Air Force sets up new Experimental Operations Unit for Collaborative Combat Aircraft
The U.S. Air Force's 53rd Wing officially elevated its Collaborative Combat Aircraft unit to a fully operational squadron. The new Experimental Operations Unit was formally activated on Thursday, June 5 at Nellis Air Force Base.
The unit had previously operated as a detachment under the 53rd Wing, based in Nevada, since 2023. This week's activation as a fully operational squadron comes as the Air Force steps up testing of the first phase of its Collaborative Combat Aircraft (or CCA) program.
'The EOU embodies our commitment to rapid innovation and ensuring our warfighters have the most advanced tools to dominate the future battlespace,' Col. Daniel Lehoski, commander of the 53rd Wing, said in the announcement from the Air Force. 'They are ready to reduce risk in concurrency and deliver capability faster.'
CCA development is a part of the sixth-generation Next Generation Air Dominance fighter jet program, which itself started as a Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (or DARPA) project in 2015. The idea is to create remote controlled aircraft to be essentially uncrewed wingmen for pilots, with each crewed fighter jet able to give commands to the drones.
While other branches of the armed forces are working on a greater integration of drones and other uncrewed systems, the Air Force's CCA program is unique in that it would act as an uncrewed force multiplier for crewed aircraft. The program is being developed in two stages, or increments as the Air Force refers to it. Increment 1 is currently testing some of the new aircraft, which were designated the YFQ-42A and the YFQ-44A in March, and made by General Atomics and Anduril, respectively.
The new experimental operations unit at Nellis will start with running simulations out of the base's Virtual Warfare Center and the Joint Integrated Test and Training Center. The Air Force's stated plan is to eventually carry out actual flight tests based on those simulations.
Lt. Col. Matthew Jensen, head of the Experimental Operations Unit, said that the new squadron's mission is to deliver 'combat-ready capabilities' to the force.
'Our vision is to create a collaborative combat ecosystem that is more agile, adaptable and lethal,' Jensen said. 'This will enable our forces to dominate the future battlespace and achieve decisive advantages in complex, contested environments.'
The activation of the experimental operations unit comes only a few weeks after the Air Force began ground testing of CCA systems at Beale Air Force Base in California. Beale was selected as the home for the Air Force's first CCA Aircraft Readiness Unit.
Navy SEAL Team 6 operator will be the military's new top enlisted leader
Veterans receiving disability payments might have been underpaid, IG finds
Guam barracks conditions are 'baffling,' Navy admiral says in email
Navy fires admiral in charge of unmanned systems office after investigation
The Pentagon wants troops to change duty stations less often
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Is Increased Focus on Hypersonic Tech Opening New Doors for Rocket Lab?
In recent years, the rapid development and adoption of hypersonic technology across industries, from aerospace and defense to space exploration, have opened new growth avenues for Rocket Lab USA RKLB, a key player in hypersonic testing with its HASTE launch system. With commercial firms and government agencies ramping up investments in advanced hypersonic systems to bolster space access and national security, RKLB remains well-positioned to capitalize on this accelerating technological shift. Notably, Rocket Lab's HAEST (Hypersonic accelerator suborbital test electron) is a suborbital testbed launch vehicle that provides reliable, high-cadence flight test opportunities needed to boost hypersonic and suborbital system technology development. In April 2025, Rocket Lab secured a contract from Kratos Defense to conduct a full-scale hypersonic test flight for the U.S. Department of Defense. Additionally, RKLB's HASTE platform has been included in two major defense frameworks — the $46 billion Enterprise-Wide Agile Acquisition Contract with the U.S. Air Force and the UK Ministry of Defence's £1 billion ($1.3 billion) Hypersonic Technologies & Capability Development Framework. These programs allow Rocket Lab to compete for launch and engineering services in advancing hypersonic technologies. The inclusion across both U.S. and UK initiatives underscores the growing demand for HASTE in defense testing and is likely to significantly boost Rocket Lab's future revenue stream. While HASTE has not yet won any purely commercial contract, its demonstrated reliability and cadence in the defense sector may soon open doors to non-defense payload opportunities. As increased investment in hypersonic technology has become a global trend lately, with nations like the United States, the United Kingdom, and China significantly boosting funding for research and development in this tech, other stocks like Lockheed Martin LMT and RTX Corp. RTX are also indulging in advanced hypersonic technology developments. Notably, Lockheed Martin has been developing highly advanced hypersonic technology for the past 60 years. To this end, the company is currently working in partnership with DARPA, the U.S. Air Force, the U.S. Army, and the U.S. Navy to transition hypersonic concepts to operational reality. LMT's Conventional Prompt Strike is a hypersonic boost-glide missile currently under development, which boasts the capability to provide longer range, shorter flight times, and high survivability against enemy defenses. On the other hand, RTX is working across its business and domains to move advanced hypersonic capabilities from creation to testing and into the hands of warfighters at top speed. RTX is currently involved in the design of the Hypersonic Attack Cruise Missile, which leverages Northrop Grumman's scramjet propulsion to travel at more than five times the speed of sound and cover vast distances in minutes. The U.S. Air Force currently expects this missile to be operational by fiscal 2027. Shares of RKLB have surged 467.2% in the past year compared with the industry's 40.9% growth. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research The company's shares are trading at a premium on a relative basis, with its forward 12-month Price/Sales being 17.85X compared with its industry's average of 9.65X. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research The Zacks Consensus Estimate for RKLB's 2025 and 2026 earnings has improved over the past 60 days. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research RKLB currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) : Free Stock Analysis Report RTX Corporation (RTX) : Free Stock Analysis Report Rocket Lab Corporation (RKLB) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
