current strategy may be creating more harm than it mitigates, mirroring many of the unintended consequences historically associated with drug prohibition,' Martin and Jegasothy wrote recently in Harm Reduction Journal. Plain packaging, health warnings, restrictions on how smokes are displayed, and education about the dangers of cigarettes have all helped lower smoking rates in recent decades. The gains were hard-fought, particularly against fierce opposition from the tobacco industry, and have garnered global praise. The treasurer, Jim Chalmers, and health minister, Mark Butler, have dismissed calls from the states to lower the tobacco excise, insisting that greater enforcement, rather than cheaper cigarettes, is the answer to squashing the illicit trade. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email But with Australian cigarettes the most expensive in the world and crime associated with illicit tobacco and vapes rising, Martin said that Australian health authorities should move towards a 'harm reduction' approach. Such an approach would include removing the tobacco excise for a period, and making vapes more available as a recognised smoking cessation tool, alongside other demand-focused policies such as more investment in education. 'Look at the war on drugs; there is something worse than the tobacco industry, and that's the black market,' Martin said. Between 2019 and 2023, Australia experienced its steepest drop in smoking rates in the past 30 years, with the share of adults smoking falling from 11.6% to 8.8%. Martin said it was no coincidence that these years were also when more people were using e-cigarettes. 'Vaping isn't risk-free, but we need to consider its risk vis-a-vis the risks of smoking,' he said. 'Here we have a harm reduction product that many smokers prefer.' Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion But the University of Sydney's Becky Freeman, one of the country's leading experts on tobacco control, said she has been frustrated by those calling for radical changes despite a lack of up-to-date and reliable data. 'We want to make sure the growth in the illicit trade isn't undermining tobacco control,' Freeman said. 'If we see any increases in smoking that would be very alarming. 'Freezing tobacco taxes at the moment makes sense – until we get enforcement sorted out there's no point in putting in extra taxes. But that's quite different from rolling it back.' Freeman said that limiting sales of nicotine vapes to pharmacies was 'not a big ask for a product that is highly addictive and dangerous'. 'They are not a consumer good,' she said. 'We made this mistake with tobacco products, why would we turn around and do the same thing with vapes?' Freeman said youth vaping rates in Australia were lower than in New Zealand, the UK and Canada, which allow the retail sale of e-cigarettes, and that new licensing requirements for tobacconists in New South Wales and Victoria were 'long overdue'. 'We have done an excellent job on demand reduction,' she said. 'We haven't controlled supply that well at all.'

The Guardian

11 hours ago

• The Guardian

Bulldogs forward Jamarra Ugle-Hagan opens up on mental health struggles and hitting ‘rock bottom'

The Western Bulldogs forward Jamarra Ugle-Hagan has opened up about his mental health struggles for the first time since taking a leave of absence, saying there were times he 'didn't want to leave the house'. The former No 1 draft pick is hoping to make his AFL comeback after recently visiting a health retreat in northern New South Wales. Ugle-Hagan has not played this season but rejoined Bulldogs teammates earlier this week for the first time since April. He revealed the extent of his struggles while speaking with former AFL players Mitch Robinson and Rhys Mathieson on their Rip Through It podcast, saying he had battled with suicidal thoughts. 'All the noises actually sent me to a rehab facility for my mental health,' Ugle-Hagan said. 'It got to a point where I had to give my car to a mate, so I couldn't drive – I just didn't trust myself driving. 'There were times when I would think about, to be honest with you, [it is] just not even worth living. 'I went through a struggle where I didn't want to leave the house. I hit rock bottom and found basement … suicidal thoughts would come pretty frequently.' Ugle-Hagan said he turned to alcohol at the height of his struggles before spending time at the health retreat. 'When you are down, you want to keep finding an upper,' Ugle-Hagan said. 'My upper was probably staying and hanging out with my mates and getting on the piss, and training with them as well. 'But it just had no end goal. I didn't have a game. I didn't have anything. 'My mental health wasn't in the right space, so I was struggling, and I found it really tough to even enjoy football.' Ugle-Hagan had been unable to regularly train with the Dogs since late last year. He took part in a light training session at Whitten Oval, but could still be weeks away from a possible comeback at VFL level. The AFL would need to approve Ugle-Hagan's comeback because he has been under the league's mental health plan since taking leave. But Ugle-Hagan, who is contracted to the Bulldogs until the end of next season, said he was focused on resuming his 67-game AFL career. The Bulldogs coach Luke Beveridge last week raised that same prospect. 'I want to play footy. I can't wait to play footy,' Ugle-Hagan said. Sign up to From the Pocket: AFL Weekly Jonathan Horn brings expert analysis on the week's biggest AFL stories after newsletter promotion 'I have been watching every single Bulldogs game. I have been supporting them. 'I will go to games at the end of the year. I genuinely want to play one more (game), I want to play some games. 'It's going to be grouse.' Ugle-Hagan maintained his commitment to the Bulldogs after trade speculation linked him with a possible trade to the Sydney Swans, given his time spent in NSW. He led the Bulldogs with a career-best 43 goals in 22 appearances last year, but has not featured at any level since the elimination final defeat to Hawthorn. Beveridge has also swatted away suggestions Ugle-Hagan could be on the move, declaring him 'our player'. 'I'm obviously still contracted with the Doggies and I still want to play for them and I want to win a flag,' Ugle-Hagan said. 'It's the Bulldogs until my contract runs out and then hopefully they offer me ­another one, but we will see how we go. 'They have given me opportunities since day dot, so why can't I get back?' – with Australian Associated Press In Australia, the crisis support service Lifeline is 13 11 14. In the US, the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline is 1-800-273-8255. In the UK, Samaritans can be contacted on 116 123. Other international suicide helplines can be found at

