Issas' petrol station giant drops diversity goals before £13bn US listing

The Issa brothers' petrol station empire is rolling back diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) targets as it gears up for a £13bn listing in the US.
EG Group said it was no longer pursuing a goal to increase the number of women in senior leadership roles in the US, saying its diversity initiatives only applied 'in regions where legally permissible'.
It previously had set a company-wide goal to increase the proportion of women in top roles to 40pc by 2025, from 20pc in 2021.
However, the US – which is EG Group's largest market – has since been excluded from that objective.
EG Group said it was also reviewing gender targets for the rest of the business, which includes operations in Australia and Europe. The UK arm of the company was sold last year.
The retreat from diversity goals comes as EG appeared to fall short of its 40pc gender goal for 2025.
By 2024, just 27pc of senior leadership roles were held by women, according to its latest filings, with the company admitting that this was 'some way off achieving [its] target'.
The diversity shake-up comes as the billionaire Issa brothers push ahead with plans to list Blackburn-based EG Group in the US for as much as £13bn.
EG Group is jointly owned by the Issa brothers and private equity firm TDR. TDR owns 50pc of the company, while Mohsin and Zuber hold 25pc each.
The brothers have both stepped back from running the business over the past year.
Meanwhile, the move to pull the US female representation target comes as more companies start to roll back their inclusivity programmes amid a crackdown by Donald Trump.
The US president has banned companies with federal contracts from operating 'illegal' DEI programmes.
It has meant a wave of UK businesses have started to ditch diversity efforts, including drug giant GSK and consulting giant Accenture.
When addressing diversity in its latest report, EG said it wanted to ensure its targets 'are fit for purpose going forward and focused on the areas that matter most to our colleagues and customers, but also to our investors, regulators and wider society'.
A spokesman said: 'EG Group complies with all relevant laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate.
'We remain committed to being an equitable and inclusive business, reflecting the diversity of our colleagues, customers and wider communities.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Telegraph

