Poland, Baltic states eye new submarines, attack boats to deter Russia
WARSAW, Poland — Poland and the Baltic states are accelerating efforts to acquire new submarines and vessels that will broaden their capabilities suitable for the sea's shallow waters.
In Poland, Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz, the country's deputy prime minister and defense minister, has said his ministry aims to order between three and four new submarines for the Polish Navy until the end of this year. The planned procurement, which is pursued under the Orka (Orca) program, is deemed urgent, as the country's naval forces rely on a single Soviet-designed submarine, the Kilo-class ORP Orzel, whose outdated technology and equipment makes it incompatible with the requirements of modern naval warfare.
While a number of countries are competing to secure the potential order from Warsaw, the ministry has disclosed that its experts assigned the highest scores to the offers placed by Germany, Sweden and Italy.
In 2023, Poland unveiled that 11 entities took part in a market consultation. Known competitors include France's Naval Group, German ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems, Italy's Fincantieri, Spain's Navantia, South Korea's Hanwha Ocean and Hyundai, Sweden's Saab, and the U.K.'s Babcock.
A spokesperson for the Polish ministry told Defense News that, while three offers have received the highest scores from the Polish Armaments Agency, the military's procurement arm, the remaining submarines have not been discarded amid ongoing talks with foreign governments.
'Currently, government-level talks are being held. Following the decision of the Technical Modernization Council, the Armaments Agency will take steps with the aim to acquire these submarines,' the spokesperson said.
Meanwhile, Latvia and Lithuania have joined forces to buy multipurpose attack boats from Finnish shipbuilder Marine Alutech. Under the Common Future Multipurpose Attack Craft (CFMAC) program, the shipyard is to develop and deliver combat vessels based on the Watercat M18 design to the two Baltic States' militaries.
'This contract is the second step after the 2024 Technical Agreement between Latvia, Lithuania and Finland to strengthen regional defense. Under this contract, Lithuania will acquire two advanced Fast Multirole Attack Crafts from Marine Alutech,' the Finnish shipbuilder said in a statement.
A spokesperson for the Lithuanian Ministry of National Defence told Defense News the two multirole attack craft that are to be built for the country's Navy will be integrated into the Coastal Defense Battalion.
The acquisition 'will significantly enhance Lithuania's naval defense capabilities. These vessels will feature advanced combat systems, including Spike NLOS missile launchers and a remote heavy machine gun control system, which will enable them to engage both maritime and land-based targets effectively,' the ministry's representative said.
'Furthermore, the boats are specially designed for operations in shallow waters, allowing them to perform missions in areas such as the Curonian Lagoon, where conventional vessels may struggle. This unique design and propulsion system will ensure that Lithuania can maintain a rapid response capacity for a variety of threats, ranging from asymmetric warfare to traditional defense operations,' the spokesperson added.
The vessels are scheduled to enter service in the Lithuanian Navy in late 2026.
'The Lithuanian Ministry of National Defence has plans to further expand and modernize naval capabilities in the coming years. Between 2030 and 2037, Lithuania is preparing for a progressive modernization of its naval fleet,' said the ministry representative. 'This initiative will include the acquisition of new multirole offshore patrol vessels, which will be equipped with advanced capabilities to address evolving security challenges.'
Based in Teijo, on the Finnish Baltic Sea shore, Marine Alutech says that its shipyard has built more than 500 vessels since 1985.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
17 hours ago
- New York Post
Russian soldier kills, eats comrade in twisted attempt to survive Ukraine war: report
He bit more than the bullet. A Russian soldier on the frontlines in Ukraine murdered his comrade and ate the corpse to survive the grim wartime conditions — only to end up dying anyway, Kyiv's military intelligence reported. A call between two Russian soldiers who shared the jaw-dropping story of the cannibalistic 'Brelok', who killed his countryman 'Foma', was allegedly intercepted by Ukraine's Main Directorate of Intelligence, according to the Kyiv Post. 'F–king hell… Brelok f–king ate him, f–k me… nobody went anywhere. Brelok took him out and then ate him for f–king two weeks,' the first caller said. A Russian soldier reportedly killed and ate his comrade in order to survive the harsh frontline conditions in Ukraine. 'No f–king way… Holy sh-t… F—k my bald skull. Was Brelok really found as a 200?' the other person replied, using Soviet era slang for a soldier found killed in action. 'Yeah, they say he was a 200. He ate his comrade. So yeah… something to think about. I was shocked myself,' the caller concluded. The ghoulish cannibal was found dead, according to the report. Russia has recruited hardened criminals — including murderers and convicted cannibals — to bolster its ranks during the country's three-year invasion of Ukraine. Denis Gorin, a cannibal from Sakhalin, who killed four people and was sentenced to 22 years in prison in 2012, ate part of the body of one of his victims, Politico reported, citing Radio Liberty. Russia recently launched a deadly attack in Kyiv, killing 15 Ukrainians with Iranian-made vehicles. AFP via Getty Images Another criminal, Nikolay Ogolobiak — a Satanist convicted of killing two young women and cooking their organs in 2008 — was also sent to fight for Mother Russia back in 2023, according to that report. Convict Dmitry Malyshev, who was jailed for killing three men and pan-frying one of their hearts, was also sent to the frontlines, the Daily Mail reported. That deranged madman infamously took a selfie with freed murderer-rapist Alexander Maslennikov, who grinned in fatigues before being sent to the frontlines in 2024, the Daily Beast reported. Russia strongman Vladimir Putin continues to pound Ukraine — with Iranian-made drones killing 15 Ukrainians in Kyiv earlier this week.