United States Air Force Awards Gentex Corporation Aircrew Laser Eye Protection (ALEP) Ballistic Day and Night Spectacle Contract
CARBONDALE, Pa., June 18, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Gentex Corporation, a global leader in personal protection and situational awareness solutions for defense forces, aircrew, emergency responders and industrial personnel, announced today that it was awarded an additional United States Air Force Aircrew Laser Eye Protection (ALEP) contract to develop and produce its laser protective eyewear for aircrew, the Block 3 Day and Night Ballistic Spectacles. This order includes more than 3,800 Block 3 Day and Night Ballistic Spectacles over the next 18 months, including development and full rate production. The new ballistic spectacle joins the unique USAF Block 3 product line and follows Gentex's five previously awarded delivery orders for the USAF Block 3 Contract, which include the Ballistic Day Spectacle, Ballistic Night Spectacle, Day Spectacle, Aircrew Night Vision Goggles Joined LEP (ANJL) and Night Spectacle, totaling 29,400 pieces of state-of-the-art laser protective eyewear. The Block 3 LEP eyewear provides the warfighter a variety of form factors to best suit their mission profile and replaces the Block 2 spectacles with a higher performance product line. "Gentex is proud to continue to serve the USAF team and warfighters by providing the best ocular protection available to maintain their mission effectiveness while staying safe," said John Cueva, Senior Director of Optics at Gentex Corporation. About Gentex Corporation With a history of innovation that spans for 130 years, Gentex Corporation is the leading supplier of high-performance flight equipment for military, law enforcement, aircrew and aircraft maintainers worldwide. The company's comprehensive line of durable and innovative helmet systems for fixed wing, rotary wing and cross-platform applications allows for the easy integration of advanced capability upgrades without sacrificing protection. An equally comprehensive line of hearing protection and communication solutions provide these users with superior hearing protection and precise, intelligible communications in the most extreme noise environments. Learn more at View source version on Contacts Media Contact Alexandra E. Braxabrax@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data
Forbes
3 days ago
- Forbes
Preserving America's Air Battle Edge: Why Canceling The E-7 Would Be A Strategic Mistake
An artist's depiction shows an E-7A in flight. The Pentagon's recent questioning of the Air Force plan to purchase 26 E-7 airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) aircraft in favor of an option to use five Navy E-2s during a transition of the mission to space raises significant concerns about America's ability to achieve and maintain air superiority. Modern air combat takes a team, with the sensor and battle management expertise on board AEW&C aircraft a key part of that enterprise. They serve as the quarterbacks for the broader air superiority effort. Built on the Boeing 737 airframe and equipped with Northrop Grumman's advanced multirole electronically scanned array radar, the E-7 is the lynchpin for modern air battle management. Modernization Long Overdue The AEW&C mission is currently executed by the E-3 Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) aircraft. First fielded in the 1970s, it is based on the 1960s-era Boeing 707 airframe. Fifty years later, the aircraft and its associated mission systems are increasingly unsustainable. Today, E-3s require hand-crafted, aircraft junkyard, or 3D-printed parts due to absence of a supply base—the 707 airframe was retired by the airlines over 40 years ago. Commanders around the globe frequently call upon the AWACS, but more often than not, they are broken. Maintaining these aging aircraft through the mid-2030s is projected to cost nearly $10 billion. The E-3 recapitalization crisis is not new. In 2001, then-Air Combat Command Commander Gen. John Jumper proposed the E-10 Multi-Sensor Command and Control Aircraft to consolidate and replace multiple sensor aircraft that included the E-3, E-8, and RC-135. However, the E-10 program was cancelled in 2007 due to technical integration challenges, underfunding of the Air Force amidst an excessive focus on counterinsurgency operations, and a mistaken belief that China would not become an adversary. Since then, no serious AEW&C recapitalization was pursued, and the E-3 inventory grew older. A decades-long vulnerability is now acute. Threats from China, Russia, North Korea, and Iran demand modern, robust and resilient airborne command and control. Air Force Chief of Staff General David Allvin testified to Congress to that effect on May 6, 2025, when he explained that the E-3 is a 'dying platform,' and that only the E-7 can effectively replace it. The E-7 is becoming the free-world's standard with Australia, United Kingdom, South Korea, and Turkey operating it. That makes the aircraft an export success—with allies funding a significant portion of the aircraft's development. The Department of Defense (DOD) should capitalize on this reality, not abandon it. Moving the Mission to Space A key rationale of those who support terminating the Air Force E-7 plan is the prospect of transitioning the airborne moving target indicator (AMTI) mission to space-based sensors, which may ultimately offer a more secure and persistent solution. While that solution path holds much promise, the scale and scope of the technical challenges involved with engineering, testing, and fielding an operationally relevant space-based AMTI enterprise will take many years if not decades. The transition of the AMTI enterprise from air to space is an incredibly challenging mission evolution that requires significant technical invention. Cutting edge innovation takes time and therefore it is important to pursue a careful handoff. The reality is that combatant commanders require reliable AEW&C solutions today. It comes down to assuring air superiority capability at sufficient capacity to deter conflict. Failing deterrence, we must ensure that we can fight and win. Even with a fully functioning space-based AMTI enterprise, there are limitations inherent with a space-based only solution. The optimal plan involves a collaborative multi-domain approach. That is why when asked about the AEW&C mission, Chief of Space Operations Gen Chance Saltzman explained: 'No one system is going to be perfectly optimized to take care of the full spectrum of ops. And so that's where I think you need a mix of systems.' Advocates of the move to a space-based AMTI architecture acknowledge the need to bridge from the E-3 to space-based AMTI and have proposed the idea of pursuing the Navy's E-2 airborne early warning aircraft (AEW) as an alternative to the E-7. While the E-2 is effective in its intended role for aircraft carrier strike group defense, it was not designed for large-scale, multi-theater air battle management. Its smaller mission crew—three versus the E-7's complement of eight air battle managers, and two additional electronic warfare officers—limits its capacity for complex operations. Its radar, constrained by lower flight altitudes, offers less range and fidelity across the vast Indo-Pacific theater. The E-2's size hampers future upgrades, and its probe-and-drogue refueling system is incompatible with most Air Force tankers. Furthermore, the proposed acquisition of just five E-2s is insufficient to backfill an E-3 inventory that recently numbered over 30 aircraft. U.S. combatant commanders require far more than five AEW&C aircraft dedicated to theater air battle management to fulfill the demands of the National Defense Strategy. Matching one E-7's capability would require multiple E-2Ds per mission—inefficient, impractical, and insufficient. Human Capital is Overlooked in Proposed DOD Alternative Absent in the Pentagon's latest proposal is the most important element of the AWE&C mission: human capital. Raw sensor data—whether coming from a space-based AMTI constellation or a handful of E-2s—does not manifest effective command and control. The actual mission—air battle management—requires highly trained personnel to interpret the various data inputs, correlate it into actionable information, and task various mission aircraft in accordance with operational and tactical objectives. This is a highly complex job that takes years of training and realistic practice to execute. It involves real-time surveillance, force direction, and coordination—not simply the transmission of data. Future space-based AMTI concepts have yet to define where and how air battle managers integrate into the overarching mission. Thus far, the effort has been focused on technical solutions. That is only half the equation. This mission requires trained air battle managers who can translate sensor data into actionable information and direct it to the right combat elements—often within seconds—to achieve operational effects. The same challenge exists for the E-2 option given its smaller mission crew capacity. The need for persistent air battle management is real and growing. The Indo-Pacific, European, and Central Command theaters all face threats from adversaries growing in capability. Ironically, China recognizes the value of modern AEW&C aircraft. That is why they field their own KJ-500 and are in the process of building more advanced versions. The E-7 is Key to Keeping America's Air Battle Management Edge Golden Dome is a result of a very appropriate increase in focus on homeland defense given the dangers posed by growing air and missile threats. This concern is validated by the attacks that Ukraine and Isreal are now experiencing—the U.S. could soon face similar challenges. The E-7 is central to Golden Dome's success in detecting and tracking cruise missiles, hostile aircraft, and drones. That is why U.S. Northern Command and NORAD Commander Gen. Gregory Guillot testified that the E-7's AMTI capability is essential to layered defense against these potential threats. For those who argue the E-7 should be sunset given survivability concerns, yes, non-stealth aircraft like the E-7 are vulnerable to advanced adversary weapon systems—but so is the E-2, as are satellites, ships, armor, infantry, etc. Chinese and Russian anti-satellite weapons, jamming capabilities, and cyber threats could rapidly neutralize U.S. space assets in wartime. Survivability is best achieved through a diversified mix of platforms in both air and space, along with robust offensive and defense offensive measures—not only by placing AMTI capability in space. Canceling the E-7 now would be a costly and strategic blunder. The Air Force has already invested $2.56 billion in the program. The insufficiency of a five-aircraft unit to meet combatant command requirements, the limitations of the proposed alternative for theater-wide air battle management, and the immaturity of the AMTI move to space all point to one conclusion: the DOD must move forward with E-7 acquisition. History is clear: air battle management, paired with modern fighters, is essential to achieving air superiority. Pentagon leadership should reconsider terminating the E-7 program, and if not, Congress must fund its continuation and deployment. The consequences for U.S. national security of not moving forward with the Air Force E-7 program could be dire and are simply not worth the risk that the proposed DOD alternative entails.
