Tanzania leads as top source of FDI into Kenya in East Africa
Tanzania is the largest source of foreign direct investment (FDI) to Kenya among member states of the East African community (EAC).
Investors from Dodoma have pumped in a total of $72.45 million in Nairobi in the last six years highlighting the growing appeal of the Kenyan economy to regional and foreign investors despite continuous trade dispute with Tanzania over non-tariff barriers (NTBs).
Latest data by the EAC Secretariat shows that Dodoma has been the top most investor in Kenya in the period running from 2018 to 2023 with a total of $72.45 million invested in 19 projects, followed by Uganda and Rwanda which invested $36.91 million and $3.69 million respectively.
According to the data that is contained in the EAC trade and investment report (2023) Burundi and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) invested $2.01 million and $250,000 in Kenya respectively during the period under review while South Sudan invested $190,000.
Read: Moderna, Taifa Gas deals lift Kenya's FDIThe major investors in Kenya however came from the rest of the world putting a massive $3.75 billion into the Kenyan economy during the period.
Investors are mainly interested in putting money in key sectors including manufacturing, transport, communication and storage, finance and insurance.
Other sectors were real estate and business services, agriculture, fishing, forestry and hunting, wholesale, retail trade and tourism and construction.
Overall intra EAC planned investments declined by 5.6 percent to $567.17 million in 2023 from $600.78 million in 2022 with the number of projects also decreasing to 72 from 76 in the same period, according to the report.
Uganda attracted the most intra-EAC investments worth $280.74 million though it was a drop from $391 million in 2022, followed by Burundi ($155.18 million).
Burundi intra-EAC investments projects increased from two to four while their value rose from $1.9 million in 2022 to $155.18 million in 2023.
Rwanda's intra-EAC Investment inflows jumped to $55.16 million from $46.78 million and the number of projects rose to 18 from 15.
The report shows that Kenya's intra-EAC investment fell to $1.32 million in 2023 from $22.6 million in 2022 while that of Tanzania declined to $74.77 million from $138.5 million in the same period.
Despite growing interest of Tanzanian investors in the Kenyan economy the two countries are still embroiled in on-and-off trade disputes over non-tariff barriers (NTBs) that are stifling business between them.
Last year (2024) the two countries resolved to address at least 14 NTBs following a, meeting between President William Ruto and his Tanzanian counterpart Samia Suluhu in 2023.
The meeting considered 14 issues six from Tanzania and eight from Kenya and provided direction for their resolution. However of the 14 only three were fully resolved.
Tanzania continues to deny Kenya import permit for poultry and poultry products including day-old chicks, hatching eggs and meat.
Last week Dodoma hit Nairobi with fresh protectionist levies on eggs, dairy and meat as well as confectionery such as biscuits upsetting the EAC customs unions rule and cutting export earnings.
The fresh tariff war threatens to reopen another round of on-and-off frosty trade ties between the two countries.
The Kenya Association of Manufacturers (KAM) said Dodoma has slapped a 25 percent excise duty on exports of hatching eggs to Kenya contrary to the spirit of the EAC Customs union.
Kenya and Tanzania have largely been involved in persistent trade wars over tariff and non- tariff barriers to trade prompting intervention by respective ministries and sometimes Heads of State.
Despite tiffs over trade barriers data shows Tanzanian investors still consider Nairobi a worthwhile destination.
Read: Ruto launches building of $130.5m LPG plant in MombasaSeveral business tycoons from Dodoma have made massive investments in Kenya, some through acquisitions of Kenyan companies.
Among notable Tanzanian investors in Kenya include Rostam Aziz who through his Taifa Gas is building a multimillion dollar 30,000 tonne cooking gas plant and storage facilities in Mombasa worth Ksh16.9 billion ($131 million) and Ally Awadh who is also building a similar but smaller facility at 10,000 tonnes.
Mr Awadh is the founder of Tanzania's Lake Oil that acquired the Petroleum retail division of Kenya's Hashi Energy for undisclosed fee in 2017.
The family of Tanzanian business tycoon Abdallah Nahdi through Amsons Group has also successfully acquired Bamburi cement at deal estimated at $180 million.
In 2017, Tanzanian investors Aunali and Sajjad Rajabali bought 30.2 million shares equivalent to a 2.06 percent stake in oil marketer Kenokobil rising to the list of the oil marketers top shareholders.
In 2016 Tanzanian Bank M became the first lender from the neighbouring country to take over a Kenyan institution when it acquired a 51 percent stake in Oriental commercial bank.