Boston Globe
a day ago
- Boston Globe
‘Whole of Ukraine is ours,' Putin muses without ruling out capturing key city
'Wherever a Russian soldier steps foot, that's ours,' he added. Putin's insistence on maintaining the offensive in Ukraine has come at a diplomatic cost. President Trump's election last year gave Russia hope that it could restore economic and diplomatic ties with the United States while continuing to wage war in Ukraine, but Trump has become impatient with Russia's insistence on continuing the war. The Russian president made clear he had no intentions of soon ending the war. But it was less clear whether Putin, whose comments came in response to a question about his military's ultimate goals in Ukraine, was suggesting that Russia would annex additional territory beyond the four Ukraine regions that it has already declared are officially part of Russia. Advertisement In peace talks, the Kremlin has insisted on formal recognition of sovereignty over those regions — one of several positions that are unacceptable to the Ukrainian government. But since those annexations, Russian forces have pushed into three additional regions. Advertisement On Friday, before Putin's remarks, the Kremlin made its most direct statement yet, acknowledging that improved relations with the US were tied to Russia's willingness to end the war. 'American diplomats believe that we need to directly tie the process of removing the irritants in bilateral relations with the settlement in Ukraine,' Dmitry Peskov, the Kremlin's spokesperson, told reporters at the conference Friday. Peskov reiterated the Kremlin's position, which is that it wants to discuss relations with the United States separately from efforts to end the war in Ukraine. The Kremlin has been hoping that a thaw with Washington would lead to the lifting of some economic sanctions, the return of some American companies, US investments in Russian natural resources, and more leeway for Russia to assert its interests in former Soviet states. At the same time, Putin has shown little interest in bending to US, European, and Ukrainian demands to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine, where his forces are on the offensive. Trump had promised to end the war in Ukraine 24 hours after taking office, but efforts to mediate have been dogged by deep disagreements between the warring countries about what peace should look like. After two direct meetings between Russian and Ukrainian representatives, the negotiations have led only to agreements to exchange prisoners of war and bodies of fallen soldiers. Frustrated by the lack of progress, Trump has his diplomatic attention elsewhere, most recently the conflict between Iran and Israel, where he is considering whether to join the war on the side of Israel. Meanwhile, Russian air assaults on Ukraine have intensified in recent weeks, dimming any hopes for a ceasefire. On Thursday night, Russia launched drone attacks on Odesa and Kharkiv, injuring 20 people and killing one person in Odesa, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine said on Facebook. Advertisement Peskov said Russia expected Russian and Ukrainian representatives to set a date for their third meeting next week, but that the Kremlin was determined to achieve its stated goals in Ukraine either diplomatically or militarily. The talks between Russia and the United States on restoring bilateral ties have also been dragging. Despite multiple phone calls between Putin and Trump this year and at least four public meetings of Russian and American officials over the same period, nothing substantive has been achieved so far on that issue. The two countries' diplomatic missions are still understaffed and some consulates are still shut. There has also not been any tangible movement in terms of American companies returning to Russia or sanctions being lifted. The St. Petersburg conference, a yearly event promoted by the Kremlin as a magnet for Western businesses, has turned into a platform where Russian state companies showcase themselves. Again this year, no major American investors showed up and there was little sign of Western interest. At the conference, Putin instructed government members that they cannot allow it to slip into 'stagnation and even recession.' 'This cannot be allowed under any circumstances,' Putin said. On Thursday, Russia's economy minister said the country was on the verge of sliding into a recession, putting more pressure on its central bank to lower interest rates, which now are at 20 percent. This article originally appeared in
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Opinion: We needed to get rid of the dairy cartel, not sanctify it in law
By Lawrence L. Herman It never ends. On June 5, Yves-François Blanchet, the Bloc leader in Parliament, tabled Bill C-202, a private member's bill that's yet another regrettable effort to enshrine Canada's Soviet-style supply management system in the statute books. It legislates against any increased imports of dairy products, eggs and poultry — sectors the system protects from foreign competition — under Canada's current or future trade agreements. The Senate fast-tracked the bill, passing it on June 17 after it sailed through the House with virtually unanimous support. It's an unprecedented piece of protectionist legislation that favours this one group of farmers. C-202 is virtually identical to Bill C-282, which a Bloc member tabled in 2021 during the past Parliament. It was passed by the Commons in June 2023 and was still being examined in the Senate last November when Donald Trump was elected. It had been stalled there for almost two years and — mercifully — died on the order paper when this spring's election was called. As well as preventing imports, supply management is a quintessential barrier to internal trade, designed to protect local producers against out-of-province competition, whether in dairy, eggs or poultry. Under the influence of the well-financed dairy lobby, the Trudeau government and all the other parties supported Bill C-282 as it made its way through the House. This time round, however, it's hard to see how the Liberals could have voted in favour of a blatantly protectionist bill completely at odds with the Carney government's core policy of dismantling interprovincial trade barriers — and doing so before July 1, no less. While Blanchet and his Bloc colleagues have remained focused on currying favour with Quebec dairy farmers, there has been a sea change in the geopolitical context, most notably a dramatic deterioration in the Canada-U.S. relationship, with Trump targeting dairy import restrictions among the many trade assaults he's been directing at Canada. For Parliament to raise this protectionist fence higher is downright foolish — as was emphasized by experts over and over again during the debate on C-282 — and would seriously jeopardize our relations with the U.S. at this very sensitive juncture. That alone should have consigned C-202 to the Parliamentary dustbin. But some other factors that are not always fully aired should outrage Canadians when the facts are better understood. Consider the dairy sector as an illustration. First, to make supply management work, over the past 50 years governments at both federal and provincial levels have layered complexities onto the system, creating a mind-numbing process run by vast bureaucracies from coast to coast. This newspaper explained it all in a report compiled by staff about a year ago. At the top of the structure is the Canadian Dairy Commission (CDC) and its Canadian Milk Supply Management Committee (CMSMC). Each year, the CMSMC sets the allowable production volume for Canada as whole and the Commission then divides this up among the provinces, who parcel out the quota to their own producers, distributors, processors and consumers. The CDC then sets the farm-gate price for milk under what's called the National Pricing Formula. While consumers may think of milk as milk, under supply management milk is divided into five different classes and many sub-classes, based on what the milk is used for, whether as a consumer good or for further processing. The CDC applies the National Pricing Formula to set the annual farm-gate price in each class, with the price being different for each milk component — butter fat, proteins and solids. Provincial marketing boards then take all of this and, after even more consultations with industry players, determine who in their province is allowed to produce what, as well as where and to whom it can be sold, in what volume and at what price in that particular province. This goes on, year after year, involving scads of officials. Other industries, meanwhile, manage to decide prices and quantities without regulators' help. The point here isn't to go through all of these bureaucratic intricacies — details can be found in the FP report already referred to and on the CDC website — but to illustrate that in diary alone, the system is inordinately complex, difficult to penetrate, and run by large bureaucracies across the country. All this for the benefit of a few more than 9,000 dairy farms, compared, say, with Canada's 71,000 beef farms and 7,400 pig farms, which operate on the open market and receive no such guarantees. These numbers alone illustrate the inequities of this complex, over-staffed and costly system that exists to protect a small but highly favoured fraction of Canada's agricultural producers. When it comes to who runs the system, there's another set of issues that should outrage Canadians. It's run by insiders, persons with direct connections to the dairy industry, the same industry the system is supposed to regulate. For example, the CDC board is made up of persons with dairy industry connections, the chair being a dairy farmer himself. The Supply Management Committee is also weighted with industry players. At the provincial level, there's the same problem. All members of the Ontario Milk Marketing Board, for example, are dairy farmers, a pattern replicated in the other provinces. It's hard to see where the public interest comes in. Jack Mintz: Don't expect big economic gains from lower interprovincial barriers Bjorn Lomborg: Freer trade isn't dead yet, which is a good thing for all of us All of this should have led to a derailment of Bill C-202 and for the Carney government to start to phase out supply management as an outdated, discriminatory, protectionist system, contrary to the public interest. Though C-202 has passed, the government could hold up the proclamation needed to bring it into force pending further developments in our trading relations. In the meantime, Canadians should be concerned both about supply management itself and about the outsized influence its lobbyists have in Ottawa. Lawrence L. Herman, international counsel at Herman & Associates, is a senior fellow at the C.D. Howe Institute. Sign in to access your portfolio
