Quebec Liberals hope to boost their fortunes as they choose new leader
After a drawn-out campaign overshadowed by upheaval in Ottawa and threats from the United States, Quebec Liberals will choose a new leader this weekend who they hope will revive the party from years of inertia.
The Liberals suffered back-to-back defeats to François Legault's upstart Coalition Avenir Québec in 2018 and 2022. The party has struggled to connect to francophone voters in regions outside of Montreal, and has failed to benefit from Legault's waning popularity in recent years.
Instead, the sovereigntist Parti Québécois has surged in the polls and seems poised to form the next government, despite holding just five of the 125 seats in the provincial legislature. With the next election set for October 2026 in a province known for dramatic electoral swings, the pressure is on for the Liberals to prove they're still a vital force.
The question card-carrying Liberals must answer before choosing their new leader is simple, said Pablo Rodriguez, a leadership candidate and former federal minister.
"Who can beat François Legault and the Parti Québécois?" said Rodriguez, 57. "Who can bring us back to power in 2026?"
The timing of the campaign, which began in January, has made it difficult for the party to capture the public's attention. Former prime minister Justin Trudeau's decision to resign kicked off a whirlwind federal leadership race in February, followed by a general election, with U.S. President Donald Trump's threats of tariffs and annexation looming over it all.
"The [Quebec] leadership race has unfortunately been drowned out," said Sébastien Dallaire, an executive vice-president with the polling firm Leger.
Rodriguez, the most well-known of the five candidates, is the presumed front-runner. After nine years in Trudeau's government, he left Ottawa last September to seek the provincial leadership and has emphasized his lengthy political resumé. A Leger survey of the general population published in May showed him leading his rivals by a wide margin.
But the party's leadership rules make it hard to predict the results, which will be revealed at a convention in Quebec City on Saturday, said Sophie Villeneuve, a political analyst and former Parti Québécois staffer.
The Liberals have assigned an equal number of points to each of Quebec's 125 ridings. In each riding, one third of the points are reserved for members aged 25 and younger. That means the winner will have to appeal to young voters and those outside Montreal. That could be a challenge for Rodriguez, whose federal seat was in the city, Villeneuve said.
"I think that Mr. Rodriguez is very well-known in Montreal, but not so well-known in the regions of Quebec," she said. "And it's through the regions that the Liberal party can hope to win back the trust of Quebec voters."
Although there is some overlap among members, the provincial Liberals are not affiliated with the federal Liberal party.
The Quebec Liberals currently hold just 19 seats in the provincial legislature, mostly in and around Montreal. The concentration of Liberal voters in the city has allowed them to hang on to Official Opposition status.
A look at the candidates
Karl Blackburn, former president of a Quebec employers group who hails from the Saguenay area, said the Liberals need to re-establish themselves as the party of the economy and the regions.
"Mr. Rodriguez is zero for two on these issues," said Blackburn, 57, who is leaning heavily on his business credentials.
Blackburn's campaign has commissioned a poll of party members that it claims shows Rodriguez with a slight lead, but not enough to win on the first round of the party's ranked ballot system. His team says Rodriguez's support is focused in Montreal, which could give Blackburn an advantage in a second round, when voters' second choices start to matter.
Villeneuve also predicted there will be no winner in the first round. But she said Blackburn, who was a member of the provincial legislature during the Liberal government of former premier Jean Charest, "represents the Liberal party's past" at a time when it's looking for renewal.
Meanwhile, Charles Milliard, former head of the federation of Quebec chambers of commerce, is pitching himself as the youthful option. A political newcomer, he compared himself in an interview to charismatic Parti Québécois Leader Paul St-Pierre Plamondon, who had never held office before taking the reins of the party in 2020.
"I like the way he does politics," said Milliard, 45. "We obviously have different views on the future of Quebec, but I think it would be a very interesting match next year."
Marc Bélanger, an international trade lawyer, and Mario Roy, an economist and farmer, are also seeking the party's leadership.
The leading candidates offer similar lines on many of the major issues facing Quebec. They've attacked Legault's record on the economy, pointing to the record $13.6-billion deficit the government tabled this year. They've expressed openness to new pipeline projects in Quebec, which have long been a non-starter in the province.
And they're promising to unify Quebecers after years of what they call divisive politics under the Coalition Avenir Québec government, pointing to Legault's focus on identity issues such as immigration, secularism and the French language.
"The first job of a premier is to unite the people, not to divide them," Rodriguez said. "So just by changing the tone, that will change a lot of things."
They're also presenting the Liberals as the best option for those who want to avoid another referendum on independence, which the Parti Québécois has promised to hold by 2030.
"I really feel that Quebecers are due for a change," Blackburn said. "And that change won't be a referendum like Mr. St-Pierre Plamondon is proposing. It will be a vision that looks to the future."
Regardless of who the party elects on Saturday, the Liberals will have their work cut out for them if they're to have a shot at forming the next government, Dallaire said.
"Somehow the long-standing relationship between the Liberal party and their francophone voters in Quebec got broken," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
34 minutes ago
- CTV News
Ontario proposes to weaken impending new recycling rules over costs to producers
Old Metropolitan Toronto signage and Ontario provincial insignia are seen on a blue recycling box at the side of the street on a weekly collection day in Toronto, Tuesday, June 17, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Giordano Ciampini TORONTO — Ontario Premier Doug Ford's government is proposing to weaken an impending slate of new recycling rules because producers of the materials said the system is getting too expensive. The province began transitioning in 2023 toward making producers pay for the recycling of their packaging, paper and single-use items. The companies' obligations were set to increase next year, but the government is now looking to delay some measures and outright cancel others, such as requirements to extend collection beyond the residential system. Environmental advocates say the proposed changes let producers off the hook and will mean more materials will end up in landfills or be incinerated. Producers say despite the rising costs, recycling rates don't actually appear to be improving, so it's time for a broader rethink. Environment Minister Todd McCarthy said the proposed changes are about ensuring the sustainability of the blue box system and protecting against unintended consequences such as job losses. 'We want to take what we've done and improve upon what already exists, but the costs were a big deal, and so we're proposing some measures that would bring about cost savings and transparency and improvement to accomplish the goal of recycling that we all want,' he said earlier this month. The Canadian Retail Council estimates that producer costs have already increased by about 350 per cent in three years and would nearly double again just from this year to next if no changes were made to the impending new rules for 2026. The government says blue box collection costs could more than double between 2020 and 2030. 'Cost increases of this magnitude were not anticipated when the regulation was passed in 2021 and have jeopardized the stability of the blue box system today,' it says in its proposal to change the rules. Currently, producers just have to make 'best efforts' to hit certain recycling rate percentages, such as 80 per cent of paper and 50 per cent of rigid plastic, and starting next year they are set to be enforceable. Then in 2030 those percentages are set to rise. But now the government is proposing to delay those 2026 targets to 2031. As well, Ontario is proposing to allow non-recyclable material that gets incinerated to count for up to 15 per cent of producers' recycling targets. Starting next year, producers are also supposed to be responsible for collecting material from more multi-residential buildings, and certain long-term care homes, retirement homes and schools. The government is now proposing to remove that requirement entirely. The same goes for a rule that would have made beverage producers responsible for containers not just dropped in a residential blue box but also those used outside the home, and a provision for producers to expand collection in public spaces. The intent behind the initial regulations was to incentivize producers to use less packaging and to use materials that can more easily be recycled, said Karen Wirsig, senior program manager for plastics with Environmental Defence. These changes would halt any progress on that score, she said. 'Municipalities have been saying for years, 'Our blue box is getting more and more filled with packaging types we can't even identify let alone properly sort ... because often they're made with mixed materials that are not easily recycled,'' Wirsig said. 'So because there was that disconnect between the producers who design all this packaging and the municipalities who are collecting it, there was no way to rationalize the system and improve packaging from an environmental and sustainability point of view. These regulations were intended to start doing that, and unfortunately, now all of the incentives are going the opposite direction.' The recycling of flexible plastics, which includes food wraps, pouches and bags, is a particular bone of contention and the government is proposing to both delay and reduce the target for that category. In a recycling facility, flexible plastics end up in all sorts of places because they're so light, getting stuck among paper or falling through the cracks of conveyor belts, said Michael Zabaneh, the Retail Council of Canada's vice-president of sustainability. Instead of a recycling target of 25 per cent taking effect next year, a target of five per cent would take effect in 2031 under the government's proposal for flexible plastics. That five per cent reflects the estimated current level of flexible plastic diversion, according to the government's regulatory proposal. It is silent on the current levels for all other materials. Those current levels are unknown, with the Resource Productivity and Recovery Authority saying it will report on rates once the three-year transition is over. That is a big problem, said Zabaneh. 'We're all in the blind,' he said. 'I think you can't have a recycling system with accountability, (and not have) transparency and real data.' The main problem with the government's current system is that it allows for multiple administrators, said Zabaneh. Producers sign up with producer responsibility organizations, which help them meet their blue box obligations. There are four such organizations operating in Ontario, which just ends up complicating the system and making it more expensive, Zabaneh said. 'There's an administrative body to drive collection, but then processing is kind of a competitive thing, and this creates a very fragmented and inefficient system,' he said. 'It limits planning, it prevents collective investment, capital investment, so that's disincentivized, and you have a lot of added costs from logistics and audits, and that's why we have escalating costs.' Retail council members helped found and sit on the board of one producer responsibility organization so they have some idea of recycling rates from that, and based on that limited view the numbers look stagnant, the council says. Producers welcome the delayed targets, Zabaneh said, but it doesn't solve the core problem. Having a single producer responsibility organization would reduce costs and allow for greater transparency of recycling rates and financial performance, the retail council says. Canadian Beverage Association president Krista Scaldwell said their members want the system to be successful because recycling and recovery benefits companies as well as the environment. 'We want the aluminum and plastic back because we can make it into new containers,' she said. 'The members are very committed to sustainability initiatives, and so we need to understand what's creating the cost so that we can help support some change, so we can see improved recovery without escalating costs.' Comments on the regulatory registry proposal can be submitted until July 21. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 23, 2025. Allison Jones, The Canadian Press
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Canada pausing removals and deportations to Israel over conflict with Iran
A Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) patch is seen on an officer in Calgary, Alta., Thursday, Aug. 1, 2019. (THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh) Canada is temporarily pausing removals and deportations to Israel as the country faces retaliatory strikes from Iran. 'This measure is being taken given the volatile and unpredictable situation in Israel due to ongoing hostilities with Iran,' a news release from the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) explained. The temporary halt is officially known as an Administrative Deferral of Removals (ADR). According to the CBSA, such deferrals are temporarily put in place for 'countries that are considered unsafe due to conditions such as environmental disasters or violence.' There are currently 16 such deferrals in effect, including one for Iran that began in November 2022. The other countries and territories covered by deferrals are Ukraine, Syria, Mali, Central African Republic, South Sudan, Libya, Yemen, Burundi, Venezuela, Haiti, Sudan, Lebanon, the Gaza Strip and parts of Somalia like Middle Shabelle, Afgoye and Mogadishu. Israel and Iran have traded deadly barrages of missiles and drones since Israel launched a surprise attack on its archrival on June 13. 'Once the situation in Israel stabilizes and the circumstances no longer pose a generalized risk to the entire civilian population, the ADR will be lifted and the CBSA will resume removals for individuals who are inadmissible to Canada and have a removal order that is enforceable,' the CBSA news release stated. There are three types of removal orders: departure orders, exclusion orders and deportation orders. Anyone who receives one cannot remain in Canada. While removal orders can be appealed in court, if legal avenues have been exhausted, you are expected to leave the country or be removed. Removal orders are issued for violating immigration law, such as arriving in Canada without a proper visa, overstaying a visa, or working or studying in Canada without proper approval. An ADR is different from what's known as a Temporary Suspension of Removals (TSR), which is typically put in place for longer periods of time. TSRs are currently in effect for Afghanistan, Democratic Republic of Congo and Iraq. Anyone who is inadmissible to Canada due to criminality, international or human rights violations, organized crime or security can still be removed despite an ADR or TSR. If someone cannot be removed from Canada due to a current ADR or TSR, they may be eligible to apply for a work or study permit.
National Post
an hour ago
- National Post
How Canada got on the wrong side in the war against Iran: Full Comment podcast
Article content Article content As the Islamic Republic's missiles rain down on the Jewish state, and with massive U.S. attacks against Iran's nuclear sites ratcheting up the war, Brian Lilley talks to two Canadians living under fire as they frantically duck in and out of bomb shelters. Postmedia columnist Adam Zivo has been stuck in Israel, unable to get out, while former Canadian ambassador to Israel Vivian Bercovici (also a Postmedia columnist) has been helping evacuate fellow expatriates who've been abandoned by the Canadian government. They talk about how Canada hasn't only been largely useless in helping its citizens; as Bercovici says, the Carney government's feeble demands for 'de-escalation' in this critical, historic war to stop the global menace of an Iranian nuclear bomb has put Canada on the foolish side of history. (Recorded June 20, 2025.) Article content Article content Article content Article content
