500+ COVID Studies Retracted for Unreliable Data
Retractions are driven by pressure to produce studies quickly, watchdog co-founder says
More than 500 studies on COVID-19 have been withdrawn due to 'bias,' 'unreliable' information, or unspecified reasons, a blog that tracks retracted documents, found.
Retraction Watch co-founder Ivan Oransky told The College Fix via phone interview one reason for the high number of retractions is the academic system's incentive structure which pressures researchers to rapidly produce studies and get them peer reviewed as quickly as possible.
'Why do they feel the need to rush papers through? Well, it's because that's how they get or keep their jobs, that's how they get grants, everything is based on that,' he said.
'When you know that your whole career depends on publishing papers in particular journals, you're going to do what you have to do to publish those papers. Most of the time that means you work hard, you hire the smart grad students and postdocs,' he said.
Oransky also said researchers may feel 'too desperate' or that 'incentives are so stark' that there's no 'humanly possible way' to do it. 'So you start engaging in misconduct,' he said.
The articles in the list pertain to risk factors related to COVID-19 vaccines and various alternative treatments for the disease.
'It's really a range of everything from essays to big clinical trials,' he said.
Oransky pointed The Fix to one of his research letters examining the differences between retractions of COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 related research papers.
The results showed that papers on COVID-19 had a higher likelihood of being retracted or withdrawn within the first six months of publication and that they were more likely removed 'without detailed explanation or for non-misconduct-related concerns.'
He said retracting papers is not necessarily a bad thing, as it can correct information that was potentially wrong or misleading. Ensuring clear and concise reasoning for retractions is crucial, he told The Fix .
'The problem is when papers aren't retracted. The problem is when papers sit in the literature, people know there's a problem, but everybody refuses to do anything about them,' Oransky said.
Further, many people use retractions to argue the government, drug companies, and others are untrustworthy. Generally, those people either 'have an axe to grind' or are 'just trying to sell the public something,' he said.
A retraction simply says the information 'is unreliable.' 'It doesn't remove it from the world,' he said.
However, the transparency of the process varies. Some retraction notices provide no explanation, while others include detailed reasons for the retraction.
One of the retracted papers in the list, which question why children are being vaccinated against COVID-19, was withdrawn due to 'unreliable' findings stemming from 'inappropriate bias,' according to the retraction notice.
Another paper on COVID-19 vaccination risks was completely withdrawn without any explanation. Oransky told The Fix that full withdrawals are not considered best practice.
In other instances, retractions occurred because the author or editor sought further information they wanted to include or because of a technical error that occurred during the study that affected the results.
The College Fix reached out to the publisher of the COVID vaccination risk study, Elsevier , seeking an answer as to why the paper was removed without an explanation. The publisher said because the article was published in 2020, it wouldn't be able to determine why it was withdrawn within a reasonable amount of time.
Click here to read more
Also read: Trump Could Be About To Ban COVID Vaccines; Report
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Tribune
5 days ago
- Daily Tribune
New maternity charges for visitors at public hospitals
Non-Bahraini visitors and non-residents will be charged new rates for childbirth at government hospitals from 1 July 2025, under a decision by the Supreme Council of Health (SCH). Natural births will cost BD425, while caesarean sections will be priced at BD1,025. The change follows a detailed review carried out with the relevant bodies to re-examine the cost of maternity care. The figures were adjusted to match the actual outlay, including pay for medical staff, supplies used during delivery, and supporting services. Those living in Bahrain and women employed in the public sector are not affected by the revised prices. They will continue to receive maternity services as per the current rules. The Council said the move is part of its push to improve how services are shared out and to ensure the quality of care can be maintained over time.
Gulf Insider
5 days ago
- Gulf Insider
Why Have Any COVID-19 Vaccines, 2025?