The Guardian

2 days ago

• The Guardian

Psychiatrist body holds firm on 25% pay bid but NSW Health says shortages are ‘more nuanced'

Closing submissions have been heard in the long-running dispute between psychiatrists – who are pushing for a 25% pay increase – and the New South Wales department of health, bringing to a close a landmark legal action brought by the psychiatrists, who argue psychiatric care in NSW is facing 'collapse' because of poor pay and conditions. Over two days this week, the Industrial Relations Commission court in Sydney heard closing submissions from lawyers, before the full bench retired to consider their decision. At the heart of the dispute is the proposition from the psychiatrists, represented by the Australian Salaried Medical Officers Federation (Asmof), that NSW staff specialist psychiatrists are significantly underpaid compared with their interstate counterparts. This, they argued, has led to an exodus of qualified psychiatrists to other jurisdictions or the private sector, leading to drastic and dangerous understaffing of psychiatric units and overwork and moral injury of staff. Asmof is arguing for a special levy to increase their pay by 25% to stem the flow of specialist doctors leaving the state's public system. In January, 206 psychiatrists in NSW threatened to resign; 62 have resigned, while others await the commission's decision. In closing submissions Thomas Dixon, the barrister for Asmof, pointed the commission to evidence it had heard about the 'proliferation' of mental health patient presentations in the public health system in recent years, at the same time there has been a reduction in the number of public psychiatric specialists. Dixon said that in the five years from July 2019, the number of staff psychiatric specialist vacancies in NSW increased from 35 full-time equivalent (FTE) roles to 131, a near 400% increase. 'Why is this occurring?' he asked the full bench. 'The reasons are many, including pay … stress, overwork and concern for patient outcomes. All of these factors were caused or exacerbated by staff shortages. 'Staff shortages are having a negative impact on the quality of patient care and integrity of the health system.' Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email According to Asmof, psychiatrists are paid significantly more in states other than NSW. Salaries were up to 51% higher in Western Australia, 44% higher in the Northern Territory, 38% higher in South Australia, 28% in Queensland and 25% in Tasmania. They are 2% higher in Victoria, but Asmof said that in Victoria, as most psychiatrists do not work full-time, they are paid an hourly rate which amounts to 31% more than in NSW. Dixon reminded the court of evidence it had heard that giving a pay rise to psychiatrists would actually end up costing the government less than its current policy, which was to fill gaps in staffing with locums or visiting medical officers (VMOs). Dixon said that a full-time staff psychiatrist cost the same as a VMO working at 0.6FTE. Ian Neil SC, the barrister representing the secretary of health and the NSW department of health, argued that there was no evidence that increasing the pay of psychiatrists with a special levy would have any impact on the attraction and retention of staff, except for stopping those who had threatened resignation pending the outcome of the arbitration, which he urged the court not to consider. 'Asmof loaded up the gun and pointed it at our heads,' Neil said of the mass resignation threat. 'That ought not to be taken into account.' Neil told the court that increasing the pay for psychiatrists by 25% in an interim 12-month order was problematic in that it meant the commission would have to keep that pay uplift in other award negotiations going forward, and that it would not address the issue that Asmof hoped it would remedy. 'Wage fixing is not an appropriate mechanism to address the problem of attraction and retention, of itself,' he said. 'The problem of workplace shortages … are a much more nuanced problem that requires a nuanced response.' Neil was pushed by the justices to give an account of what the health secretary contended the solution was for the problem of attraction and retention, if not a pay increase, to which he said: 'There is no simple answer to that question because it's not a simple issue. It would be a simple issue if funds were infinite, it would be a simple issue if the source of trained staff specialist psychiatrists were infinite, but none of those propositions are true or realistic.' The full bench has adjourned to consider its judgment.