an hour ago

• Telegraph

Rachel Reeves's plan is unravelling. She could be gone before the next Budget

It can't be easy living in the maelstrom of 11 Downing Street these days. First, Rachel Reeves had to endure almost four months of being warned what not to do with taxes, such was the brittleness of the UK economy. Then – after she chose to both increase taxes by a record amount and increase borrowing so she could afford her spending commitments – came months of warnings about the dire consequences. People are losing their jobs because of her choices, which will push up benefit claims and spending. Tax revenues will fall rather than increase by the numbers she expected. The economy has been flatlining with miniscule and highly erratic growth as it stops, starts, then stalls – seemingly on an endless repeat. Then there were the cuts to pensioners' heating allowances, the cuts to disability benefits, the death tax changes for farmers, businesses and pensions. On top of that, there were the tax rises we always knew were likely because Labour had refused to rule them out – the increases in capital gains tax and stamp duty, and the removal of incentives to entrepreneurs. It has maybe taken longer than some of us expected, but the bad news for the Chancellor – and us – now seems to be arriving like buses. I've imagined what it's like to be at the end of that constant deluge of bad numbers. 'Incoming!' The annual estimate for public sector borrowing for year ending March 2025 is £148.3bn – £17.2bn more than last year and £11bn more than the OBR forecast. Reeves carries on with her Sudoku. 'Incoming!' Oh no! The latest inflation figures for April have surged to 3.4pc, trending towards double the Bank of England's target of 2pc. Reeves stares out the window. 'Incoming!' The unemployment rate is up 0.2pc to 4.6pc – the highest since 2021. The unemployed claimant count is up 107,000 year-on-year to 1.73 million. 'Incoming!' Monthly GDP is down -0.3pc, three times worse than the -0.1pc consensus prediction. Reeves purses her lips. Looking forward, we can imagine over the months of July, August and September an unrelenting series of indicators breaking bad. 'Incoming!' The latest tax receipts are below estimates. The latest borrowing numbers are up again. Finally, the markets are beginning to react. 'Incoming!' The pound has fallen to $1.20, the lowest since 2023. Gilts are moving too. 'Incoming!' Ten-year gilt yields are over 5pc. The Bank of England reverses course and puts rates up to 4.5pc. 'Incoming!' The team from the IMF has arrived. 'Incoming!' Prime Minister! I have the Chancellor's letter of resignation. That type of scenario might seem far-fetched, but it is the trajectory the country is travelling. Unemployment is already up 10pc since Labour came to power, and sadly there's no reason to believe this trend will be reversed. Since 'modern' records began, in 1971, every Labour government has left office with unemployment higher in percentage and absolute numbers than when it took power. Reeves is continuing that tragic tradition. The spending statement from Rachel Reeves was not so much a review as a litany of unfunded spending commitments aimed not at reassuring the markets, but at reassuring Labour backbenchers. The brighter among them will not buy it. They will soon notice the important numbers getting worse every month as the full effect of the employers' National Insurance increase, the lowering of the threshold to start paying it and the increase in the minimum pay rates costs jobs and halts hiring. What does this all mean for people trying to get by: the savers, pensioners and those running their own businesses? It means that tax rises are not just inevitable in October's Budget, they will become a must-do if an embarrassing bail out is to be avoided. Labour likes to talk of having ended austerity – something that Philip Hammond, former Conservative chancellor, first claimed back in 2017. The truth of it is the UK has never had real austerity this century. The direction of travel of our public spending has always been up. When you hear of spending cuts, what you are being told about is cuts to the rate of increase in government spending, not a cut in the total amount of spending, which continues to rise year-on-year. Increasing taxes means an attack on our pensions, our savings and our properties. The tax hikes will be passed off as necessary to save the NHS when the NHS really requires an overhaul that boosts its productivity. The much hyped increases for the NHS of £29bn each year over the next three years is most likely to be eaten up by rising pay awards. The NHS is one of the world's largest employers, with around 1.3 million full-time equivalent staff in England (as of February 2024). Consequently, the wage bill for the NHS makes up a substantial proportion of its budget. Nurses are already being balloted about strike action over an 3.6pc inflation-busting pay offer – junior doctors are also wanting more again. In 2022-23, the total cost of employing the staff in the NHS was £71bn – 45.6pc of the NHS budget. These statistics don't include salaries for GPs (who are not directly employed by the NHS), nor employees in the Department of Health and Social Care and other national bodies, such as NHS England. GPs and GP practice staff are indirectly funded by the NHS through a complex system of contracts. The Resolution Foundation think tank estimates that, by the end of the decade, half of all public spending will be going to the NHS – and continuing to rise. So optimistic has Reeves been about 'fixing the foundations' and 'delivering growth' while 'making the right choices', that there will be no way back for the Chancellor when the next crisis begins. The next time someone shouts 'incoming!' in the Treasury, everyone had better duck under their desks. It will be to announce a new Chancellor.

Telegraph

an hour ago

• Telegraph

Labour policy ‘actively working against job creation', says Currys boss

The boss of one of Britain's biggest electricals retailers has criticised government policy for 'actively working against job creation' amid a raft of tax increases and looming worker rights reforms. Writing in The Telegraph, Alex Baldock, the chief executive of Currys, said Labour risked making it 'harder, riskier and more expensive to hire people' as Angela Rayner prepares to implement the Employment Rights Bill, which is making its way through the House of Lords. Mr Baldock said the retailer had already faced a 13pc overnight increase in the cost of employing part-time workers from Rachel Reeves's £25bn National Insurance raid, while its property tax bill also rose. He said Currys was now facing 'new and counter-productive red tape in the shape of employment law changes'. Mr Baldock added: 'Smart people know that changing your mind in the face of compelling evidence is a sign of strength, not weakness. 'It's not too late for the Government to change its mind on employment law changes that would lead to less employment.' It comes amid growing warnings from bosses that the Government risks derailing its growth ambitions by piling higher taxes and more red tape on businesses. In a recent poll by the Institute of Directors, a quarter of business leaders said the Employment Rights Bill made it likely that they would make redundancies. Under the planned reforms, workers will be entitled to contracts with a minimum number of weekly hours baked in, giving them the same number of hours as they have worked in the recent past. However, retail and hospitality chiefs have called for a rethink of the plans amid concerns that the changes risk stopping them from hiring extra people during crucial trading periods such as Christmas. Bosses have said they cannot afford to offer everyone more shifts all year round when stores are quieter. Mr Baldock said businesses including Currys were 'ready to play our part in getting Britain back to work', adding: 'Enlist us in this cause, don't hammer us.' In a House of Lords debate in April, Lord Wolfson, the boss of Next, said the employment rights reforms risked making it 'almost impossible for businesses to offer additional voluntary hours to workers' because they could then end up overstaffed at some times of the year. Lord Wolfson said: 'There is a world of difference between tackling potentially abusive zero-hours contracts and eliminating the flexibility that legitimate part-time contracts provide to those who need and want them.' A government spokesman said: 'Through our transformative Plan for Change, this Government is delivering the biggest upgrade to workers' rights in a generation, and our measures already have strong support amongst business and the public. 'We've consulted extensively with business on our proposals, and we will continue to work closely with employers to ensure new laws, including the right to guaranteed hours, work for them while putting money back into the pockets of working people and giving them greater job security and stability.' Enlist us in getting Britain back to work, don't hammer us By Alex Baldock, the chief executive of Currys The Government talks a lot about growth and jobs, with plenty of warm words and encouragement for growth drivers such as high-tech manufacturing, life sciences and the creative industries. Next week these are expected to be at the heart of the government's new Industrial Strategy. And more power to such exciting sectors, where the UK enjoys a real competitive edge. Yet the engine room of the British economy lies elsewhere. The likes of retail, leisure and hospitality may be less glamorous. But they employ 6m people – nearly a quarter of the private sector workforce – bringing prosperity and prospects to every corner of the country. They're no less innovative, either. Retailer productivity is growing at twice the national rate, as we deploy AI and other technology to improve customer service and empower colleagues. And boosting Britain's moribund productivity, as every economist will tell you, is essential for growth. Nor are these retail and hospitality jobs just any jobs. They're great introductions (or re-introductions) to work. Once we've given colleagues this leg up, and as they gain in confidence and experience, we often find they progress rapidly, taking on more hours, moving into management or moving on to other work with our good wishes. My first job as a spotty teenager was in a high street retailer (Waterstones in Newbury, as it happens), and I'm far from alone. Flexible and entry-level as they often are, retail jobs help people break into the world of work. They help those coming back after having children or caring for their elders – and, crucially, to those seeking a way off benefits. It's crucial because of the UK's biggest domestic challenge today: the human and economic crisis of worklessness. The UK now has almost 1m 16-24 year olds not in employment, education or training, out of fully 3m people not in work because of physical or mental ill health. This is much more than pre-pandemic, and much higher than in other countries.

Daily Mail​

an hour ago

• Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE How 5,600 high rollers switched current accounts with £100,000 in the bank

Thousands of current account switchers have transferred with more than £100,000 in the bank, exclusive data shows. Since the start of 2024, 5,600 people have used the official Current Account Switching Service (Cass) to swap bank with six-figure sums. Many banks offer cash incentives of up to £200 to entice new customers to switch primary bank account. The process of switching accounts became smoother with the arrival of Cass in 2013 which is operated by Pay UK. It has facilitated more than 11m bank switches. In the first three months of 2025, 228,805 bank switches took place, according to bank-specific data from Cass. Of these, 995 switched their current account with balances of more than £100,000, the data reveals, representing 0.4 per cent of bank switchers. In the same period, 13,259 people moved balances between £10,000 and £99,999.99. There are some 8.3m current accounts in Britain with balances of £10,000 or more and 80pc of these accounts pay no interest, according to savings app Spring. The average current account balance is around £2,000. For those earning 0pc on £100,000, they would get £4,500 annual interest with the top paying easy-access rate from Coventry Building Society. Individuals who transfer six figure sums will also breach Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) protection. This guarantees sums of up to £85,000 per individual if a bank goes bust. John Dentry, of Pay UK, said the fact people feel safe enough to move across large sums is because it provides a secure service, guarantees completion within seven days and carries all direct debits across. If something goes wrong, Cass promises to refund interest lost and any charges. It says 99.8pc of switches complete without a problem. The Cass data also shows 50,000 people switched between £1,000 and £9,999.99 to a new bank account in the first three months of the year. But most switchers transferred between 1p and £999, with 130,824 switching this amount. Birmingham was the hotspot for switching, with just shy of 6,000 customers taking the leap. This was followed by Sheffield, Manchester and Nottingham.