Five years on, SARS–CoV–2 is a ghost. It's not the beast it was (or was purported to be); yet (as of this last 'flu season') young medical students were still required to get the 'jab.' The current iteration of coronavirus, Omicron, LP.8.1–feels like a cold now, nothing more – moreover, its epitope is not even included in the 'bivalent' Covid vaccine handed out, 2025. Prior to 2003's SARS, coronaviruses were just that: colds, the kind you shook off with soup and sleep. No one demanded shots. No one cared. So why are we still doing this? The numbers, the past, the plain truth say it's hollow—a rule for the sake of rules. Back in 2020, the virus (or the overreaction to it) hit like a storm. Hospitals were packed. People died–350,000 in the US, mostly old, mostly sick – either 'from' or 'with' coronavirus. Kids? They were fine. The American Academy of Pediatrics counted 112 deaths under 18 by December—0.005% of cases; however, those children had problems: diabetes, obesity, and bad lungs. Healthy ones sneezed and moved on. Medical students, in their 20s, were close behind. The CDC pegged that age group's mortality rate at 0.02%–1,200 out of 6 million cases. Two percent landed in hospitals; near zero needed ICUs. There was no real danger for them, 2020 – and beyond. Now it's 2025. The virus hasn't vanished, but it's weak. Immunity—from shots, or from previously having contracted one or another of the Covid variant strains–covers essentially everyone. The current Omicron virus is no monster. It's a nuisance– moreover, it's likely conflated with background 'common cold' coronavirus. Omicron showed up in 2021, spread like crazy, but didn't hit hard. My 2022 piece 'Is it Time to Accept That Omicron is not COVID-19?' noted it was not even genomically and offspring of Covid-19—just another coronavirus, like the ones that give you a runny nose. The current version is much weaker. So what's the reason for medical students' 'booster' mandates' continuation? The shots aren't harmless. Myocarditis hits young guys–1–10 per 100,000 mRNA doses, says a 2022 JAMA study. Medical schools, in particular, should know better. They should move away from anachronistic, lockstep, doctrinaire mandates. In February 2025, President Trump signed an Executive Order prohibiting federal funding for educational institutions that mandate Covid–19 vaccines for in–person attendance. Medical schools reliant on federal funds may reconsider these pointless mandates, paeans to outdated orthodoxy.
Daily Tribune
5 days ago
- Daily Tribune
‘COVID Legacy Powers Safety'
TDT | Manama Bahrain's handling of the COVID-19 pandemic has laid the foundation for a far-reaching transformation in civil protection and crisis governance, according to a senior lawmaker. MP Dr. Maryam Al-Dhaen said the Kingdom's pandemic response had demonstrated how trust, innovation, and citizen participation could be channelled into a long-term national safety strategy. That experience, she noted, has now evolved into an integrated civil defence model focused on readiness, technology, and shared responsibility. She pointed to current efforts that embed digital tools into emergency response frameworks, while simultaneously empowering society at large to play a greater role in public safety. Smart tools, safer citizens One of the most visible changes is the rollout of the 'BeAware Bahrain' mobile application, which offers users real-time alerts, safety guidance, and interactive support in emergency scenarios. Dr. Al-Dhaen described the app as a key part of Bahrain's shift from reactive crisis response to proactive community protection. Complementing the app is the National Civil Protection Platform, an institutional framework designed to unify state and community efforts under a common strategy. The platform, she said, reinforces Bahrain's advanced security culture and promotes an environment of resilience and awareness. Shared responsibility The government's civil protection efforts also include expanding the scope of preparedness across different sectors. Dr. Al-Dhaen highlighted the recent civil defence training sessions conducted for Members of Parliament, calling it a clear sign that the responsibility for public safety is being shared across institutions. 'The concept of safety in Bahrain has become a shared responsibility between state institutions and society,' she said, noting that awareness campaigns and simulations have now reached multiple levels of government and civil society. Leadership and coordination Dr. Al-Dhaen credited His Majesty King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa for leading a crisis governance model that prioritises regional stability and domestic readiness. She also praised the active role of His Royal Highness Prince Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa, the Crown Prince and Prime Minister, in monitoring emergency procedures and enhancing national preparedness. She further commended the Civil Defence Council, chaired by His Excellency Lieutenant General Shaikh Rashid bin Abdullah Al Khalifa, Minister of Interior, for its role in strengthening preventive measures and coordination across agencies. In closing, Dr. Al-Dhaen said Bahrain's civil protection system today reflects the lessons of its pandemic response, turning past challenges into future safeguards.