© Copyright 2022 Nation Media Group. All Rights Reserved. Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (Syndigate.info).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
4 days ago
- Zawya
East Africa private sector lobby criticises Kenya trade deals
Kenya's bilateral trade deal with European Union is facing fresh scrutiny over claims that it violates the East African Community Common External Tariff. The Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) between Kenya and the EU that came into force in 2024 after Nairobi signed a similar arrangement with the United Kingdom. Both deals are being assessed on the wavelength of Common External Tariff (CET), according to a brief from the East African Business Council, the bloc's private sector lobby. EABC criticised Kenya for signing these deals with third parties without taking into consideration the EAC Customs Union and the Common Market, which require uniformity in imports from outside East Africa. Ideally, Kenya has argued variable geometry, a principle that allows members of a bloc to negotiate and accede to a common trade agreement with another bloc. The EU had initially wanted a bloc-to-bloc arrangement, seeing potential markets in the region for its goods. Read: Kenya looks to EU for more exports amid Trump tariffsBut, as Kenya is the only Lower Middle-Income economy in the EAC, it needed the deal as fast as possible to avoid facing tariffs in Europe. EABC has taken issue with the deals, saying they are based on the EAC CET, 2017 edition, which was structured in three bands. The bloc is currently implementing the EAC CET version, which has four bands. The lobby argues that the deals distort trade by allowing free access of goods from 22 European countries and the UK, which otherwise need to be taxed.'The EAC partner states have found it difficult to collectively negotiate and finally concluded reciprocal trade agreements as the bloc with third parties outside Africa. A notable example is the EAC-EU Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) and the EAC-UK EPA with Kenya,' said Adrian Raphael Njau, acting EABC executive director.'Third-party agreements must align with EAC objectives while being sensitive to development disparities among partner states. Dual classification of development of partners should be used as strengt, not weakness, when negotiating trade agreements with third parties.'While Kenya is implementing the reciprocal EPAs with EU and UK, the other EAC partner states are using nonreciprocal GSP (Generalised System of Preferences) schemes to access the EU and UK markets. GSP are special programmes where developed countries grant preferential treatment to products imported from developing countries, often excluding military weapons.'There is fear among the EAC private sector that these separate individual trade agreements are being concluded without following the procedures and principles set out by EAC CU, which may subsequently create mistrust among EAC partner states as well as distorting the EAC CET – the EAC tariff wall for the region,' he said.'Individual countries having separate tariff concessions with third parties which is different from the existing EAC CET may compel other partner states to restrict free circulation of goods to mitigate trade deflection.'The EAC Customs Union Protocol requires the Community to coordinate its trade relations with foreign countries so as to facilitate the implementation of common policy in the field of external trade. The main purpose is to ensure that the EAC CET is uniformly implemented by all partner states.'The CET as a key instrument of EAC Customs Union ensures there is a common duty for goods entering the EAC Customs Territory from Rest of the World,' Mr Njau said. He pointed out that the EU and UK products access the Kenyan market using Kenya's tariff concessions, which are based on the 2017 version, while EAC partner states are implementing the 2022 version after a comprehensive review. The EAC CET 2017 version was structured in three bands: 25 percent for finished goods, 10 percent for intermediate goods, and 0 percent for raw materials, essential, and capital goods. It included a limited number of products on a sensitive list that attracted rates above the maximum 25 percent, ranging between 35 percent and 100 percent. The 2022 version is structured under four bands: 0 percent for raw materials, essential, and capital goods; 10 percent for intermediate goods; 25 percent for finished goods not sufficiently available in the EAC; and 35 percent for finished goods sufficiently available in the region. The tariff structure also includes a sensitive list, which attracts higher tariffs ranging between 50 percent and 100 percent. The primary difference between the two versions of the EAC CET is the introduction of a fourth band in the 2022 version, comprising 496 tariff lines that attract a 35 percent import duty.'EAC Partner States should analyse the implications of existing EPAs in the region for EAC commitments and the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA),' he said.'To uphold EAC commitments to implement a common external trade policy and progress made in the Customs Union and Common Market, EAC Partner States, as a bloc, should explore options for collectively reviewing EPAs with the EU and UK.'Tanzania and Uganda are yet to agree on whether to sign the EPA with Brussels on the grounds that it would require them to open up their own economies to European firms. But Kenya's Trade Cabinet Secretary Lee Kinyanjui has defended Kenya-EU-EPA saying failing to sign the deal would have locked Kenya's free market access to the 22-member country market for Kenya's exports.'The dual categorisation of EAC Partner States, with Kenya classified as a non-Least Developed Country (non-LDC) and the others as Least Developed Countries (LDCs) compelled us to negotiate the trade deals separately,' said Kinyanjui. Through the Generalised Scheme of Preferences (GSP), LDCs enjoy Duty-Free, Quota-Free (DFQF) access to the EU and UK markets under the 'Everything but Arms' (EBA) pillar of the GSP. Kenya is offered lower-than-Most-Favoured-Nation (MFN) import tariffs on approximately 66 percent of tariff lines applied by the EU. To ensure continuity and certainty in trade relations between Kenya and the UK, both parties negotiated a reciprocal Kenya-UK EPA, which was primarily based on the EAC-EU EPA. In the recent past, the USA has also in the past raised concerns about the implementation of the CET in trade with Kenya. According to US officials, high import taxes and complex regulatory procedures are limiting the competitiveness of American maize in Kenya, a key market in the region. © Copyright 2022 Nation Media Group. All Rights Reserved. Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (
Zawya
4 days ago
- Zawya
EAC's invisible walls: Why intra-trade remains stubbornly at 15pc?
