Victoria's rising debt the constant in an uncertain world says Jeff Kennett

Don't miss out on the headlines from Opinion. Followed categories will be added to My News.
Last week I wrote here about the sea of debt that is engulfing Australia, and particularly Victoria. Someone close to me on reading the column said, 'Here you go again, banging on about debt'.
Of course I took on board her comments. However, many Australians under 40 seem to think government debt is just that – the government's debt, not theirs.
As you drive around the state, as you suffer damage or worse to your car because it has hit one of thousands of potholes, as CFA equipment reaches museum status, as mental health services are reduced and so the list goes on, it is for one reason only.
Debt in Victoria is grossly, indecently too high.
The government is paying $28m a day in interest on its debt – more than $1m every hour. Some of that money could have fixed our roads, provided new CFA trucks and maintained our mental health services.
Premier Jacinta Allan and Treasurer Jaclyn Symes are the new architects of Victoria's debt time bomb. Picture: David Crosling
As the world seems to become more conflicted, causing so much pain and uncertainty, we Australians can be forever grateful that we live so far away from the rest of the world.
That does not mean that we should be complacent. For tariffs, wars and the impact on the price of petrol, even perhaps its availability – not to mention the increase in energy prices from July 1, even the reliability of supply – could dramatically affect the comfort in which we live.
If you wanted to travel overseas, where would you go? Fewer countries now provide a risk-free environment.
As much as I would like to think that the leaders of the world would somehow meet to take the heat out of the international situation, it is unlikely to happen.
Here in Australia, particularly at a federal level, I would like to think there will be a much more heightened bipartisanship, to ensure we as a country can get through the next couple of years.
The speed of change is happening all around us. Australia is too small a population to not be affected by the international challenges.
We have heard much about the AUKUS treaty recently, but what is Plan B if energy prices become unaffordable to households and industry, or our access to petroleum is severely restricted by availability or price?
I can only suggest we prepare for the unexpected. If we do, we are better off. If my fears are not realised, we are still better off.
Originally published as Jeff Kennett: In increasingly uncertain world, you can always relay on Victoria's debt

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

AU Financial Review

26 minutes ago

• AU Financial Review

‘Scarce resources': AUKUS submarine sales at risk from Pentagon review

Washington | The Albanese government is being warned that a Pentagon review risks imperilling Australia's nuclear submarine ambitions if the US administration takes a hardline stance on the threat from China in the coming years. American national security experts familiar with the Trump administration, who spoke with The Australian Financial Review, viewed the most likely outcome of a 30-day review of the AUKUS pact would be a White House push for more investment from Canberra, either in its own defence hardware or for US shipbuilding facilities.

Herald Sun

an hour ago

• Herald Sun

Australian Army chief identifies problems with troop training in leaked letter

Don't miss out on the headlines from SA News. Followed categories will be added to My News. Australian Army recruits are 'not up to scratch' and lack the mental strength to take on criticism or be 'yelled at', a unit commander has claimed. The criticism comes as a leaked letter – written in December by Deputy Chief of the Army Major General Christopher Smith – identified a range of deficiencies in the force's troop training. Support units were particularly affected, with the letter claiming personnel lacked 'competency in foundational soldiering skills [including] navigation, digging pits, putting up wire, patrolling and air sentry duties'. The result: 'non-arms corp units are finding it necessary to expend valuable time teaching foundational skills rather than on collective training, inhibiting the value troops draw from exercises'. Major Smith's letter urged commanders to shift their priorities and focus on improving the physical, psychological and social conditioning (or group cohesion) of troops, representing a broader philosophical change in the army's approach to training – to ensure the army can meet the nation's 'changing situation'. A defence spokesman confirmed General Smith wrote the letter to all army commanders in December, saying it was 'intended to reflect on the force's posture changes and strategic circumstances as outlined in the 2024 National Defence Strategy'. But one commander, speaking under anonymity, suggests the letter speaks to his own deeper concerns about troop standards claiming some were simply 'not up to scratch'. They claim cadets lacked the mental fortitude expected of a soldier, being unable to take on criticism or withstand 'being yelled at'. The letter also flagged remote training as a problem, being at odds with the army's philosophical shift, stating in-person experiences were preferable as they built 'camaraderie, resilience, and readiness in ways that remote learning cannot replicate'. The letter emphasised on multiple occasions the need to change immediately, with General Smith explaining that he took 'the unusual step' of issuing the letter to all commanders rather than following a standard top-down process, 'because the requirement to adapt is urgent'. 'Army Headquarters is leading the development of doctrine for the essential physical, psychological, and social conditioning we seek to instil across the force,' the letter says. 'That work is important however, action cannot wait for top-down directives. 'In the interim, I encourage you to take immediate steps to reflect this change in the bias of our training to the extent you are able and to the extent resources and staffing allows. 'Time is the critical resource for conditioning our soldiers and officers. Exploit it fully.' Defence would not clarify why General Smith's letter reiterated a sense of urgency, but a spokeswoman said there have already been changes within the army over the last six months since the letter was sent – including an increase in the number of weeks troops spent going through basic training. Minister for Defence Richard Marles declined to comment. Originally published as Deputy Chief of the Army instructs commanders to fix 'deficiencies' with troop training as some units lack basic soldier skills

Sky News AU

2 hours ago

• Sky News AU

Opposition Leader Sussan Ley expresses support for US strikes on Iran, calls for solidarity against nuclear threat

Opposition Leader Sussan Ley has expressed support for US President Donald Trump's military strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. President Donald Trump confirmed on Sunday (Australian time) that US forces had hit three of Iran's principal nuclear sites, including Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan. While the Albanese government has called for 'de-escalation', the federal opposition has expressed strong support for the United States' military actions. 'The Coalition supports actions taken by the United States of America to ensure that the Iranian regime is stopped from acquiring nuclear weapons,' Ms Ley said. 'It was made clear by the International Atomic and Energy Agency on June 12 that Iran was in breach of its Non-Proliferation Treaty obligations.' Under the treaty, Iran was prohibited from attempting to acquire, manufacture, or otherwise obtain nuclear weapons. The Islamic Republic had since stockpiled more than 400 kilograms of 60 per cent enriched uranium at the Fordow facility. This was understood to be the last step in enrichment before Iran was able to produce a nuclear weapon. 'The world can never accept a nuclear-armed Iranian regime and today the United States military has taken proactive action to ensure that we never need to,' Ms Ley said. 'A nuclear armed Iranian regime would be a serious and direct threat to world peace and stability. The Coalition stands with the United States of America today. 'We can never allow the Iranian regime the capacity to enact its objectives of the destruction of the United States and Israel.' The Albanese government also issued a carefully worded statement on Sunday calling for 'de-escalation and diplomacy'. 'We have been clear that Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile programme has been a threat to international peace and security," a government spokesperson said. 'The security situation in the region is highly volatile. We continue to call for de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy.' The statement also warned Australians in the region to follow public safety advice and confirmed that DFAT was providing support. Former prime minister Scott Morrison told Sky News that the US strikes were 'necessary' and accused the Albanese government of 'ambiguity' in its response. 'This was a necessary event. There were no other options available to the (US) president,' Mr Morrison said. "It's time for some clarity (from the Albanese government). I think there's been far too much ambiguity about this from Australia." Defence Minister Richard Marles had refrained from giving an explicit position on any US strikes earlier on Sunday. 'We are worried about the prospect for escalation here and we've been urging de-escalation,' Mr Marles said prior to the attack. The US strikes mark a dramatic escalation in the volatile conflict between Israel and Iran. President Trump said the attacks were 'very successful' and declared that the underground Fordow facility was 'gone' after bunker-buster bombs were dropped. 'This was an amazing success tonight… They should make peace immediately or they'll get hit again,' he said.