The East African Community (EAC) Council of Ministers has received a report on a fresh surge in non-tariff barriers to trade in the regional bloc, largely fuelled by contradictory domestic taxes. The EAC Sectoral Council of the Ministers of Trade, Industry, Finance and Investment (SCTIFI) says the number of non-tariff barriers (NTBs) within the bloc increased from 10 in November 2024 to 48 in May 2025, reflecting the challenges member states are facing trading with one another. This has left the intra-EAC trade stagnant at 15 percent. NTBs have impacted trade in various goods and services, including sugar, milk, soft drinks, beer, cement, clinker, road user charges, paints and varnishes, fish, and forest and timber products, according to disclosures by the council. Read: Ugandan traders bemoan erratic road fees on EAC trade routesThe ministers blamed the resurgence of NTBs in the region on the continued enactment of discriminatory laws and regulations by member states. This has led to violations of the national treatment principle and the non-notification of such breaches and the partial implementation of partner states' commitments to EAC integration, including non-resolution of NTBs and the imposition of new ones, which contravenes EAC laws. Other major causes are non-harmonisation of policies and regulations among partner states, especially fees, levies and charges and the non-timely resolution of reported NTBs. Read: EAC is not treating us well, say Rwandan tradersThe meeting noted that of the 48 NTBs, 18 were resolved, 22 are at various stages of resolution, two were operational and were referred to the relevant committees for consideration, and that six were not bona fide. By November 2023, 269 NTBs had been resolved, leaving only nine were outstanding. The resurgence of NTBs raises concerns about the partner states' commitment to regional integration and the promotion of intra-EAC trade. Domestic taxesThe EAC Secretariat says intra-EAC trade has remained low, largely due to NTBs. EAC's total trade with the rest of the world increased by 2.37 percent to $80.6 billion in 2023 from $78.7 billion in 2022, while intra-EAC total trade grew by 13.1 percent to $12.1 billion from $10.6 billion in the same period. However, the percentage share of intra-EAC trade to bloc's total trade was 15 percent in 2023. NTBs have been a major hindrance to the free movement of goods as enshrined in the EAC Customs and Common Market protocols. Ordinarily, NTBs refer to any obstacles to international trade that are not import or export duties and may take the form of import quotas, subsidies, customs delays, technical barriers, or other systems preventing or impeding trade. According to the ministers, the number of NTBs were attributed to domestic taxes such as excise duties and other charges of equivalent effect and that a number of reported NTBs were operational related to service delivery and could be addressed through Trade Facilitation Committee rather than describing them as NTB. The council took note of the 18 resolved NTBs and directed partner states to refrain from enacting laws that impose fees, levies and charges of equivalent effect on goods originating from the bloc and to refrain from imposing quotas on goods originating from the bloc. It also directed the partner states to make budgetary allocation to undertake activities related to the resolution of NTBs and that the EAC Secretariat should convene and coordinate the bilateral engagements among partner states on specific NTBs as they occur in order to resolve them promptly. Customs UnionThe council also directed partner states to treat goods from the region as transfers and refrain from enacting discriminatory laws that treat EAC originating goods as imports and that partner states should timely notify the EAC Secretariat in a timely manner of any new measures that would affect trade. The Customs Union is the first pillar of the EAC regional integration that provides for free movement of goods and services in the region by eliminating trade barriers and fostering a competitive environment for goods produced within the region. Under the region's revised four-band Common External Tariff (CET), which took effect on July 1, 2022, finished products imported from countries outside the bloc attract a 35 percent duty, intermediate products available in the EAC 25 percent, intermediate products not available in the region 10 percent and raw materials and capital goods attract a zero percent import duty. Additionally, there is a list of sensitive items, such as sugar, wheat, rice and milk, which attract a duty of more than 35 percent, to protect local industries from competition.
Zawya
4 days ago
- Zawya
Budgets: EAC partners have common goal – more revenue – yet pursue divergent policies
East African Community partner states seem reluctant to adopt policies meant to raise domestic revenues even as they face pressure to address mounting fiscal obligations. And experts warn that there is a risk of diluting the market in the EAC as a universal environment conducive for doing business, weakening the real goals of integration. These scanty economic integration gains are reflected in Uganda's latest budgetary proposals, pointing to sluggish harmonisation of policies in the East African Community (EAC). It could also pose a setback to investors eager to reap the benefits of the convergence of economic and financial policies among member states. A close look at the 2025/26 budget blueprint reveals a burning hunger for extra tax monies required to clear surging public debt obligations, financing of pending infrastructure projects, and poverty alleviation programmes across the region. For instance, an import declaration fee of one percent based on the customs value of taxable goods under the EAC Common External Tariff (CET) will be applied on all imports entering Uganda's borders with effect from July 1, 2025; a tax measure similar to customs levies imposed by other EAC countries to date. New tax measures in Uganda are projected to generate Ush538.6 billion ($149.5 million) for the treasury during the financial year 2025/26. Kenya's Treasury expects to raise Ksh25 billion ($191.9 million)-Ksh30 billion ($230 million) from new tax measures during the financial year 2025/26, according to latest government data. Yet Uganda's decision to offer a three-year tax exemption to domestic startups owned by local citizens that bear an investment of less than Ush500 million ($138,828) could reflect the government's determination to attract higher inflows of venture capital in a business environment previously deemed hostile. 'The EAC's financial strain – evident in recent internal borrowing due to delayed contributions – further hampers progress. Without stronger fiscal coordination and timely funding, the path to monetary union remains uncertain,' noted Shani-Smit Langton, a senior economist at Oxford Eco Historically, it added, Kenya has struggled to meet revenue collection targets and has often exceeded its spending limits.'Although enhanced tax enforcement is much needed, it is unlikely to deliver immediate results. Moreover, the decision to avoid broad-based tax increases may help mitigate political turmoil but increases the likelihood of relying on other measures, such as targeted taxes on foreign firms or taxing the wealthy,' the brief added. Latest budget proposals presented by the region's finance ministers this week did not offer clues on harmonisation of critical domestic tax rates that include Value Added Tax (VAT), Excise duty rates, stamp duties and withholding tax rates- a major source of competition headaches faced by businesses selling goods across the region's borders. Provision of an interest-free credit facility for Ugandan commercial farmers- a strategic tool for the mitigation of future food security risks tied to negative climate conditions was similarly missing in other EAC member states' budget proposals. The government has allocated Ush175 billion ($48.5 million) to this credit facility for the financial year 2025/26, though its operations kicked off before budget day. On the other hand, biting macroeconomic blues confronting most of the EAC member states- a key driver of spending cuts targeted at some sectors and increased tax mobilisation pressures are widely mirrored by Kenya's economic woes. Failure to harmonise key economic and financial policies across EAC member states poses a threat to the bloc's business competitiveness, experts indicated. Uganda's overall budget envelope for the financial year 2025/26 stands at Ush72.3 trillion ($20 billion) while domestic resources are estimated at Ush37.55 trillion ($10.4 billion). The latter comprises tax revenues amounting to Ush33.94 trillion ($9.4 billion) and non-tax revenues estimated at Ush3.28 trillion ($910.7 million). Domestic borrowing is estimated at Ush11.38 trillion ($3.1 billion) for the financial year 2025/26 according to the latest budget proposals.'You need to achieve political integration first before you can attain effective monetary and financial integration. The old approach of pursuing a customs union followed by a common market and monetary plus financial integration is not very reliable in the regional harmonisation context.'For example, the signing of the EAC customs union protocols in 2005 was supposed to be followed by harmonisation of different laws meant to facilitate easy movement of goods and labour, but this has not been fully implemented,' explained Derrick Nkajja, CEO of Institute of Certified Public Accountants of Uganda. Matia Kasaija, Uganda's Finance Minister, said during the budget speech that the economic fundamentals -- growth, employment, inflation, and exchange rates -- are in good shape. The increase in GDP represents a larger demand for intermediate goods and services. This will also help the government increase tax revenues over time. © Copyright 2022 Nation Media Group. All Rights Reserved. Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (
